Comparison of two-stage and three-stage surgery for obstructing left-sided colon cancer

Management of obstructed colorectal carcinoma in an emergency setting: An update

Colorectal carcinoma is common, particularly on the left side. In 20% of patients, obstruction and ileus may be the first clinical manifestations of a carcinoma that has advanced (stage II, III or even IV). Diagnosis is based on clinical presentation, plain abdominal radiogram, computed tomography (CT), CT colonography and positron emission tomography/CT. The best management strategy in terms of short-term operative or interventional and long-term oncological outcomes remains unknown. For the most common left-sided obstruction, the first choice should be either emergency surgery or endoscopic decompression by self-expendable metal stents or tubes. The operative plan should be either one-stage or two-stage resection. One-stage resection with on-table bowel decompression and irrigation can be accompanied or not accompanied by proximal defunctioning stoma (colostomy or ileostomy). Primary anastomosis is more convenient but has increased risks of anastomotic leakage and morbidity. Two-stage resection (Hartmann's procedure) is safer and the most widely used despite temporally affecting quality of life. Damage control surgery in high-risk frail patients is less frequently performed since it can be successfully substituted with endoscopic stenting or tubing. For the less common right-sided obstruction, one-stage surgical resection is more beneficial than endoscopic decompression. The role of minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic) is a subject of debate. Emergency laparoscopic-assisted management is advantageous to some extent but requires much expertise due to inherent difficulties in dissecting the distended colon and the risk of rupture and subsequent septic complications. The decompressing stent as a bridge to elective surgery more substantially decreases the risks of morbidity and mortality than emergency surgery for decompression and has equivalent medium-term overall survival and disease-free survival rates. Its combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation may have a positive effect on long-term oncological outcomes. Management plans are crucial and must be individualized to better fit each case.

Immune function status of postoperative patients with colon cancer for predicting liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer (CC) has a high incidence rate. Radical resection is the main treatment method for CC; however, liver metastasis (LM) often occurs post-surgery. The liver contains both innate and adaptive immune cells that monitor and remove abnormal cells and pathogens. Before LM, tumor cells secrete cytokines and exosomes to adjust the immune microenvironment of the liver, thus forming an inhibitory immune microenvironment for colonization by circulating tumor cells. This indicates that the immune state of patients with CC plays a crucial role in the occurrence and progression of LM.

AIM

To observe and analyze the relationship between immune status and expression of tumor factors in patients with LM of CC, and to provide a scientific intervention method for promoting the patient prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed. The baseline data of 100 patients with CC and 100 patients with CC who suffered from postoperative LM and were admitted to our hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were included in the non-occurrence and occurrence groups, respectively. The immune status of the patients and the expression of tumor factor-related indicators in the two groups were compared, and the predictive value of the indicators for postoperative LM in patients with CC was analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-occurrence group, the expression of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA19-9, CA242, CA72-4 and CA50 in patients in the occurrence group were significantly higher, while the expression of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, natural killer (NK) and CD4+/CD25 in patients in the occurrence group were significantly lower (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in other baseline data between groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression model analysis revealed that the expressions of CEA, CA19-9, CA242, CA72-4, CA50, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, NK, and CD4+/CD25 were associated with the LM in patients with CC. High expressions of serum CEA, CA19-9, CA242, CA72-4 and CA50, and low expressions of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, NK, and CD4+/CD25 in patients with CC were risk factors for LM (OR > 1, P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under curve for CEA, CA19-9, CA242, CA72-4, CA50, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, NK, and CD4+/CD25 in the prediction of LM in patients with CC were all > 0.80, with a high predictive value.

CONCLUSION

The expression of tumor factors and immune state-related indices in patients with CC is closely associated with the occurrence of LM.

Timing of restoration of bowel continuity after decompressing stoma, in left-sided obstructive colon cancer: a nationwide retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of decompressing stoma as a bridge to surgery for left-sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC), the timing of restoration of bowel continuity (ROBC) is a subject of debate. There is a lack of data on immediate ROBC during elective resection as an alternative for a 3-stage procedure. This study analysed if immediate ROBC during tumour resection is safe and of any benefit for patients who underwent decompressing stoma for LSOCC.

METHODS

In a Dutch nationwide collaborative research project, 3153 patients who underwent resection for LSOCC in 75 hospitals (2009-2016) were identified. Extensive data on disease and procedural characteristics, and outcomes was collected by local collaborators. For this analysis, 332 patients who underwent decompressing stoma followed by curative resection were selected. Immediate ROBC during tumour resection was compared to two no immediate ROBC groups, (1) tumour resection with primary anastomosis (PA) with leaving the decompressing stoma in situ, and (2) tumour resection without PA.

RESULTS

Immediate ROBC was performed in 113 patients (34.0%) and no immediate ROBC in 219 patients [168 with PA (50.6%) and 51 patients without PA (15.4%)]. No differences at baseline between the groups were found for age, ASA score, cT, and cM. Major surgical complications (8.8% immediate ROBC vs. 4.8% PA with decompressing stoma and 7.8% no PA; P =0.37) and mortality (2.7% vs. 2.4% and 0%, respectively; P =0.52) were similar. Immediate ROBC resulted in a shorter time with a stoma (mean 41 vs. 240 and 314 days, respectively; P <0.001), and fewer permanent stomas (7% vs. 21% and 80%, respectively; P <0.001) as compared to PA with a decompressing stoma or no PA.

CONCLUSION

After a decompressing stoma for LSOCC, immediate ROBC during elective resection appears safe, reduces the total time with a stoma and the risk of a permanent stoma.