Impact of Distinct Oxygenators on Pulsatile Energy Indicators in an Adult Cardiopulmonary Bypass Model

Clinical evaluation of two adult oxygenator systems in terms of mortality and major adverse events

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to examine the effects of two oxygenator systems on major adverse events and mortality.

METHODS

A total of 181 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the oxygenator used: Group M, in which a Medtronic Affinity (Medtronic Operational Headquarters, Minneapolis, MN, USA) oxygenator was used, and Group S, in which a Sorin Inspire (Sorin Group Italia, Mirandola, Italy) oxygenator was used.

RESULTS

Group S consisted of 89 patients, whereas Group M included 92 patients. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of age (p = .112), weight (p = .465), body surface area (p = .956), or gender (p = .484). There was no statistically significant difference in hemorrhage on the first or second postoperative day (p = .318 and p = .455, respectively). No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of red blood cell (p = .468), fresh frozen plasma (p = .116), or platelet concentrate transfusion (p = .212). Infections, wound complications, and delayed sternal closure were significantly more common in Group M (p = .006, p = .023, and p = .019, respectively). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenators and intra-aortic balloon pumps were required significantly more frequently in Group S (p = .025 and p = .013, respectively). Major adverse events occurred in 16 (18%) patients in Group S and 14 (15.2%) patients in Group M (p = .382). Mortality was observed in six (6.7%) patients in Group S and three (3.3%) patients in Group M (p = .232). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay (p = .451).

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes of the two oxygenator systems, including mortality, major adverse events, hemorrhage, erythrocyte and platelet transfusions, and length of hospital stay, were similar.

Systemic inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass: Axial flow versus radial flow oxygenators

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to investigate the inflammatory effects of different oxygenator flow pattern types in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

We designed this randomized, single-blind, prospective study of patients with coronary artery disease. We compared the systemic inflammatory effects of oxygenators with two types of flow: axial flow and radial flow. Therefore, we divided the patients into two groups: 24 patients in the axial group and 28 patients in the radial group. IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α were examined for cytokine activation leading to a systemic inflammatory reaction. The samples were collected at three different time intervals: T1, T2, and T3 (T1 was taken before cardiopulmonary bypass, T2 just 1 h after CPB onset, and T3 was taken 24 h after the surgery).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups. We observed that there were notably lower levels of humoral inflammatory response parameters (IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α) in the radial flow oxygenator group than in the axial flow group at the specific sampling times. For IL-10, there was no significant difference for any time period.

CONCLUSION

It might be advantageous to use a radial-flow-patterned oxygenator to limit the inflammatory response triggered by the oxygenators in cardiopulmonary bypass.

Hemodynamic evaluation of a new pulsatile blood pump during low flow cardiopulmonary bypass support

BACKGROUND

The VentriFlo^® True Pulse Pump (VentriFlo, Inc, Pelham, NH, USA) is a new pulsatile blood pump intended for use during short-term circulatory support. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the VentriFlo and compare it to a conventional centrifugal pump (ROTAFLOW, Getinge, Gothenberg, Sweden) in acute pig experiments.

METHODS

Pigs (40-45 kg) were supported by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with the VentriFlo (n = 9) or ROTAFLOW (n = 5) for 6 h. Both VentriFlo and ROTAFLOW circuits utilized standard CPB components. We evaluated hemodynamics, blood chemistry, gas analysis, plasma hemoglobin, and microcirculation at the groin skin with computer-assisted video microscopy (Optilia, Sollentuna, Sweden).

