1
|
Plúa-Muñiz K, Bailón-Cuadrado M, Pérez-Saborido B, Pacheco-Sánchez D, Pinto P, Asensio-Díaz E. Survival analysis and identification of prognostic factors in colorectal liver metastasis after liver resection. Cir Esp 2023; 101:160-169. [PMID: 36108955 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastasis. The identification of predictive factors leads to personalize patient management to enhance their long-term outcomes. This population-based study aimed to characterize factors associated with, and survival impact of patients who received hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of all the hepatectomies for colorectal liver metastasis performed at third-level hospital of Spain (2010-2018) was conducted. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. Multivariable Cox and regression models were used to determine prognostic factors associated with overall survival. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 42 and 33%, respectively. Survival analysis showed that metastasis features (number, largest size, distribution, and extrahepatic disease) and postsurgical factors (transfusion, major complications, and positive margin resection), as well as non-mutated KRAS, showed a significant association with survival. Otherwise, on multivariate analysis, only 5 independent risk factors were identified: major size metastasis >4 cm, RAS mutation, positive margin resection, intraoperative transfusion, and major complications. CONCLUSIONS According to our findings, major size metastasis >4 cm, intraoperative transfusion, and major postoperative complications continue to be traditional prognostic factors. Meanwhile, the KRAS biomarker has a powerful impact as a survival prognostic factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Plúa-Muñiz
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancréatica, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
| | - Martín Bailón-Cuadrado
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancréatica, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Baltasar Pérez-Saborido
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancréatica, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - David Pacheco-Sánchez
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancréatica, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Pilar Pinto
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancréatica, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Enrique Asensio-Díaz
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancréatica, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
von Heesen M, Schuld J, Holländer S, Spiliotis AE, Merscher A, Scherber PR, Igna D, Gäbelein G, Glanemann M. Repeated hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: is this concept safe and feasible? Eur Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-022-00783-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Summary
Background
The beneficial outcomes of hepatectomy in patients with colorectal metastases have encouraged the attempts of repeated hepatectomy in patients with recurrent disease. Although studies have provided encouraging results regarding perioperative outcomes and survival rates following repeated hepatectomy, it remains unclear whether the reported outcomes reflect the therapeutic results of redo hepatectomy or rather reflect the effect of selection bias. The aim of this study was to investigate differences among patients who underwent single and repeated hepatectomy and to hereby identify prognostic factors that contribute to the premises of repeated resection.
Methods
Patients who underwent hepatectomy due to colorectal metastases were listed in a retrospective database. Study participants were divided into a single partial hepatectomy group, a multiple partial hepatectomies group, and into subgroups of two or more than two hepatectomies.
Results
A total of 338 patients with 439 partial liver resections were included in the analysis. The overall survival rate after 1, 3, and 5 years was 89%, 56%, and 36%, respectively. The survival benefit in patients who underwent multiple partial liver resections versus those with a single partial resection was 10%, 16%, and 4% after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Repeated hepatectomy was not associated with increased rates of surgical and non-surgical complications.
Conclusion
Beneficial outcomes have been found in terms of median overall survival and perioperative morbidity in patients with recurrence of colorectal hepatic metastases after partial and tissue-sparing repeated liver resections.
Collapse
|
3
|
Plúa-Muñiz K, Bailón-Cuadrado M, Pérez-Saborido B, Pacheco-Sánchez D, Pinto P, Asensio-Díaz E. Análisis de supervivencia e identificación de factores pronósticos de metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal tras resección hepática. Cir Esp 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2022.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
4
|
Yoshino K, Hamzaoui Y, Yoh T, Ftériche FS, Aussilhou B, Beaufrère A, Belghiti J, Soubrane O, Cauchy F, Dokmak S. Liver resection for octogenarians in a French center: prolonged hepatic pedicle occlusion and male sex increase major complications. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:1543-1552. [PMID: 34057599 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02210-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The prolonged life expectancy and increase in aging of the population have led surgeons to propose hepatectomy in the elderly population. In this study, we evaluate the surgical outcome of octogenarians in a single French center. METHODS Between 2000 and 2020, 78 patients over 80 years old were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors of major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade IIIa) and patient performance after surgery by using textbook outcome (TO) (no surgical complications, no prolonged hospital stay (≤ 15 days), no readmission ≤90 days after discharge, and no mortality ≤90 days after surgery) were studied. RESULTS The main surgical indication was for malignancy (96%), including mainly colorectal liver metastases (n = 41; 53%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 22; 28%), and major hepatectomy was performed in 28 patients (36%). There were 6 (8%) postoperative mortalities. The most frequent complications were pulmonary (n = 22; 32%), followed by renal insufficiency (n = 22; 28%) and delirium (n = 16; 21%). Major complications occurred in 19 (24%) patients. On multivariate analysis, the main risk factors for major complications were the median vascular clamping time (0 vs 35; P = 0.04) and male sex (P = 0.046). TO was ultimately achieved in 30 patients (38%), and there was no prognostic factor for achievement of TO. CONCLUSIONS Hepatectomy in octogenarians is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Meanwhile, prolonged hepatic pedicle clamping should be avoided especially if hepatectomy is planned in a male patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Yoshino
