Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for zone-II retinopathy of prematurity

Secondary glaucoma after bevacizumab injection in Type-1 retinopathy of prematurity

Purpose

The authors report three separate cases of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated with intravitreal bevacizumab before, or at 34 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), with subsequent development of secondary glaucoma.

Observations

All three cases involve patients born ≤24 weeks and meeting the American Academy of Pediatrics criteria for ROP screening. Prior to treatment, each patient was noted to have normal anterior chamber structures with no signs of glaucoma. Each patient developed type 1 ROP and was treated with intravitreal bevacizumab, which was administered at or before 34 weeks PMA. Following the administration of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), each patient developed a suspected open-angle glaucoma (OAG) within an approximate 4-week time frame. In these cases, the presentation of glaucoma differed from those that have been previously reported in the literature.

Conclusion and importance

Based on similar timing of glaucoma development following intravitreal bevacizumab injections, we hypothesize that the administration of anti-VEGF agents to very premature infants (≤24 weeks) at or before 34 weeks PMA, may predispose them to the development of secondary glaucoma through an unknown and possibly novel pathway.

Comparison of different agents and doses of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (aflibercept, bevacizumab, conbercept, ranibizumab) versus laser for retinopathy of prematurity: A network meta-analysis

Laser photocoagulation (LPC) and/or intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections constitute the current standard treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). This network meta-analysis focus on whether a ranking of interventions may be established for different dose levels of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents (aflibercept, bevacizumab, conbercept, ranibizumab) as primary treatments for ROP versus laser in terms of retreatment rate as primary outcome, and time to retreatment and refractive error as secondary endpoints, since best anti-VEGF dosage remains under debate. Sixty-eight studies (15 randomized control trials and 53 nonrandomized studies) of 12,356 eyes of 6445 infants were retrieved from databases (2005 Jan. - 2023 June). Studies were evaluated for model fit, risk of bias and confidence of evidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). Bayesian NMA showed that anti-VEGF drugs were not inferior to laser in terms of retreatment rate. For intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), doses half of the conventional infant dose showed a low risk of retreatment rate (risk ratio (RR) of 1.43; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.508, 4.03). On probability ranking as surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) plot, half dose of bevacizumab had a better position than conventional and augmented (1.2-2 times the regular dose) doses. A similar probability trend was observed for half vs. conventional doses of aflibercept and ranibizumab. Conventional infant dose of conbercept showed the lowest risk for retreatment (RR 0.846; 95% CrI: 0.245, 2.91). For secondary endpoints, lower doses of anti-VEGF agents were associated with shorter times to retreatment. The largest changes were noted for the augmented doses of bevacizumab and ranibizumab (0.3 mg) with means of 14.1 weeks (95% CrI: 6.65, 21.6) and 12.8 weeks (95% CrI: 3.19, 20.9), respectively. Finally, NMA demonstrated better refractive profile for anti-VEGF than laser therapy, especially for the conventional infant doses of bevacizumab and ranibizumab which exhibited a significantly better refractive profile than LPC, with mean differences of 1.67 (spherical equivalent - diopters) (95% CrI: 0.705, 2.67) and 2.19 (95% CrI: 0.782, 3.59), respectively. In the SUCRA plots, LPC had a markedly different position with a higher probability for myopia. Further clinical trials comparing different intravitreal doses of anti-VEGF agents are needed, but our findings suggest that low doses of these drugs retain efficacy and may reduce ocular and systemic undesired events.

Efficacy comparison of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs for the treatment of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched for eligible literature up to February 22, 2023. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of anti-VEGF agents for ROP in infants. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed. We also conducted subgroup analyses to determine the efficacy ranking of regimens used in different regions. The odds ratio (OR), standardised mean difference (SMD), and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated for each outcome.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs of 10 different regimens, involving 1196 infants (2388 eyes), were identified. Bevacizumab (0.625 mg; OR = 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.40, SUCRA = 80.6%) and conbercept (0.15 mg; OR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.30, SUCRA = 96.0%) were the most effective regimens in reducing the risk of ROP recurrence requiring retreatment in Western countries and China, respectively. Compared with laser therapy, bevacizumab (0.625 mg; SMD = 1.54, 95% CI 0.06-3.02) achieved significantly longer intervals between treatment and recurrence. No significant difference in the risk of retinal detachment was detected between any anti-VEGF agent and laser (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab (0.625 mg) and conbercept (0.15 mg) appeared to be the most effective therapies for ROP in Western countries and China, respectively. More high-quality RCTs are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of anti-VEGF drugs for the management of ROP.

The efficacy and ocular safety following aflibercept, conbercept, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and laser for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is typically treated with laser photocoagulation and/or intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). To the best of our knowledge, most systematic reviews have focused on comparing anti-VEGF against laser treatment while comparisons between different anti-VEGF agents are lacking. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different anti-VEGF agents or laser after primary ROP therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases up to November 2022. We included studies that used anti-VEGF or laser for ROP with comparable cohorts.

RESULTS

Overall, 44 studies were included in this meta-analysis. When comparing anti-VGEF with laser, we found that the anti-VEGF group had a significantly higher retreatment rate (RR = 1.56, 95%CI = [1.06, 2.31], p = 0.03), a longer time from treatment to retreatment (WMD = 5.99 weeks, 95%CI = [4.03, 7.95], p < 0.001), a lower retinal detachment rate (RR = 0.55, 95%CI = [0.30, 0.91], p = 0.02), higher spherical equivalent (WMD = 1.69D, 95%CI = [0.61, 2.77], p = 0.002), lower myopia rate (RR = 0.69, 95%CI = [0.50, 0.97], p = 0.03) and lower anisometropia rate (RR = 0.44, 95%CI = [0.29, 0.67], p = 0.0001). In comparisons between ranibizumab and bevacizumab, the intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) group was associated with higher recurrence rate (RR = 2.02, 95%CI = [1.49, 2.73], p < 0.0001), higher retreatment rate (RR = 1.70, 95%CI = [1.17, 2.47], p = 0.0006), and lower high myopia rate (RR = 0.31, 95%CI = [0.12, 0.77], p = 0.01). Similarly, when compared to aflibercept and conbercept, the IVR cohort also demonstrated higher recurrence and retreatment rates. While no significant differences were observed in any of the variables included in the statistical analysis in the comparison between bevacizumab and aflibercept.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-VEGF was associated with higher retreatment and lesser incidence of myopia as compared to laser. Laser therapy was linked to more complications like retinal detachment and myopia. Ranibizumab exhibited higher recurrence and retreatment rates compared to bevacizumab, aflibercept, and conbercept.

Reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity six years after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab

Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is effective in the management of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), reactivations following treatment are known to occur. We present the case of an asymptomatic child who developed a very late reactivation of ROP 6 years after its successful treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab. This case reemphasizes the importance of long-term follow-up after anti-VEGF therapy for ROP until retinal vascularization is complete. It also supports investigating the utility of laser photocoagulation for peripheral avascular retina after successful treatment with anti-VEGF injection for type I ROP.

