Systematic screening for vasa previa at the 20-week anomaly scan

Vasa previa in singleton pregnancies: diagnosis and clinical management based on an international expert consensus

BACKGROUND

There are limited data to guide the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Currently, what is known is largely based on case reports or series and cohort studies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically collect and classify expert opinions and achieve consensus on the diagnosis and clinical management of vasa previa using focus group discussions and a Delphi technique.

STUDY DESIGN

A 4-round focus group discussion and a 3-round Delphi survey of an international panel of experts on vasa previa were conducted. Experts were selected on the basis of their publication record on vasa previa. First, we convened a focus group discussion panel of 20 experts and agreed on which issues were unresolved in the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. A 3-round anonymous electronic survey was then sent to the full expert panel. Survey questions were presented on the diagnosis and management of vasa previa, which the experts were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale (from "strongly disagree"=1 to "strongly agree"=5). Consensus was defined as a median score of 5. Following responses to each round, any statements that had median scores of ≤3 were deemed to have had no consensus and were excluded. Statements with a median score of 4 were revised and re-presented to the experts in the next round. Consensus and nonconsensus statements were then aggregated.

RESULTS

A total of 68 international experts were invited to participate in the study, of which 57 participated. Experts were from 13 countries on 5 continents and have contributed to >80% of published cohort studies on vasa previa, as well as national and international society guidelines. Completion rates were 84%, 93%, and 91% for the first, second, and third rounds, respectively, and 71% completed all 3 rounds. The panel reached a consensus on 26 statements regarding the diagnosis and key points of management of vasa previa, including the following: (1) although there is no agreement on the distance between the fetal vessels and the cervical internal os to define vasa previa, the definition should not be limited to a 2-cm distance; (2) all pregnancies should be screened for vasa previa with routine examination for placental cord insertion and a color Doppler sweep of the region over the cervix at the second-trimester anatomy scan; (3) when a low-lying placenta or placenta previa is found in the second trimester, a transvaginal ultrasound with Doppler should be performed at approximately 32 weeks to rule out vasa previa; (4) outpatient management of asymptomatic patients without risk factors for preterm birth is reasonable; (5) asymptomatic patients with vasa previa should be delivered by scheduled cesarean delivery between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation; and (6) there was no agreement on routine hospitalization, avoidance of intercourse, or use of 3-dimensional ultrasound for diagnosis of vasa previa.

CONCLUSION

Through focus group discussion and a Delphi process, an international expert panel reached consensus on the definition, screening, clinical management, and timing of delivery in vasa previa, which could inform the development of new clinical guidelines.

Impact of Universal Vasa Previa Screening With Color Doppler During the OB Ultrasound Anatomy Scan

OBJECTIVES

Our institution introduced universal vasa previa (VP) screening utilizing transabdominal ultrasound with color Doppler for all pregnancies at the second trimester anatomy scan. Our study sought to describe the clinical impact of this intervention.

METHODS

Radiology records from the 12 months pre- and post-intervention were queried for "vasa previa." Records included for analysis were those with a first-time diagnosis or discussion of VP at the anatomy scan. Cases were categorized by outcome: (Group 1) True VP, with subgroups A, unresolved by time of delivery and B, resolved by delivery; (Group 2) False positives; (Group 3) Possible VP without definitive diagnosis; and (Group 4) VP ruled out, for example, "no features of VP." Group size was expressed as a percentage of total anatomy scans during pre- or post-intervention periods respectively. Absolute and relative percent change were calculated for each group.

RESULTS

In the pre-intervention period, 1 case (0.36% of total scans) was categorized in Group 1A, 1 case (0.36%) in Group 3, and 7 cases (2.53%) in Group 4. In the post-intervention period, 2 cases (0.30%) were in Group 1A, 4 cases (0.61%) in Group 1B, 2 cases (0.30%) in Group 2, 1 case (0.15%) in Group 3, and 7 cases (1.06%) in Group 4. There was a +153% relative change in true positives, from 0.36 to 0.91%.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal color Doppler screening may have increased detection (sensitivity) while simultaneously increasing false positives (decreased specificity). While decreasing sensitivity is not ideal, this is acceptable given the potential catastrophic outcome of a missed VP.

Inpatient versus outpatient management of prenatally diagnosed vasa praevia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Vasa praevia is a serious pregnancy complication that is potentially life-threatening for the fetus. The possible benefits of prophylactic hospital admission of asymptomatic women diagnosed with vasa praevia antenatally remain unclear. This study aims to compare the pregnancy outcomes of inpatient versus outpatient management in women with a prenatal diagnosis of vasa praevia.

