Outcome of boys with posterior urethral valves from a single tertiary hospital in Singapore

Clinical considerations in adults with history of posterior urethral valves

INTRODUCTION

Management of patients with posterior urethral valves (PUV) is commonplace for many pediatric urologists, however adult providers may be far less familiar with this diagnosis, its management and long-term ramifications. As urologic management of these patients has evolved, clinical outcomes have substantially improved with many more patients now surviving into adulthood. These patients remain at increased risk of morbidity due to their condition and therefore are likely to benefit from long term follow-up with adult providers.

OBJECTIVE

In this review we analyze the psychosocial impacts of PUV on adults, evaluate long term transplant outcomes in PUV patients and discuss effective clinical management strategies of bladder dysfunction in adult PUV patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective literature review was performed using the MEDLINE (Pubmed) electronic database using key words such as "posterior urethral valve", "quality of life", "sexual function", "transplant outcomes", "bladder dysfunction", "mitrofanoff" etc. to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Generally, the quality of life of PUV patients is good, those suffering from renal insufficiency or lower urinary tract symptoms, specifically incontinence, appear to be a group that may benefit from more intensive follow-up. Good long-term kidney transplant (KT) function and survival can be achieved in patients with PUV. Rigorous management to optimize bladder function and close follow-up, are key for long term graft survival after KT.

DISCUSSION

The chronicity of PUV warrants adult providers to be not only well versed in the pathophysiology of the disease, but well prepared to care for these patients as they transition into adulthood.

CONCLUSION

Additional studies addressing psychosocial, clinical and transplant outcomes of adults with PUV are necessary to develop optimal long-term follow-up regimens for these patients.

Comparison of outcomes of prenatal versus postnatal presentation of posterior urethral valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis the differences in the outcomes of prenatally versus postnatally diagnosed posterior urethral valves (PUV) to ascertain if prenatal detection of PUV has superior outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in March 2022 (PROSPERO ID - CRD42021243546) and included all studies that reported outcomes of prenatally and postnatally diagnosed PUV. However, for meta-analysis, only those studies that described both groups were included. The main outcomes of interest included progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and renal transplant, and bladder dysfunction as determined by initiation of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). Time to event analyses were completed when possible.

RESULTS

The systematic review included 49 studies (3820 patients). The pooled effect estimates for progression to CKD (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.43, 1.31]), need for RRT (OR 1.39 [95% CI 0.64, 2.99]) and need for renal transplant (OR 1.64 [95% CI 0.61, 4.42]) between prenatal and postnatal groups was not different. CICs rates were as high as 32% in the prenatal group and 22% in the postnatal group. Most studies had a moderate or serious risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

The existing comparative literature on prenatal versus postnatal presentation of PUV is very heterogeneous. The diagnostic and treatment protocols have not been reported in majority of the studies. The outcome variables are also reported inconsistently. Based on the current evidence, prenatal diagnosis of PUV does not appear to improve the long-term outcomes of these patients.