Similar evolution of pain symptoms and quality of life in women with and without endometriosis undergoing assisted reproductive technology ( ART )

Pain after oocyte retrieval in women with endometriosis undergoing fertility preservation or IVF

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do women with endometriosis undergoing oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation experience the same level of pain as women undergoing oocyte retrieval for IVF?

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included 796 cycles in women with endometriosis undergoing oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation (n = 401) or IVF (n = 395) between January 2020 and October 2022. Post-operative pain assessments were compared between the two groups using a numeric rating scale (NRS).

RESULTS

Women in the fertility preservation group were younger (32.1 ± 4.2 years versus 35.1 ± 4.1 years; P < 0.001), had a lower body mass index (22.8 ± 3.9 kg/m2 versus 24.6 ± 4.4 kg/m2; P < 0.001) and had a lower concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (1.8 ± 1.5 ng/ml versus 2.15 ± 2.11 ng/ml; P = 0.026) in comparison with women in the IVF group. The oestrogen concentration on the day of ovulation trigger was higher in women in the fertility preservation group (2188 ± 1152 pg/ml versus 2081 ± 995 pg/ml; P = 0.004), and the prevalence rates of adenomyosis and digestive endometrial lesions were lower in women in the fertility preservation group (14% versus 29%, P < 0.001; 16% versus 25%, P = 0.003, respectively) compared with women in the IVF group. After oocyte puncture, more women in the fertility preservation group had an NRS pain score >3 (moderate to severe pain) compared with women in the IVF group (20% versus 14%; P = 0.018). The progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol was identified as an independent predictive factor of greater post-operative pain (adjusted OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06-5.15; P = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Women with endometriosis undergoing fertility preservation reported more intense post-operative pain in the recovery room than women undergoing IVF. The PPOS protocol was an independent risk factor of intense pain (NRS pain score >3) in women with endometriosis, but further studies are needed to confirm this result.

A systematic review to determine use of the Endometriosis Health Profiles to measure quality of life outcomes in women with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

The Endometriosis Health Profiles (EHPs), the EHP-30 and EHP-5, are patient-reported outcome measures that were developed to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of women living with endometriosis. Prior to their development, a systematic review was undertaken which identified that the HRQoL of women living with endometriosis was poorly understood, with only three medical and one surgical study identified.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The 20-year anniversary of the EHP-30 provided a timely opportunity to assess how the tools have been used and explore what the findings tell us about the impact of endometriosis and its associated treatments upon women's QoL. Applying robust systematic review methodology, following PRISMA guidelines, we sought to answer: How many studies have used the EHP and for what purpose?; What are the demographic characteristics and international context of the studies?; What is the methodological nature and quality of the studies?; Which interventions have been assessed and what are the reported EHP outcomes?; and Can the EHP outcomes of these interventions be analysed using a meta-analysis and, if so, what do the results show?

SEARCH METHODS

The electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched from the year the EHP was first published, in 2001 to 26 February 2020 using the search terms 'EHP30', 'EHP5', 'EHP-30', 'EHP-5', 'endometriosis health profile 30', and 'endometriosis health profile 5'. We updated the searches on 9 April 2021. All included studies were quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

OUTCOMES

The review included 139 papers. In clinical intervention studies, the EHPs were deployed most frequently to measure the outcomes of medical (n = 35) and surgical (n = 21) treatment. The EHPs were also used in 13 other intervention studies, 29 non-interventional studies, 32 psychometric/cross cultural validation studies; six diagnostic studies, and in three other studies to measure outcomes in related conditions. They were mainly deployed in studies undertaken in Europe and North America. Overall, regardless of the nature of the intervention, most women reported improvements in HRQoL after treatment. Surgical interventions generally resulted in significant improvements for the longest amount of time. There was also evidence that when participants stopped taking medication their EHP scores worsened, perhaps reinforcing the temporary impact of medical treatment. Younger patients reported more negative impact upon their HRQoL. Further evidence using classical test theory to support the EHPs' robust psychometric properties, including acceptability, dimensionality, reliability, validity (including cross-cultural), and responsiveness, was demonstrated, particularly for the EHP-30. Strikingly, using anchor-based methods, EHP-30 responsiveness studies demonstrate the largest mean changes in the 'control and powerlessness' domain post-intervention, followed by 'pain'. MMAT outcomes indicated the quality of the papers was good, with the exception of five studies. A meta-analysis was not undertaken owing to the heterogeneity of the interventions and papers included in this review.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Women with endometriosis face a lifetime of surgical and/or medical interventions to keep the condition under control. Less invasive treatments that can lead to improved longer term physical and psycho-social outcomes are needed. The EHPs are reliable, valid, acceptable, and responsive tools, but more assessment of EHP outcomes using modern psychometric methods and in the context of women from ethnically diverse backgrounds and in routine clinical care would be beneficial. Given the brevity of the EHP-5, it may be the most appropriate version to use in routine clinical practice, whereas the longer EHP-30, which provides more granularity, is more appropriate for research.

