1
|
Guasch Arévalo E, Brogly N. Intravenous remifentanil for labour analgesia: is it effective, safe, and feasible? REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2023; 70:487-490. [PMID: 37865140 DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- E Guasch Arévalo
- Sección Anestesia-Reanimación Obstétrica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid; Comité de Anestesia Obstétrica de la Federación Mundial de Sociedades de Anestesia (WFSA); Board Europeo de Anestesia de la Unión Europea de Médicos Especialistas (EBA-UEMS); Board y Council WFSA, Spain.
| | - N Brogly
- Servicio Anestesia-Reanimación, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid; Servicio de Anestesia, Hospital Universitario La Zarzuela; Madrid; Sección de Anestesia Obstétrica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesia-Reanimación (SEDAR); Subforum de Anestesia obstétrica Sociedad Europea de Anestesia y Cuidados Intensivos (ESAIC); Chair SubComité Parte 1 del Diploma Europeo Anestesia y Cuidados intensivos (EDAIC part 1) de la Sociedad Europea de Anestesia y Cuidados Intensivos (ESAIC), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lei X, Yu Y, Li M, Fang P, Gan S, Yao Y, Zhou Y, Kang X. The efficacy and safety of remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia in labor: A meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0275716. [PMID: 36534641 PMCID: PMC9762599 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (rPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) has been used for pain relief in labor. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rPCA versus EA in labor, to provide evidence support for clinical analgesia and pain care. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Weipu databases for RCTs comparing rPCA and EA in labor until February 15, 2022. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data. RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS A total of 10 RCTs involving 3086 parturients were enrolled, 1549 parturients received rPCA and 1537 received EA. Meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of intrapartum maternal fever within 1 hour of labor analgesia (OR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.30~0.62), after 1 hour of labor analgesia (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.20~0.90) in the rPCA was significantly less than that of EA (all P<0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression (OR = 3.56, 95%CI: 2.45~5.16, P<0.001) in the rPCA was significantly higher than that of EA. There were no significant differences in the incidence of Apgar scores<7 at 5 minutes (OR = 1.18, 95%CI: 0.71~1.96, P = 0.53), the patients' satisfaction of pain relief during labor analgesia (SMD = 0.03, 95%CI: -0.40~0.46, P = 0.90) between rPCA and EA (all P>0.05). CONCLUSION rPCA can be an optional alternative to EA with similar pain relief and less risk of intrapartum maternal fever. However, rPCA was associated with increased risk of respiratory depression. Future studies with rigorous design and larger sample size are needed to provide more reliable evidences for clinical rPCA and EA use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuzhen Lei
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mei Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Peng Fang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shuyuan Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yongxing Yao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yanfeng Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xianhui Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 277:53-56. [PMID: 35998385 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the potential association between remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) or epidural analgesia (EA), and caesarean section (CS) rate, operative vaginal delivery rate (OVD), operative delivery (OD) rate (CS or OVD) with pathological cardiotocography (CTG) tracing, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min after birth, incidence of perinatal asphyxia and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) labour types; group 1: nulliparous, singleton cephalic, ≥37 weeks, spontaneous onset of labour; group 2a: nulliparous, singleton cephalic, ≥37 weeks, induction of labour; group 3: multiparous, singleton cephalic, ≥37 weeks, spontaneous onset of labour; group 4a: multipara, singleton cephalic, ≥37 weeks, induction of labour). We hypothesized that labour and delivery outcomes between RPCA and EA would differ within the different TGCS labour types. STUDY DESIGN 10,561 deliveries (4876 with RPCA, 5685 with EA) at the University Clinical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia, from 2015 through 2019 were analysed using the Slovenian National Perinatal Information System data. RESULTS Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower CS and OVD rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 1) (CS: 9.9 % vs14.3 %; P < 0.001) (OVD: 5.1 % vs 8.4 %; P < 0.001), in nulliparous women with induced labour (group 2a) (CS: 14.8 % vs 24.2 %; P < 0.001) (OVD: 6.5 % vs 8.9 %; P = 0.036) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3) (CS: 1.1 % vs 2.4 %; P = 0.021) (OVD: 0.1 % vs 0.8 %; P = 0.007), respectively. RPCA was associated with a lower incidence of OD with pathologic CTG in all four studied groups (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). No differences in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, neonatal asphyxia, and NICU admission were recorded between the two analgesic techniques within any of the TGCS groups. CONCLUSION Compared to EA, RPCA was not associated with worse delivery and neonatal outcomes within any of the four studied TGCS groups. RPCA could be used for labour analgesia routinely if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ronel I, Weiniger CF. A broadening choice for labor analgesia: remifentanil on the á la carte menu. Int J Obstet Anesth 2019; 39:1-6. [PMID: 31230989 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- I Ronel
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - C F Weiniger
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Drzymalski DM, Lumbreras-Marquez MI, Tsen LC, Camann WR, Farber MK. The effect of patient-selected or preselected music on anxiety during cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 33:4062-4068. [PMID: 30880522 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1594766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Background: Women undergoing cesarean delivery may have significant anxiety prior to surgery. Nonpharmacological approaches to anxiety reduction are favored in this patient population.Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of patient-selected or preselected music on anxiety in parturients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery.Materials and methods: This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial (IRB protocol #2015P002043; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02732964), of 150 parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Parturients were randomized to patient-selected music (Pandora®), preselected music (Mozart), or no music (control). The primary outcome was anxiety after music exposure (versus no music) in the preoperative holding room. Secondary outcomes included postoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction.Results: Baseline anxiety and anxiety following preoperative exposure did not differ in the Pandora versus control group (3.8 ± 2.4 versus 4.6 ± 2.6, mean difference -0.8 [95% CI -1.8 to 0.2], p = .12), but was lower in the Mozart group versus control group (3.5 ± 2.5 versus 4.6 ± 2.5, mean difference -1.1 [95% CI -2.2 to -0.1], p = .03). Postoperative anxiety did not differ in the Pandora versus control group (1.0 ± 1.4 versus 1.3 ± 2.0, mean difference -0.3 [95% CI -1.0 to 0.4], p = .43), or in the Mozart versus control group (0.8 ± 1.3 versus 1.3 ± 2.0, mean difference -0.5 [95% CI -1.2 to 0.2], p = .15). Postoperative pain was not different in the Pandora group versus control group (0.8 ± 1.5 versus 1.4 ± 1.9, mean difference -0.6 [95% CI -1.3 to 0.1], p = .10), but was lower in the Mozart versus control group (0.6 ± 1.3 versus 1.4 ± 1.9, mean difference -0.8 [95% CI -1.4 to -0.1], p = .03). Total patient satisfaction scores were not different among the control, Pandora, and Mozart groups.Conclusion: While preselected Mozart music results in lower anxiety prior to cesarean delivery, patient-selected Pandora music does not. Further investigation to determine how music affects patients, clinicians, and the operating room environment during cesarean delivery is warranted.Clinical trial registration: NCT02732964.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Michael Drzymalski
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mario Isaac Lumbreras-Marquez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lawrence Ching Tsen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William Reid Camann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michaela Kristina Farber
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Although it is the most effective method to treat labor pain, neuraxial analgesia may be undesired, contraindicated, unsuccessful, or unavailable. Providing safe choices for labor pain relief is a central goal of health care providers alike. Consequently, knowledge of the efficacy, clinical implementation, and side effects of various non-neuraxial strategies is needed to provide appropriate options for laboring patients. In addition to nonpharmacologic alternatives, inhaled nitrous oxide and systemic opioids represent two broad classes of non-neuraxial pharmacologic labor analgesia most commonly available. This review summarizes the current published literature for these non-neuraxial labor analgesic options.
Collapse
|
7
|
Camann W. Pain, Pain Relief, Satisfaction and Excellence in Obstetric Anesthesia: A Surprisingly Complex Relationship. Anesth Analg 2018; 124:383-385. [PMID: 28098685 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000001676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- William Camann
- From the Department of Obstetric Anesthesiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Melber AA, Sia ATH. “Do no harm” - Where to place remifentanil for labour analgesia? TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tacc.2017.10.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
9
|
Nilvér H, Begley C, Berg M. Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17:203. [PMID: 28662645 PMCID: PMC5492707 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women's childbirth experience can have immediate as well as long-term positive or negative effects on their life, well-being and health. When evaluating and drawing conclusions from research results, women's experiences of childbirth should be one aspect to consider. Researchers and clinicians need help in finding and selecting the most suitable instrument for their purpose. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically identify and present validated instruments measuring women's childbirth experience. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in January 2016 with a comprehensive search in the bibliographic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, The Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Included instruments measured women's childbirth experiences. Papers were assessed independently by two reviewers for inclusion, and quality assessment of included instruments was made by two reviewers independently and in pairs using Terwee et al's criteria for evaluation of psychometric properties. RESULTS In total 5189 citations were screened, of which 5106 were excluded by title and abstract. Eighty-three full-text papers were reviewed, and 37 papers were excluded, resulting in 46 included papers representing 36 instruments. These instruments demonstrated a wide range in purpose and content as well as in the quality of psychometric properties. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review provides an overview of existing instruments measuring women's childbirth experiences and can support researchers to identify appropriate instruments to be used, and maybe adapted, in their specific contexts and research purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Nilvér
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecily Begley
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marie Berg
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pan Z, Qi Y, Wen Y, Chen L. Intravenous morphine titration as a rapid and efficient analgesia for adult patients with femoral shaft fractures after injury. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34:2107-2111. [PMID: 27524680 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Revised: 07/15/2016] [Accepted: 07/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of intravenous ibuprofen and intravenous morphine titration for femoral shaft fractures in adult patients. In total, 293 participants were enrolled and randomly received intravenous ibuprofen or intravenous morphine titration. Their visual analogue scale (VAS) results were recorded every 5 minutes after the first administration. The VAS scores before and during transport were also measured. Meanwhile, the type and frequency of the adverse effects were also recorded in both groups. Patients treated with morphine showed a faster and greater reduction in the VAS than those in the ibuprofen group within 1 hour after the first administration. Interestingly, intravenous morphine titration provided consistent analgesia even during the further transport. No significant immediate adverse event was observed in all of the participants, except for sedation, which might be beneficial for keeping the patient quiet and might not be arbitrarily attributed to adverse effects. No addiction was noted in the morphine group. This study demonstrated that intravenous morphine titration is a faster and more efficient analgesia for femoral shaft fractures than ibuprofen in adult patients immediately after injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengqi Pan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
| | - Yongjian Qi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
| | - Yinxian Wen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
| | - Liaobin Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China.
| |
Collapse
|