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, University of Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92100, Clichy, France
| | - Yanis Hamzaoui
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, University of Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92100, Clichy, France
| | - Tomoaki Yoh
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, University of Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92100, Clichy, France
| | - Fadhel Samir Ftériche
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, University of Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92100, Clichy, France
| | - Béatrice Aussilhou
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, University of Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92100, Clichy, France
| | - Aurélie Beaufrère
- Department of Pathology, University of Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, Clichy, France
| | - Jacques Belghiti
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, University of Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92100, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, University of Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92100, Clichy, France
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, University of Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92100, Clichy, France
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, University of Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92100, Clichy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alabraba E, Gomez D. Systematic Review of Treatments for Colorectal Metastases in Elderly Patients to Guide Surveillance Cessation Following Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:210-223. [PMID: 33710135 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although included in surveillance programmes for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases, elderly patients are susceptible to declines in health and quality of life that may render them unsuitable for further surveillance. Deciding when to cease surveillance is challenging. METHODS There are no publications focused on surveillance of elderly patients for CRC metastases. A systematic review of studies reporting treatment outcomes for CRC metastases in elderly patients was performed to assess the risk-benefit balance of the key objectives of surveillance; detecting and treating CRC metastases. RESULTS Sixty-eight eligible studies reported outcomes for surgery and chemotherapy in the elderly. Liver resections and use of chemotherapy, including biologics, are more conservative and have poorer outcomes in the elderly compared with younger patients. Selected studies demonstrated poorer quality-of-life (QoL) following surgery and chemotherapy. Studies of ablation in elderly patients are limited. DISCUSSION The survival benefit of treating CRC metastases with surgery or chemotherapy decreases with advancing age and QoL may decline in the elderly. The relatively lower efficacy and detrimental QoL impact of multimodal therapy options for detected CRC metastases in the elderly questions the benefit of surveillance in some elderly patients. Care of elderly patients should thus be customized based on their preference, formal geriatric assessment, natural life-expectancy, and the perceived risk-benefit balance of treating recurrent CRC metastases. Clinicians may consider surveillance cessation in patients aged 75 years and above if geriatric assessment is unsatisfactory, patients decline surveillance, or patient fitness deteriorates catastrophically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Alabraba
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Dhanny Gomez
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
- NIHR Nottingham Digestive Disease Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de’Angelis N, Baldini C, Brustia R, Pessaux P, Sommacale D, Laurent A, Le Roy B, Tacher V, Kobeiter H, Luciani A, Paillaud E, Aparicio T, Canuï-Poitrine F, Liuu E. Surgical and regional treatments for colorectal cancer metastases in older patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230914. [PMID: 32320417 PMCID: PMC7176093 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The present study explored the existing literature to describe the outcomes of surgical and regional treatments for colorectal cancer metastases (mCRC) in older patients. Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published since 2000 that investigated the short- and long-term outcomes of regional treatments (surgical or non-surgical) for mCRC in patients aged ≥65 years. Pooled data analyses were conducted by calculating the risk ratio (RR), mean differences (MD) and hazard ratio (HR) between older and younger patients or between two different approaches in older patients. Results After screening 266 articles, 29 were included in this review. These studies reported the outcomes of surgery (n = 19) and non-surgical local ablation treatments (n = 3) for CRC metastases in older vs. younger patients or compared the outcomes of different interventions in older patients (n = 7). When comparing older vs. younger patients undergoing liver surgery for mCRC, pooled data analysis showed higher postoperative mortality [RR = 2.53 (95%CI: 2.00–3.21)] and shorter overall survival [HR = 1.17 (95%CI: 1.07–1.18)] in older patients, whereas no differences in operative outcomes, postoperative complications and disease-free survival were found. When comparing laparoscopy vs. open surgery for liver resection in older mCRC patients, laparoscopy was associated with fewer postoperative complications [RR = 0.27 (95%CI: 0.10–0.73)]. Conclusion Liver resection for mCRC should not be disregarded a priori in older patients, who show similar operative and postoperative outcomes as younger patients. However, clinicians should consider that they are at increased risk of postoperative mortality and have a worse overall survival, which may reflect comorbidities and frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de’Angelis
