1
|
Baston-Büst DM, Scheliga I, Bielfeld AP. Setup of a cryobank for ovarian tissue in a university-based setting. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1193178. [PMID: 37305049 PMCID: PMC10248428 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1193178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Establishing and maintaining a newly set-up cryobank for ovarian tissue in a university setting requires at least 1 year's notice to start financial, spatial, lab equipment, and employee acquisition planning. Right before and after the start of the cryobank, the newly founded team should introduce itself to the hospitals and local and national health systems via mail, print flyers, and symposia in order to share the possibilities and the knowledge. Potential referrers should be provided with standard operating procedures and advice on getting used to the new system. Especially in the first year after the establishment, all procedures should be internally audited in order to avoid possible difficulties.
Collapse
|
2
|
Leflon M, Rives-Feraille A, Letailleur M, Petrovic CH, Martin B, Marpeau L, Jardin F, Aziz M, Stamatoulas-Bastard A, Dumont L, Rondanino C, Rives N. Experience, gynaecological and reproductive health follow up of young adult women who have undergone ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 45:913-922. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
3
|
Takae S, Kato K, Watanabe C, Nara K, Koizumi T, Kawai K, Ota K, Yumura Y, Yabuuchi A, Kuwahara A, Furui T, Takai Y, Irahara M, Suzuki N. A practical survey of fertility-preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022; 48:1061-1075. [PMID: 35274401 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions. METHODS This study was conducted as "Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016" which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016. RESULTS Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40-41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44-45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified. CONCLUSIONS Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seido Takae
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki-city, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Chie Watanabe
- Faculty of Human Sciences, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuko Nara
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomoe Koizumi
- National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Kawai
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kuniaki Ota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nasu Red Cross Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yasushi Yumura
- Reproduction Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama-city, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Akira Kuwahara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Tatsuro Furui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Yasushi Takai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Minoru Irahara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Nao Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki-city, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wikander I, Lundberg FE, Nilsson H, Borgström B, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. A Prospective Study on Fertility Preservation in Prepubertal and Adolescent Girls Undergoing Hematological Stem Cell Transplantation. Front Oncol 2021; 11:692834. [PMID: 34277437 PMCID: PMC8278233 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.692834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hematological stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an established method which has markedly increased the survival rate of hematologic malignancies since its introduction in the 1980’s. The conditioning for HSCT has known gonadotoxic effects and often leads to premature loss of fertility. In this study we have prospectively followed a cohort of girls undergoing HSCT and studied the outcomes of fertility preservation treatments performed before or after HSCT, as well as the long-term reproductive outcome. Methods In this one-center prospective study, 39 girls counselled for fertility preservation prior to or after conditioning for HSCT for malignant or benign diseases at childhood or adolescence between 1990 and 2017 were included. The patients were presented with the option to undergo cryopreservation of ovarian tissue or oocytes depending on their age and the time available. Follicle counts of the ovarian tissue and number of oocytes collected before or after HSCT were compared between patients treated for benign and malignant diseases. Hormone measurements post HSCT treatment, including FSH and AMH, reproductive outcomes and overall survival until January 2021 were investigated. Results In total, 34 girls and adolescents underwent fertility preservation before or after HSCT. Before HSCT, ovarian tissue was cryopreserved in 15 patients and two patients had oocytes preserved. Thirteen patients cryopreserved ovarian tissue after HSCT and seven patients returned to cryopreserve oocytes. Follicles were present in all tissue samples collected prior to HSCT, and in more than half of the samples collected post-HSCT. Half of the patients had spontaneous menarche or resumed menstruation post HSCT. Overall, 35 patients had survived at end of follow up and 7 patients had achieved parenthood. Conclusions Since fertility loss is common following HSCT, fertility preservation should be offered to all patients. Fertility preservation treatments can be performed both before and after HSCT. Clinical Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04602962, identifier NTC04602962
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Wikander
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Frida E Lundberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna Nilsson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Birgit Borgström
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kristensen SG, Wakimoto Y, Colmorn LB, Dueholm M, Pors SE, Macklon KT, Mamsen LS, Nikiforov D, Cadenas J, Greve VH, Bay Bjørn AM, Rosendahl M, Pedersen AT, Nyboe Andersen A, Fedder J, Ernst E, Andersen CY. Use of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in the Danish fertility preservation cohort. Fertil Steril 2021; 116:1098-1106. [PMID: 34130800 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the use of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in the Danish fertility preservation cohort. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING University hospitals and fertility clinics. PATIENT(S) Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) was performed for 1,186 Danish girls and women from 1999-2020, of whom 117 subsequently underwent ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT). Subgroup 1 included 759 patients with a follow-up period of >5 years. Out of these, OTT rates were further analyzed for those patients who were alive and aged >24 years in July 2020 (subgroup 2; n = 554). INTERVENTION(S) OTC and OTT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) OTT, death, donation of tissue. RESULT(S) In subgroup 1, 14% of the patients had undergone OTT, 18% had died, 9% had donated their tissue for research, and 59% still had their tissue stored. In subgroup 2, 19% had undergone OTT and for most diagnoses the OTT rates ranged from 15% to 22% with benign hematologic diseases having the highest OTT rate (35%). On the basis of the entire cohort, stratified age analysis indicated that women aged ≥30 years at OTC were more likely to return for OTT than women aged 18-29 years at OTC; mean storage times were 3.7 and 3.6 years, respectively. Only 4% of the girls aged <18 years at OTC had undergone OTT. CONCLUSION(S) The OTT rates depended on the diagnosis, age at OTC, and follow-up time. Specific criteria are needed for reporting and comparing OTT rates. Six out of 10 patients still had their cryopreserved tissue stored and longer follow-up is needed, especially for younger girls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Gry Kristensen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Yu Wakimoto
