Monitoring relative blood volume changes during hemodialysis: Impact of the priming procedure

Accuracy of Crit-Line® monitors in predicting hematocrit and change in blood volume of dogs during hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Ultrafiltration (UF) is an extracorporeal technique for treating fluid overload and is monitored with noninvasive blood volume monitors.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine the accuracy of Crit-Line® III and IV noninvasive blood volume monitors to estimate canine packed cell volume (PCV) and changes in blood volume during UF. A secondary aim was to determine accuracy of targeted ultrafiltration rates (UFR) compared to calculated delivered UFR.

METHODS

An ex vivo study with a single Phoenix® X36 platform and canine packed red blood cells (pRBC) was performed. Through dilution and UF, clinically applicable PCV values were obtained and compared to Crit-Line® hematocrit (Hct). Blood volume was constantly measured and compared to targeted UFR. Systematic and proportional bias were calculated using a Bayes method.

RESULTS

Crit-Line® III and IV reported Hct was significantly lower than PCV (n = 140, median 26%, range, 8%-50%) when PCV was >25% and >30%, respectively. Crit-Line® III and IV calculated change in blood volume (ΔBV%) was significantly different from measured blood volume changes at ΔBV% ±20% and >-20%, respectively. Comparing targeted and delivered UFR (mL/h), less than targeted UFR was removed at UFR100 through UFR400 and UFR0 adding volume.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Crit-Line® III and IV monitors provide accurate estimates of canine PCV and UF volume change within specific ranges and are useful in monitoring canine UF and hemodialysis. Veterinary hemodialysis services should evaluate individual machines for UFR inaccuracies, which can meaningfully affect small animals.

Vascular refilling coefficient is not a good marker of whole-body capillary hydraulic conductivity in hemodialysis patients: insights from a simulation study

Refilling of the vascular space through absorption of interstitial fluid by micro vessels is a crucial mechanism for maintaining hemodynamic stability during hemodialysis (HD) and allowing excess fluid to be removed from body tissues. The rate of vascular refilling depends on the imbalance between the Starling forces acting across the capillary walls as well as on their hydraulic conductivity and total surface area. Various approaches have been proposed to assess the vascular refilling process during HD, including the so-called refilling coefficient (Kr) that describes the rate of vascular refilling per changes in plasma oncotic pressure, assuming that other Starling forces and the flow of lymph remain constant during HD. Several studies have shown that Kr decreases exponentially during HD, which was attributed to a dialysis-induced decrease in the whole-body capillary hydraulic conductivity (L_pS). Here, we employ a lumped-parameter mathematical model of the cardiovascular system and water and solute transport between the main body fluid compartments to assess the impact of all Starling forces and the flow of lymph on vascular refilling during HD in order to explain the reasons behind the observed intradialytic decrease in Kr. We simulated several HD sessions in a virtual patient with different blood priming procedures, ultrafiltration rates, session durations, and constant or variable levels of L_pS. We show that the intradialytic decrease in Kr is not associated with a possible reduction of L_pS but results from the inherent assumption that plasma oncotic pressure is the only variable Starling force during HD, whereas in fact other Starling forces, in particular the oncotic pressure of the interstitial fluid, have an important impact on the transcapillary fluid exchange during HD. We conclude that Kr is not a good marker of L_pS and should not be used to guide fluid removal during HD or to assess the fluid status of dialysis patients.