Management and monitoring of opioid use in pregnancy

Maternal opioid use during pregnancy and the risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome in the offspring

INTRODUCTION

Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) is caused by sudden cessation from in utero exposure to opioids. The indications for opioid use during pregnancy are diverse including medication for opioid use disorder and analgesia. The opioid dose typically depends on the indication, with higher doses used for medication for opioid use disorder and lower doses used for analgesia. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between maternal opioid dose during pregnancy and the risk of NOWS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a historical multicenter cohort study of neonates prenatally exposed to opioids in Eastern Denmark during a six-year period from 2013 to 2018. The data was extracted from reviewing the individual's medical record(s), which were identified through a search of the Danish National Patient Register. Four groups (quartiles) according to maternal opioid dose during the last four weeks prior to delivery were compared. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the risk of NOWS while controlling for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 130 in utero opioid exposed neonates were included. The majority of the pregnant patients (88%) were treated with opioids for analgesic purposes. Overall, 52% of neonates developed NOWS. The cumulative incidence of NOWS was 21%, 28%, 67% and 91% at maternal average daily dose of morphine milligram equivalent during the last four weeks prior to delivery of 0.7-14 (group I), 14.3-38.6 (group II), 40-90 (group III) and 90.9-1440 (group IV), respectively. Compared to group I the adjusted odds (aOR) of NOWS increased significantly in group III (aOR 10.6 [2.9-39.1]) and group IV (aOR 37.8 [7.6-188.2]) but not in group II (aOR 1.5 [0.4-5.2]). No cases of NOWS were reported at maternal dose less than an average daily dose of five morphine milligram equivalent during the last four weeks prior to delivery. No significant changes in the incidence of NOWS were observed between 2013 and 2018.

CONCLUSIONS

The odds of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome increased significantly as the maternal average daily dose of morphine milligram equivalent during the last four weeks prior to delivery surpassed 40.

Maternal care behavior and physiology moderate offspring outcomes following gestational exposure to opioids

The opioid epidemic has resulted in a drastic increase in gestational exposure to opioids. Opioid-dependent pregnant women are typically prescribed medications for opioid use disorders ("MOUD"; e.g., buprenorphine [BUP]) to mitigate the harmful effects of abused opioids. However, the consequences of exposure to synthetic opioids, particularly BUP, during gestation on fetal neurodevelopment and long-term outcomes are poorly understood. Further, despite the known adverse effects of opioids on maternal care, many preclinical and clinical studies investigating the effects of gestational opioid exposure on offspring outcomes fail to report on maternal care behaviors. Considering that offspring outcomes are heavily dependent upon the quality of maternal care, it is important to evaluate the effects of gestational opioid exposure in the context of the mother-infant dyad. This review compares offspring outcomes after prenatal opioid exposure and after reduced maternal care and integrates this information to potentially identify common underlying mechanisms. We explore whether adverse outcomes after gestational BUP exposure are due to direct effects of opioids in utero, deficits in maternal care, or a combination of both factors. Finally, suggestions for improving preclinical models of prenatal opioid exposure are provided to promote more translational studies that can help to improve clinical outcomes for opioid-dependent mothers.

A Pathway to Treatment for Pregnant Women With Opioid Use Disorder

BACKGROUND

Addiction to opioids, a well-known public health crisis, is now more prevalent in pregnant women as evidenced by the parallel rise with pregnant women in the epidemic with the general population. Evidence is now available that substantiates the need for global awareness to increase efforts in the treatment of pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD) as this vulnerable population lacks equal access to opioid abuse treatment across the United States.

AIM

The overarching aim and purpose of this quality improvement project was to increase access to treatment for pregnant women with OUD who are currently underserved in a community located in Florida.

METHODS

Between January and April 2022, the 4Ps (parents, partners, past, and pregnancy), a validated screening tool, was implemented in an organization that accepts individuals with substance abuse. Each positive screen was referred for assessment for buprenorphine induction and medication-assisted treatment follow-up. Descriptive statistics were collected counting the number of screens completed, the number of positive screens, the number of referrals, and the number of patients remaining in treatment for 30 and 60 days.

RESULTS

Twenty-two screens were completed. The results yielded an increase in referrals, a 75% increase in treatment of pregnant women, and an average of 83% of participants remained in treatment.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a validated screening tool assisted in increasing access to treatment for pregnant women with OUD. Once implemented, the screening tool forges a pathway for referrals and evidence-based treatment for pregnant women with OUD.

Opioid Use in Pregnancy: A Review

Importance

The use and misuse of opioids in pregnancy have been increasing and are a major public health issue. Opioid use in pregnancy and during lactation has been associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Objective

This review aims to summarize the existing literature and current recommendations for opioid use while pregnant or lactating.

Evidence Acquisition

A PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar literature search using the following terms was performed to gather relevant data: "opioids," "opioid maintenance therapy," "opioid use disorder," "suboxone," "buprenorphine," "methadone," "medication for opioid use disorder," "fetal outcomes," "perinatal outcomes," "pregnancy," "lactation," and "neonatal abstinence syndrome."

