The value of human epididymis 4, D-dimer, and fibrinogen compared with CA 125 alone in triaging women presenting with pelvic masses: a retrospective cohort study

The Prognostic Role of Circulating FPR Before Operation in Patients with BCLC A-C Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

This research aimed to comprehensively assess the prognostic role of fibrinogen to prealbumin ratio (FPR) in BCLC A-C HCC patients treated by TACE and RFA.

Methods

The research included 240 patients at stage BCLC A-C treated by TACE and RFA at Beijing Ditan Hospital of Capital Medical University from May 2011 to November 2018.

Results

The results showed that the size of the tumor, vascular invasion, α-foetoprotein, cirrhosis, NLR, LMR, and PLR showed prognostic value in predicting 5-year OS. Besides, FPR (95% confidence interval: 1.006–1.013, hazard ratio: 1.009) was a prognostic factor for the prediction of 5-year OS in HCC.

Conclusion

Our research indicated that FPR was a potential indicator for patients with BCLC A-C hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment of RFA and TACE.

Diagnostic Accuracy of the ADNEX Model for Ovarian Cancer at the 15% Cut-Off Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ADNEX model for ovarian cancer at the 15% cut-off value.

Methods

Studies on the identified diagnosis of the ADNEX model for ovarian cancer published in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases from January 1st, 2014 to February 20th, 2021 were searched. Two researchers independently screened the retrieved studies and extracted the basic features and parameter data. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2, and the result was summarized by Review Manager 5.3. Meta-Disc 1.4 and STATA 16.0 were used in statistical analysis. Heterogeneity of this meta-analysis was calculated. Meta-regression was performed to investigate the potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis and Deek's funnel plot analysis were conducted to evaluate the stability and publication bias, respectively.

Results

280 studies were initially retrieved through the search strategy, and 10 eligible studies were ultimately included. The random-effects model was selected for data synthesis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86), 5.2 (95% CI: 4.1-6.4), 0.10 (95% CI: 0.07-0.13), 54.0 (95% CI: 37.0-77.0) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95). Meta-regression based on study design, country, enrollment and blind method was not statistically significant. This meta-analysis was stable with no obvious publication bias.

Conclusions

The ADNEX model at the 15% cut-off had high diagnostic accuracy in identifying ovarian cancer.