Comparison of adverse events between intravitreal anti-VEGF and laser photocoagulation for treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To synthesize existing evidence on adverse events, complications, and unfavorable outcomes of current treatment modalities for treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity (TR-ROP).

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, EMBASE, Trip Database, and the gray literature available were searched. Randomized Clinical Trials and observational studies comparing the adverse events of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, pegaptanib, conbercept) and laser photocoagulation (LPC) as treatment modalities for infants with TR-ROP were included. The main outcomes compared between the two treatment modalities were: 1. Refractive Errors and Biometry Parameters, 2. Adverse events, complications, and unfavorable outcomes, 3. Disease Recurrence/Disease Regression/Need for retreatment, 4. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes.

RESULTS

Higher quality studies concluded that LPC leads to greater rates of myopia than intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment while the rate of adverse events and of unfavorable neurodevelopmental outcomes is similar. However, there was controversy among the included studies concerning the rate of ROP recurrence between intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and LPC.

CONCLUSION

There is need for future primary studies assessing the adverse events of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections compared with LPC as treatment modalities for infants with TR-ROP.

Systemic Cytokines in Retinopathy of Prematurity

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a vasoproliferative vitreoretinal disorder, is the leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. Although angiogenic pathways have been the main focus, cytokine-mediated inflammation is also involved in ROP etiology. Herein, we illustrate the characteristics and actions of all cytokines involved in ROP pathogenesis. The two-phase (vaso-obliteration followed by vasoproliferation) theory outlines the evaluation of cytokines in a time-dependent manner. Levels of cytokines may even differ between the blood and the vitreous. Data from animal models of oxygen-induced retinopathy are also valuable. Although conventional cryotherapy and laser photocoagulation are well established and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents are available, less destructive novel therapeutics that can precisely target the signaling pathways are required. Linking the cytokines involved in ROP to other maternal and neonatal diseases and conditions provides insights into the management of ROP. Suppressing disordered retinal angiogenesis via the modulation of hypoxia-inducible factor, supplementation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1/IGF-binding protein 3 complex, erythropoietin, and its derivatives, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and inhibition of secretogranin III have attracted the attention of researchers. Recently, gut microbiota modulation, non-coding RNAs, and gene therapies have shown promise in regulating ROP. These emerging therapeutics can be used to treat preterm infants with ROP.

Effect of ranibizumab on retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis

The primary objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab injection in the treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in infants. The MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, China Biology Medicine disc, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Data, CNKI, and CQVIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of ranibizumab with laser treatment in ROP. The retrieval time was from 2007, on which ranibizumab was approved until 12 January 2022. Data were extracted based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two investigators employed QUADAS-2 to independently assess the quality of all eligible original studies. Following quality evaluation, we also performed a meta-analysis using STATA v 15.1 and RevMan v 5.4 and funnel plots were used to detect publication bias. A total of five RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. In this study, the regression rate of retinal neovascularization was used as the index of therapeutic effectiveness. According to the results, the retinal neovascularization regression rate of the intravitreal ranibizumab injection group was statistically higher than that of the laser therapy group [risk ratio (RR) = 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18–1.35]; however, the incidence of adverse events, including recurrence and complications, was not different between them (RR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.19–2.80). Therefore, intravitreal ranibizumab injection may be more clinically effective than laser therapy in the treatment for ROP. The safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in the long-term treatment for ROP needs further investigation.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42022296387

The role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in treatment of retinopathy of prematurity-a current review

The review aims to evaluate the uses of conventional laser therapy and intravitreal injection of various anti-VEGF in terms of efficacy and side effects for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. A literature search of the publication, concerning conventional laser treatment and intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF for ROP. A total of 40 articles were reviewed after curation by the authors for relevance. Intravitreal anti-VEGF showed better ocular efficacy in zone I ROP while laser therapy had a lower recurrence rate in zone II. Comparing the two mainstay anti-VEGF agents, bevacizumab showed lower ROP recurrence rate than ranibizumab. Anti-VEGF has a higher chance in developing persistent peripheral avascularisation compared to conventional laser therapy, but a lower chance of developing high myopia. Ranibizumab has a lower systemic absorption than bevacizumab, despite having no difference in the incidence of persistent peripheral avascularisation. In conclusion, it is advised that intravitreal anti-VEGF should be used as the first-line treatment for zone I ROP while laser therapy should be the mainstay for zone II ROP owing to the different pathogenetic mechanisms. In patients with recurrence after initial anti-VEGF injection, that given ranibizumab may opt to repeat the injection while that given bevacizumab should consider supplement laser ablative treatment.

Appropriate dose of intravitreal ranibizumab for ROP: a retrospective study

Objective

To compare the recurrence rate of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after treatment with 0.3 mg vs. 0.25 mg ranibizumab.

Subjects

All patients with ROP who underwent intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in Hainan General Hospital between January 2014 and May 2020 were included in this retrospective study.

Methods

Eighty-two cases (146 eyes) who received intravitreal injection of 0.25 mg ranibizumab were included in the conventional-dose group, and 59 cases (108 eyes) who received intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg ranibizumab were included in the high-dose group. The two groups were further divided into the 25-28-week, 29-31-week, 32-34-week, and 35-36-week GA subgroups. The differences between the conventional-dose group and the high-dose group in gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), age at initial injection (weeks), incidence of systemic diseases, the recurrence rate of ROP, and age at retinal vascularization completed (weeks) were analyzed.

Results

GA, BW, age at initial injection, and the incidence of systemic diseases were not significantly different between the conventional-dose group and the high-dose group (p > 0.05). The recurrence rates of ROP were significantly lower in the 25-28-week, 29-31-week, and 32-34-week subgroups of the high-dose group than in the same subgroups of the conventional-dose group (p < 0.05). Within the conventional-dose group, the recurrence rate of ROP was significantly lower in the 32-34-week and 35-36-week subgroups than in the 25-28-week and 29-31-week subgroups (p < 0.05). Within the high-dose group, the recurrence rate of ROP was not significantly different between the four subgroups (p > 0.05). Retinal vascularization was completed at a later age in the 32-34-week subgroup of the high-dose group than in the 32-34-week subgroup of the conventional-dose group (p < 0.05) but was not significantly different between the two groups at any other GA range (p > 0.05). No severe ocular or systemic complications occurred in any patient.

Conclusion

Treatment with 0.3 mg ranibizumab can reduce the recurrence rate of ROP without prolonging retinal vascularization or causing serious systemic complications. Therefore, this dose may be an appropriate therapeutic dose for ROP.

