Impact of uterine balloon tamponade on the use of invasive procedures in severe postpartum hemorrhage

[Can we predict intrauterine balloon tamponade failure according to the mode of delivery?]

OBJECTIVE

The intrauterine balloon tamponade (IUBT) is one of the major tool to manage the postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Previous studies identified factors predicting IUBT failure regardless the mode of delivery. Our aim was to determine if IUBT predictive failure can be determined regarding the mode of delivery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study among women who had IUBT secondary to severe PPH after vaginal or cesarean delivery from 2012 until 2021 at Lille (France). We compared 2 groups: success or failure of the IUBT, which was defined as the need of additional invasive procedures (uterine embolization or surgical procedure).

RESULTS

We included 238 women, 83 who underwent cesarean and 155 vaginal delivery. The overall success of the IUBT was 78% (80% for vaginal delivery and 75% for cesarean delivery). In the vaginal delivery group with failed IUBT, coagulopathies were significantly more frequent (84.2 vs. 33.3% P=<0.001) with higher estimated blood loss at the use of the IUBT (1865.8 vs. 1580.8mL, P=0.015) compared with the vaginal delivery group with success of IUBT. In the cesarean delivery group, none factor was significant between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to identify predictors of IUBT failure in case of vaginal delivery. In contrast, in case of cesarean delivery, there is no apparent predictive facto. It could be interesting to validate our findings in a multicentric study.

Introduction of the Ellavi uterine balloon tamponade into the Kenyan and Ghanaian maternal healthcare package for improved postpartum haemorrhage management: an implementation research study

OBJECTIVES

Use of intrauterine balloon tamponades for refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) management has triggered recent debate since effectiveness studies have yielded conflicting results. Implementation research is needed to identify factors influencing successful integration into maternal healthcare packages. The Ellavi uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) (Ellavi) is a new low-cost, preassembled device for treating refractory PPH.

DESIGN

A mixed-methods, prospective, implementation research study examining the adoption, sustainability, fidelity, acceptability and feasibility of introducing a newly registered UBT. Cross-sectional surveys were administered post-training and post-use over 10 months.

SETTING

Three Ghanaian (district, regional) and three Kenyan (levels 4-6) healthcare facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

Obstetric staff (n=451) working within participating facilities.

INTERVENTION

PPH management training courses were conducted with obstetric staff.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Facility measures of adoption, sustainability and fidelity and individual measures of acceptability and feasibility.

RESULTS

All participating hospitals adopted the device during the study period and the majority (52%-62%) of the employed obstetric staff were trained on the Ellavi; sustainability and fidelity to training content were moderate. The Ellavi was suited for this context due to high delivery and PPH burden. Dynamic training curriculums led by local UBT champions and clear instructions on the packaging yielded positive attitudes and perceptions, and high user confidence, resulting in overall high acceptability. Post-training and post-use, ≥79% of the trainees reported that the Ellavi was easy to use. Potential barriers to use included the lack of adjustable drip stands and difficulties calculating bag height according to blood pressure. Overall, the Ellavi can be feasibly integrated into PPH care and was preferred over condom catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

The training package and time saving Ellavi design facilitated its adoption, acceptability and feasibility. The Ellavi is appropriate and feasible for use among obstetric staff and can be successfully integrated into the Kenyan and Ghanaian maternal healthcare package.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT04502173; NCT05340777.

Risk Factors for Intrauterine Tamponade Failure in Postpartum Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with intrauterine tamponade failure after vaginal or cesarean delivery.

METHODS

This was a nationwide population-based cohort study that used data from the French Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information. This study compared the failure and effectiveness of intrauterine tamponade among all women who received the procedure in France from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. Failure was defined as the use of a second-line method (uterine artery embolization, conservative or radical surgery, or death) within 7 days of intrauterine tamponade. Factors associated with intrauterine tamponade failure were identified by univariate analyses and tested using multivariate generalized logistic regression models (with a random intercept on institution) to obtain adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% CI statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 39,193 patients presented with postpartum hemorrhage in 474 French maternity wards. Of these patients, 1,761 (4.5%) received intrauterine tamponade for persistent bleeding. The effectiveness rate of intrauterine tamponade was 88.9%. For 195 women (11.1%), a second-line method was indicated. Patients for whom intrauterine tamponade failed had a higher maternal age, a lower mean gestational age, and more frequent instances of placental abnormalities, preeclampsia, cesarean birth, and uterine rupture. The multivariate analysis revealed that cesarean birth (aOR 4.2; 95% CI 2.9-6.0), preeclampsia (aOR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.0), and uterine rupture (aOR 14.1; 95% CI 2.4-83.0) were independently associated with intrauterine tamponade failure.