- Unit of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Capucine Baldini
- Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Hepato-biliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Digestive, and Endocrine Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Université de Strasbourg, and U1110 Inserm, Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Strasbourg, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Unit of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Bertrand Le Roy
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Vania Tacher
- Departement of Radiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Hicham Kobeiter
- Departement of Radiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- Departement of Radiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Elena Paillaud
- Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Department of Geriatrics, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP, and University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Florence Canuï-Poitrine
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Evelyne Liuu
- Department of Geriatrics, CHU La Milétrie, Poitiers University Hospital, Grand Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lallement M, Maulat C, Suc B, Péré G, Lozano S, Bérard E, Muscari F. Short-term autonomy and survival after hepatectomy in the elderly. J Visc Surg 2020; 157:378-386. [PMID: 31980381 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM To study morbi-mortality, survival after hepatectomy in elderly patients, and influence on their short-term autonomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a retrospective study conducted between 2002 and 2017 comparing patients less than 65 years old (controls) to those more than 65 years old (cases) from a prospective database, with retrospective collection of geriatric data. Cases were divided into three sub-groups (65-70 years, 70-80 years and>80 years). RESULTS Four hundred and eighty-two patients were included. There was no age difference in number of major hepatectomies (P=0.5506), length of stay (P=0.3215), mortality at 90 days (P=0.3915), and surgical complications (P=0.1467). There were more Grade 1 Clavien medical complications among the patients aged over 65 years (P=0.1737). There was no difference in overall survival (P=0.460) or disease-free survival (P=0.108) according to age after adjustment for type of disease and hepatectomy. One-third of patients had geriatric complications. The "home discharge" rate decreased significantly with age from 92% to 68% (P=0.0001). Early loss of autonomy after hospitalization increased with age, 16% between 65 and 70 years, 23% between 70 and 80 years and 36% after 80 years (P=0.10). We identified four independent predictors of loss of autonomy: age>70 years, cholangiocarcinoma, length of stay>10 days, and metachronous colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients had the same management as young patients, with no difference in surgery or survival, but with an increase in early loss of autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lallement
- Unité hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation, département de chirurgie et de transplantation d'organes, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
| | - C Maulat
- Unité hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation, département de chirurgie et de transplantation d'organes, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - B Suc
- Unité hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation, département de chirurgie et de transplantation d'organes, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - G Péré
- Unité hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation, département de chirurgie et de transplantation d'organes, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - S Lozano
- Unité de gériatrie et oncogériatrie, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France
| | - E Bérard
- Service d'épidémiologie, pôle santé publique et médecine sociale, département d'épidémiologie, économie de la santé et santé publique, CHU de Toulouse, Inserm UMR 1027, Toulouse, France
| | - F Muscari
- Unité hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation, département de chirurgie et de transplantation d'organes, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wei F. Does an extreme age (≥80 years) affect outcomes in patients after liver cancer surgery? A meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2018; 89:25-31. [PMID: 29885205 DOI: 10.1111/ans.14676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing global life expectancy has resulted in a greater demand for cancer surgery in aged patients. However, whether extreme age causes poorer clinical outcomes remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of extreme age (≥80 years) on outcomes in patients after liver cancer surgery. METHODS A systematic search was performed to enrol relevant studies. Data were analysed using fixed-effects or random-effects models. Eight retrospective studies involving 253 participants older than 80 years were included. RESULTS Compared with younger patients, patients of extreme age (≥80 years) who had undergone curative liver cancer surgery experienced less operating time and blood loss (both P < 0.0001); a larger size (weighted mean difference = 0.48 cm, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.87 cm; P = 0.02) and more advanced stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (risk ratio (RR) = 1.20, 95% CI 1.04-1.39; P = 0.01); a higher overall morbidity (RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.47; P = 0.01); and more post-operative ileus (POI) (RR = 3.45, 95% CI 1.03-11.56; P = 0.04), delirium (RR = 3.04, 95% CI 1.36-6.78; P = 0.007) and cardiovascular events (RR = 6.17, 95% CI 2.79-13.60; P < 0.00001). No significant difference was noted in overall (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.15, 95% CI 0.87-1.53; P = 0.32) or disease-free (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.75-1.24; P = 0.77) survival. CONCLUSION Although an extreme age may not be a contraindication for undertaking liver cancer surgery, it may cause more morbidity. Perioperative intervention should be considered for prevention and early treatment of POI, delirium and cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangqiang Wei
- School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.,Department of Developmental Biology, Pittsburgh Liver Research Center, McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|