Emergency appendicectomy in Australia: findings from a multicentre, prospective study

Appendicectomy pathway: Insights from electronic medical records of a local health district in Australia

BACKGROUND

This study aims to identify the common pathways of appendicectomy, the most common emergency surgery in Australia's public hospitals and any variations within a regional public health district in New South Wales, Australia.

METHODS

We analyzed the electronic medical records of 3,943 patients who underwent appendicectomy between January 2014 and July 2020 at 2 hospitals in the Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia, using the PM2 approach for surgical pathway identification and subsequent statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Among 3,943 patients, 3,606 (91.5%) followed an 11-step main pathway: (1) emergency department admission, (2) surgery booking, (3) anesthesia start, (4) operating room entry, (5) surgery start, (6) surgery end, (7) anesthesia end, (8) operating room discharge, (9) postanesthesia care unit admission, (10) postanesthesia care unit discharge, and (11) hospital discharge. The median length of stay was 48.13 hours (interquartile range 32.74). The main pathway differed from either variation 1 (n = 246, 6.2%) or variation 2 (n = 30, 0.8%) only in the timing and location of anesthesia administration or conclusion. Variation 3 (n = 26, 0.7%) included patients who underwent appendicectomy twice, whereas variation 4 (n = 25, 0.6%) included patients booked for surgery before emergency department admission through community doctor referrals. Thirteen exceptional cases experienced combinations of the aforementioned pathways. The length of stay and phase durations varied between the main pathway and these variations.

CONCLUSION

The appendicectomy pathway was largely standardized across the studied hospitals, with the location of anesthesia administration or conclusion affecting specific stages but not the overall length of stay. Only a complex 2-surgery pathway increased length of stay.

Emphasizing the Clinical Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Amidst Technological Advancements

Background The clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of this diagnosis amidst technological progress. It compared clinical diagnosis to radiology-aided diagnostic outcomes and negative appendicectomy rates (NAR). Methodology This study conducted a single-center retrospective and prospective cohort observational study on all adult patients presenting with suspected AA in 2018 at a major tertiary teaching hospital in Perth, Western Australia. Key demographics, clinicopathological, radiology, and operative reports were reviewed. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.27. Results Of 418 patients with suspected AA, 234 (56%) were in the retrospective group. The median age was 35 (IQR=26), and 224 (54%) were female. The overall NAR was 18.6% (95% CI (14.8-22.4)) and 20.8% for clinical diagnosis. Notably, the NAR for ultrasound (USS)-reported AA (false positive) was 17.6% (95% CI (10.6-27.4)). Three-quarters of the patients, 298 (71.3%), had radiological imaging. The most common modality was CT 176 (59.1%), and 33 (7.9%) had both CT and USS imaging performed. Compared with final histopathology, no significant difference was found in the accuracy of clinically diagnosed and USS-diagnosed cases, with rates of 83.5% and 82.5%, respectively (p=0.230). CT had the best positive predictive value at 82.1%. Single-modality imaging did not cause a significant surgical delay (p=0.914), but multi-modal imaging showed a non-significant trend toward delay (p=0.065). When surgeons assessed an appendix as normal, 54 (12.9%), the histopathological assessment revealed pathology in 28 (51.9%). The inter-observer agreement was only fair to moderate, Kappa=0.46 (95% CI (0.33-0.58); p<0.001). The intraoperative identification of a normal appendix inversely correlated to the grade of the primary surgeon, which was likely related to the number of surgical personnel in the theater (p<0.001). Conclusion This study showed that clinical diagnosis matches the diagnostic accuracy of imaging technologies. Utilizing diagnostic imaging methods promptly and appropriately did not lead to considerable delays in surgery. Surgeons' capability to diagnose appendicitis during surgery is moderately accurate. Most patients underwent imaging, with CT scans being the most common. Moving forward, practitioners must minimize excessive reliance on imaging techniques as this can be resource-intensive, especially in developing countries. Future clinical practice should balance embracing technological advancements and preserving essential clinical diagnostic expertise, for medicine is both a science and an art.

Other Pathologies Were Rarely Reported after Laparoscopic Surgery for Suspected Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic laparoscopy is often used when a patient is suspected of having acute appendicitis. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of other pathologies found during diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis.