Intravitreal Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Laser photocoagulation and/or intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections constitute the current standard treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF monotherapy for ROP treatment using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Methods

We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy (e.g., bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, and pegaptanib) with laser photocoagulation in preterm infants with ROP. We evaluated the rates of recurrence, treatment switching, retreatment, adverse events, and mortality. The risk ratio (RR) was used to represent dichotomous outcomes. Data were pooled using the inverse variance weighting method. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials.

Results

Seven RCTs (n = 579; 1,158 eyes) were deemed eligible. Three RCTs had an overall low risk of bias, three had some concerns, and one had an overall high risk of bias. The pooled effect estimate showed a statistically significant reduction in adverse events in favor of anti-VEGF monotherapy [RR = 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.44]. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the anti-VEGF and laser groups in terms of recurrence rate (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.23–10.54), treatment switching (RR = 2.92, 95% CI 0.40–21.05), retreatment (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.35–6.96), and mortality rate (RR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.48–3.41).

Conclusion

Overall, intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy was associated with fewer adverse events than laser therapy, rated as high quality of evidence according to the GRADE criteria. Pooled analysis revealed no significant difference between the two arms with respect to the recurrence rate, treatment switching, retreatment, and mortality rate, with quality of evidence ranging from moderate to very low as per the GRADE approach.

Systematic Review Registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails], identifier [CRD42021270077].

Progression of retinal vascularization after intravitreal anti-vascular-endothelial growth factor therapy in retinopathy of prematurity

Background

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) therapy is now considered as one of standard therapies in approaching infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). The purpose of this study was to assess the time to full retinal vascularization in infants with ROP who were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study evaluated premature infants with ROP who were treated with IVB between 2012 and 2019. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the medical records and analyzed. Main outcomes were defined as time to complete vascularization and time of zone shift.

Results

Eight hundred sixty-five eyes from 441 patients were included. Average gestational age and birth weight were 28 ± 4 weeks and 1121 ± 624 g, respectively. Primary treatment failure and reactivation occurred in 35 eyes (4.0%) and 33 eyes (3.8%), respectively. Recurrent ROP occurred significantly more frequently in infants with pre-treatment zone 1 ROP compared to those with zone 2 ROP (7.6% versus 3%, p < 0.01). Patients with pre-treatment zone 2 reached zone 3 faster than those with pre-treatment zone 1 (142 ± 152 days versus 181 ± 174 days, p < 0.01); however, the time until full retinal vascularization did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.10).

Conclusion

This study revealed that pre-treatment ROP zone was associated with ROP reactivation rate but not with time to full vascularization in those treated with IVB.

Trial registration Retrospectively registered; IR.TUMS.FARABI.REC.1399.040

Retinopathy of Prematurity: Advances in the Screening and Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity Using a Single Center Approach

PURPOSE

To focus on the longitudinal evaluation of high-risk infants for the development of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) at a single tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and to evaluate evolving demographics of ROP and the transition of treatment-warranted disease.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A consecutive retrospective review was performed of all infants screened for ROP between 1990 and 2019 at the Jackson Memorial Hospital neonatal intensive care unit. All inborn infants meeting a birth criteria of <32 weeks' gestational age (GA) or a birthweight (BW) of 1500 g were included. Longitudinal demographic, diagnostic, and treatment data were reported.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 1990, and June 20, 2019, a total of 25,567 examinations were performed and 7436 patients were included. Longitudinal trends over 3 decades demonstrated a decreasing incidence of ROP (P < .05). Although the mean BW and GA increased over 3 decades, patients with ROP demonstrated lower BW and GA over time (P < .05). The prevalence of micro-premature infants (as defined by BW <750 g) continues to rise over time. Micro-preemies demonstrated increasing severity of zone and stage grading, plus disease, and propensity to require treatment (P < .05). The rate of progression of ROP to stage 4 and 5 disease has decreased over time, and there has been an associated increased adoption of intravitreal bevacizumab as primary and salvage therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the evolution of ROP infants and treatment over time is critical in identifying high-risk infants and in reducing the incidence of severe-stage ROP. Micro-prematurity is one of the significant risk factors for treatment-warranted ROP that continues to increase as neonatal care improves. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Assessment and management of retinopathy of prematurity in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)

The incidence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) continues to rise due to the improved survival of very low birth weight infants in developed countries. This epidemic is also fueled by increased survival of preterm babies with variable use of oxygen and a lack of ROP awareness and screening services in resource-limited regions. Improvements in technology and a basic understanding of the disease pathophysiology have changed the way we screen and manage ROP, educate providers and patients, and improve ROP awareness. Advancements in imaging techniques, expansion of telemedicine services, and the potential for artificial intelligence-assisted ROP screening programs have created opportunities to improve ROP care in areas with a shortage of ophthalmologists trained in ROP. To address the gap in provider knowledge regarding ROP, the Global Education Network for Retinopathy of Prematurity (GEN-ROP) created a web-based tele-education training module that can be used to educate all providers involved in ROP, including non-physician ROP screeners. Over the past 50 years, the treatment of severe ROP has evolved from limited treatment modalities to cryotherapy and laser photocoagulation. More recently, there has been growing evidence to support the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents for the treatment of severe ROP. However, VEGF is known to be important in organogenesis and microvascular maintenance, and given that intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment can result in systemic VEGF suppression over a period of at least 1-12 weeks, there are concerns regarding adverse effects and long-term ocular and systemic developmental consequences of anti-VEGF therapy. Future research in ophthalmology to address the growing burden of ROP should focus on cost-effective fundus imaging devices, implementation of artificial intelligence platforms, updated treatment algorithms with optimal use of anti-VEGF and careful investigation of its long-term effects, and surgical options in advanced ROP. Addressing these unmet needs will aid the global effort against the ROP epidemic and optimize our understanding and treatment of this blinding disease.

Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injection versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3,701 eyes

We investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection (IVI) of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation (LPC) for retinopathy of prematurity. We performed a systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL (2005-2019). Comparative studies reporting on ocular efficacy and/or safety outcomes after IVIs and LPC for retinopathy of prematurity were included. The primary outcome was the regression rate, whereas secondary endpoints included the likelihood of requiring additional treatment, visual and refractive outcomes, and complications. Overall, 777 publications were identified. Twenty-four articles were included, with 1,289 eyes receiving IVI and 2,412 eyes undergoing LPC. There was no significant difference in the regression rate between IVI and LPC (P = 0.68); however, eyes that underwent IVI were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of requiring additional treatment (risk ratio = 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.26, 3.73], P = 0.005) and longer time from treatment to retreatment or recurrence (weighted mean difference = 6.43 weeks, 95% CI = [2.36, 10.51], P = 0.002). Eyes receiving IVI required surgical intervention significantly less often (risk ratio = 0.45, 95% CI = [0.23, 0.89], P = 0.02). Astigmatism was significantly lower after IVI relative to LPC (weighted mean difference = -0.25 D, 95% CI = [-0.45, -0.06], P = 0.01), and there was a lower proportion of emmetropic eyes at last follow-up after LPC (risk ratio = 0.51, 95% CI = [0.27, 0.99], P = 0.05). There were no differences in visual and safety outcomes between IVI and LPC. LPC had a lower likelihood of requiring additional treatment, whereas IVIs were associated with a longer interval from treatment to retreatment or recurrence, reduced risk of surgical intervention and superior refractive outcomes. All other outcomes were comparable between IVIs and LPC.

