1
|
Ma JM, Wang PF, Yang LQ, Wang JK, Song JP, Li YM, Wen Y, Tang BJ, Wang XD. Machine learning model-based prediction of postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31:102071. [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i8.102071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Revised: 11/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2025] [Indexed: 01/23/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery has established the definition and grading system for postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP). There are no established machine learning models for predicting PPAP following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
AIM To explore the predictive model of PPAP, and test its predictive efficacy to guide the clinical work.
METHODS Clinical data from consecutive patients who underwent PD between 2016 and 2024 were retrospectively collected. An analysis of PPAP risk factors was performed, various machine learning algorithms [logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting decision tree, extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, and category boosting (CatBoost)] were utilized to develop predictive models. Recursive feature elimination was employed to select several variables to achieve the optimal machine algorithm.
RESULTS The study included 381 patients, of whom 88 (23.09%) developed PPAP. PPAP patients exhibited a significantly higher incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (55.68% vs 14.68%, P < 0.001), grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula (9.09% vs 1.37%, P = 0.001). The CatBoost algorithm outperformed other algorithms with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.859 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.814-0.905] in the training cohort and 0.822 (95%CI: 0.717-0.927) in the testing cohort. According to shapley additive explanations analysis, pancreatic texture, main pancreatic duct diameter, body mass index, estimated blood loss, and surgery time were the most important variables based on recursive feature elimination. The CatBoost algorithm based on selected variables demonstrated superior performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.837 (95%CI: 0.788-0.886) in the training cohort and 0.812 (95%CI: 0.697-0.927) in the testing cohort.
CONCLUSION We developed the first machine learning-based predictive model for PPAP following PD. This predictive model can assist surgeons in anticipating and managing this complication proactively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Ming Ma
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China
| | - Peng-Fei Wang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China
| | - Liu-Qing Yang
- Department of Information Administration, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China
| | - Jun-Kai Wang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China
| | - Jian-Ping Song
- Organ Transplantation, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yu-Mei Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Xiangyang No. 1 People’s Hospital, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Yan Wen
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China
| | - Bing-Jun Tang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China
| | - Xue-Dong Wang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bai XH, Yin J, Yu SY, Shu YP, Lu ZP, Jiang KR, Xu Q. Extracellular volume fraction derived from dual-energy CT: a potential predictor for acute pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:6957-6966. [PMID: 38760508 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10750-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the value of extracellular volume (ECV) fraction and fat fraction (FF) derived from dual- energy CT (DECT) for predicting postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS This retrospective study included patients who underwent DECT and PD between April 2022 and September 2022. PPAP was determined according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Iodine concentration (IC) and FF of the pancreatic parenchyma were measured on preoperative DECT. The ECV fraction was calculated from iodine map images of the equilibrium phase. The independent predictors for PPAP were assessed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients were retrospectively enrolled (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 55-70 years; 47 men). Of these, nine patients (13.0%) developed PPAP. These patients had lower portal venous phase IC, equilibrium phase IC, FF, and ECV fraction, and higher pancreatic parenchymal-to-portal venous phase IC ratio and pancreatic parenchymal-to-equilibrium phase IC ratio, compared with patients without PPAP. After multivariable analysis, ECV fraction was independently associated with PPAP (odd ratio [OR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79, 0.96; p < 0.001), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839 (sensitivity 100.0%, specificity 58.3%). CONCLUSIONS A lower ECV fraction is independently associated with the occurrence of PPAP after PD. ECV fraction may serve as a potential predictor for PPAP after PD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT DECT-derived ECV fraction of pancreatic parenchyma is a promising biomarker for surgeons to preoperatively identify patients with higher risk for postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis after PD and offer selective perioperative management. KEY POINTS PPAP is a complication of pancreatic surgery, early identification of higher-risk patients allows for risk mitigation. Lower DECT-derived ECV fraction was independently associated with the occurrence of PPAP after PD. DECT aids in preoperative PAPP risk stratification, allowing for appropriate treatment to minimize complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Han Bai
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jie Yin
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Si-Yao Yu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yu-Ping Shu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Zi-Peng Lu
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Kui-Rong Jiang
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China.
