1
|
Bizoń M, Olszewski M, Grabowska A, Mawlichanów K, Pilka R. Robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: first Polish experience. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:14. [PMID: 38216814 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01752-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
In Poland, robotic surgery is nowadays perceived as a new method of surgical treatment in endometrial cancer patients. We aim to present the first Polish group of endometrial cancer patients treated using robotic surgery. The analysis was based on 79 patients with mean age of 59.72 ± 11.709 (range 27-83) years and endometrial cancer scheduled for surgical treatment. Mean BMI was 31.38 ± 8.78 (range 19.03-65.97) kg/m2. The data were collected based on a questionnaire consisting of 19 questions concerning the patient's perception of robotic surgery before the procedure. Patients with a family history of neoplastic diseases indicate precision of movements as the most important reason for choosing robotic surgery (p = 0.0035). Patients after surgery procedures in the past named shorter hospitalization as a major benefit (p = 0.0037). Patients who chose robotic surgery for financial reasons stressed the cosmetic effect as a priority (p = 0.0319). Shorter length of hospital stay, less blood loss, enlarged view, and good visualization were statistically significant reasons for choosing robotic surgery (p < 0.05). Women who consider work, good material status, and well-being as the most important aspects of their lives cited the cosmetic effect as a benefit of robotic surgery (p = 0.0029 vs. p = 0.0074 vs. p = 0.01745, respectively). In the follow-up after operations, no patients regretted choosing robotic surgery. Good visualization, precise movements, less blood loss, and cosmetic effects are the most frequent reasons for choosing robotic surgery. Even patients after other types of surgery in the past decided on robot-assisted radical hysterectomy because of the clear benefits of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Bizoń
- LUX MED Oncology Hospital, św. Wincentego 103, Warsaw, Poland.
- Neohospital, Kostrzewskiego 47, Cracow, Poland.
- Lazarski University, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Maciej Olszewski
- LUX MED Oncology Hospital, św. Wincentego 103, Warsaw, Poland
- Neohospital, Kostrzewskiego 47, Cracow, Poland
- Lazarski University, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Krzysztof Mawlichanów
- Neohospital, Kostrzewskiego 47, Cracow, Poland
- Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Cracow, Poland
| | - Radovan Pilka
- Neohospital, Kostrzewskiego 47, Cracow, Poland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University Medical Faculty, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mothes AR, Kather A, Cepraga I, Esber A, Kwetkat A, Runnebaum IB. Robotic-assisted Gynecological Surgery in Older Patients - a Comparative Cohort Study of Perioperative Outcomes. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:437-445. [PMID: 37153652 PMCID: PMC10155232 DOI: 10.1055/a-1902-4577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Study design Because of current demographic developments, a hypothesis was proposed whereby older female patients aged > 65 years can be safely operated using minimally invasive, robotic-assisted surgery, despite having more preoperative comorbidities. A comparative cohort study was designed to compare the age group ≥ 65 years (older age group, OAG) with the age group < 65 years (younger age group, YAG) after robotic-assisted gynecological surgery (RAS) in two German centers. Patients and methods Consecutive RAS procedures performed between 2016 and 2021 at the Women's University Hospital of Jena and the Robotic Center Eisenach to treat benign or oncological indications were included in the study. The age groups were compared according to their preoperative comorbidities (ASA, Charlson comorbidity index [CCI], cumulative illness rating scale - geriatric version [CIRS-G]) and perioperative parameters such as Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of surgical complications. Analysis was performed using Welch's t -test, chi 2 test, and Fisher's exact test. Results A total of 242 datasets were identified, of which 63 (73 ± 5 years) were OAG and 179 were YAG (48 ± 10 years). Patient characteristics and the percentage of benign or oncological indications did not differ between the two age groups. Comorbidity scores and the percentage of obese patients were higher in the OAG group: CCI (2.7 ± 2.0 vs. 1.5 ± 1.3; p < 0.001), CIRS-G (9.7 ± 3.9 vs. 5.4 ± 2.9; p < 