Same formula, different philosophy: more mindful use of the Modified Parkland Formula in severe burns

Effect of silver-containing hydrofiber dressing on burn wound healing: A meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Silver sulfadiazine is commonly used to treat local burn wounds. Aquacel-Ag is a hydrogen fiber dressing containing ionic silver that reduces burn wound infection and promotes antimicrobial activity. It is necessary to compare the efficacy of the two in the healing of burns.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effect of Aquacel-Ag on burn wound healing.

METHODS

A computerized search of CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, Science Direct, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, and Open Access Library databases was performed from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2021 for randomized controlled clinical trials. The trials on Aquacel-Ag dressing and silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of burns were selected. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.0 software.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were finally included, with 794 burn patients. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with patients treated with silver sulfadiazine, burn patients treated with Aquacel-Ag dressing had shorter wound healing time [MD = -2.49, 95% CI (-5.64-0.65), p = 0.12], significantly lower tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) level [MD = -0.52, 95% CI (-0.82-0.22), p = 0.0008], higher wound healing rate [MD = 8.41, 95% CI (3.39-13.43), p = 0.001], fewer dressing changes [MD = -3.27, 95% CI (-4.90-1.63), p < 0.0001].

CONCLUSION

Aquacel-Ag dressing can shorten wound healing time and effectively reduce inflammatory reactions in burn patients compared with silver sulfadiazine, but their safety still needs further exploration and analysis.

A practical formula for fluid resuscitation in acute paediatric burns in a low resource setting: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Appropriate fluid resuscitation of acute burn injury is critical and there are recognized challenges with fluid resuscitation, including those with relevance to low resource settings. We developed a practical protocol that guides burn resuscitation and sought to evaluate the safety of our modified resuscitation formula through a small pilot study that particularly addresses the problems we have experienced in a low resource setting.

METHODS

Children with burns more than 15% total body surface area admitted within 24 h of injury to Edendale Hospital between 1 June 2021 and 31 August 2021 were included. The resuscitation formula used was 2 mls of Ringers Lactate per bodyweight in kilograms per% total body surface area (TBSA) given over 24 h and adjusted according to urine output. Data analysed included age, weight, mechanism, TBSA, hours post burn at presentation to hospital, total fluid given in the first 24 h of admission, total urine output in the first 24 h of admission, number of fluid adjustments made during the first 24 h and complications related to fluid resuscitation.

RESULTS

Ten children were included. The median age was 3 (IQR 2-5) years old, with a mean weight of 14.9 (SD 5.07) kilograms, a median TBSA of 17.4 (IQR 16-26)%, presenting at a median of 12 (6.5-18) hours post burn injury. Mechanism of burn was scald in all cases, with 9 being hot water and hot food in one. In the first 24 h a mean of 2.05 (SD 0.58) mls/kg of fluid was received with a mean urine output of 1.66 (SD 0.57) mls/kg/hr.

CONCLUSION

The results of this pilot study to evaluate the safety of our protocol seem reasonable. It is limited by the lack of larger injuries as well as adult patients and a larger prospective study is pertinent.