METHODS

A systematic search of four electronic databases was conducted and two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility. The inclusion criteria incorporated studies with prenatally diagnosed vasa praevia, a distinction on whether women were managed as inpatients and/or outpatients and where perinatal mortality was recorded as an outcome. The primary outcome of the study was perinatal mortality with additional outcomes of perinatal morbidity, need for emergency caesarean and antenatal steroid administration. Reporting of the results followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

The search produced 2,300 studies with ten of these studies included in the qualitative synthesis and four included in the quantitative analysis. There was no significant difference in perinatal mortality (OR 1.12, 95 % CI 0.10-12.07, p = 0.93, I2 = 0 %) or morbidity between women managed as inpatients or outpatients. The prophylactic inpatient group had higher rates of earlier gestational delivery and antenatal corticosteroid administration (OR 10.78, 95 % CI 1.07-108.74, p = 0.04, I2 = 82 %), but lower rates of emergency caesareans (OR 0.35, 95 % CI 0.17-0.72, p = 0.004, I2 = 0 %).

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in perinatal mortality or morbidity rates observed between inpatient and outpatient management of asymptomatic women with antenatally diagnosed vasa praevia. However, outpatient management is associated with prolonged gestation, a decrease in antenatal corticosteroid administration, and higher odds of emergency caesarean. Outpatient management of prenatally diagnosed vasa praevia seems appropriate for carefully selected asymptomatic women.

Incidence and causes of perinatal death in prenatally diagnosed vasa previa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the perinatal mortality associated with prenatally diagnosed vasa previa and to determine what proportion of those perinatal deaths are directly attributable to vasa previa.

DATA SOURCES

The following databases have been searched from January 1, 1987, to January 1, 2023: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Our study included all studies (cohort studies and case series or reports) that had patients in which a prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa was made. Case series or reports were excluded from the meta-analysis. All cases in which prenatal diagnosis was not made were excluded from the study.

METHODS

The programming language software R (version 4.2.2) was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The data were logit transformed and pooled using the fixed effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was reported by I2. The publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot and the Peters regression test. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Overall, 113 studies with a cumulative sample size of 1297 pregnant individuals were included. This study included 25 cohort studies with 1167 pregnancies and 88 case series or reports with 130 pregnancies. Moreover, 13 perinatal deaths occurred among these pregnancies, consisting of 2 stillbirths and 11 neonatal deaths. Among the cohort studies, the overall perinatal mortality was 0.94% (95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.70; I2=0.0%). The pooled perinatal mortality attributed to vasa previa was 0.51% (95% confidence interval, 0.23-1.14; I2=0.0%). Stillbirth and neonatal death were reported in 0.20% (95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.80; I2=0.0%) and 0.77% (95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.48; I2=0.0%) of pregnancies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Perinatal death is uncommon after a prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa. Approximately half of the cases of perinatal mortality are not directly attributable to vasa previa. This information will help in guiding physicians in counseling and will provide reassurance to pregnant individuals with a prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa.

Incidence of vasa praevia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To derive accurate estimates of the incidence of vasa praevia (VP) in a routine population of unselected pregnancies.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane database was performed to review relevant citations reporting outcomes in pregnancies with VP from January 2000 until 5 April 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF STUDIES

Prospective or retrospective cohort or population studies that provided data regarding VP cases in routine unselected pregnancies during the study period. We included studies published in the English language after the year 2000 to reflect contemporary obstetric and neonatal practice.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved citations and extracted data. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses was used to ensure standardised reporting of studies.

RESULTS

A total of 3847 citations were screened and 82 full-text manuscripts were retrieved for analysis. There were 24 studies that met the inclusion criteria, of which 12 studies reported prenatal diagnosis with a systematic protocol of screening. There were 1320 pregnancies with VP in a total population of 2 278 561 pregnancies; the weighted pooled incidence of VP was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.01) per 1000 pregnancies, corresponding to 1 case of VP per 1271 (95% CI: 990 to 1692) pregnancies. Nested subanalysis of studies reporting screening for VP based on a specific protocol identified 395 pregnancies with VP in a population of 732 654 pregnancies with weighted pooled incidence of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.53 to 1.18) per 1000 pregnancies (1 case of VP per 1218 (95% CI: 847 to 1901) pregnancies).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of VP in unselected pregnancies is 1 in 1218 pregnancies. This is higher than is previously reported and can be used as a basis to assess whether screening for this condition should be part of routine clinical practice. Incorporation of strategies to screen for VP in routine clinical practice is likely to prevent 5% of stillbirths.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020125495.