CONCLUSION

Cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, and uterine rupture are associated with intrauterine tamponade failure in the management of postpartum hemorrhage.

Impact of the introduction of a low-cost uterine balloon tamponade (ESM-UBT) device for managing severe postpartum hemorrhage in India: A comparative before-and-after study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of introducing a uterine balloon tamponade (ESM-UBT) device for managing severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), mainly due to uterine atony, in health facilities in India on the rates of PPH-related maternal death and invasive procedures for PPH control.

METHODS

We used a quasi-experimental, difference-in-difference (DID) design to compare changes in the rates of a composite outcome (PPH-related maternal death and/or artery ligation, uterine compression sutures, or hysterectomy) among women delivering in nine intervention facilities compared with those delivering in two control facilities, before and after the introduction of ESM-UBT.

RESULTS

The study sample included 214 123 deliveries (n = 78 509 before ESM-UBT introduction; n = 47 211 during ESM-UBT introduction; and n = 88 403 after ESM-UBT introduction). After introduction of ESM-UBT, there was a significant decline in the rate of the primary composite outcome in intervention facilities (21.0-11.4 per 10 000 deliveries; difference -9.6, 95% confidence interval -14.0 to -5.4). Change in the rate of the primary composite outcome was not significant in control facilities (11.7-17.2 per 10 000 deliveries; difference 5.4, 95% confidence interval -3.9 to 14.9). DID analyses showed there was a significant reduction in the rate of the primary composite outcome in intervention facilities relative to control facilities (adjusted DID estimate -15.0 per 10 000 points, 95% confidence interval -23.3 to -6.8; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Introduction of the ESM-UBT in health facilities in India was associated with a significant reduction in PPH-related maternal death and/or invasive procedures for PPH control.

Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate uterine tamponade devices' effectiveness for atonic refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal birth and the effect of including them in institutional protocols.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, POPLINE, from inception to January 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised and non-randomised comparative studies.

OUTCOMES

Composite outcome including surgical interventions (artery ligations, compressive sutures or hysterectomy) or maternal death, and hysterectomy.

RESULTS

All included studies were at high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low to low. One randomised study measured the effect of the condom-catheter balloon compared with standard care and found unclear results for the composite outcome (relative risk [RR] 2.33, 95% CI 0.76-7.14) and hysterectomy (RR 4.14, 95% CI 0.48-35.93). Three comparative studies assessed the effect of including uterine balloon tamponade in institutional protocols. A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial suggested an increase in the composite outcome (RR 4.08, 95% CI 1.07-15.58) and unclear results for hysterectomy (RR 4.38, 95% CI 0.47-41.09) with the use of the condom-catheter or surgical glove balloon. One non-randomised study showed unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-1.03) and hysterectomy (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.04-5.38) after the inclusion of the Bakri balloon. The second non-randomised study found unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32-2.81) and hysterectomy (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.44-7.69) after the inclusion of Ebb or Bakri balloon.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of uterine tamponade devices for the management of atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery is unclear, as is the role of the type of device and the setting.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Unclear effects of uterine tamponade devices and their inclusion in institutional protocols for atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery.

Predictors of Failed Intrauterine Balloon Tamponade in the Management of Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage

To identify the factors predicting intrauterine balloon tamponade (IUBT) failure for severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) after delivery, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent IUBT for severe PPH after delivery from October 1, 2016 until September 30, 2017. The failure of IUBT was defined as the need of additional surgical procedures or uterine embolization. A total of 99,650 deliveries occurred during the study period. Among the patients, 106 cases of severe PPH were managed with IUBT, and the global success rate was 70.8% (75/106). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was performed to select the potential risk factors predicting IUBT failure. The associated risk factors-obesity, multiple gestation, cesarean delivery, estimated blood loss (EBL), and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)-were included in multivariate logistic models. Ultimately, these models identified multiple gestation, EBL, and PAS as independent risk factors for IUBT failure. In conclusion, IUBT is an effective method for severe PPH. The presence of factors affecting IUBT failure should be recognized early, and other modalities of management should be anticipated.

Intrauterine balloon tamponade in the management of severe postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal delivery: Is the failure early predictable?