Endometriosis-related infertility: severe pain symptoms do not impact assisted reproductive technology outcomes

STUDY QUESTION

Do severe endometriosis-related painful symptoms impact ART live birth rates?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Severe pain symptoms are not associated with reduced ART live birth rates in endometriosis patients.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

ART is currently recognized as one of the main therapeutic options to manage endometriosis-related infertility. Presently, no data exist in the literature regarding the association between the core symptom of the disease, e.g. pain and ART reproductive outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Observational cohort study of 354 endometriosis patients, who underwent ART at a tertiary care university hospital, between October 2014 and October 2021. Diagnosis of endometriosis was based on published imaging criteria using transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging, and histologically confirmed in women who had a previous history of endometriosis surgery (n = 127, 35.9%).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The intensity of painful symptoms related to dysmenorrhea (DM), dyspareunia (DP), noncyclic chronic pelvic pain, gastrointestinal (GI) pain, or lower urinary tract pain was evaluated using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), before ART. Severe pain was defined as having a VAS of 7 or higher for at least one symptom. The main outcome measure was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per patient. We analyzed the impact of endometriosis-related painful symptoms on ART live births using univariable and multivariate analysis.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Three hundred and fifty-four endometriosis patients underwent 711 ART cycles. The mean age of the population was 33.8 ± 3.7 years, and the mean duration of infertility was 3.6 ± 2.1 years. The distribution of the endometriosis phenotypes was 3.1% superficial endometriosis, 8.2% ovarian endometrioma, and 88.7% deep infiltrating endometriosis. The mean VAS scores for DM, DP, and GI pain symptoms were 6.6 ± 2.7, 3.4 ± 3.1, and 3.1 ± 3.6, respectively. Two hundred and forty-two patients (68.4%) had severe pain symptoms. The CLBR per patient was 63.8% (226/354). Neither the mean VAS scores for the various painful symptoms nor the proportion of patients displaying severe pain differed significantly between patients who had a live birth and those who had not, based on univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.229). The only significant factors associated with negative ART live births were age >35 years (P < 0.001) and anti-Müllerian hormone levels <1.2 ng/ml (P < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The diagnosis of endometriosis was based on imaging rather than surgery. This limitation is, however, inherent to the design of most studies on endometriosis patients reverting to ART first.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Rather than considering a single argument such as pain, the decision-making process for choosing between ART and surgery in infertile endometriosis patients should be based on a multitude of aspects, including the patient's choice, the associated infertility factors, the endometriosis phenotypes, and the efficiency of medical therapies in regard to pain symptoms, through an individualized approach guided by a multidisciplinary team of experts.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding; no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Pain assessment in women with or without endometriosis during the IVF process: a prospective study

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does the typology and effect of pain vary between infertile patients with or without endometriosis during the different stages of the IVF process?

DESIGN

A prospective, monocentric, observational cohort study was conducted at Lille University Hospital between November 2019 and June 2021. The study was proposed to all patients starting an IVF cycle. Pain assessment questionnaires using validated scales (about type of pain, without specific location), were completed by patients at key points during IVF: before starting treatment, at the end of stimulation and on the day of oocyte retrieval.

RESULTS

A total of 278 patients were analysed: 73 patients with endometriosis and 205 without. At the start of the IVF process, patients with endometriosis had higher pain scores than disease-free women (mean numerical scale score 3.47 versus 1.12 [P < 0.0001]) and 17.81% of patients with endometriosis had neuropathic pain. For mental disorders before starting treatment, 22% of patients with endometriosis had suspected or confirmed depression, and 33% had anxiety compared with 8% and 20% in patients without endometriosis, respectively. During IVF, for patients without endometriosis, pain increased significantly between the baseline, the end of stimulation and on the day of retrieval (P ≤ 0.05). In patients with endometriosis, however, pain did not significantly vary during these times.