Vasa Previa

Vasa previa refers to unprotected fetal vessels running through the membranes over the cervix. Until recently, this condition was associated with an exceedingly high perinatal mortality rate attributable to fetal exsanguination when the membranes ruptured. However, ultrasonography has made it possible to diagnose the condition prenatally, allowing cesarean delivery before labor or rupture of the membranes. Several recent studies have indicated excellent outcomes with prenatally diagnosed vasa previa. However, outcomes continue to be dismal when vasa previa is undiagnosed before labor. Risk factors for vasa previa include second-trimester placenta previa and low-lying placentas, velamentous cord insertion, placentas with accessory lobes, in vitro fertilization, and multifetal gestations. Recognition of individuals who are at risk and screening them will greatly decrease the mortality rate from this condition. Because of the relative rarity of vasa previa, there are no randomized controlled trials to guide management. Therefore, recommendations on the diagnosis and management of vasa previa are based largely on cohort studies and expert opinion. This Clinical Expert Series review addresses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, natural history, diagnosis and management of vasa previa, as well as innovative treatments for the condition.

Perinatal Mortality Despite Prenatal Diagnosis of Vasa Previa: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the causes and potential preventability of perinatal deaths in prenatally identified cases of vasa previa.

DATA SOURCES

Reports of prenatally identified cases of vasa previa published in the English language literature since 2000 were identified in Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov with the search terms "vasa previa," "abnormal cord insertion," "velamentous cord," "marginal cord," "bilobed placenta," and "succenturiate lobe."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

All cases from the above search with an antenatally diagnosed vasa previa present at delivery in singleton or twin gestations with perinatal mortality information were included.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Cases meeting inclusion criteria were manually abstracted, and multiple antenatal, intrapartum, and outcome variables were recorded. Deaths and cases requiring neonatal transfusion were analyzed in relation to plurality, routine hospitalization, and cervical length monitoring. A total of 1,109 prenatally diagnosed cases (1,000 singletons, 109 twins) were identified with a perinatal mortality rate attributable to vasa previa of 1.1% (95% CI 0.6-1.9%). All perinatal deaths occurred with unscheduled deliveries. The perinatal mortality rate in twin pregnancies was markedly higher than that in singleton pregnancies (9.2% vs 0.2%, P <.001), accounting for 80% of overall mortality despite encompassing only 9.8% of births. Compared with individuals with singleton pregnancies, those with twin pregnancies are more likely to undergo unscheduled delivery (56.4% vs 35.1%, P =.01) despite delivering 2 weeks earlier (33.2 weeks vs 35.1 weeks, P =.006). An institutional policy of routine hospitalization is associated with a reduced need for neonatal transfusion (0.9% vs 6.0%, P <.001) and a reduction in the perinatal mortality rate in twin pregnancies (0% vs 25%, P =.002) but not in singleton pregnancies (0% vs 0.5%, P =.31).

CONCLUSION

Routine hospitalization and earlier delivery of twins may result in a reduction in the perinatal mortality rate. A smaller benefit from routine admission of individuals with singleton pregnancies cannot be excluded. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of cervical length measurements to guide clinical management.

Guideline No. 439: Diagnosis and Management of Vasa Previa

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current evidence and to make recommendations for diagnosis and classification of vasa previa and for management of women with this diagnosis.

TARGET POPULATION

Pregnant women with vasa previa or low-lying fetal vessels.

OPTIONS

To manage vasa previa in hospital or at home, and to perform a cesarean delivery preterm or at term, or to allow a trial of labour when a diagnosis of vasa previa or low-lying fetal vessels is suspected or confirmed.

OUTCOMES

Prolonged hospitalization, preterm birth, rate of cesarean delivery, and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Women with vasa previa or low-lying fetal vessels are at an increased risk of maternal and fetal or postnatal adverse outcomes. These outcomes include a potentially incorrect diagnosis, need for hospitalization, unnecessary restriction of activities, an early delivery, and an unnecessary cesarean delivery. Optimization of diagnostic and management protocols can improve maternal and fetal or postnatal outcomes.

EVIDENCE

Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2022, using medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords related to pregnancy, vasa previa, low-lying fetal vessels, antepartum hemorrhage, short cervix, preterm labour, and cesarean delivery. This document presents an abstraction of the evidence rather than a methodological review.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Obstetric care providers, including obstetricians, family physicians, nurses, midwives, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and radiologists.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Unprotected fetal vessels in placental membranes and cord that are close to the cervix, including vasa previa, need careful characterization by sonographic examination and evidence-based management to reduce risks to the baby and the mother during pregnancy and delivery.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Directive clinique no 439: Diagnostic et prise en charge du vasa prævia

OBJECTIF

Résumer les données probantes actuelles et énoncer des recommandations pour le diagnostic et la classification du vasa prævia et pour la prise en charge des femmes ayant reçu ce diagnostic.

