Dynamic measurement of centering forces on transvalvular cannulas

Tool-tissue forces in surgery: A systematic review

Background

Excessive tool-tissue interaction forces often result in tissue damage and intraoperative complications, while insufficient forces prevent the completion of the task. This review sought to explore the tool-tissue interaction forces exerted by instruments during surgery across different specialities, tissues, manoeuvres and experience levels.

Materials & methods

A PRISMA-guided systematic review was carried out using Embase, Medline and Web of Science databases.

Results

Of 462 articles screened, 45 studies discussing surgical tool-tissue forces were included. The studies were categorized into 9 different specialities with the mean of average forces lowest for ophthalmology (0.04N) and highest for orthopaedic surgery (210N). Nervous tissue required the least amount of force to manipulate (mean of average: 0.4N), whilst connective tissue (including bone) required the most (mean of average: 45.8). For manoeuvres, drilling recorded the highest forces (mean of average: 14N), whilst sharp dissection recorded the lowest (mean of average: 0.03N). When comparing differences in the mean of average forces between groups, novices exerted 22.7% more force than experts, and presence of a feedback mechanism (e.g. audio) reduced exerted forces by 47.9%.

Conclusions

The measurement of tool-tissue forces is a novel but rapidly expanding field. The range of forces applied varies according to surgical speciality, tissue, manoeuvre, operator experience and feedback provided. Knowledge of the safe range of surgical forces will improve surgical safety whilst maintaining effectiveness. Measuring forces during surgery may provide an objective metric for training and assessment. Development of smart instruments, robotics and integrated feedback systems will facilitate this.

•

This review explores tool-tissue forces during surgery, a new and expanding field.

•

Forces were lowest in ophthalmology (0.04N) and highest in orthopaedics (210N).

•

Forces were lowest during sharp dissection (0.03N) and highest when drilling (14N).

•

Being an expert (vs. novice) and having feedback mechanisms (e.g. haptic) reduced exerted forces.

•

Development of force metrics will facilitate training, assessment & novel technology.

Dynamic measurement of centering forces on transvalvular cannulas

In heart failure therapy, minimally invasive devices (transcatheter valves, catheter‐based cannulas or pumps) are increasingly used. The interaction with the valve is of special importance as valve damage, backflow, and thrombus formation are known complications. Therefore, the aim of this in vitro study was to characterize the forces acting on different sized transvalvular cannulas at various transvalvular pressures for four different valves. In a pulsatile setup radial and tangential forces on transvalvular cannulas were measured for bioprosthetic, artificial pericardial tissue, fresh, and fixated porcine valves. The cannula position was varied from a central position to the wall in 10° rotational steps for the whole circular range and the use of different cannula diameters (4, 6, and 8 mm) and transvalvular pressures (40‐100 mmHg). Centering forces of four different aortic valve types were identified and the three leaflets were visible in the force distribution. At the mid of the cusps and at the largest deflection the forces were highest (up to 0.8 N) and lowest in the commissures (up to 0.2 N). Whereas a minor influence of the cannula diameter was found, the transvalvular pressure linearly increased the forces but did not alter the force patterns. Centering forces that act on transvalvular cannulas were identified in an in vitro setup for several valves and valve types. Lowest centering forces were found in the commissures and highest forces were found directly at the cusps. At low pressures, low centering forces and an increased cannula movement can be expected.