0.001), ASA class II/III (91.8% vs. 74.1%; p = 0.004), obesity (54.1% vs. 38.2%; p = 0.030). There was no difference between age groups, even grouped for benign or oncological indications, with regard to perioperative parameters such as duration of surgery (p = 0.088; p = 0.368), length of hospital stay (p = 0.786; p = 0.814), decrease in Hb levels (p = 0.811; p = 0.058), conversion rate (p = 1.000; p = 1.000) and CD complications (p = 0.433; p = 0.745). Conclusion Although preoperative comorbidity was higher in the group of older female patients, no differences were found between age groups with regard to perioperative outcomes following robotic-assisted gynecological surgery. Patient age is not a contraindication for robotic gynecological surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke R. Mothes
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Robotisches Zentrum, St. Georg Klinikum Eisenach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus des Universitätsklinikums Jena, Eisenach, Germany
| | - Angela Kather
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Irina Cepraga
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Robotisches Zentrum, St. Georg Klinikum Eisenach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus des Universitätsklinikums Jena, Eisenach, Germany
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Anke Esber
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Robotisches Zentrum, St. Georg Klinikum Eisenach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus des Universitätsklinikums Jena, Eisenach, Germany
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Anja Kwetkat
- Klinik für Geriatrie und Palliativmedizin, Klinikum Osnabrück GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Ingo B. Runnebaum
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
- Correspondence Prof. Dr. Ingo B. Runnebaum, MBA Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin,
Universitätsklinikum JenaAm Klinikum 107747
JenaGermany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marchand G, Taher Masoud A, Ware K, Govindan M, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Calteux N, Coriell C, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, Filippelli C, Loli H, Sainz K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing gynecologic laparoscopic procedures with and without robotic assistance. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 265:30-38. [PMID: 34418694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Following the publication of several high quality randomized controlled trials regarding the comparison of similar laparoscopic gynecologic procedures being performed with or without robotic assistance, we aimed to perform a systematic review to identify any differences in patient safety and expected incidence of complications in these procedures. DATA SOURCES Articles on ClinicalTrials.Gov, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were retrieved and screened for eligibility up to April 1st 2021. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION In addition to meeting our screening algorithm, we included studies that met all the following: randomized control trials (RCT), enrolling patients for indicated laparoscopic gynecologic procedures, and comparing Robotic Surgery (RS) with Laparoscopic Surgery (LS) in terms of safety or complications. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Data was pooled as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Ultimately, six studies were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data revealed that RS and LS have similar risk for intraoperative complications (RR = 0.87; 95% CI [0.23, 3.36], P = 0.84), postoperative complications (RR = 1.07; 95% CI [0.57, 2.01], P = 0.83), significant intraoperative hemorrhage (RR = 1.40; 95% CI [0.59, 3.34], P = 0.44), postoperative hemorrhage (RR = 0.43; 95% CI [0.15, 1.22], P = 0.11), vaginal cuff dehiscence (RR = 1.13; 95% CI [0.24, 5.41], P = 0.88), postoperative wound infection, urinary tract infection, and urinary bladder or ureteral injury. RS had "surgeon declared" lower estimated blood loss (MD = 85.27; 95% CI [46.45, 124.09], P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (MD = 1.20; 95% CI [0.38, 2.01], P = 0.004). CONCLUSION There was a statistically significant decrease in hospital stay and "surgeon declared" blood loss seen in the RS group. There was no statistically significant increase in risk of developing other postoperative complications between the LS and R groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Marchand
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA.
