1
|
Done JZ, Papanikolaou A, Stem M, Radomski SN, Chen SY, Atallah C, Efron JE, Safar B. Impact of preoperative chemotherapy on perioperative morbidity in combined resection of colon cancer and liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2380-2387. [PMID: 37468732 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05758-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative chemotherapy, or neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) can be used to improve resectability but can also have hepatotoxic effects on the future liver remnant. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of NAC on 30-day morbidity among patients undergoing a resection of primary colon cancer and synchronous liver metastases (sLM). METHODS This was a retrospective study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2012-2020). The association between NAC and 30-day overall morbidity, the primary outcome, was assessed. Subgroup analyses for low and high-risk procedures were performed. RESULTS Among 968 patients who underwent the combined resection, 571 (58.99%) received NAC. There was a lower rate of 30-day overall morbidity among patients who received NAC (34.50% vs. 41.56%, p = 0.026) and no difference in rates of postoperative liver failure, bile leak, need for invasive intervention for hepatic procedure, and anastomotic leak. On adjusted analyses, patients who received NAC had decreased odds of overall morbidity (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97, p = 0.031) compared to patients who did not receive NAC. On subgroup analyses, patients who received NAC prior to a low risk combined resection had lower rates of overall morbidity on both adjusted and unadjusted analyses. Among those undergoing high-risk combined resections, there was no difference in overall morbidity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Patients who are deemed to be candidates for preoperative chemotherapy can proceed with planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to combined resection of primary colon cancer and sLM as preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not appear to be associated with increased postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy Z Done
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Angelos Papanikolaou
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Miloslawa Stem
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Shannon N Radomski
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Sophia Y Chen
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Chady Atallah
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Jonathan E Efron
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Bashar Safar
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 530 First Ave, Suite 7V, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Graaff MR, Klaase JM, van Dam RM, Kuhlmann KFD, Kazemier G, Swijnenburg RJ, Elfrink AKE, Verhoef C, Mieog JS, van den Boezem PB, Gobardhan P, Rijken AM, Lips DJ, Leclercq WGK, Marsman HA, van Duijvendijk P, van der Hoeven JAB, Vermaas M, Dulk MD, Grünhagen DJ, Kok NFM. Survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with and without preoperative chemotherapy: Nationwide propensity score-matched study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106932. [PMID: 37302900 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Routine treatment with preoperative systemic chemotherapy (CTx) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains controversial due to lack of consistent evidence demonstrating associated survival benefits. This study aimed to determine the effect of preoperative CTx on overall survival (OS) compared to surgery alone and to assess hospital and oncological network variation in 5-year OS. METHODS This was a population-based study of all patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM between 2014 and 2017 in the Netherlands. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), OS was compared between patients treated with and without preoperative CTx. Hospital and oncological network variation in 5-year OS corrected for case-mix factors was calculated using an observed/expected ratio. RESULTS Of 2820 patients included, 852 (30.2%) and 1968 (69.8%) patients were treated with preoperative CTx and surgery alone, respectively. After PSM, 537 patients remained in each group, median number of CRLM; 3 [IQR 2-4], median size of CRLM; 28 mm [IQR 18-44], synchronous CLRM (71.1%). Median follow-up was 80.8 months. Five-year OS rates after PSM for patients treated with and without preoperative chemotherapy were 40.2% versus 38.3% (log-rank P = 0.734). After stratification for low, medium, and high tumour burden based on the tumour burden score (TBS) OS was similar for preoperative chemotherapy vs. surgery alone (log-rank P = 0.486, P = 0.914, and P = 0.744, respectively). After correction for non-modifiable patient and tumour characteristics, no relevant hospital or oncological network variation in five-year OS was observed. CONCLUSION In patients eligible for surgical resection, preoperative chemotherapy does not provide an overall survival benefit compared to surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R de Graaff
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur K E Elfrink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, Ijsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu W, Chen FL, Wang K, Bao Q, Wang HW, Jin KM, Xing BC. Irinotecan- vs oxaliplatin-based regimens for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal liver metastasis patients: A retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:904-917. [PMID: 36185567 PMCID: PMC9521480 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) improves the survival outcomes of selected patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The benefits of irinotecan-based regimens in these patients are still under debate.
AIM To compare the benefits of irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-based regimens in patients with resectable CRLM.
METHODS From September 2003 to August 2020, 554 patients received NC and underwent hepatectomy for CRLM. Based on a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) model, 175 patients who received irinotecan were matched to 175 patients who received oxaliplatin to obtain two balanced groups regarding demographic, therapeutic, and prognostic characteristics.
RESULTS Chemotherapy was based on oxaliplatin in 353 (63.7%) patients and irinotecan in 201 (36.3%). After PSM, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates with irinotecan were 18.0% and 49.7%, respectively, while the 5-year PFS and OS rates with oxaliplatin were 26.0% and 46.8%, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss, operating time, and postoperative complications differed significantly between the two groups. In the multivariable analysis, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, RAS mutation, response to NC, tumor size > 5 cm, and tumor number > 1 were independently associated with PFS.
CONCLUSION In NC in patients with CRLM, irinotecan is similar to oxaliplatin in survival outcomes, but irinotecan is superior regarding operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Feng-Lin Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Kun Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Quan Bao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Hong-Wei Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Ke-Min Jin
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Bao-Cai Xing
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|