1
|
Akhaladze DG, Rabaev GS, Tverdov IV, Merkulov NN, Uskova NG, Talypov SR, Krivonosov AA, Grachev NS. Central Liver Segments Resections vs Extended Hepatectomies in Children: Single-center Experience. J Pediatr Surg 2024:161927. [PMID: 39368854 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/07/2024] [Indexed: 10/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central liver segments resection (CLSR) still is not widely used in pediatric surgery due to its technical difficulty, whereas this procedure is widely spread as a parenchyma sparing approach of centrally located liver tumors in adults. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of CLSR in comparison with extended hepatectomy (EH) in children with different liver tumors. METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis of patients who received CLSR (n = 14) and EH (n = 44) from June 2017 to December 2023 was applied. Patient's characteristics, preoperative, intra- and postoperative data were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS Preoperative CT-volumetry showed that future liver remnant volume was higher in CLSR group compared to EH (FLR-V; (54 ± 29 (40-91) % vs 40 ± 12 (17-73) %, p = 0.016). The intraoperative blood loss (200 [90-1150] (20-3000) ml vs 100 [30-275] (10-9000) ml, p = 0.088) and transfusion volume (310 [85-590] (0-1860) ml vs 150 [0-310] (0-4770) ml, p = 0.484) were similar in both groups, while operation time was longer in CLSR group (420 [320-595] (145-785) min vs 280 [203-390] (125-710) min), p = 0.011). There was no difference in biliary leakage (3 (21.4 %) vs 12 (27.3 %); p = 0.479), other complications (4 (28.6 %) vs 5 (11.4 %), p = 0.198) and complications ≥ IIIb by Clavien-Dindo (2 (14.3 %) vs 8 (18.2 %), p = 0.385) postoperatively. CONCLUSION CLSRs allow to preserve more healthy liver parenchyma compared to EH with similar intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. «Extended mesohepatectomy» allows to achieve R0 resection when central liver tumor extends on the left lateral and/or right posterior section. TYPE OF STUDY Retrospective Comparative Study (Level of Evidence III).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry G Akhaladze
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Gavriil S Rabaev
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation; University Medical Centre Corporate Fund, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, 010000, Astana, 32 Turan Str., Kazakhstan.
| | - Ivan V Tverdov
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Nikolay N Merkulov
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Natalia G Uskova
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Sergey R Talypov
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Anatoliy A Krivonosov
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Nikolay S Grachev
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Birgin E, Heibel M, Téoule P, Reißfelder C, Rahbari NN. Robotic sectionectomy versus robotic hemihepatectomy for anatomic liver resection: a comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:197. [PMID: 38703346 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01751-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
Sectionectomy is a parenchma-sparing alternative to (extended) right or left hemihepatectomy. However, the effectiveness and safety of robotic sectionectomy (RS) versus robotic (extended) hemihepatectomy (RH) for the treatment of liver tumors remains unclear. We reviewed our prospective database for consecutive patients who had undergone robotic hepatectomies between March 2021 and July 2023 and included all patients with RS and RH. Demographic data, perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes were analyzed and compared between both groups. Thirty patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 16 patients underwent RS as opposed to 14 patients who underwent RH. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the study groups. The duration of Pringle maneuver was significantly longer in the RS group, while the remaining operative details were comparable. There were no significant differences in posthepatectomy outcomes between the study groups. All patients had negative resection margins. RS is a safe and effective parenchyma-sparing treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emrullah Birgin
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marie Heibel
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick Téoule
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Reißfelder
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Linn YL, Chong Y, Tan EK, Koh YX, Cheow PC, Chung AYF, Chan CY, Jeyaraj PR, Goh BKP. Early experience with pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: comparison with open donor hepatectomy and non-donor laparoscopic hepatectomy. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:515-521. [PMID: 37069484 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (L-DH) has seen a rise in uptake in recent years following the popularization of minimally invasive modality for major hepatobiliary surgery. Our study aimed to determine the safety and compare the perioperative outcomes of L-DH with open donor hepatectomy (O-DH) and laparoscopic non donor hepatectomy (L-NDH) based on our single institution experience. METHODS Eighty of 113 laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomies performed between 2015 and 2022 met study inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 were L-DH. PSM in a 1:2 ratio of L-DH versus L-NDH and 1:1 ratio of L-DH versus O-DH were performed, identifying patients with similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics. RESULTS After 2:1 matching, the L-DH cohort were significantly younger (P < 0.001) and had lower ASA scores (P < 0.001) than the L-NDH cohort. L-DH was associated with a longer median operating time (P < 0.001) and shorter median postoperative stay (P < 0.001) than L-NDH. After 1:1 matching, there were no significant differences in baseline demographic between the L-DH and O-DH cohorts. L-DH was associated with lower median blood loss (P = 0.040) and shorter length of stay compared to O-DH (P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in recipient outcomes for both cohorts. CONCLUSION L-DH can be adopted safely by surgeons experienced in L-NDH and ODH. It is associated with decreased blood loss and shorter length of stay compared to O-DH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Le Linn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yvette Chong