Update on Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Safety for Retinopathy of Prematurity

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a neovascular retinal disorder that occurs in infants born prematurely. Nowadays, ROP constitutes a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide and for decades the standard of care has involved peripheral retinal ablation. However, this type of treatment requires the use of specialized equipment by well-trained physicians, has been associated with poor structural and visual outcomes in some preterm infants, and despite its adequate application, some cases of ROP may continue to progress. Therefore, the need for simpler and more efficient strategies made anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications an appealing option for treatment. Recently, the use of anti-VEGF agents for ROP has increased worldwide; nevertheless, this practice remains off-label, and there is a lack of information regarding its safety profile and the possibility of unfavorable long-term outcomes causes the utmost concern. This review updates the recent evidence regarding the systemic and ocular safety of anti-VEGF treatment for ROP.

Laser therapy versus intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents in monotherapy of ROP: a Meta-analysis

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety between laser therapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents intravitreal injection monotherapy in type-1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (APROP).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase for original comparable studies. We included studies that compare laser therapy and intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents monotherapy in ROP regardless of languages and publication types.

RESULTS

Complication incidence was significantly higher in laser therapy group (OR: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.19-0.75; P=0.005). Spherical equivalent (SE) was higher in laser therapy [weighted mean difference (WMD): 2.40, 95%CI: 0.88-3.93; P=0.002]. The time between treatment and retreatment was longer in laser therapy group (WMD: 8.45, 95%CI: 5.35-11.55; P<0.00001). Recurrence incidence (OR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.45-2.09; P=0.93) and retreatment incidence (OR: 1.24; 95%CI: 0.56-2.73; P=0.59) were similar in two approaches. Subgroup analysis between type-1 ROP and APROP was not significant except SE reported in the included studies (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This Meta-analysis outcome indicates anti-VEGF agents are as effective as laser treatment, and safer than laser in type-1 ROP and APROP. The degree of myopia in APROP is higher than type-1 ROP. More randomized controlled trials in large sample size should be conducted in the future.

A proposal of an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrence or treatment failure of retinopathy of prematurity after anti-VEGF therapy based on a large case series

PURPOSE

To provide a diagnostic algorithm of recurrence and treatment failure after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection for retinopathy of prematurity type 1 (ROP1) and the stepwise therapeutic approach for both conditions.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with ROP1 initially treated with IVB in 6 tertiary referral centers of Toluca and Mexico City from 2005 to 2017. Treatment failure was defined as persistence or progression of neovascularization, elevation of the ridge, worsening of plus disease, or retinal crunch within the first week after treatment. Recurrence was defined as the new appearance of plus disease, an elevated ridge, or pathological new vessels after an initial regression of ROP following treatment. Therapy was observation, switch of anti-VEGF agent, retinal photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or a combination of two or more, depending on the severity of findings.

RESULTS

A total of 672 patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab injection for ROP1 treatment were included. Of these, 2.5% (17 patients) failed to treatment, 6.8% (46 patients) developed a recurrence for ROP, and 5.5% (37 patients) carried a misdiagnosis of recurrence and were diagnosed with other than ROP1 after examination. Based on the severity of findings, patients with recurrence or treatment failure were further treated by observation, repeat anti-VEGF intravitreal injection (bevacizumab or other), laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or a combination of these. Based on the treatment results, a therapeutic algorithm was created.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGFs for the treatment of ROP warrants close follow-up as some of these patients may have treatment failure or recurrence of the disease. It is crucial to differentiate between them to avoid a misdiagnosis and offer the correct treatment. We propose a novel algorithm for the follow-up and treatment approach of ROP1 following initial treatment with IVB. This algorithm offers a summary of our recommendations based on a large case series of ROP1 patients. It is meant to grow and expand as more clinical evidence becomes available.

Ranibizumab versus laser therapy for the treatment of very low birthweight infants with retinopathy of prematurity (RAINBOW): an open-label randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing worldwide use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), there are few data on their ocular efficacy, the appropriate drug and dose, the need for retreatment, and the possibility of long-term systemic effects. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab compared with laser therapy in treatment of ROP.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, superiority multicentre, three-arm, parallel group trial was done in 87 neonatal and ophthalmic centres in 26 countries. We screened infants with birthweight less than 1500 g who met criteria for treatment for retinopathy, and randomised patients equally (1:1:1) to receive a single bilateral intravitreal dose of ranibizumab 0·2 mg or ranibizumab 0·1 mg, or laser therapy. Individuals were stratified by disease zone and geographical region using computer interactive response technology. The primary outcome was survival with no active retinopathy, no unfavourable structural outcomes, or need for a different treatment modality at or before 24 weeks (two-sided α=0·05 for superiority of ranibizumab 0·2 mg against laser therapy). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02375971.

INTERPRETATION

Between Dec 31, 2015, and June 29, 2017, 225 participants (ranibizumab 0·2 mg n=74, ranibizumab 0·1 mg n=77, laser therapy n=74) were randomly assigned. Seven were withdrawn before treatment (n=1, n=1, n=5, respectively) and 17 did not complete follow-up to 24 weeks, including four deaths in each group. 214 infants were assessed for the primary outcome (n=70, n=76, n=68, respectively). Treatment success occurred in 56 (80%) of 70 infants receiving ranibizumab 0·2 mg compared with 57 (75%) of 76 infants receiving ranibizumab 0·1 mg and 45 (66%) of 68 infants after laser therapy. Using a hierarchical testing strategy, compared with laser therapy the odds ratio (OR) of treatment success following ranibizumab 0·2 mg was 2·19 (95% Cl 0·99-4·82, p=0·051), and following ranibizumab 0·1 mg was 1·57 (95% Cl 0·76-3·26); for ranibizumab 0·2 mg compared with 0·1 mg the OR was 1·35 (95% Cl 0·61-2·98). One infant had an unfavourable structural outcome following ranibizumab 0·2 mg, compared with five following ranibizumab 0·1 mg and seven after laser therapy. Death, serious and non-serious systemic adverse events, and ocular adverse events were evenly distributed between the three groups.

FINDINGS

In the treatment of ROP, ranibizumab 0·2 mg might be superior to laser therapy, with fewer unfavourable ocular outcomes than laser therapy and with an acceptable 24-week safety profile.

FUNDING

Novartis.