METHODS

This systematic search included studies with ≥100 patients who received laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis and reported on the histopathologic and other intra-abdominal findings. We performed a meta-analysis estimating the rate of other pathologies, and a sensitivity analysis excluding smaller cohorts (≤500 patients). Age groups, sex, specific findings, and geographic regions were investigated. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies were included covering 25,547 patients and of these 793 had an unexpected pathology. The findings were benign pathology in the appendix (34%), malignancy (30%), gynecologic pathology (5%), gastrointestinal pathology (4%), or unspecified (27%). Meta-analysis showed an overall rate of unexpected findings of 3.5% (95% CI 2.7-4.3; moderate certainty), and the sensitivity analysis showed similar results. Malignancy found in the appendix when treating suspected acute appendicitis was 1.0% (95% CI 0.8-1.3%; high certainty).

CONCLUSION

The rate of other histopathological findings in patients with suspected acute appendicitis was low and a malignancy in appendix was found in 1% of patients.

Varying negative appendectomy rates after laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdominal pain, and treatment with laparoscopy has become increasingly common during the past two decades. Guidelines recommend that normal appendices are removed if operated for suspected acute appendicitis. It is unclear how many patients are affected by this recommendation. The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of negative appendectomies in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for suspected acute appendicitis.

METHODS

This study was reported following the PRISMA 2020 statement. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Embase for retrospective or prospective cohort studies (with n ≥ 100) including patients with suspected acute appendicitis. The primary outcome was the histopathologically confirmed negative appendectomy rate after a laparoscopic approach with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We performed subgroup analyses on geographical region, age, sex, and use of preoperative imaging or scoring systems. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

In total, 74 studies were identified, summing up to 76,688 patients. The negative appendectomy rate varied from 0% to 46% in the included studies (interquartile range 4-20%). The meta-analysis estimated the negative appendectomy rate to be 13% (95% CI 12-14%) with large variations between the individual studies. Sensitivity analyses did not change the estimate. The certainty of evidence by GRADE was moderate due to inconsistency in point estimates.

CONCLUSION

The overall estimated negative appendectomy rate after laparoscopic surgery was 13% with moderate certainty of evidence. The negative appendectomy rate varied greatly between studies.

Criteria-led discharge for simple appendicitis in children: A pilot study

AIM

Criteria-led discharge (CLD) protocols have been suggested to increase efficiency of discharge from hospital following surgical interventions. Our aim was to assess the feasibility, clinical outcomes and parental satisfaction following the introduction of a pilot CLD for simple appendicitis (SA) in children.

METHODS

A prospective pilot cohort study was conducted including paediatric patients with SA who were managed with CLD and a control group who were managed with standard discharge procedures. A CLD pro forma was developed, standardising care guidelines and clinical criteria indicators to be met for children to be discharged post-operatively. A post-discharge parent survey was also utilised. The primary outcome measure was post-operative length of stay (pLOS), with secondary outcomes of post-operative complication rates and parental satisfaction.

RESULTS

The control group consisted of 31 patients and CLD group 35 patients. There was no difference in the median pLOS (24 [16.7-44.6] vs. 25.3 [19.1-50.1] h, P = 0.3). Furthermore, there were no significant differences on any of the secondary outcomes. Parental confidence with time of discharge was very high in both control (85.7%) and CLD (88.2%) groups (P = 1.0).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of CLD is safe and feasible. Whilst this pilot has not demonstrated a reduction in pLOS, our data suggest that it is well accepted by the parents.

Appendiceal Intraluminal Gas: A CT Marker for Gangrenous Appendicitis

Introduction

This manuscript aims to investigate the amount of intraluminal gas in acute, nonperforated appendicitis identified on computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing gangrenous appendicitis.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational, case-control study with consecutive data collected at a tertiary institution over a two-year period, of patients with CT-diagnosed acute appendicitis who subsequently went on for surgery within 48 hours. Patients who were less than 16 years old, who had an interval between CT and surgery of more than 48 hours, or with CT evidence of appendiceal perforation were excluded. Images were independently assessed by 3 radiologists for intraluminal gas, and the results were then correlated with reference standards obtained from surgical and histopathology reports for the diagnosis of nongangrenous versus gangrenous appendicitis. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of CT intraluminal gas in gangrenous appendicitis were calculated.

Results

Our study identified 93 patients with nonperforated acute appendicitis who underwent surgery within the stated timeframe. Intraluminal gas in the appendix was identified in 26 patients (28%), of which 54% had macroscopic and/or microscopic evidence of gangrenous appendicitis. This is in contrast to the subgroup of patients who did not have intraluminal gas (72%), of which only 33% had gangrenous appendicitis. The specificity of intraluminal gas for gangrenous appendicitis is 79%, with a negative predictive value of 86% and likelihood ratio of 1.85.