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ek-Khoon Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Academic Clinical Program of Surgery, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Academic Clinical Program of Surgery, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Peng-Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Academic Clinical Program of Surgery, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y F Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Academic Clinical Program of Surgery, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Academic Clinical Program of Surgery, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Prema Raj Jeyaraj
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Academic Clinical Program of Surgery, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Academic Clinical Program of Surgery, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu R, Abu Hilal M, Wakabayashi G, Han HS, Palanivelu C, Boggi U, Hackert T, Kim HJ, Wang XY, Hu MG, Choi GH, Panaro F, He J, Efanov M, Yin XY, Croner RS, Fong YM, Zhu JY, Wu Z, Sun CD, Lee JH, Marino MV, Ganpati IS, Zhu P, Wang ZZ, Yang KH, Fan J, Chen XP, Lau WY. International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:4815-4830. [PMID: 37701136 PMCID: PMC10494765 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i32.4815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The robotic liver resection (RLR) has been increasingly applied in recent years and its benefits shown in some aspects owing to the technical advancement of robotic surgical system, however, controversies still exist. Based on the foundation of the previous consensus statement, this new consensus document aimed to update clinical recommendations and provide guidance to improve the outcomes of RLR clinical practice. The guideline steering group and guideline expert group were formed by 29 international experts of liver surgery and evidence-based medicine (EBM). Relevant literature was reviewed and analyzed by the evidence evaluation group. According to the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, the Guidance Principles of Development and Amendment of the Guidelines for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment in China 2022, a total of 14 recommendations were generated. Among them were 8 recommendations formulated by the GRADE method, and the remaining 6 recommendations were formulated based on literature review and experts' opinion due to insufficient EBM results. This international experts consensus guideline offered guidance for the safe and effective clinical practice and the research direction of RLR in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic, Robotic & Laparoscopic Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia 25100, Italy
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-0075, Japan
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, South Korea
| | - Chinnusamy Palanivelu
- GEM Hospital & Research Centre, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Coimbatore 641045, India
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20251, Germany
| | - Hong-Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu 42415, South Korea
| | - Xiao-Ying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Ming-Gen Hu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, South Korea
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of Surgery/Division of Robotic and HBP Surgery, Montpellier University Hospital-School of Medicine, Montpellier 34090, France
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow 111123, Russia
| | - Xiao-Yu Yin
- Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Roland S Croner
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg 39120, Germany
| | - Yu-Man Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | - Ji-Ye Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Chuan-Dong Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan 682, South Korea
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, F. Tappeiner Hospital, Merano 39012, Italy
| | - Iyer Shridhar Ganpati
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore 189969, Singapore
| | - Peng Zhu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Zi-Zheng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Senior Department of Hepatology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Ke-Hu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200000, China
