Do high-dose progestins impair sexual function in women treated for endometriosis? A prospective observational longitudinal study

Measurement properties of sexual function assessment questionnaires in women with endometriosis: A systematic review following COSMIN guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Sexual function of patients with endometriosis should be assessed by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that present high reliability and validity. The objective was to study the PROMs used to assess sexual function for patients with endometriosis to improve their selection for research and clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review from January 2000 to September 2023. All studies including women with confirmed endometriosis and assessing sexual quality of life or sexual function or sexual distress were retrieved. Different properties of PROMs used for sexual dysfunction were assessed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) recommendations. Properties evaluated were: structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, reliability, measurement error, criterion validity, construct validity, and responsiveness. This literature review was registered on Prospero as 2018 CRD42018102278.

RESULTS

Seventy-four articles with evaluation of sexual function were included. Of the 25 PROMs assessing sexual function, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was the most frequently used (34/74 [45.9%] items), followed by the Female Sexual Distress Scale (9/74 [12.2%] items) and the Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ) (8/74 [10.8%] items). The most commonly used measurement properties were "hypothesis testing" and "responsiveness". The PROMs with a high level of evidence for these two measurement properties were the FSFI, the SAQ, the Short Sexual Functioning Scale, the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women, Sexual Quality of Life-Female, the Brief Profile of Female Sexual Function, and the Sexual Health Outcomes in Women Questionnaire. The FSFI questionnaire appeared to be more relevant for evaluating medical treatment, and the SAQ for evaluating surgical treatment. Only one instrument was specific to endometriosis (the Subjective Impact of Dyspareunia Inventory [SIDI]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic literature review of sexual function assessment questionnaires in endometriosis, the FSFI and the SAQ questionnaires emerged as having the best measurement properties according to the COSMIN criteria. The FSFI questionnaire appears to be suited for evaluating medical treatment, and the SAQ for surgical treatment. The SIDI is the only specific questionnaire, but its responsiveness remains to be defined.

Towards comprehensive management of symptomatic endometriosis: beyond the dichotomy of medical versus surgical treatment

Except when surgery is the only option because of organ damage, the presence of suspicious lesions, or the desire to conceive, women with endometriosis-associated pain often face a choice between medical and surgical treatment. In theory, the description of the potential benefits and potential harms of the two alternatives should be standardized, unbiased, and based on strong evidence, enabling the patient to make an informed decision. However, doctor's opinion, intellectual competing interests, local availability of specific services and (mis)information obtained from social media, and online support groups can influence the type of advice given and affect patients' choices. This is compounded by the paucity of robust data from randomized controlled trials, and the anxiety of distressed women who are eager to do anything to alleviate their disabling symptoms. Vulnerable patients are more likely to accept the suggestions of their healthcare provider, which can lead to unbalanced and physician-centred decisions, whether in favour of either medical or surgical treatment. In general, treatments should be symptom-orientated rather than lesion-orientated. Medical and surgical modalities appear to be similarly effective in reducing pain symptoms, with medications generally more successful for severe dysmenorrhoea and surgery more successful for severe deep dyspareunia caused by fibrotic lesions infiltrating the posterior compartment. Oestrogen-progestogen combinations and progestogen monotherapies are generally safe and well tolerated, provided there are no major contraindications. About three-quarters of patients with superficial peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis and two-thirds of those with infiltrating fibrotic lesions are ultimately satisfied with their medical treatment although the remainder may experience side effects, which may result in non-compliance. Surgery for superficial and ovarian endometriosis is usually safe. When fibrotic infiltrating lesions are present, morbidity varies greatly depending on the skill of the individual surgeon, the need for advanced procedures, such as bowel resection and ureteral reimplantation, and the availability of expert colorectal surgeons and urologists working together in a multidisciplinary approach. The generalizability of published results is adequate for medical treatment but very limited for surgery. Moreover, on the one hand, hormonal drugs induce disease remission but do not cure endometriosis, and symptom relapse is expected when the drugs are discontinued; on the other hand, the same drugs should be used after lesion excision, which also does not cure endometriosis, to prevent an overall cumulative symptom and lesion recurrence rate of 10% per postoperative year. Therefore, the real choice may not be between medical treatment and surgery, but between medical treatment alone and surgery plus postoperative medical treatment. The experience of pain in women with endometriosis is a complex phenomenon that is not exclusively based on nociception, although the role of peripheral and central sensitization is not fully understood. In addition, trauma, and especially sexual trauma, and pelvic floor disorders can cause or contribute to symptoms in many individuals with chronic pelvic pain, and healthcare providers should never take for granted that diagnosed or suspected endometriosis is always the real, or the sole, origin of the referred complaints. Alternative treatment modalities are available that can help address most of the additional causes contributing to symptoms. Pain management in women with endometriosis may be more than a choice between medical and surgical treatment and may require comprehensive care by a multidisciplinary team including psychologists, sexologists, physiotherapists, dieticians, and pain therapists. An often missing factor in successful treatment is empathy on the part of healthcare providers. Being heard and understood, receiving simple and clear explanations and honest communication about uncertainties, being invited to share medical decisions after receiving detailed and impartial information, and being reassured that a team member will be available should a major problem arise, can greatly increase trust in doctors and transform a lonely and frustrating experience into a guided and supported journey, during which coping with this chronic disease is gradually learned and eventually accepted. Within this broader scenario, patient-centred medicine is the priority, and whether or when to resort to surgery or choose the medical option remains the prerogative of each individual woman.