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality world-wide. The arrival of intrauterine balloon devices has revolutionised PPH management. However, it seems interesting to know the situations of failure to improve the management. The objective is to define the factors related to failure of intrauterine balloon tamponade (IUBT) in women with a postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal delivery, and especially blood loss after placement to avoid delaying management. Retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2 centers. All PPH after vaginal deliveries treated by IUBT were included. Two groups were defined (successes and failures) and compared. Failure was defined as the need of invasive procedure. Calculated area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and thresholds of bleeding at 10 min were also calculated for prediction of failure. 127 women were included. The overall success rate was 78.0 % (95 % CI 70.7-85.1 %). Blood loss at 10 min was factor prognostic of early IUBT failure. The ROC curve of blood loss at 10 min for prediction of failure of IUBT had an area under the curve of 0.876 (95 % CI 0.782-0.970). The predictive positive value of blood loss at 10 min were respectively 0.53, 0.8 and 0.94 for blood loss of 100, 200 and 250 mL. Physicians should be alerted if blood loss are more than 200 mL at 10 min after placement of IUBT and considered invasive procedure if more than 250 mL to avoid delaying management of PPH.

Efficacy of Intra-Uterine Tamponade Balloon in Post-Partum Hemorrhage after Cesarean Delivery: An Impact Study

Invasive therapies (surgery or radiological embolization) are used to control severe post-partum hemorrhage. The intra-uterine tamponade balloon is a potential alternative, well documented after vaginal delivery. However, available data on its use after cesarean delivery remain scarce. This study assessed the efficacy of the intra-uterine tamponade balloon during post-partum hemorrhage in a cesarean delivery setting. Using a retrospective impact design, post-partum hemorrhage-related outcomes before (“pre-balloon” period) versus after implementation of intra-uterine tamponade balloon (“post-balloon” period) were compared. All women with post-partum hemorrhage requiring potent uterotonic treatment with prostaglandins after cesarean delivery over a 9-year period were eligible. The primary outcome was the rate of invasive procedure (conservative surgery, radiological embolization and/or hysterectomy). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 279 patients were included (140 vs. 139). Most baseline characteristics were comparable between the two studied periods. The success rate of the intra-uterine tamponade balloon was 82%, and no related complications occurred. Rates of invasive procedures and transfusion were significantly reduced (28.6% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.001 and 44.3% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.006 respectively) during the “post-balloon” period, and length of hospital stay was shorter (p < 0.001). Implementation of intra-uterine tamponade balloon during post-partum hemorrhage after cesarean delivery appears to be safe and effective, with a decrease in both invasive procedures and transfusion rates.

[Efficiency of Bakri intra uterine tamponade balloon use in postpartum hemorrhage: Before and after study]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of the introduction of intrauterine balloon tamponade on second-line management practices for post-partum hemorrhage (PPH).

METHOD

This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care centre where arterial embolisation was not available. Two periods were compared, before (2008-2010) and after (2015-2017) the introduction of an intrauterine tamponade balloon protocol using the Bakri balloon. All consecutive patients with PPH refractory to sulprostone in the two periods were included. Outcomes studied were the incidence of invasive procedures (conservative surgery, embolisation, hysterectomy) as well as transfer to centres with arterial embolisation facilities.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients had refractory PPH, 44 in the first period and 65 in the second period. The proportion of all PPH cases which required sulprostone did not differ between the periods (24.2 and 29.3%, respectively, P=0.25). There were significant decreases between the first and the second period in the proportion requiring a transfer to an embolisation centre (79.6% during period 1, vs. 6.2% respectively, P<0.001), embolisation (20.6% vs. 0%, P<0.001), uterine compression sutures (13.6% vs. 3.1% P=0.04) and surgical management (22.7% vs. 7.7%, P=0.025). The decrease in the incidence of hysterectomy did not reach statistical significance (11,4 vs. 1,5%, P=0.095). Among 29 cases of PPH following cesarean sections (14 in the first period and 15 in the second period), we observed a significant decrease in transfer rates (66.7% vs. 0%, P<0.01), as well as decreases in embolisation (26.7% vs. 0%, P=0.10) and invasive procedures (60% vs. 28.7%, P=0.089), which did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of intrauterine tamponade was associated with a decrease in the need for invasive procedures. In a centre without access to on-site arterial embolisation, transfer rates were reduced improving patient comfort and reducing costs.

