1
|
Hafezi M, Zameni N, Nemati Aghamaleki SZ, Omani-Samani R, Vesali S. Awareness and attitude toward oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons: a study on women candidates for social egg freezing. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 43:532-540. [PMID: 35998044 DOI: 10.1080/0167482x.2022.2090332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study was to investigate awareness and attitudes toward female fertility and aging, desire for a child and motherhood, and oocyte freezing for non-medical reasons among women candidates for Social Egg Freezing (SEF). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a cross-sectional study on all 216 women who sought oocyte cryopreservation for nonmedical reasons at Royan Institute. A 24-item self-administered questionnaire measured knowledge and attitudes to SEF. Responses were as yes/no or a 4-point Likert scale. RESULTS Only 40% of participants accurately indicated that having a sexual partner does not help to preserve their fertility. A quarter of women correctly recalled chance of pregnancy with unprotected intercourse during a period of a year, for women 20 to 40 years old. Only one-third of respondents accurately identified the age-related fertility decline at 35-39 years. Only 6.9% correctly mentioned the low chance of pregnancy after egg freezing at 35 years old. Almost a third of women knew that the age range of 31-35 years is the right age to freeze an egg with the highest chance of pregnancy. Aging and health of offspring were most influential in women's decisions on SEF. CONCLUSION In conclusion, there was significant gaps in knowledge about age-related fertility decline, and egg cryopreservation conditions and its complications. It is crucial to impart to these women a better knowledge about fertility and a realistic picture about SEF, especially on the number of high-quality retrieved mature oocytes and live birth rates depend on women's age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Hafezi
- Department of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nadia Zameni
- School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyyedeh Zahra Nemati Aghamaleki
- Department of Medical Ethics and Law, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Omani-Samani
- Department of Medical Ethics and Law, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Samira Vesali
- Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kasaven LS, Jones BP, Heath C, Odia R, Green J, Petrie A, Saso S, Serhal P, Nagi JB. Reproductive outcomes from ten years of elective oocyte cryopreservation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 306:1753-1760. [PMID: 35988095 PMCID: PMC9519701 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06711-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION To assess the relationship between the number of oocytes retrieved during elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC) cycles with various clinical, biochemical, and radiological markers, including age, body mass index (BMI), baseline anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), Oestradiol level (E2) and total number of follicles ≥ 12 mm on the day of trigger. To also report the reproductive outcomes from women who underwent EOC. METHODS A retrospective cohort of 373 women embarking on EOC and autologous oocyte thaw cycles between 2008 and 2018 from a single London clinic in the United Kingdom. RESULTS 483 stimulation cycles were undertaken amongst 373 women. The median (range) age at cryopreservation was 38 (26-47) years old. The median numbers of oocytes retrieved per cycle was 8 (0-37) and the median total oocytes cryopreserved per woman was 8 (0-45). BMI, E2 level and number of follicles ≥ 12 mm at trigger were all significant predictors of oocyte yield. Multivariate analysis confirmed there was no significant relationship between AFC or AMH, whilst on univariate analysis statistical significance was proven. Thirty six women returned to use their cryopreserved oocytes, of which there were 41 autologous oocyte thaw cycles undertaken. There were 12 successful livebirths achieved by 11 women. The overall livebirth rate was 26.8% per cycle. No livebirths were achieved in women who underwent EOC ≥ 40 years old, and 82% of all livebirths were achieved in women who had done so between 36 and 39 years old. CONCLUSION Clinical, biochemical and radiological markers can predict oocyte yield in EOC cycles. Reproductive outcomes are more favourable when cryopreservation is performed before the age of 36, with lower success rates of livebirth observed in women aged 40 years and above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine S Kasaven
- Department of Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK.
- Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
- Department of Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Department of Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK
- Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Carleen Heath
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS, UK
| | - Rabi Odia
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS, UK
| | - Joycelia Green
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS, UK
| | - Aviva Petrie
- Biostatistics Unit, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, 256 Grays Inn Road, London, WC1X 8LD, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Department of Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK
- Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Paul Serhal
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS, UK
| | - Jara Ben Nagi
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chronopoulou E, Raperport C, Sfakianakis A, Srivastava G, Homburg R. Elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:1177-1186. [PMID: 33608838 PMCID: PMC7894970 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02072-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Women who pursue fertility at an advanced age are increasingly common. Family planning and sexual education have traditionally focused on contraception and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. A focus should now also be placed on fertility awareness and fertility preservation. This manuscript aims to give an update on the existing evidence around elective oocyte cryopreservation, also highlighting the need for fertility education and evidence-based, individualized counselling. METHODS A thorough electronic search was performed from the start of databases to March 2020 aiming to summarize the existing evidence around elective egg freezing, the logic behind its use, patient counselling and education, success rates and risks involved, regulation, cost-effectiveness, current status and future perspectives. RESULTS Clinician-led counselling regarding reproductive aging and fertility preservation is often overlooked. Elective oocyte cryopreservation is not a guarantee of live birth, and the answer regarding cost-effectiveness needs to be individualized. The existing studies on obstetric and perinatal outcomes following the use of egg freezing are, until now, reassuring. Constant monitoring of short-term and long-term outcomes, uniform regulation and evidence-based, individualized counselling is of paramount importance. CONCLUSIONS Elective oocyte cryopreservation is one of the most controversial aspects of the world of assisted reproduction, and a lot of questions remain unanswered. However, women today do have this option which was not available in the past. Elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline should be incorporated in women's reproductive options to ensure informed decisions and reproductive autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Chronopoulou
- Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, Clapton, London, E9 6SR, UK.