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Lotte Berdiin Colmorn
- The Fertility Clinic, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Margit Dueholm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Susanne Elisabeth Pors
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Tryde Macklon
- The Fertility Clinic, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Linn Salto Mamsen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dmitry Nikiforov
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesús Cadenas
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vinnie Hornshøj Greve
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne-Mette Bay Bjørn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Rosendahl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anette Tønnes Pedersen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Nyboe Andersen
- The Fertility Clinic, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Fedder
- Centre of Andrology and Fertility Clinic, Odense University Hospital and Research Unit of Human Reproduction, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Erik Ernst
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Claus Yding Andersen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bach AS, Macklon KT, Kristensen SG. Futures and fears in the freezer: Danish women's experiences with ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41:555-565. [PMID: 32736871 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) and subsequent re-transplantation is gaining ground as a valid technique to preserve fertility in patients facing imminent cancer treatment. This study explores patients' experiences with OTC and transplantation, including their reflections on long-term storage of tissue and the use of surplus tissue. DESIGN Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 42 Danish women undergoing OTC between 2003 and 2018, 32 of whom had ovarian tissue transplanted. RESULTS Overall, OTC was associated with positive experiences linked to the production of future-oriented hope and reproductive possibilities. It also generated a range of worries, particularly regarding hormone-sensitive cancers and the risk of re-transplanting malignant cells, and the women's arduous journeys to conceive after cancer resonated through the accounts. Moreover, the women's understanding of, and access to, information about the OTC procedure and its prospects affected the ways in which they approached storage and transplantation of their frozen tissue. Finally, the interviews showed how the stored ovarian tissue was also infused with potentiality beyond the scope of reproduction, both as a remedy to restore hormonal cycles and in the imagination of the-yet-to-be-discovered potential informing the women's reflections on donation and destruction. CONCLUSION Although OTC is a 'hope technology' compared with freezing of oocytes and embryos, ovarian tissue is interlinked with risk and disease and positioned as an asset beyond the scope of reproduction. Importantly, this study underscores the need for provision of specialized information, follow-up, and fertility counselling after OTC and cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sofie Bach
- Department for the Study of Culture, University of Southern, Campusvej 55, Odense 5230, DenmarkDenmark.
| | - Kirsten Tryde Macklon
- The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
| | - Stine Gry Kristensen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gosset A, Cohade C, Grosclaude P, Oumsack E, Dalenc F, Montagut M, Parinaud J, Vaysse C. [Regional state-of-the-art of the access to oncofertility consultation for young women with breast cancer]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 47:732-738. [PMID: 31493561 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES According to the 2004 Bioethics Act, oncofertility counselling must be systematically offered to all women of childbearing age before they are exposed to potentially gonadotoxic treatment. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the proportion of women under 40 years of age treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer in Midi-Pyrénées who have received an oncofertility consultation. A secondary objective was to assess practitioners' knowledge on the subject. METHODS A cross-reference was made between the databases of the oncology network in Midi-Pyrénées and the two approved centres for the preservation of fertility in the region. A computerized practitioner questionnaire was sent to all surgeons and oncologists who could manage these patients. RESULTS From 2012 and 2017, 667 women aged≤40 years received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy treatment: only 156 (23.4%) had access to an oncofertility consultation and 58 (8.7%) received preservation. This rate (23.4%) varied according to the age of the patients, ranging from 56.9% for those aged 25-29 to 13.4% for those aged 35-39 and the managing institution. Of the 85 practitioners surveyed, 45 (55%) responded to the questionnaire, and of these 20 (44%) knew that ovarian stimulation treatment could be used even in hormone-dependent breast cancer situations and 13 (29%) of practitioners believed that the time required to preserve fertility was more than 1 month. CONCLUSION Our study revealed a significant disparity in access to oncofertility consultation. It is essential to set up information and awareness-raising actions on the subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gosset
- Département de médecine de la reproduction, CHU de Toulouse, 330, avenue de Grande Bretagne, TSA 70034, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - C Cohade
- Département de médecine de la reproduction, CHU de Toulouse, 330, avenue de Grande Bretagne, TSA 70034, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - P Grosclaude
- Registre des cancers du Tarn, institut Claudius-Regaud, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 31059 Toulouse, France; Inserm, UMR1027, université de Toulouse, université Paul-Sabatier, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - E Oumsack
- Registre des cancers du Tarn, institut Claudius-Regaud, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - F Dalenc
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Claudius-Regaud, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - M Montagut
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation, Clinique Croix du Sud, 20, route de Revel, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - J Parinaud
- Département de médecine de la reproduction, CHU de Toulouse, 330, avenue de Grande Bretagne, TSA 70034, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - C Vaysse
- Département de chirurgie gynécologique et oncologique, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, CHU deToulouse, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France.
| |
Collapse
|