Neoadjuvant radiotherapy provided survival benefit compared to adjuvant radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Role of combined surgical and radiotherapy treatment in nonmetastatic WHO I nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (KSCC) is recognized as WHO I nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Current guidelines for treating nasopharyngeal cancer do not delineate specific strategies for individual pathologic subtypes.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the optimal treatment for KSCC of the nasopharynx.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data on patients were extracted from the SEER database. Survival differences between patients treated with radiotherapy alone and combined surgery were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models and compared using propensity score matching (PSM). In addition, we explored the survival differences between the two groups of patients in different risk stratifications.

RESULTS

In our study, 165 patients underwent surgical intervention, while 1238 patients did not. In both univariate (CSS: p = .001, HR = 0.612; OS: p < .001, HR = 0.623) and multivariate (CSS: p = .004, HR = 0.655; OS: p < .001, HR = 0.655) analyses, combined surgery was identified as a significant prognostic factor. These findings were consistent after PSM. Using RPA, patients were categorized into two groups. CSS improved in the high-risk group, whereas the difference in low-risk patients was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

For patients diagnosed with WHO I nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the combination of radiotherapy and surgery has significant clinical advantages, especially for patients at high risk.

Neoadjuvant therapies in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Exploring strategies to improve prognosis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a challenging malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention, notably liver resection. However, the high recurrence rate, reaching 70% within 5 years post-resection, significantly impacts patient outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapies aim to preoperatively address this challenge, reducing lesion size, improving surgical resection rates, deactivating potential micro-metastases, and ultimately lowering postoperative recurrence rates. This review concentrates on advances in research on and clinical use of neoadjuvant therapies for HCC, with particular attention to the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4). Ongoing clinical studies exploring immunotherapy combined with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), interventional therapy, radiotherapy, and other modalities offer promising insights into overcoming resistance to monotherapies. In summary, neoadjuvant therapies hold significant promise in terms of improving the prognosis for patients with HCC and enhancing long-term survival, particularly through innovative combination strategies.

Clinical Benefits of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy on the Postoperative Recurrence of Centrally Located Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Evidence Based on Phase II Clinical Trial

Objective

Although surgical resection is one of the most effective way to treat liver cancer, its efficacy and safety in treatment of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains elusive. Therefore, it is very important to find a comprehensive treatment mode, such as radical resection combined with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (neoRT).

Methods

The centrally located HCC patients who underwent radical resection from July 2015 to April 2021 were enrolled. According to whether the neoRT was implemented or not, these patients were allocated into neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined with liver resection (neoRT+LR) and liver resection alone (LR) group. The research method used propensity-score analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression models. We generated an E-value to assess the sensitivity to unmeasured confounding. This study is a real-world, retrospective study based on phase II clinical trial.

Results

A total of 168 patients were enrolled, including 38 patients treating with neoRT+LR and 130 patients with LR. The 1-, 3-, 5-year disease free survival (DFS) rates were 74%, 55% and 39% in the neoRT+LR group, and 44%, 28%, and 24% in the LR group, respectively. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for postoperative recurrence ([HR]0.42, 95% CI [0.25, 0.69]). There was significant association between neoRT+LR and longer disease-free survival (Match, [HR] 0.43, 95% CI [0.24, 0.76]; GenMatch, [HR] 0.32, 95% CI [0.23, 0.43]; Adjusted for propensity score, [HR] 0.41, 95% CI [0.23, 0.73]; Inverse probability weighting, [HR] 0.38, 95% CI [0.22, 0.65], respectively). DFS before and after matching analysis was statistically different in two groups (p-value=0.005, p-value=0.0024, respectively). Neoadjuvant radiotherapy can significantly reduce the postoperative early recurrence (p-value <0.05). E-value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding.

Conclusion

Liver resection combined with neoadjuvant radiotherapy was effective and safe for treatment of centrally located HCC patients, which improved the prognosis of patients and reduced the incidence of early recurrence.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by low resection and high postoperative recurrence rates, and conventional treatment strategies have failed to meet clinical needs. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is widely employed in the routine management of several solid tumors because it increases resectability and reduces the rate of postoperative recurrence. However, a consensus has not been reached regarding the effects of NAT on HCC. As systemic therapy, particularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy, is given for HCC treatment, accumulating evidence shows that the "spring" of NAT for HCC is imminent. In the future, HCC researchers should focus on identifying biomarkers for treatment response, explore the mechanisms of resistance, and standardize the endpoints of NAT.