RESULTS

Pigs were successfully supported by CPB for 6 h without any pump-related complications in either group. The VentriFlo delivered an average stroke volume of 29.2 ± 4.8 ml. VentriFlo delivered significantly higher pulse pressure (29.1 ± 7.2 mm Hg vs. 4.4 ± 7.0 mm Hg, p < 0.01) as measured in the carotid artery, with mean aortic pressure and pump flow comparable with those in ROTAFLOW. In blood gas analysis, arterial pH was significantly lower after five hours support in the VentriFlo group (7.30 ± 0.07 vs. 7.43 ± 0.03, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in plasma hemoglobin level in both groups after six hours of CPB support. In microcirculatory assessment, VentriFlo tended to keep normal capillary flow, but it was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

VentriFlo-supported pigs showed comparable hemodynamic parameters with significantly higher pulse pressure compared to ROTAFLOW without hemolysis.

Frequency domain analysis and clinical outcomes of pulsatile and non-pulsatile blood flow energy during cardiopulmonary bypass

INTRODUCTION

The superiority of pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass remains controversial. We analyzed the frequency-domain characteristics and organ protection of pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow in adult patients with valvular disease.

METHODS

EEP and SHE were used to calculate blood flow energy in 60 patients. The Fast Fourier Transform was employed to analyze the power spectral density and power density ratio (Rvpd) of flow energy. Changes in endothelin-1, nitric oxide, interleukin-6,10, tumor necrotic factor, S100β, NSE, blood and urinary β2-microglobulin levels were investigated to assess the endothelial function, inflammatory reaction, kidney and brain injury during CPB.

RESULTS

EEP and SHE in PP group at each time point were 1.52-1.62 times and 2.03-2.22 times higher respectively compared with NP group. Power spectral density analysis demonstrated that the blood flow energy frequencies in each group were all within 40 Hz and the low frequency energy (0-5 Hz) was dominant in physiological perfusion (>90%). The energy ratio of 0-5 Hz at radial artery was significantly decreased compared with that of post arterial filter in PP (81% vs 64%) and NP (63% vs 37%) group. The power density ratio (Rvpd) was higher than that of NP in all frequency ranges at the radial artery (9.51 vs 4.68 vs 3.59) and arterial filter (3.87 vs 2.69 vs 2.38). The S100β, NSE Urinary and plasma β2-microglobulin level were significantly increased at 6 and 24 hours after surgery in two group, and significantly higher in group NP.

CONCLUSION

PP provided more energy than NP. The proportion of low frequency energy in the pulsatile or nonpulsatile flow is significantly reduced. The low-frequency energy is significantly attenuated during conduction to peripheral tissues in nonpulsatile flow. The surplus pulsatile energy influences the secretion of endothelial and inflammatory factors, and demonstrate better cerebral and kidney protective effect at the biological marker level.

Artificial Organs 2017: A Year in Review

In this Editor's Review, articles published in 2017 are organized by category and summarized. We provide a brief reflection of the research and progress in artificial organs intended to advance and better human life while providing insight for continued application of these technologies and methods. Artificial Organs continues in the original mission of its founders "to foster communications in the field of artificial organs on an international level." Artificial Organs continues to publish developments and clinical applications of artificial organ technologies in this broad and expanding field of organ Replacement, Recovery, and Regeneration from all over the world. Peer-reviewed Special Issues this year included contributions from the 12th International Conference on Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support Systems and Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Perfusion edited by Dr. Akif Undar, Artificial Oxygen Carriers edited by Drs. Akira Kawaguchi and Jan Simoni, the 24th Congress of the International Society for Mechanical Circulatory Support edited by Dr. Toru Masuzawa, Challenges in the Field of Biomedical Devices: A Multidisciplinary Perspective edited by Dr. Vincenzo Piemonte and colleagues and Functional Electrical Stimulation edited by Dr. Winfried Mayr and colleagues. We take this time also to express our gratitude to our authors for offering their work to this journal. We offer our very special thanks to our reviewers who give so generously of time and expertise to review, critique, and especially provide meaningful suggestions to the author's work whether eventually accepted or rejected. Without these excellent and dedicated reviewers the quality expected from such a journal could not be possible. We also express our special thanks to our Publisher, John Wiley & Sons for their expert attention and support in the production and marketing of Artificial Organs. We look forward to reporting further advances in the coming years.