Impact of intrauterine balloon tamponade on emergency peripartum hysterectomy following vaginal delivery

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of intrauterine balloon tamponade as a second-line technique before resorting to emergency peripartum hysterectomy in cases with severe postpartum hemorrhage and uterotonic treatment failure following vaginal delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective, monocentric study evaluating cases of uterotonic treatment failure with severe postpartum hemorrhage following vaginal delivery between January 2005 and June 2018. Cases of cesarean section, amniotic embolism, uterine rupture, placenta accreta, and postpartum hemorrhage by vaginal laceration were excluded. The primary study outcome was incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy before and after use of intrauterine balloon tamponade was initiated.

RESULTS

Among the 55,776 women who gave birth vaginally at our site during the study period, 161 (0.3 %) had severe postpartum hemorrhage with medical treatment failure (78 during the period prior to intrauterine balloon tamponade use, and 83 after intrauterine balloon tamponade use was initiated). The intrauterine balloon tamponade failure rate was 21.9 % (n = 18). Emergency peripartum hysterectomy was performed in 7 cases prior to intrauterine balloon tamponade use and 2 cases during use of intrauterine balloon tamponade. Thus, we observed a nonsignificant decrease in emergency peripartum hysterectomy after use of intrauterine balloon tamponade was implemented (9.0 % vs. 2.4 %, p = 0.09). However, the decrease was significant among patients who underwent conservative surgical treatment before intrauterine balloon tamponade use (53.8 % vs. 12.5 %, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Though we did not find a significant overall reduction in emergency peripartum hysterectomy following implementation of intrauterine balloon tamponade, there was a decrease in these cases when conservative surgical treatment was followed by intrauterine balloon tamponade.

Experience of Bakri balloon tamponade at a single tertiary centre: a retrospective case series

Intrauterine balloon tamponade (IUBT) is an established fertility-sparing and life-saving treatment for postpartum haemorrhage. However, high-level evidence is lacking for specific aspects of its use. Our aim was to evaluate a large case series of IUBT to inform evidence-based clinical practice. 296 cases of IUBT over a three-year period at a tertiary obstetric referral centre were identified and reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and procedural outcome measures were collected; including rates of success and failure of IUBT, duration of tamponade, and complications. IUBT was successful in 265 (90%) of women and failed in 18 (6%). All failures occurred within six hours of balloon insertion. Once deemed stable and successful at six hours, no women required return to theatre or further intervention. The mean duration of intrauterine balloon tamponade was 18.5 hours. A large variance in clinical practice exists including duration of intrauterine balloon tamponade, and method and timing of removal. A number of changes informed by the results will be introduced and prospectively audited to improve IUBT use.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Intrauterine balloon tamponade (IUBT) is an important second-line treatment option in severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). IUBT is easy to use, is effective especially in the setting of uterine atony, and is associated with minimal complications.What the results of this study add? This study confirms the high rate of success for IUBT in controlling PPH. We found that after six hours, if deemed successful, it is rare that further intervention is required. In addition, tamponade beyond 12 hours, gradual or incremental deflation of the balloon, and antibiotic cover beyond the duration of tamponade are unlikely to yield any further safety benefit.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our findings suggest that women should not be required to fast for balloon removal; removal of the balloon should occur by 12 hours if deemed stable and adequately resuscitated; deflation and removal of the balloon can occur at once; and antibiotics should be ceased after balloon removal. These will allow women to mobilise and recover sooner, and improve flow and throughput in our high-acuity care areas.

[Intrauterine tamponade: Practices and training assessment]

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to describe the practices of a French center regarding the use of intrauterine tamponade. The secondary objective was to describe the training of residents in the use of intrauterine tamponade (IUT).

METHODS

This was a practice survey conducted through an anonymous quiz sent to residents in France between May 1, 2018 and July 1, 2019. Responses from first year residents were excluded. The data concerned the practices of the centers (mode of delivery, mode of insertion, ultrasound control, use of vaginal gauze or antibiotic prophylaxis) as well as the feeling of the residents concerning their training in using of the intrauterine tamponade (frequency, training sessions, learning difficulties).

RESULTS

We obtained 145 responses to represent all regions of France. Responses from 27/28 centres were obtained. All the centres use it during cesarean section and after vaginal delivery. Vaginal gauze is used in 74% of cases and 65% use antibiotic prophylaxis. A specific training during the residentship is described in only 26% of cases and 21% of residents say they have never used an IUT.

