The clinicopathologic and operative characteristics of patients with small nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Comparison of EUS-guided ablation and surgical resection for nonfunctioning small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a propensity score-matching study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Treatment strategies for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) <2 cm in size are still under debate. The feasibility and safety of EUS-guided ethanol ablation (EUS-EA) have been demonstrated. However, sample sizes in previous studies were small with no comparative studies on surgery. Therefore, we aimed to compare the safety and long-term outcomes of EUS-EA with those of surgery for the management of nonfunctioning small PNETs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with PNETs who were managed by EUS-EA (from 2011 to 2018) and surgery (from 2000 to 2018) at Asan Medical Center. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to increase comparability. The primary outcome was early and late major adverse events (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) after treatment. Secondary outcomes were 10-year overall (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates, length of hospital stay, and development of endocrine pancreatic insufficiency.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 97 and 188 patients were included in the EUS-EA and surgery groups, respectively. PSM created 89 matched pairs. EUS-EA was associated with a significantly lower rate of early major adverse events (0% vs 11.2%, P = .003). Late major adverse events occurred more frequently after surgery, with no significant difference between groups (3.4% vs 10.1%, P = .07). Both treatment modalities showed comparable 10-year OS and DSS rates. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the EUS-EA group (4 days vs 14.1 days, P < .001), and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency was less common after EUS-EA than after surgery (33.3% vs 48.6%, P = .121).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-EA had fewer adverse events and a shorter hospital stay with similar OS and DSS rates compared with surgery, suggesting that EUS-EA may be a preferred alternative to surgical resection in selected patients with nonfunctioning small PNETs.

Prognostic Factors of Small Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis: A Population-Level Study

BACKGROUND

Small non-functional neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) are a heterogeneous subset of tumors with controversy regarding their optimal management. We aimed to analyze the prognostic factors of patients with small NF-PNETs and create a risk score for lymph node metastasis (LNM).

METHODS

Data of 751 patients with NF-PNETs ≤ 2 cm were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate survival analysis was performed to analyze the prognostic factors. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for LNM.

RESULTS

Of the 751 patients, 99 (13.2%) were confirmed to have LNM. In multivariate survival analysis, LNM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% CI, 1.04-4.32, p = 0.040) was independently associated with disease-specific survival. Logistic regression identified that tumor location in the head of the pancreas (odds ratio [OR], 4.33; 95% CI, 2.75-6.81; p < 0.001), size ≥ 1.5-2 cm (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.17-2.87; p = 0.009), and grade III-IV (OR, 7.90; 95% CI, 1.79-34.90; p = 0.006) were independent risk factors of LNM. According to the OR value, the risk of LNM was scored as follows: a score of 1 for tumors located in the body/tail of the pancreas and 4 for those located in the head; a score of 1 for tumors <1 cm and 2 for those ≥1.5-2 cm; and a score of 1 for tumors with grade I-II and 8 for those with grade III-IV. Finally, the median score for this cohort was 4, with an interquartile range of 3-6. Therefore, patients were classified as three groups based on the risk score system: a total score of 1-3 for low risk, 4-6 for intermediate risk (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.59-5.60; p = 0.001), and 7-14 for high risk (OR, 8.94; 95% CI, 4.50-17.7; p < 0.001), with an incidence of LNM 5.0%, 13.5%, and 31.8%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection with regional lymphadenectomy is recommended for small NF-PNETs with malignant potential of LNM. A risk score for LNM based on tumor grade, location, and size may preoperatively predict LNM of small NF-PNETs and guide clinical practice.