Results

Available studies on opioid use in pregnancy and during lactation were reviewed and support association with increased odds of maternal death, placental insufficiency, cardiac arrest, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, low birth weight, and small for gestational age infants. Studies were also reviewed on pharmacotherapy options in pregnancy and promising prenatal care models.

Conclusion and Relevance

There is a critical need for research on the effects of opioid use and related pharmacotherapy options in pregnancy. Once the adverse perinatal effects of opioid exposure are identified and well-characterized, patient education, intervention, and antenatal surveillance can be developed to predict and mitigate its impact on maternal and fetal health.

Buprenorphine-naloxone, buprenorphine, and methadone throughout pregnancy in maternal opioid use disorder

INTRODUCTION

Current WHO guidelines recommend using methadone or buprenorphine as maintenance treatments for maternal opioid use disorder. However, buprenorphine-naloxone, with a lower abuse risk than buprenorphine monotherapy or methadone, offers a potentially beneficial alternative, but scientific evidence on its effects on pregnancies, fetuses, and newborns is scarce. This paper compares the outcomes of the pregnancies, deliveries, and newborns of women on buprenorphine-naloxone, buprenorphine, or methadone maintenance treatments. According to the hypothesis, as a maintenance treatment, buprenorphine-naloxone does not have more adverse effects than buprenorphine, whereas methadone is more complicated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this population-based study, 172 pregnant women on medical-assisted treatments were followed-up at Helsinki University Women's Hospital (Finland). Women receiving the same opioid maintenance treatment from conception to delivery and their newborns were included. Consequently, 67 mother-child dyads met the final inclusion criteria. They were divided into three groups based on their opioid pharmacotherapy. The outcomes were compared among the groups and, where applicable, with the Finnish population.

RESULTS

The buprenorphine-naloxone and buprenorphine groups showed similar outcomes and did not significantly differ from each other in terms of maternal health during pregnancies, deliveries, or newborns. Illicit drug use during the pregnancy was common in all groups, but in the methadone group it was most common (p = 0.001). Most neonates (96%) were born full-term with good Apgar scores. They were of relatively small birth size, with those in the methadone group tending to be the smallest. Of the neonates 63% needed pharmacological treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. The need was lower in the buprenorphine-based groups than in the methadone group (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Buprenorphine-naloxone seems to be as safe for pharmacotherapy for maternal opioid use disorder as buprenorphine monotherapy for both mother and newborn. Hence it could be a choice for oral opioid maintenance treatment during pregnancy, but larger studies are needed before changing the official recommendations. Women on methadone treatment carry multifactorial risks and require particularly cautious follow up. Furthermore, illicit drug use is common in all treatment groups and needs to be considered for all patients with opioid use disorder.

European clinical practice recommendations on opioids for chronic noncancer pain - Part 2: Special situations

BACKGROUND

Opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is under debate. In the absence of pan-European guidance on this issue, a position paper was commissioned by the European Pain Federation (EFIC).

METHODS

The clinical practice recommendations were developed by eight scientific societies and one patient self-help organization under the coordination of EFIC. A systematic literature search in MEDLINE (up until January 2020) was performed. Two categories of guidance are given: Evidence-based recommendations (supported by evidence from systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials or of observational studies) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) statements (supported either by indirect evidence or by case-series, case-control studies and clinical experience). The GRADE system was applied to move from evidence to recommendations. The recommendations and GCP statements were developed by a multiprofessional task force (including nursing, service users, physicians, physiotherapy and psychology) and formal multistep procedures to reach a set of consensus recommendations. The clinical practice recommendations were reviewed by five external reviewers from North America and Europe and were also posted for public comment.

RESULTS

The European Clinical Practice Recommendations give guidance for combination with other medications, the management of frequent (e.g. nausea, constipation) and rare (e.g. hyperalgesia) side effects, for special clinical populations (e.g. children and adolescents, pregnancy) and for special situations (e.g. liver cirrhosis).

CONCLUSION

If a trial with opioids for chronic noncancer pain is conducted, detailed knowledge and experience are needed to adapt the opioid treatment to a special patient group and/or clinical situation and to manage side effects effectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

If a trial with opioids for chronic noncancer pain is conducted, detailed knowledge and experience are needed to adapt the opioid treatment to a special patient group and/or clinical situation and to manage side effects effectively. A collaboration of medical specialties and of all health care professionals is needed for some special populations and clinical situations.

Impact of the Opioid Epidemic on Drug Testing

BACKGROUND

This review provides a description of how the opioid epidemic has impacted drug testing.

METHODS

Four major service areas of drug testing were considered, including emergency response, routine clinical care, routine forensics, and death investigations.

RESULTS

Several factors that the opioid epidemic has impacted in drug testing are discussed, including specimens, breadth of compounds recommended for testing, time to result required for specific applications, analytical approaches, interpretive support requirements, and examples of published practice guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Both clinical and forensic laboratories have adapted practices and developed new testing approaches to respond to the opioid epidemic. Such changes are likely to continue evolving in parallel with changes in both prescription and nonprescription opioid availability and use patterns, as well as emerging populations that are affected by the "waves" of the opioid epidemic.