CONCLUSION

Intrauterine tamponade is a technique widely used in France, regardless of the mode of delivery. The training of residents is essential, especially since the simulation is perfectly adapted to the learning for using intrauterine tamponade.

Uterine balloon tamponade for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of uterine balloon tamponade for treating postpartum hemorrhage.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched electronic databases (from their inception to August 2019) and bibliographies. We included randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized studies, and case series that reported on the efficacy, effectiveness, and/or safety of uterine balloon tamponade in women with postpartum hemorrhage. The primary outcome was the success rate of uterine balloon tamponade for treating postpartum hemorrhage (number of uterine balloon tamponade success cases/total number of women treated with uterine balloon tamponade). For meta-analyses, we calculated pooled success rate for all studies, and relative risk with 95% confidence intervals for studies that included a comparative arm.

RESULTS

Ninety-one studies, including 4729 women, met inclusion criteria (6 randomized trials, 1 cluster randomized trial, 15 nonrandomized studies, and 69 case series). The overall pooled uterine balloon tamponade success rate was 85.9% (95% confidence interval, 83.9-87.9%). The highest success rates corresponded to uterine atony (87.1%) and placenta previa (86.8%), and the lowest to placenta accreta spectrum (66.7%) and retained products of conception (76.8%). The uterine balloon tamponade success rate was lower in cesarean deliveries (81.7%) than in vaginal deliveries (87.0%). A meta-analysis of 2 randomized trials that compared uterine balloon tamponade vs no uterine balloon tamponade in postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine atony after vaginal delivery showed no significant differences between the study groups in the risk of surgical interventions or maternal death (relative risk, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-16.69). A meta-analysis of 2 nonrandomized before-and-after studies showed that introduction of uterine balloon tamponade in protocols for managing severe postpartum hemorrhage significantly decreased the use of arterial embolization (relative risk, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.63). A nonrandomized cluster study reported that use of invasive procedures was significantly lower in the perinatal network that routinely used uterine balloon tamponade than that which did not use uterine balloon tamponade (3.0/1000 vs 5.1/1000; P < .01). A cluster randomized trial reported that the frequency of postpartum hemorrhage-related invasive procedures and/or maternal death was significantly higher after uterine balloon tamponade introduction than before uterine balloon tamponade introduction (11.6/10,000 vs 6.7/10,000; P = .04). Overall, the frequency of complications attributed to uterine balloon tamponade use was low (≤6.5%).

CONCLUSION

Uterine balloon tamponade has a high success rate for treating severe postpartum hemorrhage and appears to be safe. The evidence on uterine balloon tamponade efficacy and effectiveness from randomized and nonrandomized studies is conflicting, with experimental studies suggesting no beneficial effect, in contrast with observational studies. Further research is needed to determine the most effective programmatic and healthcare delivery strategies on uterine balloon tamponade introduction and use.

The effectiveness and safety of introducing condom-catheter uterine balloon tamponade for postpartum haemorrhage at secondary level hospitals in Uganda, Egypt and Senegal: a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of introducing condom-catheter uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) management in low- and middle-income settings.

DESIGN

Stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial.

SETTING

Eighteen secondary-level hospitals in Uganda, Egypt and Senegal.

POPULATION

Women with vaginal delivery from October 2016 to March 2018.

METHODS

Use of condom-catheter UBT for PPH management was introduced using a half-day training and provision of pre-packaged UBT kits. Hospitals were randomised to when UBT was introduced. The incident rate (IR) of study outcomes was compared in the control (i.e. before UBT) and intervention (i.e. after UBT) periods. Mixed effects regression models accounted for clustering (random effect) and time period (fixed effect).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Combined IR of PPH-related invasive surgery and/or maternal death.

RESULTS

There were 28 183 and 31 928 deliveries in the control and intervention periods, respectively. UBT was used for 9/1357 and 55/1037 women diagnosed with PPH in control and intervention periods, respectively. PPH-related surgery or maternal death occurred in 19 women in the control period (IR = 6.7/10 000 deliveries) and 37 in the intervention period (IR = 11.6/10 000 deliveries). The adjusted IR ratio was 4.08 (95% confidence interval 1.07-15.58). Secondary outcomes, including rates of transfer and blood transfusion, were similar in the trial periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of condom-catheter UBT in these settings did not improve maternal outcomes and was associated with an increase in the combined incidence of PPH-related surgery and maternal death. The lack of demonstrated benefit of UBT introduction with respect to severe outcomes warrants reflection on its role.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Stepped wedge trial shows UBT introduction does not reduce the combined incidence of PPH-related surgery or death.