| | - Ahmed Taher Masoud
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA; Fayoum University Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum, Egypt
| | - Kelly Ware
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA; International University of Health Sciences, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis
| | - Malini Govindan
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA
| | - Alexa King
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA
| | - Stacy Ruther
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA
| | - Giovanna Brazil
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA
| | - Nicolas Calteux
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA
| | | | - Hollie Ulibarri
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA
| | - Julia Parise
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA
| | - Amanda Arroyo
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA
| | - Candace Filippelli
- Midwestern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, AZ, USA
| | - Helen Loli
- Midwestern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, AZ, USA
| | - Katelyn Sainz
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
AI applications in robotics, diagnostic image analysis and precision medicine: Current limitations, future trends, guidelines on CAD systems for medicine. INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE UNLOCKED 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
|
5
|
Giannini A, Malacarne E, Sergiampietri C, Mannella P, Perutelli A, Cela V, Stomati M, Melfi F, Simoncini T. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and technical features using da Vinci Si and Xi robotic platforms for early stages of endometrial cancer. J Robot Surg 2020; 15:195-201. [PMID: 32447594 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01091-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
We directly compared perioperative outcomes and technical features between previous da Vinci Si and the newer Xi robotic platform during total hysterectomy plus salpingo-oophorectomy with or without lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer. We retrospectively analyzed147 patients with histological confirmation of endometrial carcinoma stage IA: grade 1-2, 3 and stage IB: grade 1-2 who underwent surgery with da Vinci Si or Xi system between January 2016 and December 2018. Perioperative data, technical features and postoperative complications were considered. 91 patients underwent surgery with the Si system and 56 with the Xi system. Docking time using the Xi system was significantly shorter (p < 0.002), while overall operating time was similar. There were no significant differences in the number of harvested lymph nodes, conversion rate, mean hospital stay, complications, and technical aspects between the two groups. Our study detected similar perioperative outcomes and the trend toward shorter docking and operating time for Xi over Si robot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Giannini
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elisa Malacarne
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Claudia Sergiampietri
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paolo Mannella
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Perutelli
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vito Cela
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Massimo Stomati
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Francavilla Fontana Hospital, Francavilla Fontana, Italy
| | - Franca Melfi
- Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital Cisanello, Pisa, Italy
| | - Tommaso Simoncini
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang LL, Yan PJ, Yao L, Liu R, Hou F, Chen XH, Han LL, Xu LY, Xu H, Li J, Guo TK, Yang KH, Wang HL. Evaluation of intra- and post-operative outcomes to compare robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopy for gynecologic oncology. Asian J Surg 2019; 43:347-353. [PMID: 31229360 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopy for gynecologic oncology regarding intra- and post-operative outcomes. METHODS A retrospective study was performed on consecutive patients with gynecologic oncology from February 2014 to October 2017 at Gansu Provincial Hospital, China. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were performed to explore the difference between two surgeries in the surgical outcomes after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS 276 women were included in this study: 153 robot-assisted surgeries and 123 conventional laparoscopies. The multivariable linear regression model showed that robot-assisted surgery was longer operative time [coefficient (coef), 33.76; 95% CI, 12.47, 55.05; P = 0.002) ], higher lymph node yield (coef, 10.41; 95% CI, 7.47, 13.35; P < 0.001), shorter time to early post-operative feeding (coef, -1.09; 95% CI, -1.33, -0.84; P < 0.001) and less post-operative drainage volume (coef, -368.77; 95% CI, -542.46, -195.09; P < 0.001) than conventional laparoscopy. However, no difference was observed between the two surgeries regarding the estimated blood loss (P > 0.05). The multivariable logistic regression model showed that post-operative complications were similar between robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopy (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Robot-assisted surgery was superior to conventional laparoscopy regarding intra- and post-operative outcomes for gynecologic oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liu-Li Wang
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, PR China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, PR China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, PR China
| | - Pei-Jing Yan
- Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, PR China
| | - Liang Yao
- Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, PR China
| | - Rong Liu
- The Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, PR China
| | - Fan Hou
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, PR China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, PR China
| | - Xiao-Hong Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, PR China
| | - Liang-Liang Han
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China
| | - Li-Yuan Xu
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, PR China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, PR China
| | - Hui Xu
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China
| | - Jing Li
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China
| | - Tian-Kang Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, PR China.
| | - Ke-Hu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, PR China; Key laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, PR China.
