The hypertrophic cartilage induction influences the building-block capacity of human adipose stem/stromal cell spheroids for biofabrication

Bioprinting Using Organ Building Blocks: Spheroids, Organoids, and Assembloids

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, a promising advancement in tissue engineering technology, involves the robotic, layer-by-layer additive biofabrication of functional 3D tissue and organ constructs. This process utilizes biomaterials, typically hydrogels and living cells, following digital models. Traditional tissue engineering uses a classic triad of living cells, scaffolds, and physicochemical signals in bioreactors. A scaffold is a temporary, often biodegradable, support structure. Tissue engineering primarily falls into two categories: (i) scaffold based and (ii) scaffold free. The latter, scaffold-free 3D bioprinting, is gaining increasing popularity. Organ building blocks (OBB), capable of self-assembly and self-organization, such as tissue spheroids, organoids, and assembloids, have begun to be utilized in scaffold-free bioprinting. This article discusses the expanding range of OBB, presents the rapidly evolving collection of bioprinting and bioassembly methods using these OBB, and finally, outlines the advantages, challenges, and future perspectives of using OBB in organ printing.

Scaffolded spheroids as building blocks for bottom-up cartilage tissue engineering show enhanced bioassembly dynamics

Due to the capability of cell spheroids (SPH) to assemble into large high cell density constructs, their use as building blocks attracted a lot of attention in the field of biofabrication. Nevertheless, upon maturation, the composition along with the size of such building blocks change, affecting their fusiogenic ability to form a cohesive tissue construct of controllable size. This natural phenomenon remains a limitation for the standardization of spheroid-based therapies in the clinical setting. We recently showed that scaffolded spheroids (S-SPH) can be produced by forming spheroids directly within porous PCL-based microscaffolds fabricated using multiphoton lithography (MPL). In this new study, we compare the bioassembly potential of conventional SPHs versus S-SPHs depending on their degree of maturation. Doublets of both types of building blocks were cultured and their fusiogenicity was compared by measuring the intersphere angle, the length of the fusing spheroid pairs (referred to as doublet length) as well as their spreading behaviour. Finally, the possibility to fabricate macro-sized tissue constructs (i.e. cartilage-like) from both chondrogenic S-SPHs and SPHs was analyzed. This study revealed that, in contrast to conventional SPHs, S-SPHs exhibit robust and stable fusiogenicity, independently from their degree of maturation. In order to understand this behavior, we further analyze the intersection area of doublets, looking at the kinetic of cell migration and at the mechanical stability of the formed tissue using dissection measurements. Our findings indicate that the presence of microscaffolds enhances the ability of spheroids to be used as building blocks for bottom-up tissue engineering, which is an important advantage compared to conventional spheroid-based therapy approaches. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The approach of using SPHs as building blocks for bottom-up tissue engineering offers a variety of advantages. At the same time the self-assembly of large tissues remains challenging due to several intrinsic properties of SPHs, such as for instance the shrinkage of tissues assembled from SPHs, or the reduced fusiogenicity commonly observed with mature SPHs. In this work, we demonstrate the capability of scaffolded spheroids (S-SPH) to fuse and recreate cartilage-like tissue constructs despite their advanced maturation stage. In this regard, the presence of microscaffolds compensates for some of the intrinsic limitations of SPHs and can help to overcome current limitations of spheroid-based tissue engineering.

Articular Cartilage Regeneration through Bioassembling Spherical Micro-Cartilage Building Blocks

Articular cartilage lesions are prevalent and affect one out of seven American adults and many young patients. Cartilage is not capable of regeneration on its own. Existing therapeutic approaches for articular cartilage lesions have limitations. Cartilage tissue engineering is a promising approach for regenerating articular neocartilage. Bioassembly is an emerging technology that uses microtissues or micro-precursor tissues as building blocks to construct a macro-tissue. We summarize and highlight the application of bioassembly technology in regenerating articular cartilage. We discuss the advantages of bioassembly and present two types of building blocks: multiple cellular scaffold-free spheroids and cell-laden polymer or hydrogel microspheres. We present techniques for generating building blocks and bioassembly methods, including bioprinting and non-bioprinting techniques. Using a data set of 5069 articles from the last 28 years of literature, we analyzed seven categories of related research, and the year trends are presented. The limitations and future directions of this technology are also discussed.

Correlation of the regenerative potential of dermal fibroblasts in 2D culture with the biological properties of fibroblast-derived tissue spheroids

In situ 3D bioprinting is a new emerging therapeutic modality for treating human skin diseases. The tissue spheroids have been previously suggested as a powerful tool in rapidly expanding bioprinting technology. It has been demonstrated that the regenerative potential of human dermal fibroblasts could be quantitatively evaluated in 2D cell culture and confirmed after implantation in vivo. However, the development of unbiassed quantitative criteria of the regenerative potential of 3D tissue spheroids in vitro before their in situ bioprinting remains to be investigated. Here it has been demonstrated for the first time that specific correlations exist between the regenerative potential of human dermal fibroblasts cultured in vitro as 2D cell monolayer with biological properties of 3D tissue spheroids fabricated from these fibroblasts. In vitro assessment of biological properties included diameter, spreading and fusion kinetics, and biomechanical properties of 3D tissue spheroids. This comprehensive characterization could be used to predict tissue spheroids' regenerative potential in vivo.