Very short cervix in low-risk asymptomatic singleton pregnancies: Outcome according to treatment and cervical length at diagnosis

Cervical cerclage: An evolving evidence base

Cervical cerclage is an established intervention for the management of pregnancies at high risk of preterm birth. Although studies exist to support its use in certain situations, particularly in singleton pregnancies, many questions such as adjunct therapies and efficacy in specific subgroups of high-risk women have not been fully elucidated. This review will assess the current evidence as well as areas where there is currently a paucity of data and an urgent requirement for further research.

Cervical length evolution in pregnancy and prediction of preterm delivery

PURPOSE

To construct reference charts for cervical length (CL) in pregnancy based on longitudinal measurements and to assess the value of measuring cervical length after 24 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

CL was measured transvaginally in singleton pregnancies at 5 to 41 weeks. Pregnancies with more than one measurement were used for creating the CL chart, whereas any measurement after 24 weeks was considered for assessing the correlation of CL with preterm delivery.

RESULTS

The dataset consisted of 12,601 pregnancies and 33,899 observations. Gestational age was the main predictor of CL (R2 = 67.3%). Further adjustments in the fixed effects part for maternal characteristics (age, BMI, smoking status, parity, history of miscarriage, and cervical surgery) improved the prediction ability (R2 = 78.4%). CL was predictive of spontaneous preterm delivery before 37 weeks when measured at any gestation between 24 and 35 weeks and it was predictive of spontaneous preterm delivery before 32 weeks when measured between 28 and 31 weeks (AUC = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Gestational age is the main predictor of CL followed by maternal characteristics and history. CL assessment between 24 and 35 + 6 weeks can enhance our ability to predict spontaneous preterm delivery.

Rate of preterm delivery and latency period in asymptomatic patients undergoing cerclage for very short cervix ≤10.0 mm

BACKGROUND

In asymptomatic women with cervical length ≤10 mm, vaginal progesterone has a limited effect in reducing the rate of preterm delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the rate of preterm delivery and mean latency period to delivery in asymptomatic women with no history of preterm delivery and a cervical length of ≤10.0 mm undergoing or not undergoing cerclage and who were not treated with vaginal progesterone.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of asymptomatic patients with singleton pregnancies and no history of preterm delivery with an incidental finding of a cervical length of ≤10.0 mm measured by transvaginal ultrasound during midtrimester scan. Of note, 56 patients (63.6%) underwent cerclage placement and 32 patients (36.4%) did not, none of them received vaginal progesterone. Patients with evidence of advanced dilation, prolapsing membranes, ruptured membranes, or positive signs of infection were not candidates for cerclage placement and were excluded from the analysis. Differences in the prevalence of preterm delivery, mean gestational age at delivery, and mean latency from very short cervix identification to delivery between the 2 groups were calculated. Associations between cerclage and preterm delivery adjusted for maternal characteristics and fetal weight were estimated.

RESULTS

The median gestational ages at the time of cervical length measurement were 20 6/7 weeks (interquartile range, 17 5/7 to 23 3/7) in the cerclage group and 21 5/7 weeks (interquartile range, 17 6/7 to 23 6/7) in the no-cerclage group (P=.02). No difference in cervical length was observed between patients who had a cerclage (5.9±3.1 mm) and those who did not have a cerclage (6.5±3.2 mm) (P=.4). The prevalence of preterm delivery in women with cerclage vs women without cerclage was as follows: PTD at <37 weeks of gestation (31/56 [55.3%] in the cerclage group vs 28/32 [87.5%] in the no-cerclage group; adjusted odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.62; P=.008), PTD at ≤34 weeks of gestation (27/56 [48.2%] in the cerclage group vs 24/32 [75.0%] in the no-cerclage group; adjusted odds ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.55; P=.02), and PTD at ≤28 weeks of gestation (19/56 [33.9%] in the cerclage group vs 22/32 [68.7%] in the no-cerclage group; adjusted odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.51; P=.002). The median gestational ages at delivery were 32 6/7 weeks (interquartile range, 19 1/7 to 40 1/7) in the cerclage group and 28 1/7 weeks (interquartile range, 20 1/7 to 40 2/7) in the no-cerclage group (P=.001). The median latencies from the time of cervical length measurement to delivery were 84 days (interquartile range, 8-144) in the cerclage group and 43 days (interquartile range, 1-146) in the no-cerclage group (P=.003).

CONCLUSION

Among low-risk asymptomatic women with a very short cervix (≤10.0 mm) in the midtrimester of pregnancy, women treated with cerclage have an increased latency to delivery and a lower prevalence of preterm delivery than those treated with expectant management.

Cerclage Plus Adjuvant Vaginal Progesterone for Preterm Birth Prevention in Patients with a Short or Dilated Cervix without Prior Preterm Birth

OBJECTIVE

 The primary objective was to determine if vaginal progesterone following cerclage for cervical length <10 mm or cervical dilation in patients without a history of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) decreased the risk of preterm birth at <34 weeks' gestation compared with cerclage alone. Secondary objectives were to determine if vaginal progesterone following cerclage (1) decreased the risk of preterm birth at <24, <28, and <37 weeks' gestation and (2) increased the latency period from cerclage placement to delivery compared with treatment with cerclage alone.