| | - Xiao-Ping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chua DW, Syn N, Koh YX, Teo JY, Cheow PC, Chung AYF, Chan CY, Goh BKP. Association of standardized liver volume and body mass index with outcomes of minimally invasive liver resections. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:456-465. [PMID: 35999310 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09534-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While minimally invasive liver resections (MILR) have demonstrated advantages in improved post-operative recovery, widespread adoption is hampered by inherent technical difficulties. Our study attempts to analyze the role of anthropometric measures in MILR-related outcomes. METHODS Between 2012 and 2020, 676 consecutive patients underwent MILR at the Singapore General Hospital of which 565 met study criteria and were included. Patients were stratified based on Body Mass Index (BMI) as well as Standardized Liver Volumes (SLV). Associations between BMI and SLV to selected peri-operative outcomes were analyzed using restricted cubic splines. RESULTS A BMI of ≥ 29 was associated with increase in blood loss [Mean difference (MD) 69 mls, 95% CI 2 to 137] as well as operative conversions [Relative Risk (RR) 1.63, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.62] among patients undergoing MILR while a SLV of 1600 cc or higher was associated with an increase in blood loss (MD 30 mls, 95% CI 10 to 49). In addition, a BMI of ≤ 20 was associated with an increased risk of major complications (RR 2.25, 95% 1.16 to 4.35). The magnitude of differences observed in these findings increased with each unit change in BMI and SLV. CONCLUSION Both BMI and SLV were useful anthropometric measures in predicting peri-operative outcomes in MILR and may be considered for incorporation in future difficulty scoring systems for MILR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren W Chua
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, Level 5, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, Level 5, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, Level 5, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, Level 5, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Peng-Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, Level 5, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y F Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, Level 5, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, Level 5, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, Level 5, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
- Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zheng Z, Xie H, Liu Z, Wu X, Peng J, Chen X, He J, Zhou J. Laparoscopic central hepatectomy using a parenchymal-first approach: how we do it. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8630-8638. [PMID: 36107243 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09163-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic central hepatectomy (LCH) is a difficult and challenging procedure. This study aimed to describe our experience with LCH using a parenchymal-first approach. METHODS Between July 2017 and June 2021, 19 consecutive patients underwent LCH using a parenchymal-first approach at our institution. Herein, the details of this procedural strategy are described, and the demographic and clinical data of the included patients were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS There were 1 female and 18 male patients, all with hepatocellular carcinoma without major vascular invasion. The mean age was 57 ± 10 years. No patients underwent conversion to open surgery, and no blood transfusions were needed intraoperatively. The average operative duration and the average Pringle maneuver duration were 223 ± 65 min and 58 ± 11 min. respectively. The median blood loss was 200 ml (range: 100-800 ml). Postoperative morbidities occurred in 3 patients (15.8%), including 2 cases of bile leakage and 1 case of acquired pulmonary infection; there were no postoperative complications happened such as bleeding, hepatic failure, or mortality. The average postoperative hospital stay was 10 ± 3 days. CONCLUSION The optimized procedure of LCH using a parenchymal-first approach is not only feasible but also expected to provide an advantage in laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhipeng Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838, North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111, Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Haorong Xie
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111, Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhangyuanzhu Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111, Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiang Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111, Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Jianxin Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111, Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Xuefang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111, Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Junming He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No.111, Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
| | - Jie Zhou
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838, North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang Z, Linn YL, Chong Y, Chung AY, Chan CY, Goh BKP. Laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe liver resections: a 1:2 propensity score-matched controlled study based on a single institution experience. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2157-2162. [PMID: 35692120 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the wide use of laparoscopy for liver resection, laparoscopic caudate lobe resections(L-CLR) remain technically challenging, only attempted by experts in the field. The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety and compare the perioperative outcomes of L-CLR with O-CLR based on our single institution experience in a 1:2 propensity score-matched controlled study based on our single institution experience. METHODS Between 2004 and 2020, 67 consecutive patients who underwent CLR at Singapore General Hospital were identified. Propensity score matching (PSM) of laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resections(O-CLR) was performed in a 1:2 ratio with no replacements using nearest neighbour matching method. RESULTS L-CLR was associated with a significantly decreased median blood loss (150 mL versus 500 mL, P = 0.001) and a decreased median post-operative stay (3 days versus 7.5 days, P = <0.01) in the unmatched cohorts. After 1:2 propensity score matching, these results were again demonstrated with a significantly lower blood loss (150 mL versus 400 mL, P = 0.016) and a shorter postoperative stay (3 days versus 7 days, P = <0.01) in favour of L-CLR. 30-day readmission and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade > 2) rates were all in favour of L-CLR as well but could not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION L-CLR can be safely performed by experienced surgeons. It is associated with decreased blood loss and shorter perioperative stay compared to O-CLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongkai Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Department of General Surgery, Woodlands Health, Singapore
