Incidence of secondary glaucoma after treatment of uveal melanoma with robotic radiosurgery versus brachytherapy

Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma: A Review of Ocular Complications

Uveal melanoma represents the most prevalent form of primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Historically, enucleation was considered the gold-standard approach in the treatment of uveal melanoma. Currently, radiotherapy is the most commonly used therapy, aiming at a better quality of life. However, radiotherapy can result in several ocular complications, some of which may be vision-threatening. Radiation-induced dry eye, scleral necrosis, cataract, rubeosis iridis, neovascular glaucoma, radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, and optic neuropathy are the most common complications. This article aims to summarize the current literature regarding the ocular complications after radiotherapy, as well as their clinical features, risk factors, and management strategies. A thorough understanding of these issues is crucial for ophthalmologists and oncologists to provide optimal patient care, improve visual outcomes, and minimize long-term complications.

Current management of uveal melanoma: A review

Uveal melanoma is the most frequent primary intraocular cancer in adulthood and is mostly localised to the choroid. It can be treated using radiation therapy, laser therapy, local resection and enucleation, with the best results achieved by combining these procedures. However, up to half of patients develop metastatic disease. There are no efficacious treatment methods for patients in advanced stage or with metastasis. In recent years, several novel treatment modalities aimed at improving tumour control and reducing adverse events have emerged. This review summarises current clinical treatment methods and new therapeutic perspectives for uveal melanoma.

Anatomical and Functional Outcomes after Endoresection and Adjuvant Ruthenium Brachytherapy for Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of endoresection and adjuvant ruthenium (Ru)-106 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma (UM).

METHODS

Retrospective case series of 15 UM patients (15 eyes) treated at our center (Careggi University Hospital, Florence).

RESULTS

Six patients (40%) were male and nine were female (60%). The mean age of patients at the time of treatment was 61.6 years (±19.41). The mean BCVA at baseline was 20/50. In all cases UM originated from the choroid. The mean tumor thickness at baseline was 7.14 mm (±2.05), and the mean largest basal diameter was 11.2 mm (±1.92). A concurrent retinal detachment was diagnosed in 11 patients (73.3%). Two patients (13.3%) showed vitreous seeding at baseline. Eleven patients (73.3%) were treated with primary endoresection, while four patients (26.7%) were treated with a "salvage endoresection" after primary treatment failure (previous radiation treatment). The mean follow-up time was 28.9 months (±10.6). Thirteen out of fifteen patients were alive and showed no evidence of local recurrence or distance metastasis at the last follow-up visit. The treatment achieved local control of the disease in 14 out of 15 cases (93.3%). In one case, the patient underwent enucleation for disease recurrence. The overall survival rate at the end of the follow-up was 93.3%. The mean BCVA at last follow-up visit was 20/40. Treatment was well tolerated, without significant complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoresection and adjuvant Ru-106 brachytherapy is a valuable conservative option for selected UM patients and can be used both as a primary treatment and as a salvage therapy. It can control melanoma and avoid enucleation, reduce radiation-related complications, and provide tumor tissue for chromosomal analysis and prognostic testing.

Ocular Complications of Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Radiation therapy has replaced enucleation and is now the preferred treatment in most cases. Nonetheless, around 70% of patients develop radiation-related complications, some of which are vision-threatening. The objective of this review is to present the most important complications associated with radiotherapy in the treatment of uveal melanoma and their pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, and available preventive and therapeutic measures. The most common complications are cataracts, with a reported incidence ranging from 4% to 69%, and radiation retinopathy, reported in 5-68% of cases. Radiation-related complications are responsible for approximately half of secondary enucleations, the leading cause being neovascular glaucoma. A poor visual outcome is mainly associated with the presence of radiation retinopathy and radiation optic neuropathy. Therapeutic options are available for the majority of complications with the notable exception of optic neuropathy. However, many studies report a final visual acuity of less than 20/200 in more than 60% of treated eyes. Reducing complication rates can be achieved by lowering the dose of radiation, with the use of eccentric, customized plaques and careful planning of the irradiation delivery in order to protect structures vital to vision and by associating radiation therapy with other methods with the aim of reducing tumor volume.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Secondary Glaucoma in Eyes with Uveal Melanoma

PURPOSE

To estimate incidence of and analyze risk factors for developing secondary glaucoma in eyes with uveal melanoma before and after diagnosis.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, population-based cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Seven hundred eighty-one patients (median age, 64 years; range, 14-93) consecutively diagnosed with uveal melanoma from 1997 to 2012 in a national ocular oncology service, 708 (91%) of whom received ruthenium (50%) or iodine (50%) brachytherapy.