| | - Hai-Lin Wang
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, PR China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jørgensen SL, Mogensen O, Wu C, Lund K, Iachina M, Korsholm M, Jensen PT. Nationwide Introduction of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Its Association With Severe Complications. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:530-538. [PMID: 30810740 PMCID: PMC6584253 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery (MILS) for endometrial cancer reduces surgical morbidity compared with a total abdominal hysterectomy. However, only a minority of women with early-stage endometrial cancer undergo MILS. Objective To evaluate the association between the Danish nationwide introduction of minimally invasive robotic surgery (MIRS) and severe complications in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants In this nationwide prospective cohort study of 5654 women with early-stage endometrial cancer who had undergone surgery during the period from January 1, 2005, to June 30, 2015, data from the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database were linked with national registers on socioeconomic status, deaths, hospital diagnoses, and hospital treatments. The women were divided into 2 groups; group 1 underwent surgery before the introduction of MIRS in their region, and group 2 underwent surgery after the introduction of MIRS. Women with an unknown disease stage, an unknown association with MIRS implementation, unknown histologic findings, sarcoma, or synchronous cancer were excluded, as were women who underwent vaginal or an unknown surgical type of hysterectomy. Statistical analysis was conducted from February 2, 2017, to May 4, 2018. Exposure Minimally invasive robotic surgery, MILS, or total abdominal hysterectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures Severe complications were dichotomized and encompassed death within 30 days after surgery and intraoperative and postoperative complications diagnosed within 90 days after surgery. Results A total of 3091 women (mean [SD] age, 67 [10] years) were allocated to group 1, and a total of 2563 women (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years) were allocated to group 2. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, the odds of severe complications were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11-1.74). The proportion of women undergoing MILS was 14.1% (n = 436) in group 1 and 22.2% in group 2 (n = 569). The proportion of women undergoing MIRS in group 2 was 50.0% (n = 1282). In group 2, multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that a total abdominal hysterectomy was associated with increased odds of severe complications compared with MILS (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.80-3.70) and MIRS (OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 2.52-5.93). No difference was found for MILS compared with MIRS (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.99-2.27). Conclusions and Relevance The national introduction of MIRS changed the surgical approach for early-stage endometrial cancer from open surgery to minimally invasive surgery. This change in surgical approach was associated with a significantly reduced risk of severe complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siv Lykke Jørgensen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ole Mogensen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Chunsen Wu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ken Lund
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Research Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Maria Iachina
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Research Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Malene Korsholm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Danish Centre for Health Economics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Pernille Tine Jensen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lundin ES, Wodlin NB, Nilsson L, Kjölhede P. A prospective randomized assessment of quality of life between open and robotic hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:ijgc-2019-000285. [PMID: 30923082 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are limited prospective data on the evaluation of quality of life in patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Our objective was to determine whether post-operative recovery differs between robotic and abdominal hysterectomy. METHODS At a Swedish tertiary referral university hospital, 50 women with low-risk endometrial cancer scheduled for surgery between February 2012 and May 2016 were included in a randomized trial. Surgery was performed according to principles for minimal invasive surgery. Anesthesia and peri-operative care followed a standardized enhanced recovery after surgery program in both groups. The EuroQol Group form EQ-5D and the Short Form-36 were used to evaluate patients' health-related quality of life. The Swedish Postoperative Symptoms Questionnaire assessed symptoms pre-operatively, daily for 7 days from the day of surgery, and then weekly until 6 weeks post-operatively. Data were analyzed by means of non-parametric tests and repeated measures ANOVA. To evaluate the time-dependent occurrence of complications, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional-hazard models were used. RESULTS A total of 50 women were enrolled in the study (25 robotic and 25 abdominal hysterectomy). Median age (68 years vs 67 years), estimated blood loss (50 mL vs 50 mL), length of hospital stay de facto (53 hours vs 51 