Metal stents are safe and cost-effective for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreaticobiliary tumours

Impact of biliary drainage method before pancreaticoduodenectomy on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with periampullary carcinoma and obstructive jaundice: A multicenter retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The optima preoperative biliary drainage before pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with biliary tract and pancreatic cancer remains controversial.

METHODS

A total of 898 patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage via endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage, endoscopic transnasal biliary drainage, or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage before pancreaticoduodenectomy for biliary tract and pancreatic cancer were included. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 morbidity rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy were higher in the endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (21.9%; P = .001) or endoscopic transnasal biliary drainage (20.2%; P = .007) than in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (9.7%) groups. In biliary tract cancer, the frequency of dissemination after pancreaticoduodenectomy was higher in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (15.3%) than in the endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (0.7%; P = .001) and endoscopic transnasal biliary drainage (4.1%; P = .037) groups; percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was an independent factor associated with worse disease-free survival (P = .04), whereas in pancreatic cancer the frequency of dissemination and survival was comparable among the 3 preoperative biliary drainage methods. Albumin <3.9 g/dL was independently associated with worse overall survival in patients with both pancreatic (P = .038) and biliary tract (P = .002) cancers, respectively. During biliary drainage, external drainage (P = .038) was independently associated with albumin <3.9 g/dL; albumin was higher in endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage group than in endoscopic transnasal biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage groups after 21 days from tube insertion.

CONCLUSION

In biliary tract cancer, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may carry the risk of increasing the incidence of disseminative recurrence. In pancreatic cancer, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is preferable owing to fewer complications without influencing recurrence. However, if patients cannot undergo surgery immediately, endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage will be applicable to help the preservation of nutritional status, which can have an impact on survival.

Pancreatoduodenectomy Following Preoperative Biliary Drainage Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus a Transpapillary Stent: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study of the ACHBT-FRENCH-SFED Intergroup

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is equivalent to electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent (ECE-LAMS) before pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

Patients who underwent PBD for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) followed by PD were retrospectively included in nine expert centers between 2015 and 2022. ERCP or endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with ECE-LAMS were performed. In intent-to-treat analysis, patients drained with ECE-LAMS were considered the study group (first-LAMS group) and those drained with conventional transpapillary stent the control group (first-cannulation group). The rates of technical success, clinical success, drainage-related complications, surgical complications, and oncological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 156 patients, 128 underwent ERCP and 28 ECE-LAMS in first intent. The technical and clinical success rates were 83.5% and 70.2% in the first-cannulation group versus 100% and 89.3% in the first-LAMS group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.05, respectively). The overall complication rate over the entire patient journey was 93.7% in first-cannulation group versus 92.0% in first-LAMS group (p = 0.04). The overall endoscopic complication rate was 30.5% in first-cannulation group versus 17.9% in first-LAMS group (p = 0.25). The overall complication rate after PD was higher in the first-cannulation group than in the first-LAMS group (92.2% versus 75.0%, p = 0.016). Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PBD with ECE-LAMS is easier to deploy and more efficient than ERCP in patients with DMBO. It is associated with less surgical complications after pancreatoduodenectomy without compromising the oncological outcome.

Endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: When and how?

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA) is a primary liver tumor associated with a dim prognosis. The role of preoperative and palliative biliary drainage has long been debated. The most common techniques are endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD); however, recently developed endoscopic ultrasound-assisted methods are gaining more atention. Selecting the best available method in any specific scenario is crucial, yet sometimes challenging. Thus, this review aimed to discuss the available techniques, indications, perks, pitfalls, and timing-related issues in the management of hCCA. In a preoperative setting, PTBD appears to have some advantages: low risk of postprocedural complications (namely cholangitis) and better priming for surgery. For palliative purposes, we propose ERCP/PTBD depending on the experience of the operators, but also on other factors: the level of bilirubin (if very high, rather PTBD), length of the stenosis and the presence of cholangitis (PTBD), ERCP failure, or altered biliary anatomy.