METHODS

Patient, tumor, treatment, and follow-up data were collected prospectively. Frequency and associations of melanoma-related glaucoma at tumor diagnosis were assessed. Incidence of developing secondary glaucoma after diagnosis was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Independent risk factors were modeled using Cox regression.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Melanoma-related glaucoma and related risk factors.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (5.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-7.6) had tumor-related secondary glaucoma at diagnosis, 34 (76%) from a narrow-to-closed angle (25 had direct angle invasion) and 10 (22%) from anterior neovascularization. Synchronous metastases were common in patients with initial secondary glaucoma (11% vs. 1.2% with incident glaucoma, P = 0.005). Patients with secondary glaucoma were often male (58% vs. 48% without glaucoma; P = 0.010) and had larger tumors (median thickness, 9.1 vs. 4.0 mm; P < 0.001) involving the ciliary body (43% vs. 21%; P < 0.001) with retinal detachment (53% vs. 30%; P < 0.001). One hundred and sixty-eight patients 165 of which were treated with brachytherapy developed incident tumor- or treatment-related secondary glaucoma a median of 1.7 years (range, 0.1-13.6) after tumor diagnosis. Cumulative proportion of developing secondary glaucoma was 23% (95% CI, 20-27) at 5 years. The most common mechanism was neovascularization in 119 patients (71%; 95% CI, 63-78). By multivariable regression, initial retinal detachment 3 to 4 quadrants (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; P < 0.001), initial intraocular pressure 17 mmHg or higher (HR, 1.64; P = 0.01), and tumor thickness predicted incident secondary glaucoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary glaucoma at initial uveal melanoma diagnosis predicts high risk of synchronous metastases. Although anterior neovascularization is the most common mechanism for secondary glaucoma after diagnosis, other mechanisms such as angle narrowing and anterior chamber hemorrhage are not infrequent. Initial retinal detachment and intraocular pressure with tumor thickness could inform interim assessments of intraocular pressure and neovascularization.

Retrospective analysis of secondary enucleation for uveal melanoma after plaque radiotherapy

Background

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Plaque brachytherapy (PRT) is widely accepted as an effective globe-conserving treatment modality for UM. However, local treatment failure and complications lead to the enucleation of irradiated eyes. We conducted this study to explore the causes and long-term prognosis for UM patients who accepted secondary enucleation after plaque radiotherapy.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. Data of patients who underwent secondary enucleation for UM after plaque radiotherapy, from July 2007 to July 2019, at Beijing Tongren Hospital were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to assess the probability of indications, metastasis, and metastasis-related death. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze associations of the prognostic factors.

Results

Eight hundred and eighty patients were clinically diagnosed with uveal melanoma and initially treated by iodine-125 plaque radiotherapy, 132 of whom underwent secondary enucleation and pathological examination in the same hospital. Fifty-two (39.4%) eyes were enucleated simply because of uncontrollable neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Forty-four (33.3%) patients suffered from tumor recurrence. Tumor non-response occurred in 18 (13.6%) cases. Ten (7.6%) eyes received enucleation entirely due to other types of glaucoma. Failure to preserve the eyes for other reasons occurred in eight (6.1%) patients. At a median follow-up of 58.1 [IQR: 40.9–90.5] months, the systemic spread was detected in 45 (34.1%) patients, and 38 of them died. On multivariate analysis, tumor largest basal diameter (HR 1.15 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.31]), tumor non-response (HR 7.22 [95% CI: 2.63, 19.82]), and recurrence (HR 3.29 [95% CI: 1.54, 7.07]) were risk factors for metastasis. Increased age (HR 1.54 [95% CI: 1.07, 2.23]), tumor non-response (HR 7.91 [95% CI: 2.79, 22.48]), and recurrence (HR 3.08 [95% CI: 1.13, 7.23]) were risk factors for metastasis-related death.

Conclusions

NVG was the major reason for secondary enucleation for Chinese UM patients after PRT. Tumor non-response and recurrence were associated with a significantly higher risk of long-term metastasis and metastasis-related death.

Comparison of iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy and gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery treatment outcomes for uveal melanoma patients

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacies of iodine-125 brachytherapy (IBT) and gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKRS) in the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma.

METHODS

The demographic data and tumor characteristics at diagnosis of 201 patients treated with IBT and 52 patients treated with GKRS were recorded. The two treatments were then compared in terms of complications, local control, eye retention, metastasis, and overall survival rate.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 56 months for the GKRS group and 45 months for the IBT group (p = 0.167). There were no significant differences in demographic data or tumor characteristics between the groups at diagnosis. Radiation retinopathy, radiation optic neuropathy, and neovascular glaucoma occurred at similar rates in both groups. However, radiation maculopathy and cataracts occurred more frequently in the GKRS group. The number of cases that have developed vision loss (worsening of best-corrected visual acuity on three or more lines on the Snellen chart) was significantly higher in the GKRS group (60%) compared to the IBT group (44%) (p = 0.048). Local control, metastasis, and 5-year overall survival rates were statistically similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

GKRS can be preferred as an eye-sparing treatment option for posterior uveal melanoma in cases where brachytherapy cannot be used.