Clinical application of advances and innovation in radiation treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management has evolved over the past two decades, with the development of newer treatment modalities. While various options are available, unmet needs are reflected through the mixed treatment outcome for intermediate-stage HCC. As HCC is radiosensitive, radiation therapies have a significant role in management. Radiation therapies offer local control for unresectable lesions and for patients who are not surgical candidates. Radiotherapy also provides palliation in metastatic disease, and acts as a bridge to resection and transplantation in selected patients. Advancements in radiotherapy modalities offer improved dose planning and targeted delivery, allowing for better tumor response and safer dose escalations while minimizing the risks of radiation-induced liver damage. Radiotherapy modalities are broadly classified into external beam radiation therapy and selective internal radiation therapy. With emerging modalities, radiotherapy plays a complementary role in the multidisciplinary care of HCC patients.

Aim

We aim to provide an overview of the role and clinical application of radiation therapies in HCC management.

Relevance for Patients

The continuous evolution of radiotherapy techniques allows for improved therapeutic outcomes while mitigating unwanted adverse effects, making it an attractive modality in HCC management. Rigorous clinical studies, quality research and comprehensive datasets will further its application in the present era of evidence-based practice in Medicine.

Chinese expert consensus on neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

The low resection and high recurrence rates in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the major challenges to improving prognosis. Neoadjuvant and conversion therapies are underlying strategies to overcome these challenges. To date, no guideline or consensus has been published on the neoadjuvant and conversion therapies in HCC. Recent studies showed that neoadjuvant therapy for resectable HCC and conversion therapy for unresectable HCC are safe, feasible, and effective. Neoadjuvant and conversion therapies have the following advantages in treating HCC: R0 resection with sufficient volume of future liver remnant, relatively simple operation, and wide applicability. Therefore, it was necessary to conduct a widely accepted consensus among the experts in China who have extensive expertise and experience in treating HCC using neoadjuvant and conversion therapies, which is important to standardize the application of neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for the management of HCC. The strategies of neoadjuvant therapy include the selection of the eligible patients, therapy regimen, cycles, effect evaluations, and multidisciplinary treatment. The management of patients with insufficient volume of future liver remnant and patients who cannot achieve R0 resection is the key to the strategies of conversion therapy. Here, we present the resultant evidence- and experience-based consensus to guide the application of neoadjuvant and conversion therapies in clinical practice.

Expanding the Surgical Pool for Hepatic Resection to Treat Biliary and Primary Liver Tumors

Surgical management of primary liver and biliary tract tumors has evolved over the past several decades, resulting in improved outcomes in these malignancies with historically poor prognoses. Expansion of patient selection criteria, progress in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, development of techniques to increase future liver remnant, and the select utilization of liver transplantation have all contributed to increasing the patient pool for surgical intervention. Ongoing and future studies need to focus on improving multimodality treatment regimens and further refining the selection criteria for transplantation in order to optimize utilization of limited organ resources.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver malignancy worldwide and a major cause of cancer-related mortality for which liver resection is an important curative-intent treatment option. However, many patients present with advanced disease and with underlying chronic liver disease and/or cirrhosis, limiting the proportion of patients who are surgical candidates. In addition, the development of recurrent or de novo cancers following surgical resection is common. These issues have led investigators to evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies aimed at improving resectability rates and decreasing recurrence rates. While high-level evidence to guide treatment decision making is lacking, recent advances in locoregional and systemic therapies, including antiviral treatment and immunotherapy, raise the prospect of novel approaches that may improve the outcomes of patients with HCC. In this review, we evaluate the evidence for various neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and discuss opportunities for future clinical and translational research.

Neoadjuvant Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Controlled Study

PURPOSE

To compare the survival outcomes of neoadjuvant three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (RT) followed by hepatectomy with hepatectomy alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized, multicenter controlled study was conducted from January 2016 to December 2017 in patients with resectable HCC and PVTT. Patients were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant RT followed by hepatectomy (n = 82) or hepatectomy alone (n = 82). The modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) guidelines were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects of RT. The primary end point was overall survival. The expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients’ serum before RT and in surgical specimens was correlated with response to RT.

RESULTS

In the neoadjuvant RT group, 17 patients (20.7%) had partial remission. The overall survival rates for the neoadjuvant RT group at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 89.0%, 75.2%, 43.9%, and 27.4%, respectively, compared with 81.7%, 43.1%, 16.7%, and 9.4% in the surgery-alone group (P < .001). The corresponding disease-free survival rates were 56.9%, 33.0%, 20.3%, and 13.3% versus 42.1%, 14.9%, 5.0%, and 3.3% (P < .001). On multivariable Cox regression analyses, neoadjuvant RT significantly reduced HCC-related mortality and HCC recurrence rates compared with surgery alone (hazard ratios, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.54; P < .001] and 0.45 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.64; P < .001]). Increased expressions of IL-6 in pre-RT serum and tumor tissues were significantly associated with resistance to RT.

CONCLUSION

For patients with resectable HCC and PVTT, neoadjuvant RT provided significantly better postoperative survival outcomes than surgery alone. IL-6 may predict response to RT in these patients.