Conclusion

In cases of established acute appendicitis, the presence of intraluminal gas is a moderately specific sign for gangrenous complication. This is worth reporting as it can help prognosticate and triage patients accordingly, for a timelier surgical management and a better outcome.

Diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado, RIPASA and Tzanakis scoring system in acute appendicitis: A prospective observational study

Our prospective observational study, enrolling 167 patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy, served to evaluate the Alvarado, Tzanakis and RIPASA diagnostic scores. The latter was found to be a better scoring system because of its higher diagnostic accuracy. At centres with limited expertise in ultrasonography, RIPASA outperforms the Tzanakis score. Although easy to use, the Alvarado score was useful only to 'rule in' cases with AA with significant accuracy but at the cost of low sensitivity. It cannot be effectively used in triaging.

Johan Forceps As a Knot Pusher for Extracorporeal Roeder Knot: An Inexpensive Alternative to an Endoloop Ligature in Laparoscopic Appendicectomy

Background: Securing of the appendix stump is one of the key steps in performing laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA). This can be achieved by a variety of methods including endoloops, stapler, and clips. An alternative technique, previously described by authors, is the use of Johan forceps as a knot pusher, to deploy an extracorporeal Roeder knot at the base of appendix. We aimed to evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness of our technique. Patients and Methods: A single surgeon's, prospective cohort, and multicenter study was undertaken at three different hospitals in the United Kingdom. We collected data of all patients, who underwent LA by this technique between 2014 and 2019. Demographics, operative findings, postoperative complications and readmissions were recorded and analyzed. Results: In total, 227 appendicectomies were performed. Median age was 24 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 16-58) with 58% male preponderance. Operative findings were 57% (n = 130) acutely inflammatory appendicitis, 16.74% (n = 38) were complicated appendicitis (perforated, gangrenous). Rest of the operative findings were macroscopically normal appendix (with no other pathology in 18.06% (n = 41), and macroscopically normal appendix but with gynecological pathologies in 7.9% (n = 18). Postoperatively, there were no cases to report complication of blow out stumps neither clinically nor radiologically. Surgical site infections rate has been 3.5% (n = 8). One patient had small intra-abdominal abscess (0.4%), treated by IV antibiotics. Mean hospital stay was 1.89 days (standard deviation [SD] 1-5 days). Thirty days readmissions rate was 4.8%. None of the complications or readmissions was related to the surgical technique. There were no deaths recorded in this series. Cost of handmade endoloop was $0.69. Conclusion: Use of Johan forceps as knot pusher for extracorporeal Roeder knot is a safe, feasible, cost-effective, and easily reproducible technique for carrying out LA.

Variation in Human Research Ethics Committee and governance processes throughout Australia: a need for a uniform approach

BACKGROUND

In Australia, ethics committees across different states vary in application, requirement and process for the ethical review and approval for clinical research. This may lead to confusion and delays in the enablement of multicentre research projects. This study explores the effect of differing processes for Ethics and Governance in the establishment of the CovidSurg-Cancer study during the global COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

An anonymous, structured web-based questionnaire was designed using the Research Electronic Data Capture application (REDCap) platform to capture consultant surgeons, fellows, and trainees experience in the ethics application process. 'CovidSurg-Cancer' was an international multicentre collaborative study to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the outcomes of patients undergoing cancer surgery. The ethics process to set up this observational study was used as to explore the differing processes applied across Australia.

RESULTS

The CovidSurg-Cancer study was successfully set up in 14 hospitals. Four hospitals approved the study directly as an audit. Of the remaining sites, 10 ethics applications underwent Human Research Ethics Committee review following which two (14%) were subsequently approved as an audit activity and eight hospitals (57%) were given formal ethical approval with waiver of consent. Ethics application acceptance from another Australian Human Research Ethics Committee was provided with six applications; however, only three were reciprocated without the requirement for further agreements. A third of (30%) respondents suggested that the details of the application pathway, process and documentation were unclear.

CONCLUSION

Ethics processes are varied across Australia with considerable repetition. A centralized, harmonized application process would enhance collaborative research.

Cohort study of 1241 patients to identify predictors of negative appendicectomy

BACKGROUND

Acute Appendicitis is the most common surgical presentation within Australia. Despite the increasing use of radiological investigations to aid clinical diagnosis, many appendectomies result in a histologically normal appendix. This study examines the histological negative appendicectomy rate (NAR) in a metropolitan hospital and determine factors associated with a negative appendicectomy (NA).