Endometriosis and sexual disorders: the effect of surgical and medical treatment, a multicentre cross-sectional study

Background

Sexual health is a major concern in women with endometriosis, however only a few controlled studies have examined this with validated instruments. The effect of hormonal treatments on sexual function in endometriosis is also an underrated topic. The aim of this study was to investigate sexual function of patients with endometriosis by a specific tool to better evaluate their sexual function (including different domains), and the influence of hormonal treatment or surgery on these parameters.

Methods

An observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study was conducted in a group (n=194) of sexually active, women aged 25-45 years old, with surgical or ultrasonographic diagnosis of endometriosis, referred to the Endometriosis Center of Careggi University Hospital or Negrar di Valpolicella. Sexual function was assessed by administering the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), which assesses the domains of desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain. FSFI scores were compared to those of a control group (n=58) and according to the treatment received by patients with endometriosis.

Results

Ovarian endometriosis was present in 50 patients (25.8%), deep infiltrating endometriosis in 65 patients (33.5%) and both in 79 patients (40.7%). Adenomyosis coexisted in 102 patients (52.6%). Women with endometriosis reported a mean total FSFI score of 18.3 [4.2-25.8] (< 26.55), indicating female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in all patients. At multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounders (BMI and hormonal therapy), women with endometriosis presented significantly lower scores than controls in all the FSFI (p<0.001). Patients with endometriosis under hormonal treatments (n=124; 64%), regardless of the type, had significantly lower scores in all FSFI subscales and total score, even after adjusting for confounders-age, BMI and history of surgery.

Conclusions

Patients with endometriosis are at risk for FSD, encompassing not only dyspareunia, but all domains of sexual function. Hormonal treatments do not result in improvement in sexual symptoms.

The co-effect of sensate focus technique and sexual position changing on sexual function of women who use medical treatment for endometriosis

Endometriosis is one of the most common chronic diseases of women. This study aimed to investigate the effect of sensate focus technique and sexual position changing on sexual function of women who used medical treatment for endometriosis. This clinical trial study was performed on 80 women who used medical treatment for endometriosis. Women were randomly assigned to two groups: in the intervention group, 2 h of verbal educational session were held and at the end of the session, an instruction booklet about sensate focus technique was given to them, the control group received routine treatment. The sexual function and the dyspareunia of the participants were evaluated after 4 and 8 weeks. Eight weeks after the intervention, the mean total score of sexual function in the intervention group was significantly improved compared to before the intervention (p < 0.001). The mean score of sexual pain in the follow-up periods in the intervention group was significantly different compared to before the intervention and control groups (p < 0.001). The sensate focus technique and sexual position change simultaneously improve sexual function in women with endometriosis who used medication.Trial registration: Approval number from Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: IRCT2200617047812N1 (Registration date: 2020-11-05).Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? The role of endometriosis in the genesis of sexual dysfunction in women has been mentioned in several articles. Researches have shown that some sexual positions put less pressure on parts of the pelvis that contain endometrial tissue. The sensate focus technique can improve sexual dysfunction, including hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) and female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), orgasm, dyspareunia, and vaginismus.What do the results of this study add? Have a positive effect on sexual function and dyspareunia in women with endometriosis undergoing medical treatment and improve their sexual function.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Medical staff recommended becoming familiar with these techniques to teach sensate focus and sexual position changing to women with endometriosis to improve their sexual function.