hours), and time to meet discharge criteria (36 hours vs 36 hours) in the robotic and abdominal groups, respectively, did not differ significantly (p>0.05) Women in the robotic hysterectomy group recovered significantly faster (p=0.01) in the EQ-5D health index, and reached their pre-operative level after approximately 3 weeks, nearly 2 weeks earlier than the abdominal group. Differences regarding improvement in health-related quality of life (Short Form-36) were statistically significant in general health and social functioning only, and were in favor of robotic hysterectomy. Consumption of analgesics, pain intensity, and symptom sum score post-operatively were equal. Occurrence of complications was an independent risk factor and influenced significantly the EQ-5D health index, length of hospital stay, pain intensity, opioid consumption, and symptom sum score adversely. CONCLUSION Robotic hysterectomy in the setting of an enhanced recovery after surgery program led to faster recovery in health-related quality of life compared with abdominal hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Serreyn Lundin
- Children and Women's Health, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ninnie Borendal Wodlin
- Children and Women's Health, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Lena Nilsson
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Preben Kjölhede
- Children and Women's Health, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity. Surg Endosc 2018; 33:353-365. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6473-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
10
|
Costs of Robotic-Assisted Versus Traditional Laparoscopy in Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27:1788-1793. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
11
|
Mäenpää MM, Nieminen K, Mäenpää JU. Reply. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216:619-620. [PMID: 28143701 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Minna M Mäenpää
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Kari Nieminen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Johanna U Mäenpää
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tampere University Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kristensen SE, Mosgaard BJ, Rosendahl M, Dalsgaard T, Bjørn SF, Frøding LP, Kehlet H, Høgdall CK, Lajer H. Robot-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology: current status and controversies on patient benefits, cost and surgeon conditions - a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96:274-285. [DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Berit J. Mosgaard
- Gynecological Department; The Juliane Marie Center; Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Mikkel Rosendahl
- Gynecological Department; The Juliane Marie Center; Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Tórur Dalsgaard
- Gynecological Department; The Juliane Marie Center; Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Signe F. Bjørn
- Gynecological Department; The Juliane Marie Center; Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Ligita P. Frøding
- Gynecological Department; The Juliane Marie Center; Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Section for Surgical Pathophysiology; Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Claus K. Høgdall
- Faculty of Medicine; University of Copenhagen Health Science; Copenhagen Denmark
- Gynecological Department; The Juliane Marie Center; Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Henrik Lajer
- Gynecological Department; The Juliane Marie Center; Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Robot-assisted laparoscopic colpectomy in female-to-male transgender patients; technique and outcomes of a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:3363-3369. [PMID: 27844235 PMCID: PMC5501901 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5333-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gender-affirming surgeries in female-to-male (FtM) transgender patients include mostly hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and mastectomy. Sometimes further surgery is performed, such as phalloplasty. Colpectomy may be performed to overcome gender dysphoria and disturbing vaginal discharge; furthermore, it may be important in reducing the risk of fistulas due to the phalloplasty procedure with urethral elongation. Colpectomy prior to the reconstruction of the neourethra seems to reduce fistula rates on the very first anastomosis. Therefore, at our center, colpectomy has become a standard procedure prior to phalloplasty and metoidioplasty with urethral elongation. Colpectomy is known as a procedure with potentially serious complications, e.g., extensive bloodloss, vesicovaginal fistula or rectovaginal fistula. Colpectomy performed via the vaginal route can be a challenging procedure due to lack of exposure of the surgical field, as many patients are virginal. Therefore, we investigated whether robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TLH-BSO) followed by robot-assisted laparoscopic colpectomy (RaLC) is an alternative for the vaginal approach. METHODS Robot TLH/BSO and RaLC as a single-step procedure was performed in 36 FtM patients in a prospective cohort study. RESULTS Median length of the procedure was 230 min (197-278), which reduced in the second half of the patients, median blood loss was 75 mL (30-200), and median discharge was 3 days (2-3) postoperatively. One patient with a major complication (postoperative bleeding with readmission and transfusion) was reported. