Safety of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly

Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gallbladder disease: a literature review

BACKGROUND

Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) has gained traction globally due to its benefits, including shorter hospital stays, reduced costs, and enhanced patient experience. While concerns about patient safety, particularly related to bleeding and bile duct injury persist, the literature supports the efficacy and advantages of DCLC highlighting the need for its wider adoption in healthcare settings to optimise resources and improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

This was a literature review that aims to assess the feasibility and safety of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone patients, focusing on incidence and aetiology of unexpected admissions and readmissions, as well as conversion-to-open rates. PubMed was searched for all studies focusing on DCLC between 2014 and 2024. The timeframe was specifically selected to identify recent trends and practices in this evolving field. By focusing on this specific period, the review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of current practices, emerging trends, and the evolving standard of care in this area.

RESULTS

This review highlights that the main causes of unexpected admission post DCLC were postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, while the implementation of anaesthetic pathways notably increased day-case rates. Studies addressing complication rates postoperatively consistently found no significant difference between day-case and in-patient procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

DCLC for symptomatic gallstone patients is supported by research as safe and effective, with high success rates and patient satisfaction. Studies show minimal complications and acceptable readmission rates, suggesting that DCLC can be the standard approach for selective patients, improving outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

[Outpatient cholecystectomy as the next step? : Discussion and possible criteria in the selection of patients]

BACKGROUND

While laparoscopic cholecystectomy has largely been performed in an outpatient setting in some countries for years, in Germany it is still generally performed on an inpatient basis; however, with the progressive ambitions for more outpatient treatment within the German healthcare system, laparoscopic cholecystectomy will (have to) increasingly be performed on an outpatient basis in the upcoming years.

AIM OF THE WORK

Presentation of the current framework conditions and the potential for outpatient performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Germany. Presentation and discussion on the current state of knowledge regarding patient selection, treatment pathways and safety of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

The potential for outpatient management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Germany is high. Based on the current literature, there are no safety concerns regarding outpatient performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in selected patients.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is inevitably heading our way in the next years. The key to successful change will be comprehensive patient information, patient selection and structured outpatient treatment pathways.

The effect of ultrasound-guided low serratus anterior plane block on laparoscopic cholecystectomy postoperative analgesia: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Anterior serratus plane block for analgesia in many procedures, but there have been no reports of analgesia undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We investigated the effects of ultrasonic-guided low serratory anterior block on patients undergoing LC.

METHODS

One hundred patients who undergo LC were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups: Patients in group C with routine general anesthesia and patients in group S treat low anterior serratus block combined with general anesthesia. The serratus anterior block was performed at the T8 to T9 point after anesthesia induction, before cutting leather (T0), stamp card placement (T1), 2 groups of patients' heart rate (HR), blood pressure were recorded, at the same time dosage of analgesic drugs and postoperative 0.5, 6, 12, 24 hours when resting visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded in 2 groups of patients.

RESULTS

The T0 point, patients' HR, blood pressure had significant difference (P > .05), the T1 point, patients' HR, mean arterial pressure in group S lower than group C (P < .05), the amount of intra-operative propofol and remifentanil, patients in group S were less than in group C (P < .05), and resting VAS pain score at the 0.5, 6, 12 hours after operation patients in group S were lower than group C also (P < .05), resting VAS pain had no significant difference at postoperative 24 hours between 2 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Low serratus anterior plane block in LC can provide safe and effective analgesia for patients.