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Infants With Retinopathy of Prematurity by Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Among extremely preterm infants, we evaluated whether bevacizumab therapy compared with surgery for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is associated with adverse outcomes in early childhood.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on preterm (22-26 + 6/7 weeks' gestational age) infants admitted to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers who received bevacizumab or surgery exclusively for ROP. The primary outcome was death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) at 18 to 26 months' corrected age (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition cognitive or motor composite score <70, Gross Motor Functional Classification Scale level ≥2, bilateral blindness or hearing impairment).

RESULTS

The cohort (N = 405; 214 [53%] boys; median [interquartile range] gestational age: 24.6 [23.9-25.3] weeks) included 181 (45%) infants who received bevacizumab and 224 (55%) who underwent ROP surgery. Infants treated with bevacizumab had a lower median (interquartile range) birth weight (640 [541-709] vs 660 [572.5-750] g; P = .02) and longer durations of conventional ventilation (35 [21-58] vs 33 [18-49] days; P = .04) and supplemental oxygen (112 [94-120] vs 105 [84.5-120] days; P = .01). Death or severe NDI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 2.14) and severe NDI (aOR 1.14; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.70) did not differ between groups. Odds of death (aOR 2.54 [95% CI 1.42 to 4.55]; P = .002), a cognitive score <85 (aOR 1.78 [95% CI 1.09 to 2.91]; P = .02), and a Gross Motor Functional Classification Scale level ≥2 (aOR 1.73 [95% CI 1.04 to 2.88]; P = .04) were significantly higher with bevacizumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter cohort of preterm infants, ROP treatment modality was not associated with differences in death or NDI, but the bevacizumab group had higher mortality and poor cognitive outcomes in early childhood. These data reveal the need for a rigorous appraisal of ROP therapy.

[Treated cases of retinopathy of prematurity in Germany : 5-year data from the Retina.net ROP registry]

BACKGROUND

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the main reasons for childhood blindness. The number of infants requiring treatment, however, is low for individual centers. The Retina.net ROP registry has been founded to allow a joint analysis of treatment patterns and courses post treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reports treatment patterns over 5 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All infants born between January 2011 and December 2015 who were entered into the treatment registry by one of the 12 participating centers were analyzed.

RESULTS

The data of 150 infants (292 eyes) were analyzed and ROP 3+ in zone II was the most prevalent treatment indication. Gestational age and birth weight remained stable over the years. The treatment patterns, however, changed with anti-VEGF treatment (bevacizumab or ranibizumab) accounting for only 10% of treated eyes in 2011 but for 56% and 30% in 2014 and 2015, respectively. Almost all eyes with AP-ROP or zone I disease received anti-VEGF treatment. Zone II disease was predominantly treated with laser photocoagulation. Recurrences were more common and appeared later in the anti-VEGF group compared to the laser group (23%/interval 60 days vs. 17%/interval 23 days). Perioperative complications were evenly distributed across treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

The data in this analysis represent about 10-15% of treated infants in Germany. The results provide evidence for an increasing use of anti-VEGF agents for ROP. The data reflect a selection bias for anti-VEGF treatment in eyes with a more aggressive disease. This needs to be considered when interpreting data such as disease recurrence rates. The risk for late recurrences after anti-VEGF treatment is of particular clinical significance.

The process of retinal vascularization in retinopathy of prematurity after ranibizumab treatment in China

AIM

To explore the process of retinal vascularization and risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) as monotherapy.

METHODS

Infants with type 1 ROP who received IVR as primary treatment from August 2014 to October 2016 at Peking University People's Hospital's Ophthalmology Department were included in the study. All eyes received 0.25 mg ranibizumab at initial treatment. Retinal vascularization was evaluated clinically. Potential risk factors were also recorded and examined.

RESULTS

Retinal vascularization was completed in 126 eyes (62.7%), and retinal vascularization terminated in zone II and zone III with 16 eyes (7.9%) and 44 eyes (21.9%), respectively, after more than 1-year follow-up. In multivariate regression analysis, lower birth weight (BW), severity of ROP and repeated injections were found to be risk factors for peripheral avascular area (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective study, 29.8% of the ROP eyes treated with ranibizumab have peripheral avascular area at the last follow-up. Lighter BW and the severity of ROP are risk factors. Furthermore, repeated injections also increase the risk of retinal peripheral avascular area remaining in ROP patients.

The effect on wound healing of pazopanib and bevacizumab compared with corticosteroid in experimental glaucoma filtration surgery

AIM

To compare the effects of bevacizumab and pazopanib with corticosteroids on wound healing after trabeculectomy.

METHODS

In the study, 35 New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into five groups. Apart from the first group, limbus-based trabeculectomy was performed for the eyes of rabbits. No postoperative treatment was administered for group I. Topically administered saline, prednisolone acetate (1%), bevacizumab 5 mg/mL, pazopanib 5 mg/mL for group II, III, IV and V respectively were applied for groups 6h daily for 28d. On day 28 of the experiment, eyes were enucleated and histologically and immunohistochemically analyzed.

RESULTS

The fibroblast counts of groups IV and V were determined to be lower than those of groups II and III (P<0.05). In the mononuclear cell (MNC) count evaluation, no statistically significant difference was determined between the treatment groups (P>0.05). The immunohistochemical staining intensity of fibroblast growth factor β (FGF-β) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was determined to be lower in groups IV and V than in groups II and III (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between groups IV and V in respect of fibroblast count, MNC count, FGF-β and VEGF staining intensity (P>0.05). The platelet derived growth factor β (PDGF-β) intensity was lower in group V than in groups II, III and IV (P<0.05). While the PDGF-β staining intensity was significantly lower in group IV than in group II, the difference compared with group III was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab and pazopanib might be good alternatives of corticosteroid treatment on delaying wound healing in glaucoma surgery.

Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab injection and laser photocoagulation for type 1 zone II retinopathy of prematurity

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection with conventional laser photocoagulation in eyes with type 1 zone II retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

Methods

Preterm infants with type 1 ROP in zone II (stage 2 or 3 ROP with plus disease) were randomly assigned to intravitreal injection of 0.625 mg/0.025 ml bevacizumab (Group 1) or laser photocoagulation (Group 2). Patients were followed weekly for 4 weeks and then biweekly till 90 weeks gestational age. Also, spherical and cylindrical refractive errors were compared at 90 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA).

Results

A total of 116 preterm infants (232 eyes) were treated and completed the follow-up period. IVB injection was done in 154 eyes (77 cases), and laser photocoagulation was done in 78 eyes (39 cases). ROP regressed after single IVB injection in 149 eyes (96.8%) and in 5 eyes (3.2%) after the second injection. Cataract developed in one eye (0.63%) after IVB injection. ROP regressed in 94.7% of treated eyes (76 eyes) in the laser photocoagulation group; however, retinal fold and traction developed in 2 eyes. Spherical and also cylindrical refractive errors had no significant difference.