CONCLUSION

Endometriosis is associated with higher pain scores, but no increase in pain was observed during IVF for these patients. It seems essential to screen and characterize pain phenotypes in all patients before starting treatment and during stimulation to improve pain management.

Impact of surgery on fertility among patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate pregnancy and live birth rate after surgical resection of rectosigmoid deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), and study if complications affect these rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Historical case series. 193 patients with rectosigmoid DIE and pregnancy intention undergoing a rectosigmoid resection for DIE from January 2009 to May 2019. All operations were performed at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Surgical and fertility outcome data were obtained through patient files. Anonymized data was analyzed statistically. Normally distributed continuous variables are stated as means, categorical data as percentages and time to pregnancy as Kaplan-Meier failure function. Live birth rates stratified on complications were tested with chi2 test.

RESULTS

117 patients became pregnant postoperatively with a pregnancy and live birth rate of 60.6% and 53.9%, respectively. 39 patients (20.2%) became pregnant spontaneously and 78 patients (40.4%) by intrauterine insemination or assisted reproductive technologies. Median time to pregnancy after surgery was 12.4 months (range: 0.4-58). Clavien-Dindo complication grade III (none grade IV) was registered among 16.6%. These patients had pregnancy and live birth rates of 50%, not statistically significantly different from those without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pregnancy and live birth rates after resection of rectosigmoid endometriosis in this study are in line with conservative treatment, when comparing with the literature. Interestingly, complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III) did not affect live birth rate or time to pregnancy.

EFFORT study: Comparing impact of operation and assisted reproductive technologies on fertility for women with deep infiltrating endometriosis - study protocol for a multicentre randomised trial

INTRODUCTION

Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) affecting the rectum or sigmoid colon is associated with infertility, severe pain and decreased quality of life. As most women with DIE are young, many have a pregnancy intention. Treatment possibilities of endometriosis-associated infertility are surgery or assisted reproductive technologies (ART). However, no studies have compared the two interventions directly. Therefore, this study aims to determine the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) and the live birth rate (LBR) after first-line surgery compared with first-line ART for women with rectosigmoid DIE and a pregnancy intention.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Multicentre, parallel-group, randomised trial of women with rectosigmoid DIE and a pregnancy intention for at least 6 months in Aarhus, Denmark and Bordeaux, France. 352 women aged 18-38 years are randomised 1:1 to either surgical management (shaving, disc excision or segmental resection) or ART management (at least two in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures if not pregnant after the first cycle). Women in the surgical intervention group will attempt to get pregnant by either spontaneous conception or ART, depending on the endometriosis fertility index score. Primary outcome measures are CPR and LBR at 18 months' follow-up. Secondary outcomes are: Non-viable pregnancies, time to pregnancy, pain score, quality of life, complication rate, bowel and bladder function, endocrine and inflammatory profile, number of oocytes, blastocysts, frozen embryos and blastocyst morphology score within 18 months after either intervention.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Conduct of this study is approved by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics and Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France VIII. Study participants must sign an informed consent form. The results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in international peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT04610710).

PROTOCOL VERSION

The Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics: Fifth protocol version approved 7 September 2020 (no. 1-10-72-96-20). Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France VIII: Version 1.1 22JAN2021 the 9 March 2021.

Safety of in-vitro fertilization in women with endometriosis

Management of women with endometriosis in general is complex. It requires a multidisciplinary and tailored approach. The time of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) may be particularly complicated because women with the disease face peculiar additional risks. In particular, oocytes retrieval may be more difficult and women with endometriomas are exposed to a low but consistent risk of infection and ovarian abscess development. There are also concerns regarding progression of deep invasive peritoneal lesions and misdiagnosis of an occult early ovarian cancer. However, evidence on these latter points is more controversial. Taken together, this body evidence is generally reassuring and does not justify prophylactic surgery prior to IVF to shrink these risks. However, given the uncertainties, women with endometriosis must be informed in depth of these peculiar additional risks.

Effect of melatonin for the management of endometriosis: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to explore the effect of melatonin for the management of endometriosis.

METHODS

We will search electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from their inceptions to the February 29, 2020 without language and publication time limitations. The study identification, study quality assessment, and data extraction will be undertaken by two separate researchers. We will also appraise evidence quality of main outcomes by Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation, and statistical analysis performance by RevMan 5.3 Software.

RESULTS

This study will summarize up-to-date clinical evidence to investigate the effect of melatonin for the management of endometriosis.

CONCLUSION

This study may provide helpful evidence of melatonin for the management of endometriosis.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

INPLASY202040093.