METHODS

Patients who underwent emergency appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at Logan Hospital, Australia, between February 2016 and March 2019 inclusive were included. Clinicopathologic and imaging variables were analysed for associations with NA.

RESULTS

A total of 1241 patients underwent emergency appendicectomy of which 121 patients (9.8%) had a NA. The NAR for clinical diagnosis alone (no imaging) was 9.9%, 14.5% for ultrasonography alone and computed tomography scan alone was 4.9%. Univariate analysis revealed age <27 years (P < 0.001), absence of hypertension (P = 0.008), symptoms >48 hours (P < 0.001), absence of leucocytosis (P < 0.001), undergoing ultrasonography only (P < 0.001), undergoing computed tomography scan only (P < 0.001), macroscopically normal appendix (P < 0.001) and time to operation >24 hours (P < 0.001) were associated with NA. Multivariate analysis identified symptoms >48 h at presentation (odds ratio (OR) 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-3.24; P = 0.007), absence of leucocytosis (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.52-3.81; P < 0.001) and macroscopically normal appendix (OR 5.70, 95% CI 3.49-9.33; P < 0.001) to be associated with a NA.

CONCLUSION

The NAR reported is lowest in an Australian institution. The identified predictors of NA will be useful in identifying patients who would truly benefit from an appendicectomy versus those would have a higher rate of NA who may be suitable to be treated non-operatively to be spared the unnecessary morbidity of surgery.

Outcomes of an acute care surgery model: a 10-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Many hospitals across Australia and New Zealand have implemented acute care surgery (ACS) models over the past decade, often with improved outcomes such as reductions in wait time to surgery, complications and length of stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent non-elective appendicectomy and cholecystectomy and compare these with the results observed shortly after the implementation of an ACS model at our institution 10 years earlier.

METHODS

A retrospective review of contemporary patients who underwent non-elective appendicectomy and cholecystectomy compared with historical data was performed. Primary outcomes were wait time to surgery, surgical complications and length of stay.

RESULTS

In the contemporary cohort, 263 patients underwent non-elective appendicectomy over a 1-year period compared with 226 patients in the historical cohort. The median wait time to surgery had increased (17.7 versus 9.6 h, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in a composite end-point of complications and readmissions (8.0% versus 9.3%, P = 0.61). The length of stay was unchanged. There was greater use of preoperative imaging and reduced overnight operating. For non-elective cholecystectomies, 132 patients underwent this procedure in the contemporary cohort over a 2-year period compared with 115 patients in the historical cohort. There were no significant differences in wait time to surgery (2 versus 1 day, P = 0.13) or complications (9.8% versus 8.7%, P = 0.75). The length of stay was unchanged.

CONCLUSION

The majority of improvements seen shortly following the implementation of an ACS model have been sustained after 10 years.

Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis is the most common general surgical emergency worldwide, but its diagnosis remains challenging. The aim of this study was to determine whether existing risk prediction models can reliably identify patients presenting to hospital in the UK with acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain who are at low risk of appendicitis.

METHODS

A systematic search was completed to identify all existing appendicitis risk prediction models. Models were validated using UK data from an international prospective cohort study that captured consecutive patients aged 16-45 years presenting to hospital with acute RIF in March to June 2017. The main outcome was best achievable model specificity (proportion of patients who did not have appendicitis correctly classified as low risk) whilst maintaining a failure rate below 5 per cent (proportion of patients identified as low risk who actually had appendicitis).

RESULTS

Some 5345 patients across 154 UK hospitals were identified, of which two-thirds (3613 of 5345, 67·6 per cent) were women. Women were more than twice as likely to undergo surgery with removal of a histologically normal appendix (272 of 964, 28·2 per cent) than men (120 of 993, 12·1 per cent) (relative risk 2·33, 95 per cent c.i. 1·92 to 2·84; P < 0·001). Of 15 validated risk prediction models, the Adult Appendicitis Score performed best (cut-off score 8 or less, specificity 63·1 per cent, failure rate 3·7 per cent). The Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score performed best for men (cut-off score 2 or less, specificity 24·7 per cent, failure rate 2·4 per cent).

CONCLUSION

Women in the UK had a disproportionate risk of admission without surgical intervention and had high rates of normal appendicectomy. Risk prediction models to support shared decision-making by identifying adults in the UK at low risk of appendicitis were identified.