POPULATION CIBLE

Femmes enceintes présentant un vasa prævia ou des vaisseaux ombilicaux péricervicaux.

OPTIONS

En cas de diagnostic soupçonné ou confirmé de vasa prævia ou de vaisseaux ombilicaux péricervicaux, prendre en charge la patiente à l'hôpital ou à domicile, puis pratiquer une césarienne avant terme ou à terme ou entreprendre une épreuve de travail. RéSULTATS: Hospitalisation prolongée, accouchement prématuré, césarienne et morbidité et mortalité néonatales. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Les femmes ayant un vasa prævia ou des vaisseaux ombilicaux péricervicaux présentent un risque accru d'issues défavorables maternelles, fœtales ou postnatales, à savoir un diagnostic potentiellement erroné, un besoin d'hospitalisation, une restriction inutile des activités, un accouchement précoce et une césarienne inutile. L'optimisation des protocoles de diagnostic et de prise en charge peut améliorer les issues maternelles, fœtales et postnatales. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans les bases de données Medline, PubMed, Embase et Cochrane Library, de leur création jusqu'à mars 2022, à partir de termes MeSH et de mots clés liés à la grossesse, au vasa prævia, aux vaisseaux prævia, à l'hémorragie ante partum, au col court, au travail prématuré et à la césarienne. Le présent document est un résumé des données probantes et non pas une revue méthodologique. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux, y compris obstétriciens, médecins de famille, infirmières, sages-femmes, spécialistes en médecine fœto-maternelle et radiologistes. RéSUMé POUR TWITTER: En cas de cordon et de vaisseaux ombilicaux non protégés dans les membranes près du col (vasa prævia y compris), une caractérisation échographique et une prise en charge avisée s'imposent pour réduire les risques pour le bébé et la mère pendant la grossesse et l'accouchement.

Current Evidence on Vasa Previa without Velamentous Cord Insertion or Placental Morphological Anomalies (Type III Vasa Previa): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Vasa previa carries a high risk of severe fetal morbidity and mortality due to fetal hemorrhage caused by damage to unprotected fetal cord vessels upon membrane rupture. Vasa previa is generally classified into types I and II. However, some cases are difficult to classify, and some studies have proposed a type III classification. This study aimed to review the current evidence on type III vasa previa. A systematic literature search was conducted, and 11 articles (2011-2022) were included. A systematic review showed that type III vasa previa accounts for 5.7% of vasa previa cases. Thirteen women with type III vasa previa were examined at a patient-level analysis. The median age was 35 (interquartile range [IQR] 31.5-38) years, and approximately 45% were assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies. The median gestational week of delivery was 36 (IQR 34-37) weeks; the antenatal detection rate was 84.6%, and no cases reported neonatal death. The characteristics and obstetric outcomes (rate of ART, antenatal diagnosis, emergent cesarean delivery, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal mortality) were compared between types I and III vasa previa, and all outcomes of interest were similar. The current evidence on type III vasa previa is scanty, and further studies are warranted.

The Characteristics and Obstetric Outcomes of Type II Vasa Previa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Vasa previa is a rare fetal life-threatening obstetric disease classified into types I and II. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and obstetric outcomes of type II vasa previa. A systematic review was performed, and 20 studies (1998-2022) were identified. The results from six studies showed that type II vasa previa accounted for 21.3% of vasa previa cases. The characteristics and obstetric outcomes (rate of assisted reproductive technology (ART), antenatal diagnosis, emergent cesarean delivery, maternal transfusion, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal mortality) were compared between type I and II vasa previa, and all outcomes of interest were similar. The association between ART and abnormal placenta (bilobed placenta or succenturiate lobe) was examined in three studies, and the results were as follows: (i) increased rate of succenturiate lobes (ART versus non-ART pregnancy; OR (odds ratio) 6.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.45-19.78); (ii) similar rate of abnormal placenta (cleavage-stage versus blastocyst embryo transfer); (iii) increased rate of abnormal placenta (frozen versus fresh embryo transfer; OR 2.97, 95%CI 1.10-7.96). Although the outcomes of type II vasa previa appear to be similar to those of type I vasa previa, the current evidence is insufficient for a robust conclusion.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound for Pregnant Women with Vasa Previa and Velamentous Cord Insertion

Objective

The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility and accuracy of transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound (TA-CDUS) and transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound (TV-CDUS) as screening methods for pregnant women with vasa previa (VP) and velamentous cord insertion (VCI).