Conclusions

Both IVB injection and laser photocoagulation are effective methods for the treatment of type 1 zone II ROP. However, re-treatment requirement may be higher in the IVB injection group. IVB re-injection is an effective option for re-treatment in persistent cases.

Lamellar macular hole formation following intravitreal bevacizumab injection for choroidal neovascularization by age-related macular degeneration

This report describes a lamellar macular hole formation subsequent to intravitreal bevacizumab injection for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) by age-related macular degeneration. A 67-year-old woman with bilateral CNV underwent 3 monthly intravitreal bevacizumab injections in her both eyes. One month after the third bilateral injection, vision loss happened. Optical coherence tomography performed for further evaluation that showed reduction of intra- and sub-retinal fluid associated with lamellar macular hole development in both eyes. Although macular hole formation, especially bilateral form, is a rare complication of intravitreal injections, surgeons should consider macular hole development in cases with vision deterioration following intravitreal bevacizumab injection.

Efficacy of intravitreal conbercept injection in the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection in the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

METHODS

Patients with ROP who underwent IVC injection in Zhujiang Hospital from June 2015 to July 2016 were studied retrospectively. The primary outcome was defined as the regression of plus disease. The secondary outcomes were defined as the presence of recurrence, number of injections and the final regression of disease.

RESULTS

A total of 48 eyes of 24 patients with ROP were included. Among them, 9 eyes of 5 patients had zone I ROP, 35 eyes of 18 patients had zone II ROP and 4 eyes of 2 patients had aggressive posterior ROP. The mean gestational age was 28.5±1.6 weeks, the mean birth weight was 1209.6±228.6 g, the mean postmenstrual age of first injection was 34.2±1.9 weeks and the mean follow-up period was 31.0±4.7 weeks. Forty of 48 eyes (83.3%) received IVC only once, and the regression of plus disease occurred at an average of 3.5±1.5 weeks after the first injection of conbercept. For eight recurrent eyes (16.7%), four eyes received a second IVC and the remaining four eyes received laser photocoagulation, and the regression of plus disease occurred in 3 weeks. No lens opacity, vitreous haemorrhage, entophthalmia or retinal detachment was observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

IVC injection is an effective treatment for ROP.

Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Laser Photocoagulation in the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of patients with type I retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated with either intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) or retinal laser photocoagulation (RLP).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Infants treated for type I ROP with IVB or RLP.

METHODS

Patients who were born between January 2011 and December 2014 and were treated in Farabi Eye Hospital were included. The outcomes were stratified and analyzed, based on the treatment type and ROP zone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Need for retreatment, time to regression, refractive errors, retinal adverse anatomic outcomes, and rate of complications.

RESULTS

Five hundred twenty-three patients were treated for type 1 ROP, of whom 493 (986 eyes) met inclusion criteria. Seven hundred twenty-four eyes (73.4%) received IVB, and 262 eyes (26.5%) received RLP. Re-treatment (because of recurrent or persistent retinopathy) occurred in 14.4% (106/724) of eyes initially treated with IVB and in 8.8% (23/262) eyes initially treated with RLP (P = 0.065). Re-treatment was not significantly different between the 2 groups for patients with zone I disease (P = 0.978). Re-treatment rate was considerably higher in patients with zone II disease treated with IVB (69/558 [12.3%]) compared with those treated with RLP (20/251 [7.9%]; P = 0.017). In the IVB group, 82.8% and 53.4% of eyes showed an avascular area in zone III (despite ROP regression) at 1 and 2 years after treatment, respectively. The spherical power and the spherical equivalent were significantly higher in eyes treated with RLP (-1.31±2.83 diopters [D] and -2.84±2.77 D, respectively) than eyes treated with IVB (0.19±3.21 D and -1.26±3.19 D, respectively; P = 0.016 and P = 0.007, respectively). Differences in astigmatic power were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Both IVB and RLP are effective treatments for type 1 ROP. Longer follow-up time is necessary for infants treated with IVB. More patients with zone II disease treated with RLP achieved disease regression after a single treatment than those who received IVB, although outcomes after re-treatment were comparable except for a greater refractive error in patients treated with RLP.

Evolving Concepts in the Management of Retinopathy of Prematurity

PURPOSE

The introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents has stimulated considerable reexamination of treatment strategies for the management of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Herein we summarize and review evolving concepts and provide a personal perspective on clinical management today and future directions of treatment.

DESIGN

Literature review.

METHODS

To synthesize the evolving management concepts for diagnosis and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity and to provide interpretation and perspective on current emerging therapies.

RESULTS

Although initial treatment strategies focused on ablative therapy for threshold ROP, earlier treatment for type 1 or pre-threshold disease has been found to decrease unfavorable visual and structural outcomes. Vascular endothelial growth factor has emerged as a significant contributor to retinal-vascular diseases in the previous 2 decades. The potential role of anti-VEGF treatment for type 1 ROP has become a focus in recent years, but the protracted recurrence of disease and unknown adverse ocular and systemic effects have caused concern from some clinicians. In addition, the use of telemedicine technologies may provide the ability to screen remote areas with a shortage of ROP providers, thereby reducing the burden of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis and management of ROP has changed over the past 40 years; the role of anti-VEGF therapy remains to be established in current treatment strategies. Screening for initial disease and progression will likely be impacted by the increasing prevalence of telemedicine and relative shortage of clinicians.

Medical and developmental outcomes of bevacizumab versus laser for retinopathy of prematurity

BACKGROUND

Infants with stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in zone I or zone II posterior were randomized to initial treatment with bevacizumab or laser in a multicenter trial (BEAT-ROP). The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of bevacizumab on nonophthalmologic outcomes.

METHODS

At one study site, inborn infants of <27 weeks' gestational age underwent medical and standardized neurologic and developmental assessments at 18-22 months' corrected age (age after expected date of full-term delivery).

RESULTS

Of the 18 infants enrolled at our site, 16 (7 bevacizumab, 9 laser) were evaluated for medical and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18-28 months' corrected age. For each of the groups, the medians and ranges of growth percentiles were low compared with norms for healthy infants. The ranges for Bayley III developmental scores were also low relative to expected norms for healthy infants. There were no significant differences between the bevacizumab and laser therapy groups in weight (median percentile: bevacizumab, 18; laser, 7), length, head circumference, cerebral palsy, or Bayley scores (median Cognitive Composite Score: bevacizumab, 85; laser, 65). There was a significant difference in length of hospital stay (median days, 98 vs 140 days) favoring the bevacizumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient cohort 2-year follow-up evaluation of infants treated with bevacizumab versus laser therapy for retinopathy of prematurity showed no adverse effects on medical or neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Comparison of efficacy between anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and laser treatment in Type-1 and threshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

Background

Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) is one of the most common causes of childhood blindness worldwide. Comparisons of anti-VEGF and laser treatments in ROP are relatively lacking, and the data are scattered and limited. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of both treatments in type-1 and threshold ROP.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search on ROP treatment was conducted using PubMed and Embase up to March 2017 in all languages. Major evaluation indexes were extracted from the included studies by two authors. The fixed-effects and random-effects models were used to measure the pooled estimates. The test of heterogeneity was performed using the Q statistic.