| | - C Raperport
- Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, Clapton, London, E9 6SR, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, Bethnal Green, London, E1 4NS, UK
| | - A Sfakianakis
- Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, Clapton, London, E9 6SR, UK
| | - G Srivastava
- Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, Clapton, London, E9 6SR, UK
| | - R Homburg
- Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, Clapton, London, E9 6SR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ben-Nagi J, Kasaven LS, Jones BP, Saso S, Norris G, Green J, Petrie A, Odia R, Serhal P, Yasmin E. Oocyte yield in social, medical and donor oocyte cryopreservation cycles. HUM FERTIL 2020; 25:508-515. [PMID: 33272064 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1855369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
To determine if oocyte yield in women undergoing cryopreservation for social (SOC), medical (MOC) and oocyte donation (OD) cycles is comparable when matched for age. 315 oocyte retrievals were performed for SOC, 116 for MOC and 392 for OD. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests and Poisson regression were used to assess the impact of age stratification. The median ages of women undergoing SOC, MOC, and OD were 38, 31 and 26 years respectively. The median (IQR) number of oocytes in the three categories was 7, 10, and 12. The oocyte yield was significantly higher in women aged 30-34 years undergoing SOC, compared to the MOC group. For the SOC group, age in years, oestradiol levels per 1000 pmol/and follicle count >12mm on the day of trigger were significant predictors of oocyte yield. Women embarking on SOC are significantly older than those undergoing MOC and OD, and thus oocyte yield is reduced when stratified for age. This study highlights the significant predictors of oocyte yield amongst women undergoing oocyte cryopreservation for specific indications. The findings can be used to optimise the yield and overall chance of successful livebirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jara Ben-Nagi
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Guy Norris
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK.,Reproductive Medicine Unit, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Aviva Petrie
- Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rabi Odia
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | - Paul Serhal
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | - Ephia Yasmin
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK.,Reproductive Medicine Unit, University College Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jones B, Rajamanoharan A, Kasaven L, Jalmbrant M, Green J, Mahmoud M, Odia R, Saso S, Serhal P, Ben Nagi J. The novel use of fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) treatment subscale to assess treatment acceptability in social egg freezing. HUM FERTIL 2020; 25:447-455. [PMID: 32883118 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1815242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
This is the first study to assess the impact of social egg freezing (SEF) on quality of life. This cross-sectional survey utilised the FertiQoL treatment module in women who underwent SEF between January 2008 and October 2019 (n = 94). The mean treatment score was 65.5, whereas the tolerability and environment scores were 62.4 and 68 respectively. Being married or in a relationship was associated with higher, albeit not statistically significant, scores (69.2) when compared to single women (66.3; p = 0.49). However, being separated or divorced was associated with significantly worse scores compared to married women, women in a relationship and single women (43.3 vs. 67.0; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in scores between younger and older women, low and high number of oocytes stored, duration of stimulation cycles, or in those who had single or multiple cycles. These data suggest SEF is largely tolerable, with favourable FertiQoL scores compared to infertile women undergoing IVF. However, whilst such women are physiologically fertile, their situation renders them socially infertile. As such, women undergoing SEF should be identified as a population that requires additional support, who should be offered extensive counselling, active monitoring throughout the process and additional support if required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Jones
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Abirami Rajamanoharan
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lorraine Kasaven
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Jalmbrant
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Joy Green
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | - Makki Mahmoud
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | - Rabi Odia
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Serhal
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| | - Jara Ben Nagi
- Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jones BP, Kasaven L, L'Heveder A, Jalmbrant M, Green J, Makki M, Odia R, Morris G, Bracewell Milnes T, Saso S, Serhal P, Ben Nagi J. Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross‐sectional survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 99:324-332. [PMID: 31667820 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin P. Jones
- West London Gynecological Cancer Center Hammersmith Hospital Imperial College NHS Trust London UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK
| | - Lorraine Kasaven
- West London Gynecological Cancer Center Hammersmith Hospital Imperial College NHS Trust London UK
| | - Ariadne L'Heveder
- West London Gynecological Cancer Center Hammersmith Hospital Imperial College NHS Trust London UK
| | - Maria Jalmbrant
- West London Gynecological Cancer Center Hammersmith Hospital Imperial College NHS Trust London UK
| | - Joy Green
- Center for Reproductive and Genetic Health London UK
| | - Mahmoud Makki
- Center for Reproductive and Genetic Health London UK
| | - Rabi Odia
- Center for Reproductive and Genetic Health London UK
| | - Guy Morris
- Center for Reproductive and Genetic Health London UK
| | | | - Srdjan Saso
- West London Gynecological Cancer Center Hammersmith Hospital Imperial College NHS Trust London UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK
| | - Paul Serhal
- Center for Reproductive and Genetic Health London UK
| | - Jara Ben Nagi
- Center for Reproductive and Genetic Health London UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Social Freezing – wann, wie, mit welchem Erfolg? GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s10304-019-0243-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
8
|
Alteri A, Pisaturo V, Nogueira D, D'Angelo A. Elective egg freezing - Better younger but effective enough? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98:948. [PMID: 30970148 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Alteri
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valerio Pisaturo
- Reproductive Medicine Department, International Evangelical Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daniela Nogueira
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology INOVIE Fertilité, Toulouse, France
| | | |
Collapse
|