Comparison of outcome between intrauterine balloon tamponade and uterine artery embolization in the management of persistent postpartum hemorrhage: A propensity score-matched cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of women who were initially managed by intrauterine balloon tamponade or uterine artery embolization because of persistent postpartum hemorrhage demanding an immediate intervention to control bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Propensity score-matched cohort study including women who had intrauterine balloon tamponade or uterine artery embolization as initial management strategy to control persistent postpartum hemorrhage, that is, refractory to first-line therapy combined with at least one uterotonic agent. The primary outcome measure was a composite of peripartum hysterectomy and/or maternal mortality. Secondary outcomes measures were total volume of blood loss and total number of packed red blood cells transfused.

RESULTS

Our 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort comprised of 50 women who had intrauterine balloon tamponade and 50 women who underwent uterine artery embolization at a blood loss between 1000 and 7000 mL. There was no statistically significant difference in the hysterectomy risk between the two groups (n = 6 in each group, odds ratio [OR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] .30-3.34), in total volume of blood loss (median 4500 mL, interquartile range [IQR] 3600-5400) for balloon vs 4000 mL (IQR 3250-5000) for embolization, P = 0.382) or in total units of packed red blood cells transfused (median 7 (IQR 5-10) for balloon vs 6 [IQR 4-9] for embolization, P = 0.319). Fifteen women (30%) who were initially managed by an intrauterine balloon still underwent uterine artery embolization, of whom one had an embolization-related thrombo-embolic event. Maternal mortality occurred in neither of the intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in the risk of peripartum hysterectomy and/or maternal death was observed between women who had intrauterine balloon tamponade and women who underwent uterine artery embolization as an initial management for persistent postpartum hemorrhage. Although this study was underpowered to demonstrate equivalence, our study design provides a framework for future research in which intrauterine balloon tamponade may prove to be a suitable intervention of first choice in the management of persistent postpartum hemorrhage.

Management of postpartum hemorrhage: how to improve maternal outcomes?

Postpartum hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality and severe morbidity. Despite efforts to improve maternal outcomes, management of postpartum hemorrhage still faces at least four challenges, discussed in this review. First, current definitions for severe postpartum hemorrhage hamper early identification of women with a high risk of adverse outcomes. Adaptations to the definitions and the use of clinical tools such as shock index and early warning systems may facilitate this early identification. Second, surgical and radiological interventions to prevent hysterectomy are not always successful. More knowledge on the influence of patient and bleeding characteristics on the success rates of these interventions is necessary. Scarce data suggest that early timing of intrauterine balloon tamponade may improve maternal outcomes, whereas early timing of arterial embolization seems to be unrelated to maternal outcomes. Third, fluid resuscitation with crystalloids and colloids is unavoidable in the early phases of postpartum hemorrhage but may result in dilutional coagulopathy. Effects of different volumes of clear fluids on the occurrence of dilutional coagulopathy and maternal outcomes is unknown. Fourth, a better understanding of diagnosis and correction of coagulopathy during postpartum hemorrhage is needed. Low plasma fibrinogen levels at the start of postpartum hemorrhage predict progression to severe hemorrhage, but standard coagulation screens are time consuming. A solution may be point-of-care coagulation testing; however, clinical usefulness during postpartum hemorrhage has not been demonstrated. To date, early administration of tranexamic acid is the only hemostatic intervention that was proven to improve outcomes in women with postpartum hemorrhage.

Prognostic factors for the use of intrauterine balloon tamponade in the management of severe postpartum hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To identify prognostic factors associated with successful management of severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) using intrauterine balloon tamponade (IUBT).

METHODS

Retrospective review of all cases of severe PPH with blood loss greater than 1 L in a tertiary unit in Hong Kong from July 1, 2012, to June 30, 2017. Records of patients who had undergone IUBT insertion were reviewed. Univariate analysis and logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for successful management with IUBT.