Results

Ten studies were included in this meta-analysis. Retreatment incidence was significantly increased for anti-VEGF (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.37 to 4.66; P = 0.003) compared to the laser treatment, while the incidences of eye complications (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.82; P = 0.02) and myopia were significantly decreased with anti-VEGF compared to the laser treatment. However, there was no difference in the recurrence incidence (OR 1.86; 95% CI 0.37 to 9.40; P = 0.45) and time between treatment and retreatment (WMD 7.54 weeks; 95% CI 2.00 to 17.08; P = 0.12).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicates that laser treatment may be more efficacious than anti-VEGF treatment. However, the results of this meta-analysis also suggest that laser treatment may cause more eye complications and increase myopia. Large-scale prospective RCTs should be performed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF versus laser treatment in the future.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-0685-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs for treatment of retinopathy of prematurity

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a key role in angiogenesis in foetal life. Researchers have recently attempted to use anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a vasoproliferative disorder. The safety and efficacy of these agents in preterm infants with ROP is currently uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF drugs when used either as monotherapy, that is without concomitant cryotherapy or laser therapy, or in combination with planned cryo/laser therapy in preterm infants with type 1 ROP (defined as zone I any stage with plus disease, zone I stage 3 with or without plus disease, or zone II stage 2 or 3 with plus disease).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 11), MEDLINE (1966 to 11 December 2016), Embase (1980 to 11 December 2016), CINAHL (1982 to 11 December 2016), and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy or safety of administration, or both, of anti-VEGF agents compared with conventional therapy in preterm infants with ROP.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane and Cochrane Neonatal methods for data collection and analysis. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials involving a total of 383 infants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Five trials compared intravitreal bevacizumab (n = 4) or ranibizumab (n = 1) with conventional laser therapy (monotherapy), while the sixth study compared intravitreal pegaptanib plus conventional laser therapy with laser/cryotherapy (combination therapy).When used as monotherapy, bevacizumab/ranibizumab did not reduce the risk of complete or partial retinal detachment (3 studies; 272 infants; risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 5.13; risk difference (RD) 0.00, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.04; very low-quality evidence), mortality before discharge (2 studies; 229 infants; RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.26 to 8.75), corneal opacity requiring corneal transplant (1 study; 286 eyes; RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.26), or lens opacity requiring cataract removal (3 studies; 544 eyes; RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.79). The risk of recurrence of ROP requiring retreatment also did not differ between groups (2 studies; 193 infants; RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.63; RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.07; very low-quality evidence). Subgroup analysis showed a significant reduction in the risk of recurrence in infants with zone I ROP (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.62), but an increased risk of recurrence in infants with zone II ROP (RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.01 to 6.32). Pooled analysis of studies that reported eye-level outcomes also revealed significant increase in the risk of recurrence of ROP in the eyes that received bevacizumab (RR 5.36, 95% CI 1.22 to 23.50; RD 0.10, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.17). Infants who received intravitreal bevacizumab had a significantly lower risk of refractive errors (very high myopia) at 30 months of age (1 study; 211 eyes; RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.20; RD -0.40, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.30; low-quality evidence).When used in combination with laser therapy, intravitreal pegaptanib was found to reduce the risk of retinal detachment when compared to laser/cryotherapy alone (152 eyes; RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.55; RD -0.29, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.16; low-quality evidence). The incidence of recurrence of ROP by 55 weeks' postmenstrual age was also lower in the pegaptanib + laser therapy group (76 infants; RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.7; RD -0.35, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.16; low-quality evidence). There was no difference in the risk of perioperative retinal haemorrhages between the two groups (152 eyes; RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.56; RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.05; very low-quality evidence). However, the risk of delayed systemic adverse effects with any of the three anti-VEGF drugs is not known.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Implications for practice: Intravitreal bevacizumab/ranibizumab, when used as monotherapy, reduces the risk of refractive errors during childhood but does not reduce the risk of retinal detachment or recurrence of ROP in infants with type 1 ROP. While the intervention might reduce the risk of recurrence of ROP in infants with zone I ROP, it can potentially result in higher risk of recurrence requiring retreatment in those with zone II ROP. Intravitreal pegaptanib, when used in conjunction with laser therapy, reduces the risk of retinal detachment as well as the recurrence of ROP in infants with type 1 ROP. However, the quality of the evidence was very low to low for most outcomes due to risk of detection bias and other biases. The effects on other critical outcomes and, more importantly, the long-term systemic adverse effects of the drugs are not known. Insufficient data precludes strong conclusions favouring routine use of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents - either as monotherapy or in conjunction with laser therapy - in preterm infants with type 1 ROP.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of anti-VEGF agents on structural and functional outcomes in childhood and delayed systemic effects including adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Sedation Protocol During Bevacizumab Intravitreal Injection in Preterm Infants With Retinopathy of Prematurity

OBJECTIVES

This study describes outcomes of intravenous (IV) analgesics and sedatives for bedside intravitreal bevacizumab injections for retinopathy of prematurity.

METHODS

This retrospective study included infants receiving intravitreal bevacizumab injections between January 2012 and May 2016. Infants were excluded if bevacizumab was administered under general anesthesia or for incomplete records. Data collection included demographics, sedation and analgesia regimen, and cardiopulmonary adverse events (AEs). The primary objective was to identify the median doses of the IV analgesics and sedatives. The secondary objectives included the number of patients with cardiopulmonary AEs and those with procedure success, defined as procedure completion without interruption and absence of interventions.

RESULTS

Fifteen infants were included. Fourteen (93.3%) were initiated on a fentanyl infusion at a median of 2 mcg/kg/hr (IQR, 2-3.6), and 12 (80%) received midazolam infusions at a median of 0.06 mg/kg/hr. All patients received at least 1 IV neuromuscular blocker dose just prior to the procedure. Only 2 patients (13.3%) required an increase in their fentanyl or midazolam infusions. Procedure success was achieved in 13 patients (86.7%). Five patients (33.3%) experienced 1 cardiopulmonary AE. One patient (6.7%) had a delay in the procedure, and 1 patient (6.7%) required naloxone. Despite this, the procedure was completed in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Most received fentanyl and midazolam infusions with a dose of vecuronium just prior to the procedure. Thirteen (86.7%) met the criteria for procedure success. One-third experienced a cardiopulmonary AE. Future studies are needed to identify the optimal agents and route of administration for this procedure.

Efficacy of Intravitreal Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Zone I Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity

Purpose

To describe the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in zone I.