| | - Qing Xu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
ÖZŞAY O, AYDIN MC, ÇELİK SC, KARABULUT K, YÜRÜKER SS. Serum amylase on postoperative day one is a strong predictor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort. Turk J Med Sci 2023; 53:1271-1280. [PMID: 38813023 PMCID: PMC10763807 DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/aim Early identification of patients at risk for developing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) may facilitate drain management. In this context, it was aimed to examine the efficiency of the serum amylase (SA) value on postoperative day (PoD) 1 in predicting the occurrence of POPF. Materials and methods A total of 132 patients who underwent PD were studied. Occurrences of POPF were classified according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula classification as a biochemical leak (BL) or clinically relevant grade b/c POPF (CR-POPF). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a threshold value of SA on PoD 1 associated with POPF formation. Results Overall, 66 (50%) patients had POPF, including 51 (38.7%) with BL and 15 with CR-POPF (11.3%). The threshold value of SA associated with the development of POPF was 120 IU/L (odds ratio [OR]: 3.20; p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, independent POPF risk factors were SA ≥120 IU/L, soft pancreatic texture, and high-risk pathology (i.e., duodenal, biliary, ampullary, islet cell, and benign tumors); SA ≥120 IU/L outperformed soft pancreatic texture and high-risk pathology in predicting POPF, respectively (OR: 2.22; p = 0.004 vs. OR: 1.37; p = 0.012 vs. OR: 1.35; p = 0.018). In a subset analysis according to gland texture (soft vs. hard), patients with soft pancreatic texture exhibited a significantly higher incidence of POPF (63.4% vs. 34.4%) and SA ≥120 IU/L (52.1% vs. 27.9%); SA <120 IU/L had a negative predictive value of 82.5% for developing POPF in patients with hard pancreatic texture (OR: 4.28, p = 0.028). Conclusion A SA value ≥120 IU/L on the day after PD, which is the strongest predictor for POPF, can be used as a biomarker of the occurrence of POPF. The advantage of SA measurement is that it can contribute to identifying suitable patients for early drain removal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oğuzhan ÖZŞAY
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun,
Turkiye
| | - Mehmet Can AYDIN
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun,
Turkiye
| | - Salih Can ÇELİK
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ordu State Hospital, Ordu,
Turkiye
| | - Kağan KARABULUT
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun,
Turkiye
| | - Saim Savaş YÜRÜKER
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun,
Turkiye
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quero G, Massimiani G, Lucinato C, Fiorillo C, Menghi R, Laterza V, Schena CA, De Sio D, Rosa F, Papa V, Tortorelli AP, Tondolo V, Alfieri S. Acute pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy: clinical outcomes and predictive factors analysis according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:363-373. [PMID: 36764909 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) is an increasingly described complication after pancreatic resection. No uniform definition criteria were present in the literature until the recent proposal of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance of the novel ISGPS definition of PPAP. METHODS Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) between 2006 and 2022 were enrolled. PPAP was defined and graded according to the ISGPS criteria. RESULTS Among 520 PDs, 120 (23%)patients developed post-operative hyperamylasemia (POH), while PPAP occurred in 63(12.1%) cases. PPAP occurrence related to a higher rate of more severe complications (48-76.1%vs118-25.8%; p < 0.0001), delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (27-42.9%vd114-24.9%; p = 0.003) and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (57-90.5%vs186-40.8%; p < 0.0001). When stratified for PPAP severity, grade B and C patients more frequently developed major complications (p < 0.0001), POPF (p < 0.0001), DGE (p = 0.02) and post-operative hemorrhage (p < 0.0001) as compared to POH. At the multivariable analysis, soft pancreatic texture (p = 0.01)and a Wirsung diameter ≤3 mm (p = 0.01) were recognized as prognostic factors for PPAP onset, while a pancreatic duct ≤3 mm was the only feature significantly influencing a more severe course of PPAP (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION The ISGPS classification is confirmed as a valuable method for a uniform definition and clinical course evaluation. Further studies in a prospective manner are still needed for a further confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Quero
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Massimiani
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Chiara Lucinato
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorillo
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Menghi
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Laterza
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo A Schena
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Davide De Sio
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Fausto Rosa
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Papa
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio P Tortorelli
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tondolo
