New regulatory changes in 3D printing: implementation in surgery and research at the point of care

Trends in free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: a single surgeon series of 1027 free tissue transfers

BACKGROUND

Free tissue transfer has fundamentally changed head and neck surgery, enabling reliable reconstruction of large defects with better function and aesthetics. This study assesses two decades of trends in free flap reconstruction, and how disease incidence, survival, surgeon caseload, team approach, and technology have impacted practice.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 1027 head and neck free flaps from 2006 to 2022. Outcomes examined include chronological changes in flap selection, indication, length of stay, incorporation of virtual surgical planning (VSP), annual caseload, survival, and their associations with the single versus multi-team approach.

RESULTS

There were 764 soft-tissue and 263 osseous reconstructions utilizing 21 different flaps. Anterolateral thigh and radial forearm accounted for 76.7% of soft tissue flaps, with recent increase in superficial circumflex iliac perforator flaps in young patients. Osseous flap proportion remained stable, but fibula flaps increased five-fold with more VSP, dental implants, oral cancer, and multi-team surgery. Outcomes such as complication rates, length of stay and disease specific/overall survival have improved over time despite increasing complexity (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in operative time, complication rate, or disease specific/overall survival between single team or multi-team approaches (P = 0.45, P = 0.054, P = 0.57, and P = 0.60, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Single and multi-team approaches may have similar fundamental outcomes, but as caseload, complexity, and life-expectancy increases, both patients and surgeons benefit from a collaborative multi-team approach that focuses on improving long-term functional outcomes.

Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department

Objective: Three-dimensional printing has become a leading manufacturing technique in healthcare in recent years. Doubts in published studies regarding the methodological rigor and cost-effectiveness and stricter regulations have stopped the transfer of this technology in many healthcare organizations. The aim of this study was the evaluation and implementation of a 3D printing technology service in a radiology department. Methods: This work describes a methodology to implement a 3D printing service in a radiology department of a Spanish public hospital, considering leadership, training, workflow, clinical integration, quality processes and usability. Results: The results correspond to a 6-year period, during which we performed up to 352 cases, requested by 85 different clinicians. The training, quality control and processes required for the scaled implementation of an in-house 3D printing service are also reported. Conclusions: Despite the maturity of the technology and its impact on the clinic, it is necessary to establish new workflows to correctly implement them into the strategy of the health organization, adjusting it to the needs of clinicians and to their specific resources. Significance: This work allows hospitals to bridge the gap between research and 3D printing, setting up its transfer to clinical practice and using implementation methodology for decision support.