RESULTS

Of 22 860 deliveries during the study period, severe PPH occurred in 1.4% (n=311), and IUBT was attempted in 26.0% (n=81) of these patients. IUBT alone was successful in arresting hemorrhage in 72.8% (n=59), and the overall rate for avoiding hysterectomy was 86.4% (n=70). Presence of coagulopathy (P=0.048) and placenta accreta (P=0.048) were the adverse prognostic factors associated with higher failure rates. Less blood loss (≤1400 mL) at the time of insertion of IUBT and a positive tamponade test (≤50 mL of blood drained from the uterus within the first 30 minutes after insertion of IUBT) were good predictors for success of IUBT.

CONCLUSION

The presence of adverse prognostic factors should prompt early resort to other treatment modalities or hysterectomy as a salvage procedure.

ebb® Complete Tamponade System: effective hemostasis for postpartum hemorrhage

As a leading cause of maternal death, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a worldwide obstetrical problem. However, in most cases, mortality and morbidity can be averted if efforts are immediately undertaken to achieve hemostasis. Uterine balloon tamponade has been shown to provide effective control of PPH and avoid more invasive surgical procedures and even the emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Recent clinical recommendation suggests that balloon tamponade should be considered earlier in the treatment cascade in conjunction with uterotonic agents to ensure hemostasis in the most timely fashion and maximize clinical outcomes. This paper profiles the ebb^® Complete Tamponade System, a unique dual-balloon single-use device that was developed specifically for hemostatic management of PPH. The ebb system combines a uterine conforming balloon that can be rapidly deployed with a vaginal balloon that eliminates the need for vaginal packing. The description, indications for use, procedural steps, and clinical characterization of this device are presented.

Intraluminal pressure of uterine balloon tamponade in the management of severe post-partum hemorrhage

AIM

Intrauterine balloon tamponade has been increasingly used for the management of post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) in recent years. However, data on the precise mechanisms and pressure required for the balloon tamponade are scanty in the literature. This study aims to review the intraluminal pressure (ILP) generated by the Bakri intrauterine balloon that is necessary to produce a 'positive tamponade test' during severe PPH.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. The ILP of the Bakri balloon was measured using a manometer after a positive tamponade test was clinically achieved during severe PPH (blood loss >1 L). The patient's blood pressure was recorded, and ultrasound scan was performed to verify the position of the balloon and the presence of forward flow in the uterine arteries. The main outcome measure is the ILP of the Bakri balloon required to achieve a positive tamponade test.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included for final analysis. The net ILP measured ranged from 67 to 92 mmHg, and this pressure was lower than the concurrent systolic pressure in all cases. Color Doppler confirmed positive forward flow in the uterine vessels in all cases. There were no differences in the pressure measured with the balloon position, and there was no relationship between the volumes of saline infused and the net pressure.

CONCLUSION

A positive tamponade test in an intrauterine balloon is probably achieved by local compression pressure exerted on the vasculature of the placental bed rather than by generating an ILP exceeding systemic blood pressure or by occlusion of flow to the uterine arteries.

Intrauterine Balloon Tamponade for Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rates of invasive procedures (surgical or vascular) for hemorrhage control between a perinatal network that routinely used intrauterine balloon tamponade and another perinatal network that did not in postpartum hemorrhage management.

METHODS

This population-based retrospective cohort study included all women (72,529) delivering between 2011 and 2012 in the 19 maternity units in two French perinatal networks: a pilot (in which balloon tamponade was used) and a control network. Outcomes were assessed based on discharge abstract data from the national French medical information system. General and obstetric characteristics were included in two separate multivariate logistic models according to the mode of delivery (vaginal and cesarean) to estimate the independent association of the network with invasive procedures.

RESULTS

Invasive procedures (pelvic vessel ligation, arterial embolization, hysterectomy) were used in 298 women and in 4.1 per 1,000 deliveries (95% CI 3.7-4.6). The proportion of women with at least one invasive procedure was significantly lower in the pilot network (3.0/1,000 vs 5.1/1,000, P<.01). Among women who delivered vaginally, the use of arterial embolization was also significantly lower in the pilot than the control network (0.2/1,000 vs 3.7/1,000, P<.01) as it was for those who delivered by cesarean (1.3/1,000 vs 5.7/1,000, P<.01). After controlling for potential confounding factors, the risk of an invasive procedure among women who delivered vaginally remained significantly lower in the pilot network (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.14, 95% CI 0.08-0.27), but not for women who delivered by cesarean (adjusted OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87-1.61).

CONCLUSION

The use of intrauterine balloon tamponade in routine clinical practice was associated with a significantly lower use of invasive procedures for hemorrhage control among women undergoing vaginal delivery.