- General Surgery Unit, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Via di Ponte Quattro Capi, 39, 00186, Roma, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center) Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bannone E, Marchegiani G, Balduzzi A, Procida G, Vacca PG, Salvia R, Bassi C. Early and Sustained Elevation in Serum Pancreatic Amylase Activity: A Novel Predictor of Morbidity After Pancreatic Surgery. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e126-e135. [PMID: 33938491 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize early postoperative serum pancreatic amylase (spAMY) trends after pancreatic resections. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA A postoperative spAMY elevation is a common finding but uncertainties remain about its meaning and prognostic implications. METHODS Analysis of patients who consecutively underwent pancreatectomy from 2016 to 2019. spAMY activity was assessed from postoperative day (POD) 0 to 3. Different patterns of spAMY have been identified based on the spAMY standard range (10-52 U/l). RESULTS Three patterns were identified: (#1) spAMY values always < the lower limit of normal/within the reference range /a single increase in spAMY > upper limit of normal at any POD; (#2) Sustained increase in spAMY activity on POD 0 + 1; (#3) Sustained increase in spAMY activity including POD 1 + 2. Shifting through spAMY patterns was associated with increase morbidity (21% in #1 to 68% in #3 at POD 7; log rank < 0.001). Almost all severe complications (at least Clavien-Dindo ≥3) occurred in patients with pattern #3 (15% vs 3% vs 5% in #1 and #2 at POD 7, P = 0.006), without difference considering >3-times or >the spAMY normal limit ( P = 0.85). POPF (9% in #1 vs 48% in #3, P < 0.001) progressively increased across patterns. Pre-operative diabetes (OR 0.19), neoadjuvant therapy (OR 0.22), pancreatic texture (OR 8.8), duct size (OR 0.78), and final histology (OR 2.2) were independent predictors of pattern #3. CONCLUSIONS A sustained increase in spAMY activity including POD 1 + 2 (#3) represents an early postoperative predictor of overall and severe early morbidity. An early and dynamic evaluation of spAMY could crucially impact the subsequent clinical course with relevant prognostic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Bannone
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery - The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, P. Le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bannone E, Marchegiani G, Perri G, Procida G, Vacca PG, Cattelani A, Salvia R, Bassi C. Postoperative serum hyperamylasemia (POH) predicts additional morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy: It is not all about pancreatic fistula. Surgery 2022; 172:715-722. [PMID: 35636983 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between postoperative serum hyperamylasaemia (POH) and morbidity has been hypothesized but rarely explored once occurring with or without (POH-exclusive) a combined postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). METHODS Analysis of patients who consecutively underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2016 to 2020. POH was defined as serum amylase activity greater than the institutional upper limit of normal (52 U/L), persisting within the first 48 hours postoperatively (postoperative day [POD] 1 and 2). RESULTS Among 852 patients, 15.8% developed POH-exclusive. Compared with patients without POH or POPF (64.3%), they showed a significantly higher postoperative burden (Clavien-Dindo ≥II: 52.6% vs 30.8%) with increased rates of bacteraemia (12.6% vs 6%), pleural effusion (13.3% vs 5.3%), postpancreatectomy haemorrhage (13.3% vs 7.5%), postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) (10.3% vs 0%), and organ site infections (18.5% vs 10.9%; all P < .05). A total of 13.8% experienced POH with POPF leading to the worse outcome. The combined occurrence of POH with POPF led to a shorter median time to morbidity (3 PODs, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.7 vs 6 PODs, 95% CI 4.2-8; P < .001) than patients experiencing POPF-exclusive (5.9%). In all, 46.6% of POH patients developed POPF. Body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] 1.1), male sex (OR 2.1), increased drain fluid amylase on POD 1 (OR 1.001), and increased C-reactive protein (OR 1.01) were independent risk factors for POPF once POH has occurred. CONCLUSION POH has relevant postoperative clinical implications, independently from POPF occurrence. Developing POH with POPF leads to an earlier onset of higher postoperative burdens. Once POH is diagnosed, risk factors for additional POPF could identify patients who may benefit from additional surveillance, specific drains protocols, and preventive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Bannone
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Perri
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppa Procida
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Pier Giuseppe Vacca
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Alice Cattelani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marchegiani G, Barreto SG, Bannone E, Sarr M, Vollmer CM, Connor S, Falconi M, Besselink MG, Salvia R, Wolfgang CL, Zyromski NJ, Yeo CJ, Adham M, Siriwardena AK, Takaori K, Hilal MA, Loos M, Probst P, Hackert T, Strobel O, Busch ORC, Lillemoe KD, Miao Y, Halloran CM, Werner J, Friess H, Izbicki JR, Bockhorn M, Vashist YK, Conlon K, Passas I, Gianotti L, Del Chiaro M, Schulick RD, Montorsi M, Oláh A, Fusai GK, Serrablo A, Zerbi A, Fingerhut A, Andersson R, Padbury R, Dervenis C, Neoptolemos JP, Bassi C, Büchler MW, Shrikhande SV. Postpancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis (PPAP): Definition and Grading From the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Ann Surg 2022; 275:663-672. [PMID: 34596077 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The ISGPS aimed to develop a universally accepted definition for PPAP for standardized reporting and outcome comparison. BACKGROUND PPAP is an increasingly recognized complication after partial pancreatic resections, but its incidence and clinical impact, and even its existence are variable because an internationally accepted consensus definition and grading system are lacking. METHODS The ISGPS developed a consensus definition and grading of PPAP with its members after an evidence review and after a series of discussions and multiple revisions from April 2020 to May 2021. RESULTS We defined PPAP as an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreatic remnant beginning within the first 3 postoperative days after a partial pancreatic resection. The diagnosis requires (1) a sustained postoperative serum hyperamylasemia (POH) greater than the institutional upper limit of normal for at least the first 48 hours postoperatively, (2) associated with clinically relevant features, and (3) radiologic alterations consistent with PPAP. Three different PPAP grades were defined based on the clinical impact: (1) grade postoperative hyperamylasemia, biochemical changes only; (2) grade B, mild or moderate complications; and (3) grade C, severe life-threatening complications. DISCUSSIONS The present definition and grading scale of PPAP, based on biochemical, radiologic, and clinical criteria, are instrumental for a better understanding of PPAP and the spectrum of postoperative complications related to this emerging entity. The current terminology will serve as a reference point for standard assessment and lend itself to developing specific treatments and prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Savio George Barreto
- Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Elisa Bannone
- Department of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Michael Sarr
- Mayo Clinic Department of General Surgery, Rochester, NY
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Saxon Connor
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, "Vita-Salute" University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Nicholas J Zyromski
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Charles J Yeo
- Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mustapha Adham
- Digestive Surgery Department, Lyon Civil Hospital, Lyon, France
| | | | - Kyoichi Takaori
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Yi Miao
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Christopher M Halloran
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Yogesh K Vashist
- Professorial Surgical Unit, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kevin Conlon
- Department of Surgery, AGIA OLGA Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Passas
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano - Bicocca University, and Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Luca Gianotti
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, Humanitas University and Research Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Montorsi
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Attila Oláh
- Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Paseo Isabel la Catolica, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Abe Fingerhut
- Department of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Robert Padbury
- Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - John P Neoptolemos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zimmitti G, Coppola A, Ardito F, Meniconi R, Ettorre GM, Rosso E, Manzoni A, Colasanti M, Clemente G, Murazio M, Giuliante F. Outcomes comparison of Pancreato-Gastrostomy and Isolated Jejunal Loop Pancreato-Jejunostomy following Pancreato-Duodenectomy in patients with soft pancreas and at moderate-high risk for POPF: a retrospective multicenter experience-based analysis. Updates Surg 2021; 74:223-234. [PMID: 34761349 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01203-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), the modality of pancreato-enteric continuity restoration may impact on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) risk. The aim of this study is to compare, among patients with soft pancreas and at moderate/high risk for POPF, the outcomes of PD with Pancreato-Gastrostomy (PG), versus Isolated Jejunal Loop Pancreato-Jejunostomy (IJL-PJ). 193 patients with a Callery Fistula Risk Score (C-FRS) ≥ 3 operated at 3 HPB Units, two performing PG and one IJL-PJ as their preferred anastomotic technique following PD (2009-2019) were included in this study (PG = 123, IJL-PJ = 70). Primary outcomes were POPF, clinically relevant (cr-)postoperative pancreatic hemorrhage (cr-PPH), delayed gastric emptying (cr-DGE), and postoperative major complications and mortality. POPF, cr-PPH, and cr-DGE occurred in 21.8%, 17.6%, and 11.4% of patients, and did not differ significantly between PG (26%, 19.5%, and 10.6%, respectively) and IJL-PJ (17.1%, 14.3%, and 12.9%, respectively; all p > 0.05) patients. Major (Dindo ≥ 3) complication and mortality rates were 26.4% and 3.3%, respectively, and did not differ significantly between PG (29.3% and 3.8%) and IJL-PJ (21.4% and 2.9) patients (p > 0.05). A faster surgical drain and nasogastric tube removal matched a significantly shorter hospitalization among IJL-PJ patients (median LOS: 18 days versus 25 days among PG patients, p < 0.001). In conclusion, IJL-PJ and PG, when performed by surgeons specialized with the concerned anastomotic technique in patients with soft pancreas and moderate/high risk for POPF, have similar results in terms of perioperative mortality and postoperative complications both overall and specific for PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, via Bissolati n.57, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Coppola
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale Ed Epato-Biliare, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, via della Pineta Sacchetti n.217, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale Ed Epato-Biliare, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, via della Pineta Sacchetti n.217, Roma, Italy
| | - Roberto Meniconi
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale E Trapianti, Ospedale S. Camillo-Forlanini Spallanzani, via G. Folchi n.6a, Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale E Trapianti, Ospedale S. Camillo-Forlanini Spallanzani, via G. Folchi n.6a, Roma, Italy
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, via Bissolati n.57, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alberto Manzoni
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, via Bissolati n.57, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Colasanti
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale E Trapianti, Ospedale S. Camillo-Forlanini Spallanzani, via G. Folchi n.6a, Roma, Italy
| | - Gennaro Clemente
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale Ed Epato-Biliare, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, via della Pineta Sacchetti n.217, Roma, Italy
| | - Marino Murazio
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale Ed Epato-Biliare, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, via della Pineta Sacchetti n.217, Roma, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale Ed Epato-Biliare, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, via della Pineta Sacchetti n.217, Roma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|