Methods

Preterm infants with type 1 ROP in zone I (zone I ROP, any stage with plus disease or zone I ROP, stage 3 without plus disease) were enrolled in this prospective study. Intravitreal bevacizumab (0.625 mg/0.025 ml) was injected under topical anesthesia. Patients were followed weekly for 4 weeks and then biweekly till 90 weeks gestational age.

Results

Seventy eyes of 35 patients with type 1 ROP in zone I were enrolled. At a gestational age of 90 weeks, ROP regressed with complete or near-complete peripheral retinal vascularization, in 82.9% of eyes after a single injection and in 92.9% of eyes after up to two injections. In five eyes (7.1%), ROP progressed to stage 4B or 5, so surgical management was required. There were no major complications such as endophthalmitis, cataract, or vitreous hemorrhage after injection.

Conclusion

Intravitreal bevacizumab injection is an effective method for the management of patients with Zone I ROP requiring treatment; however, some cases may progress to more advanced stages and require surgical management. Close monitoring for recurrence or progression is necessary. Eyes with persistent zone I ROP may progress to advanced stages when treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injection and re-treatment may be needed.

Management of Retinopathy of Prematurity--Use of Anti-VEGF Therapy

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. Although laser photocoagulation re-mains the gold standard for treating threshold and prethreshold disease (type 1 ROP), the off-label use of anti‒vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy to treat ROP is increasing. Benefits include acute regression of ROP, growth of retinal vasculature beyond the demarcation line, lesser degree of myopia and peripheral visual field loss, and avoidance of sedation and intubation required for laser. However, controversies regarding anti-VEGF in this vulnerable population persist including choice of anti-VEGF agent, dosing, systemic absorption, safety, and late recurrence. This review updates recent evidence regarding the use of anti-VEGF therapy in the management of ROP.

Retinal vasculature development in health and disease

Development of the retinal vasculature is based on highly coordinated signalling between different cell types of the retina, integrating internal metabolic requirements with external influences such as the supply of oxygen and nutrients. The developing mouse retinal vasculature is a useful model system to study these interactions because it is experimentally accessible for intra ocular injections and genetic manipulations, can be easily imaged and develops in a similar fashion to that of humans. Research using this model has provided insights about general principles of angiogenesis as well as pathologies that affect the developing retinal vasculature. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms that govern the interactions between neurons, glial and vascular cells in the developing retina. This includes a review of mechanisms that shape the retinal vasculature, such as sprouting angiogenesis, vascular network remodelling and vessel maturation. We also explore how the disruption of these processes in mice can lead to pathology - such as oxygen induced retinopathy - and how this translates to human retinopathy of prematurity.

Pathophysiology, screening and treatment of ROP: A multi-disciplinary perspective

The population of infants at risk for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) varies by world region; in countries with well developed neonatal intensive care services, the highest risk infants are those born at less than 28 weeks gestational age (GA) and less than 1 kg at birth, while, in regions where many aspects of neonatal intensive and ophthalmological care are not routinely available, more mature infants up to 2000 g at birth and 37 weeks GA are also at risk for severe ROP. Treatment options for both groups of patients include standard retinal laser photocoagulation or, more recently, intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs. In addition to detection and treatment of ROP, this review highlights new opportunities created by telemedicine, where screening and diagnosis of ROP in remote locations can be undertaken by non-ophthalmologists using digital fundus cameras. The ophthalmological care of the ROP infant is undertaken in the wider context of neonatal care and general wellbeing of the infant. Because of this context, this review takes a multi-disciplinary perspective with contributions from retinal vascular biologists, pediatric ophthalmologists, an epidemiologist and a neonatologist. This review highlights the latest insights regarding cellular and molecular mechanisms in the formation of the retinal vasculature in the human infant, pathogenesis of ROP, detection and treatment of severe ROP, the risks and benefits of anti-VEGF therapy, the identification of new therapies over the horizon, and the optimal neonatal care regimen for best ROP outcomes, and the benefits and pitfalls of telemedicine in the remote screening and diagnosis of ROP, all of which have the potential to improve ROP outcomes.

Reactivation of Retinopathy of Prematurity Three Years After Treatment With Bevacizumab

Although intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (IVA) can induce rapid regression of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), late reactivation of the ROP can occur in the form of tractional retinal detachment (TRD) from contracted recurrent extraretinal fibrovascular proliferation. The authors report a case of bilateral TRD for recurrent ROP in a 3-year-old, which is the latest-reported reactivation to date. The authors propose that persistent avascular retina in eyes that have undergone IVA for ROP receive laser ablation to prevent late recurrences. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:255-259.].

The neural retina in retinopathy of prematurity

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a neurovascular disease that affects prematurely born infants and is known to have significant long term effects on vision. We conducted the studies described herein not only to learn more about vision but also about the pathogenesis of ROP. The coincidence of ROP onset and rapid developmental elongation of the rod photoreceptor outer segments motivated us to consider the role of the rods in this disease. We used noninvasive electroretinographic (ERG), psychophysical, and retinal imaging procedures to study the function and structure of the neurosensory retina. Rod photoreceptor and post-receptor responses are significantly altered years after the preterm days during which ROP is an active disease. The alterations include persistent rod dysfunction, and evidence of compensatory remodeling of the post-receptor retina is found in ERG responses to full-field stimuli and in psychophysical thresholds that probe small retinal regions. In the central retina, both Mild and Severe ROP delay maturation of parafoveal scotopic thresholds and are associated with attenuation of cone mediated multifocal ERG responses, significant thickening of post-receptor retinal laminae, and dysmorphic cone photoreceptors. These results have implications for vision and control of eye growth and refractive development and suggest future research directions. These results also lead to a proposal for noninvasive management using light that may add to the currently invasive therapeutic armamentarium against ROP.

The Process of Retinal Vascularization after Anti-VEGF Treatment in Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Comparison Study between Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab

PURPOSE

To compare the effects on the process of retinal vascularization of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in the treatment of severe retinopathy of prematurity.

METHODS

The present study is a bi-centered retrospective study. While 44 eyes of 22 patients in group 1 were applied 0.625 mg bevacizumab, 46 eyes of 23 patients in group 2 were applied 0.25 mg ranibizumab. Retinal vascularization was evaluated clinically.

RESULTS

The mean time for completion of vascularization was found to be postmenstrual 55.93 ± 4.13 weeks in group 1 and 56.30 ± 4.30 weeks in group 2. There were significant differences in the recurrence prevalence between the two groups. The prevalence of recurrence was found to be significantly higher in the ranibizumab group than in the bevacizumab group (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that after IVR or IVB treatment, vascularization could be completed with delay; there were no differences in this delay time between the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups. Besides, avascular areas may remain in the peripheral retina, and additional treatment may be necessary after IVB or IVR treatment. When the treatment was applied as monotherapy, more recurrence was observed in the ranibizumab group.