| | - Yun-Le Linn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yvette Chong
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.,Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.,Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.,Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang HY, Choi GH, Chin KM, Choi SH, Syn NL, Cheung TT, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Marino MV, Prieto M, Chong CC, Lee JH, Efanov M, Kingham TP, Sutcliffe RP, Troisi RI, Pratschke J, Wang X, D’Hondt M, Tang CN, Liu R, Park JO, Rotellar F, Scatton O, Sugioka A, Long TCD, Chan CY, Fuks D, Han HS, Goh BKP. Robotic and laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy: multicentre propensity score-matched analysis. Br J Surg 2022; 109:311-314. [PMID: 35139157 PMCID: PMC8981979 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Both robotic and laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy can be performed safely in expert centres, with excellent outcomes. The robotic approach was associated with statistically significant less blood loss compared with laparoscopy, although the clinical relevance of this finding remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Yeon Yang
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ken-Min Chin
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Centre, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Nicholas L. Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Adrian K. H. Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Marco V. Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
- Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mikel Prieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Charing C. Chong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - T. Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert P. Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Chung Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Medical Centre of Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - James O. Park
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-biliary-pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Pitie-Salpetriere, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Brian K. P. Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Birgin E, Hartwig V, Rasbach E, Seyfried S, Rahbari M, Reeg A, Jentschura SL, Téoule P, Reißfelder C, Rahbari NN. Minimally invasive mesohepatectomy for centrally located liver lesions-a case series. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8935-8942. [PMID: 35668311 PMCID: PMC9652264 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09342-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of centrally located liver lesions remains a technically demanding procedure. To date, there are limited data on the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive mesohepatectomy for benign and malignant lesions. It was therefore the objective of this study to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive mesohepatectomy for liver tumors at a tertiary care hospital. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent a minimally invasive anatomic mesohepatectomy using a Glissonean pedicle approach from April 2018 to November 2021 were identified from a prospective database. Demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics for continuous and categorical variables. RESULTS A total of ten patients were included, of whom five patients had hepatocellular carcinoma, one patient had cholangiocarcinoma, three patients had colorectal liver metastases, and one patient had a hydatid cyst. Two and eight patients underwent robotic-assisted and laparoscopic resections, respectively. The median operative time was 393 min (interquartile range (IQR) 298-573 min). Conversion to laparotomy was required in one case. The median lesion size was 60 mm and all cases had negative resection margins on final histopathological analysis. The median total blood loss was 550 ml (IQR 413-850 ml). One patient had a grade III complication. The median length of stay was 7 days (IQR 5-12 days). Time-to-functional recovery was achieved after a median of 2 days (IQR 1-4 days). There were no readmissions within 90 days after surgery. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive mesohepatectomy is a feasible and safe approach in selected patients with benign and malignant liver lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emrullah Birgin
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Vanessa Hartwig
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Erik Rasbach
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Steffen Seyfried
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Mohammad Rahbari
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Alina Reeg
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sina-Luisa Jentschura
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick Téoule
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Reißfelder
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nuh N. Rahbari
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|