Risk factors for serious morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after laparoscopic appendectomy - results from Pol-LA (Polish Laparoscopic Appendectomy) multicenter large cohort study

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for treatment of acute appendicitis has gained acceptance with its considerable benefits over open appendectomy. LA, however, can involve some adverse outcomes: morbidity, prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) and hospital readmission. Identification of predictive factors may help to identify and tailor treatment for patients with higher risk of these adverse events. Our aim was to identify risk factors for serious morbidity, prolonged LOS and hospital readmission after LA. A database compiled information of patients admitted for acute appendicitis from eighteen Polish and German surgical centers. It included factors related to the patient characteristics, peri- and postoperative period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for serious perioperative complications, prolonged LOS, and hospital readmissions in acute appendicitis cases. 4618 laparoscopic appendectomy patients were included. First, although several risk factors for serious perioperative complications (C-D III-V) were found in the univariate analysis, in the multivariate model only the presence of intraoperative adverse events (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.32-12.65, p = 0.014) and complicated appendicitis (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.74-7.61, p = 0.001) was statistically significant. Second, prolonged LOS was associated with the presence of complicated appendicitis (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.53-5.12, p = 0.001), postoperative morbidity (OR 5.01, 95% CI: 2.33-10.75, p < 0.001), conversions (OR 6.48, 95% CI: 3.48-12.08, p < 0.001) and reinterventions after primary procedure (OR 8.79, 95% CI: 3.2-24.14, p < 0.001) in the multivariate model. Third, although several risk factors for hospital readmissions were found in univariate analysis, in the multivariate model only the presence of postoperative complications (OR 10.33, 95% CI: 4.27-25.00), reintervention after primary procedure (OR 5.62, 95% CI: 2.17-14.54), and LA performed by resident (OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.03-3.70) remained significant. Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure associated with low rates of complications, prolonged LOS, and readmissions. Risk factors for these adverse events include complicated appendicitis, postoperative morbidity, conversion, and re-intervention after the primary procedure. Any occurrence of these factors during treatment should alert the healthcare team to identify the patients that require more customized treatment to minimize the risk for adverse outcomes.

CT guided appendicectomy incision: A prospective case series

OBJECTIVE

Several radiological studies have suggested that the base of the Appendix often does not correspond with Mc Burney's point. The aim of our study is to assess the value of using CT localization of the appendicocaecal junction to guide placement of the appendicectomy incision.

DESIGN & METHOD

32 consecutive patients, booked for open appendicectomy were prospectively included in this study. Coronal and axial CT scans with IV contrast were studied to assess site of the appendicocaecal junction. This information was used to guide placement of the incision.

RESULTS

28 out of 32 patients studied, the appendicocaecal junctions were accurately identified. It was noted that the final incision sites were cephalad to Mc Burney's point in 8, at the point in 3 and caudal in 17. In 1 patient, it was necessary to extend the incision medially by 2cm to retrieve the distal Appendix which had been detached through the site of rupture.

CONCLUSION

Mc Burney's point often does not correspond to the base of the appendix. We propose that using CT imaging to guide the appendicectomy incision is safe, facilitates locating the Appendix at surgery, minimizes incision size and decreases the need to extend it.

Predictive factors for publication of abstracts at the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Annual Scientific Congress

BACKGROUND

A key metric of the research quality of medical conferences is the publication rate of abstracts. The study objective was to determine the publication rate of abstracts presented at the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Annual Scientific Congress (RACS ASC) and to examine for any predictive factors associated with publication.

METHODS

Abstracts presented at the RACS ASC from 2011 to 2013 were analysed. Abstract characteristics such as presentation format, study type, study design, study site, cohort size and author origin were recorded. Abstracts published were identified by a PubMed search using a strict algorithm. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to analyse for predictive factors of publication.

RESULTS

Overall, 1438 abstracts were presented and 423 abstracts (29%) were published. The median time to publication was 15.2 months (interquartile range: 8-26) with 110 in Australasian journals (26%). The median number of citations for published abstracts was 6 (interquartile range: 2-16). After multivariable analysis, publication was significantly associated with prospective study design (odds ratio (OR) = 1.34, P = 0.02), multicentre study site (OR = 1.43, P = 0.02), cohort size ≥100 (OR = 2.00, P < 0.001) and New Zealand author origin (OR = 1.50, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that less than one-third of abstracts presented at the RACS ASC are subsequently published in a peer-reviewed journal. Factors significantly associated with journal publication include prospective studies, multicentre study, a larger cohort size and New Zealand author origin. Advances in surgery may progress from the preliminary findings of conference abstracts. However only after the rigorous peer review offered by journal publication should changes in decision-making of patient care occur.