Safety of single-anaesthetic versus staged bilateral primary total knee replacement: experience from the New Zealand National Joint Registry

Comparison of the Effect and Complications of Sequential Bilateral Arthroplasty at Different Time Intervals and Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

To the authors' knowledge, there is no current consensus regarding the optimal interprocedural interval for patients who have undergone bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate complication rates and functional outcome in patients who have undergone BTKA (simultaneous or sequential at different time intervals), and to determine an optimal time frame for the second knee.

METHODS

Data from 315 patients who were able to tolerate simultaneous BTKA according to the anaesthesiologist's preoperative assessment between 2016 and 2020 were analysed retrospectively. According to the operative time interval, they were divided into simultaneous, ≤ 1-month sequential, 1- to 3-month sequential, and ≥ 3-month sequential BTKA groups. The primary outcomes were revision and readmission rates during the follow-up period, and the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), transfusion and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the implant survival or readmission rate between the groups (p > 0.05). Multivariable linear regression showed that interprocedural interval and body mass index (BMI) affected LOS; the LOS of simultaneous BTKA was the shortest (p < 0.05). BMI was associated with an increased LOS of 0.25 days (95% CI 0.02-0.48, p = 0.03). A modified Poisson regression model showed that the odds of blood transfusion were reduced in sequential BTKAs of any interval (p < 0.05), and preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) was also a risk factor (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.98, p < 0.001). The interprocedural interval was not a risk factor for postoperative cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications.

CONCLUSION

For appropriate patients, simultaneous BTKA is beneficial. However, higher preoperative haemoglobin was required to mitigate the high blood transfusion rate associated with simultaneous surgeries. If suitable patients refuse simultaneous BTKA for other non-medical reasons, sequential BTKA with an interval greater than 1 month is recommended.

Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Shorter Length of Stay but Increased Mortality Compared With Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with high patient satisfaction. However, controversy remains regarding the safety and efficacy of conducting simultaneous bilateral (simBTKA) versus staged bilateral TKA (staBTKA). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence for simBTKA versus staBTKA and compare clinical outcomes including mortality, complications and length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

A search was performed of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane central databases between January 2000 and March 2020. Search terms included "simultaneous," "staged," and "bilateral TKA." Inclusion criteria comprised studies comparing outcomes of simBTKA versus staBTKA. Quality of included studies was assessed and meta-analyses of pooled data was conducted.

RESULTS

29 articles published between 2001 and 2020 were included in qualitative synthesis from 927 potentially relevant titles, comprising 257,284 patients. 104,207 patients underwent simBTKA and 153,632 patients underwent staBTKA. simBTKA was associated with significantly increased 90-day mortality rate (P < .00001, OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.79-2.81), increased incidence of pulmonary embolism (P < .00001, OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.51-1.89), venous thrombosis (P < .00001, OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.23-1.43), and neurological complications (P = .002, OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13-1.77). Incidence of superficial and deep infection was significantly increased with staBTKA (P = .02, P < .00001 respectively). Revision rate within one year was equivocal. Mean LOS was 2.1 days shorter for simBTKA.

CONCLUSION

SimBTKA was associated with decreased incidence of infection and LOS but increased incidence of 90-day mortality, venous thromboembolism and neurological complications. Revision rates were equivocal. Patients should be selected and counseled based on the risks respective to each strategy.

Are patient-reported outcomes the same following second-side surgery in primary hip and knee arthroplasty?

Aims

Up to one in five patients undergoing primary total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) require contralateral surgery. This is frequently performed as a staged procedure. This study aimed to determine if outcomes, as determined by the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Knee Score (OKS) differed following second-side surgery.

Methods

Over a five-year period all patients who underwent staged bilateral primary THA or TKA utilizing the same type of implants were studied. Eligible patients had both preoperative and one year Oxford scores and had their second procedure completed within a mean (2 SDs) of the primary surgery. Patient demographics, radiographs, and OHS and OKS were analyzed.

Results

A total of 236 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 122 were THAs and 114 TKAs. The mean age was 66.5 years (SD 9.4), with a 2:1 female:male ratio. THAs showed similar significant improvements in outcomes following first- and second-side surgery, regardless of sex. In contrast for TKAs, although male patients demonstrated the same pattern as the THAs, female TKAs displayed significantly less improvement in both OKS and its pain component following second-side surgery.

Conclusion

Female patients undergoing second-side TKA showed less improvement in Oxford and pain scores compared to the first-side. This difference in outcome following second-side surgery did not apply to male patients undergoing TKA, or to either sex undergoing THA.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(4):243–254.