Efficacy of an artificial pancreas device for achieving tight perioperative glycemic control in living donor liver transplantation

Closed-loop artificial endocrine pancreas from Japan

The development of a closed-loop artificial pancreas (AP) in the Western countries and Japan is different. In Western countries, wearable AP with a closed-loop glycemic control system has been developed as a treatment for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. On the contrary, in Japan, bedside closed-loop AP explored by a Japanese company (Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) has developed as perioperative glycemic control device in surgical patients and acute care patients with emergency. In this article, we reviewed the scientific evidence in the past and present and future prospects of perioperative glycemic control using bedside AP with a closed-loop system in Japan. Conventional perioperative strict glycemic controls have three major problems: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and variability in blood glucose concentrations. In Japan, perioperative strict glycemic control using the current bedside AP STG-55 (Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) has been developed since 2010. This novel glycemic control method achieved not only stable glycemic control without hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and less variability of blood glucose concentrations but also reduced postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing major surgeries. Among the rapidly increasing number of surgical or emergency patients with diabetes, frailty, and sarcopenia of intrinsic glucose intolerance, more sophisticated and smaller AP available easily in operating rooms and intensive care units will be warranted to promote improved therapeutic outcomes in such critically ill patients.

Perioperative intensive glycemic control for liver transplant recipients to prevent surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) are common among liver transplant recipients and result in adverse patient outcomes. Standard glycemic control is effective in reducing SSIs. Some studies suggest intensive glycemic control reduces the risk of SSI further.

METHODS

For this systematic review, were searched for studies comparing perioperative intensive and standard glycemic control in liver transplant recipients. Clinical trials registries and reference lists of included studies were also searched. No date or language restrictions were applied. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE method. Cohort studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and three cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Low-quality evidence from the two RCTs in a meta-analysis with 264 recipients found it was uncertain whether the risk of SSI was reduced by having intensive glycemic control (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.52, 95% CI 0.66-3.51). However, there was an increased risk of hypoglycemia among recipients having intensive glycemic control (RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.40-3.92) n = 264. Meta-analyses found it uncertain whether secondary outcomes, allograft rejection and death, were reduced among recipients having intensive glycemic control; (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.48-1.50) and (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.44-1.95), respectively. The two cohort studies were poor quality and presented conflicting outcomes on the effects of intensive blood glucose control on SSI.

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of intensive glycemic control among liver transplant recipients to reduce SSIs.