STUDY DESIGN

 Multicenter retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2020 of singleton pregnancies, without prior sPTB, who had cerclage placement <24 weeks' gestation for cervical length <10 mm or cervical dilation. Exposure defined as cerclage plus vaginal progesterone postoperatively (dual therapy) and unexposed as cerclage alone (monotherapy), based on surgeon preference.

RESULTS

 We included 122 patients, 78 (64%) treated with dual therapy and 44 (36%) treated with monotherapy. In the crude analysis, dual therapy was associated with a lower risk of delivery at <28 weeks' gestation (13%) compared with monotherapy (34%; crude risk ratio: 0.38 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.75]). When adjusted for preoperative vaginal progesterone, results were attenuated (adjusted risk ratio: 0.45 [95% CI: 0.20-1.01]). In both the crude and adjusted analyses, the risk of sPTB was not statistically different at <24, <34 or <37 weeks' gestation. Dual therapy was associated with a greater pregnancy latency from cerclage to delivery (16.3 vs. 14.4 weeks; p = 0.04), and greater gestational age at delivery (37.3 vs. 35.8 weeks' gestation; p = 0.02) compared with monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

 While not statistically significant, the risk of sPTB was lower at all gestational ages studied in patients treated with dual therapy compared with monotherapy. Dual therapy was associated with longer pregnancy latency and greater gestational age at delivery compared with monotherapy.

KEY POINTS

· Dual therapy did not decrease preterm birth risk compared with monotherapy.. · Dual therapy prolonged pregnancy compared with monotherapy.. · Dual therapy can be considered but further studies are needed..

Screening vs. no screening for preterm delivery in low-risk singleton pregnancies: comparison by propensity score analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of a policy of screening for spontaneous preterm delivery (SPD) by transvaginal cervical length (CL) measurement versus a no screening policy in the prevention of severe prematurity.

METHODS

Retrospective study on low-risk singleton pregnancies examined at 20-24 weeks. Two cohorts, one with SPD screening and the other without screening, were matched using propensity analysis to create the study groups. Women with short CL were treated with vaginal progesterone and/or cervical cerclage/pessary. The outcomes examined were SPD < 32 weeks (SPD 32) and SPD between 20 and 32 weeks (SPD 20-32).

RESULTS

Screening for SPD was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of SPD at less than 32 weeks (0.3 vs. 0.8%, p = 0.001 in the screened and no screened pregnancies, respectively) and in the rate of SPD 20-32 (0.3 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.005 in the screened and no screened pregnancies, respectively). After adjusting for maternal age, parity, body mass index, smoking and mode of conception, the screening group had significantly lower hazard for SPD 20-32 (HR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.75, p = 0.006) and SPD32 (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.82, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Screening for SPD by transvaginal CL measurement in mid-pregnancy may reduce the incidence of severe prematurity in low-risk singleton pregnancies.

Factors Associated with Spontaneous Preterm Birth after Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage

Ultrasound-indicated cerclage (UIC) is recommended to prevent spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) in women with a short cervix at mid-trimester and a history of PTB. We assessed the factors related to sPTB after UIC and determined the corresponding risks. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital. UIC was performed between 15 and 26 weeks of gestation in women with a cervical length of <2.5 cm. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine factors associated with sPTB after UIC. An earlier gestational age and shorter cervical length at UIC were associated with sPTB after UIC. While PTB history was not associated with an increased risk of sPTB, it did increase the risk of repeat cerclage after UIC. Higher levels of preoperative serum inflammatory markers and obesity significantly increased the risk of sPTB after UIC. These findings provide helpful guidance for patient counseling and management in predicting the delivery timing after UIC in women with a short cervix in the mid-trimester.

The perceptions of obstetric care providers about cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention

BACKGROUND

Routine cervical length (CL) measurement at the mid-pregnancy ultrasound is a central recommendation of the Western Australian Preterm Birth Prevention Initiative (Initiative).

AIM

To evaluate the perceptions and changes in practice of Western Australian obstetric care providers regarding routine CL screening for preterm birth (PTB) prevention following the Initiative introduction.

METHODS

Two self-administered questionnaires were completed by providers from a range of practices. The first was during site visits with the Initiative Outreach team in 2015-2016. The questionnaire was re-issued in 2021 via online dissemination. Participant demographic data and opinions on CL screening for PTB prevention were collected.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fourteen providers participated in 2015-2016 and 109 in 2021. In both surveys, providers were more likely to discuss transvaginal CL screening with high-risk women (48.1%, 76.1%; P < 0.001) compared with low-risk (7.5%, 18.3%; P = 0.002) and the importance of CL screening (13.5%, 40.4%; P < 0.001), in 2015-2016 and 2021, respectively. Responses relating to CL screening, including what constitutes a short cervix on ultrasound were varied. A transabdominal CL <35 mm was classified as short by 46.2% and 37.6% and <25 mm on transvaginal ultrasound by 49.1% and 64.2%, in the respective surveys. Most providers ceased progesterone (68.6%, 75.2%) at >28 weeks gestation.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers focused on women with overt PTB risk factors, rather than a universal CL screening approach. Although there was improvement between the surveys, the definition of what constitutes a short cervix on ultrasound and how to treat and monitor women with a short CL remained varied.