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first report of RaLC. Our results show that RaLC combined with robot TLH-BSO is feasible as a single-step surgical procedure in FtM transgender surgery. Future studies are needed to compare this technique to the two-step surgical approach and on its outcome and complication rates of subsequent phalloplasty.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mäenpää MM, Nieminen K, Tomás EI, Laurila M, Luukkaala TH, Mäenpää JU. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215:588.e1-588.e7. [PMID: 27288987 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Revised: 05/29/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies comparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery to traditional laparoscopic or open surgery in gynecologic oncology have been retrospective. To our knowledge, no prospective randomized trials have thus far been performed on endometrial cancer. OBJECTIVE We sought to prospectively compare traditional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer. STUDY DESIGN This was a randomized controlled trial. From December 2010 through October 2013, 101 endometrial cancer patients were randomized to hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy either by robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery or by traditional laparoscopy. The primary outcome measure was overall operation time. The secondary outcome measures included total time spent in the operating room, and surgical outcome (number of lymph nodes harvested, complications, and recovery). The study was powered to show at least a 25% difference in the operation time using 2-sided significance level of .05. The differences between the traditional laparoscopy and the robotic surgery groups were tested by Pearson χ2 test, Fisher exact test, or Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS In all, 99 patients were eligible for analysis. The median operation time in the traditional laparoscopy group (n = 49) was 170 (range 126-259) minutes and in the robotic surgery group (n = 50) was 139 (range 86-197) minutes, respectively (P < .001). The total time spent in the operating room was shorter in the robotic surgery group (228 vs 197 minutes, P < .001). In the traditional laparoscopy group, there were 5 conversions to laparotomy vs none in the robotic surgery group (P = .027). There were no differences as to the number of lymph nodes removed, bleeding, or the length of postoperative hospital stay. Four (8%) vs no (0%) patients (P = .056) had intraoperative complications and 5 (10%) vs 11 (22%) (P = .111) had major postoperative complications in the traditional and robotic surgery groups, respectively. CONCLUSION In patients with endometrial cancer, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery was faster to perform than traditional laparoscopy. Also total time spent in the operation room was shorter in the robotic surgery group and all conversions to laparotomy occurred in the traditional laparoscopy group. Otherwise, the surgical outcome was similar between the groups. Robotic surgery offers an effective and safe alternative in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
|
15
|
Health-related quality of life after robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer — A prospective cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 140:107-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2015] [Revised: 10/30/2015] [Accepted: 10/31/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
16
|
Hoste G, Van Trappen P. Robotic hysterectomy using the Vessel Sealer for myomatous uteri: technique and clinical outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 194:241-4. [PMID: 26454809 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Revised: 09/05/2015] [Accepted: 09/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Robotic procedures using the Vessel Sealer are not well reported in the literature, especially given the advantages of sealing devices already studied in standard laparoscopic procedures. This study reports our experience with the EndoWrist(®) One™ Vessel Sealer in robotic hysterectomy for myomatous uteri. STUDY DESIGN In this retrospective cohort study of the first 50 consecutive patients with myomatous uteri undergoing a robotic hysterectomy, we report our experience with the EndoWrist(®) One™ Vessel Sealer (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) during this procedure. The learning curve was evaluated, and the operative times as well as the complications were recorded. RESULTS After the first 10 cases, the median console and total (skin-to-skin) operative time dropped significantly from 110 to 60min and from 158 to 105min, respectively (p=0.018 and p=0.008 respectively). The body mass index (≤ or >30kg/m(2)), uterine weight (≤ or >250g), and uterine size had no statistical significant effect on the total operative time. Median blood loss during surgery was 63mL in all cases (range: 0-400mL). The morbidity was low, and approximately 50% of cases could be discharged from the hospital after one to two days. CONCLUSION Robotic hysterectomy using the Vessel Sealer has, after a short learning curve of 10 cases, similar operative times than other published reports on robotic hysterectomy or laparoscopic hysterectomy using a sealing device for myomatous or large uteri.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Griet Hoste
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, AZ Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium
| | - Philippe Van Trappen
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, AZ Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|