Management of acute type B aortic dissection

Central nervous injury risk factors after endovascular repair of a thoracic aortic aneurysm with type B aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection is the deadliest disease of the cardiovascular system. Type B aortic dissection accounts for 30%-60% of aortic dissections and is mainly treated by endovascular repair of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR). However, patients are prone to various complications after surgery, with central nervous system injury being the most common, which seriously affects their prognosis and increases the risk of disability and death. Therefore, exploring the risk factors of central nervous system injury after TEVAR can provide a basis for its prevention and control.

AIM

To investigate the risk factors for central nervous system injury after the repair of a thoracic endovascular aneurysm with type B aortic dissection.

METHODS

We enrolled 306 patients with type B aortic dissection who underwent TEVAR at our hospital between December 2019 and October 2022. The patients were categorized into injury (n = 159) and non-injury (n = 147) groups based on central nervous system injury following surgery. The risk factors for central nervous system injury after TEVAR for type B aortic dissection were screened by comparing the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The Association between age, history of hypertension, blood pH value, surgery, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, postoperative recovery times on the first day after surgery, and arterial partial pressure of oxygen on the first day after surgery differed substantially (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age, surgery time, history of hypertension, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit stay were independent risk factors for central nervous system injury after TEVAR of type B aortic dissection (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For high-risk patients with central nervous system injury after TEVAR of type B aortic dissection, early intervention measures should be implemented to lower the risk of neurological discomfort following surgery in high-risk patients with central nervous system injury after TEVAR for type B aortic dissection.

Losing, regaining, and continuing to build self-confidence - a qualitative, phenomenological study of being physically active with a type B aortic dissection

PURPOSE

To gain a comprehensive understanding of experiences related to being physically active in participants with an uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a qualitative, phenomenological study. First-person accounts of adults, who at least one year ago had an uncomplicated type B aortic dissection, were collected using semi-structured interviews. The audio recordings of the interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed with interpretative phenomenological analysis.

RESULTS

We collected, in total, 644 min interview data from 14 participants. Three patterns were interpreted: losing self-confidence, regaining self-confidence, and continuing to build self-confidence. Experiencing symptoms when pushing limits, challenges with energy management, and side effects of medication caused loss of self-confidence. Changes in identity, reaching milestones that reflect improvement, and support from others and tools helped participants regain self-confidence. To continuing to build self-confidence, participants indicated they needed success experiences and activities make life worth living.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-confidence in adults with an uncomplicated type B aortic dissection changes immediately after the diagnosis of the aortic dissection. Rehabilitation professionals can support adults regaining and continuing to build self-confidence, aiming for the perfect balance between blood pressure regulation, quality of life, and being physically active.Implications for rehabilitationRehabilitation professionals should support regaining and continuing to build self-confidence related to being physically active in adults with type B aortic dissection in the early stages of recovery and beyond.Adults with an uncomplicated type B aortic dissection want rehabilitation professionals to tell them primarily what is possible (recommendations) rather than what is not allowed (rules).Rehabilitation professionals should help adults with an uncomplicated type B aortic dissection to explore, push and, ultimately, accept limits related to exercise tolerance.

Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components are Associated with In-Hospital Complications after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore whether and to what extent metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components are associated with in-hospital complications in patients with acute type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 684 patients who had undergone TEVAR. Demographic and clinical data were collected and subgroup analysis, mixed-model regression analysis, scoring systems, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 684 inpatients were assigned to the poor outcome (n = 90) or no complications (n = 594) group. Compared to the no complications group, the poor outcome group had a higher incidence of MetS (44 [48.9%] vs. 120 [20.2%], P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, in-hospital complications were present in 3.1%, 6.6%, 11.9%, 20.7%, 40.0%, and 62.5% of patients in the 6 groups who met the 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 MetS diagnostic criteria, respectively. On multivariable logistic regression, hypertension (odds ratio [OR]: 2.680; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.571-4.570), type 2 diabetes (OR: 2.135; 95% CI: 1.192-3.824), quartiles of body mass index (OR: 1.801; 95% CI: 1.415-2.291), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR: 0.763; 95% CI: 0.611-0.953), and systolic blood pressure (OR: 1.894; 95% CI: 1.486-2.413) were independent factors for in-hospital complications after adjustment for other risk factors. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, MetS was an independent risk factor for in-hospital complications. We established a scoring system for each component and the area under the ROC curve was 0.664 (95% CI: 0.618-0.710) in all patients, 0.672 (95% CI: 0.595-0.749) in patients with MetS, and 0.610 (95% CI: 0.552-0.667) in patients without MetS, as determined by ROC analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

MetS, especially the blood pressure component, confers a greater risk of in-hospital complications in patients with acute type B aortic dissection after TEVAR.

Iatrogenic aortic dissection during right transradial intervention in a patient with aberrant right subclavian artery: A case report

BACKGROUND

Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) is the most common congenital anomaly of the aortic arch. When patients having such anomalies receive transradial intervention (TRI), aortic dissection (AD) may occur. Herein, we discuss a case of iatrogenic type B AD occurring during right TRI in an ARSA patient, that was later salvaged by percutaneous angioplasty.

CASE SUMMARY

A 73-year-old man presented to our hospital with intermittent chest pain. Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography revealed significant stenosis in the left anterior descending artery. Diagnostic coronary angiography was performed via the right radial artery without difficulty. However, we were unable to advance the guiding catheter past the ostium of the right subclavian artery to the aortic arch for percutaneous coronary intervention, while the guidewire tended to go down the descending aorta. The patient suddenly complained of chest and back pain. Emergent CT aortography revealed type B AD propagating to the left renal artery (RA) with preserved renal perfusion. However, after 2 d, the patient suddenly complained of right lower limb pain where the femoral pulse was suddenly undetectable. Follow-up CT indicated further progression of dissection to the right external iliac artery (EIA) and left RA with limited flow. We performed percutaneous angioplasty of the right EIA and left RA without complications. Follow-up CT aortography at 8 mo showed optimal results.

CONCLUSION

A caution is required during right TRI in ARSA to avoid AD. Percutaneous angioplasty can be a treatment option.

Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta Combined with Drug Therapy in Acute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection

Objective

This study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) combined with Best Medical Therapy (BMT) in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

Methods

Using the random method, 90 patients admitted to our hospital between January 2018 and January 2020 with acute uncomplicated TBAD were randomly divided into a control group and a study group, with 45 cases in each of the groups. The effectiveness of BMT combined with TEVAR treatment was compared.

Results

The incidence of recent adverse reactions did not differ significantly between the two groups. Compared to the control group, the 1-year survival rate and 2-year survival rate of patients in the study group were considerably higher. In order to examine the relationship between survival and time, the Kaplan-Meier curve was used. Both groups reached the median survival time after 24 months of follow-up. The expected survival time of the study group was longer than that of the control group. False lumen thrombosis or absence of thrombus was significantly more prevalent in the study group than in the control group.

Conclusion

For patients with acute uncomplicated TBAD, BMT combined with TEVAR can significantly improve the long-term survival rate and increase the expected survival time.