Methods

A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was performed on 5,434 pregnant women from 2018 to 2021, who underwent both TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS. Diagnostic performance of TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS was determined using specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), using the delivery information (gross examination) as the "Gold-standard". Patient records were reviewed for demographics and diagnosis.

Results

The combination of VP and VCI was diagnosed in 37/5434 (0.68%) women at delivery. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall test accuracy of TA-CDUS were 72.97%, 99.85%, 77.14%, 99.81%, and 99.67%, respectively, for diagnosing VP with VCI. The corresponding values for TV-CDUS were 89.19%, 99.87%, 82.50%, 99.93%, and 99.80%, respectively. Moreover, the sensitivity of combination of TA-CDUS and TA-CDUS in determining VP with VCI was 97.30%, specificity 99.98%, PPV 97.30%, NPV 99.98%, and accuracy 99.96%. No significant difference in the misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis was found between the examination by TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS.

Conclusions

Both TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS can be acceptable diagnostic tools for assessment of pregnant women with VP and VCI, with a better application of TV-CDUS with higher accuracy. The combination of TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS could provide an objective imaging basis for choosing clinical treatment strategies and predicting prognosis.

Assisted Reproductive Technique and Abnormal Cord Insertion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abnormal cord insertion (ACI) is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes; however, the relationship between ACI and assisted reproductive technology (ART) has not been examined in a meta-analysis. This study examines the association between ACI and ART, and delivery outcomes of women with ACI. A systematic review was conducted, and 16 studies (1990–2021) met the inclusion criteria. In the unadjusted pooled analysis (n = 10), ART was correlated with a higher rate of velamentous cord insertion (VCI) (odds ratio (OR) 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64–2.79), marginal cord insertion (n = 6; OR 1.58, 95%CI 1.26–1.99), and vasa previa (n = 1; OR 10.96, 95%CI 2.94–40.89). Nevertheless, the VCI rate was similar among the different ART types (blastocyst versus cleavage-stage transfer and frozen versus fresh embryo transfer). Regarding the cesarean delivery (CD) rate, women with VCI were more likely to have elective (n = 3; OR 1.13, 95%CI 1.04–1.22) and emergent CD (n = 5; OR 1.93, 95%CI 1.82–2.03). In conclusion, ART may be correlated with an increased prevalence of ACI. However, most studies could not exclude confounding factors; thus, further studies are warranted to characterize ART as a risk factor for ACI. In women with ACI, elective and emergent CD rates are high.

Timing of birth and adverse pregnancy outcomes in cases of prenatally diagnosed vasa previa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The ideal time for birth in pregnancies diagnosed with vasa previa remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review aiming to identify the gestational age at delivery that best balances the risks for prematurity with that of pregnancy prolongation in cases with prenatally diagnosed vasa previa.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

The intervention analyzed was delivery at various gestational ages in pregnancies prenatally diagnosed with vasa previa. Cohort studies, case series, and case reports were included in the qualitative synthesis. When summary figures could not be obtained directly from the studies for the quantitative synthesis, authors were contacted and asked to provide a breakdown of perinatal outcomes by gestational age at birth.

METHODS

Study appraisal was completed using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for the respective study types. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.

RESULTS

The search identified 3435 studies of which 1264 were duplicates. After screening 2171 titles and abstracts, 140 studies proceeded to the full-text screen. A total of 37 studies were included for analysis, 14 of which were included in a quantitative synthesis. Among 490 neonates, there were 2 perinatal deaths (0.4%), both of which were neonatal deaths before 32 weeks' gestation. In general, the rate of neonatal complications decreased steadily from <32 weeks' gestation (4.6% rate of perinatal death, 91.2% respiratory distress, 11.4% 5-minute Apgar score <7, 23.3% neonatal blood transfusion, 100% neonatal intensive care unit admission, and 100% low birthweight) to 36 weeks' gestation (0% perinatal death, 5.3% respiratory distress, 0% 5-minute Apgar score <7, 2.9% neonatal blood transfusion, 29.2% neonatal intensive care unit admission, and 30.9% low birthweight). Complications then increased slightly at 37 weeks' gestation before decreasing again at 38 weeks' gestation.

CONCLUSION

Prolonging pregnancies until 36 weeks' gestation seems to be safe and beneficial in otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies with antenatally diagnosed vasa previa.