Clinical outcomes and secondary glaucoma after gamma-knife radiosurgery and Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: a single institution experience

We retrospectively analyzed data from records of 48 patients (48 eyes) treated with gamma-knife (n = 18) or Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy (n = 30) for uveal melanoma, in our Ocular Oncology Unit between December 2013 and September 2019, with the aim to evaluate treatment outcomes, and incidence and risk factors for secondary glaucoma. Patients demographics and tumor characteristics at diagnosis were recorded. Follow-up data were collected regarding local tumor control, treatment complications, enucleation need, metastases occurrence and survival status. The median follow-up period was 33.7 months in the gamma-knife group and 26.2 months in the brachytherapy group. The mean tumor thickness, the largest basal diameter and the tumor volume were significantly higher in the gamma-knife group than in the brachytherapy group. The local tumor control rate was 100% in the brachytherapy group and 77.8% in the gamma-knife group. In the gamma-knife group, six patients were enucleated, no patient treated with brachytherapy underwent enucleation. The overall survival rate was 96.7% in the brachytherapy group and 94.44% in the gamma-knife group. Secondary glaucoma occurred in 10 patients after gamma-knife and in one patient after brachytherapy: it should be emphasized that larger lesions were treated with gamma-knife, whereas smaller tumors were selected for brachytherapy. We found a significative correlation of tumor thickness (P value = 0.043) and volume (P value = 0.040) with secondary glaucoma occurrence after gamma-knife treatment. Moreover, secondary glaucoma significantly correlated with radiation retinopathy in the gamma-knife group (P value = 0.009). This study shows preliminary clinical results that could be useful for further studies with more patients and longer follow-up.

Radiation therapy for uveal melanoma: a review of treatment methods available in 2021

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Radiation therapy has become the standard of care for the treatment of uveal melanoma. We intend to outline the current radiation therapy methods that are employed to treat uveal melanoma. We will outline their relative benefits over one another. We will also provide some background about radiation therapy in general to accustom the ophthalmologists likely reading this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Four main options exist for radiation therapy of uveal melanoma. Because the eye is a small space, and because melanomas are relatively radioresistant, oncologists treating uveal melanoma must deliver highly focused doses in high amounts to a small space. Therapies incorporating external beams include proton beam therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. Stereotactic radiosurgery comes in two forms, gamma knife therapy and cyberknife therapy. Radiation may also be placed directly on the eye surgically via plaque brachytherapy. All methods have been used effectively to treat uveal melanoma.

SUMMARY

Each particular radiotherapy technique employed to treat uveal melanoma has its own set of benefits and drawbacks. The ocular oncologist can choose amongst these therapies based upon his or her clinical judgment of the relative risks and benefits. Availability of the therapy and cost to the patient remain significant factors in the ocular oncologist's choice.

Uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. UMs are usually initiated by a mutation in GNAQ or GNA11, unlike cutaneous melanomas, which usually harbour a BRAF or NRAS mutation. The annual incidence in Europe and the USA is ~6 per million population per year. Risk factors include fair skin, light-coloured eyes, congenital ocular melanocytosis, ocular melanocytoma and the BAP1-tumour predisposition syndrome. Ocular treatment aims at preserving the eye and useful vision and, if possible, preventing metastases. Enucleation has largely been superseded by various forms of radiotherapy, phototherapy and local tumour resection, often administered in combination. Ocular outcomes are best with small tumours not extending close to the optic disc and/or fovea. Almost 50% of patients develop metastatic disease, which usually involves the liver, and is usually fatal within 1 year. Although UM metastases are less responsive than cutaneous melanoma to chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors, encouraging results have been reported with partial hepatectomy for solitary metastases, with percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan or with tebentafusp. Better insight into tumour immunology and metabolism may lead to new treatments.

[Local treatment of choroidal melanoma: possibilities and limitations]

Local treatment of choroidal melanoma (CM) attracts the attention of many ophthalmology specialists, especially in recent years as the capabilities to target irradiation at small objects and possibilities of surgical interventions on the eyeball have expanded. The article discusses the medical indications for local treatment of CM. Review of literature of the last 16 years and author's own observations on CM patients who underwent almost all kinds of conventional methods of local treatment allowed thorough analysis of indications and counter-indications for their usage. Among the authors who favor local destruction and removal of large CM, the main indication is the possibility to preserve vision and anatomical structures of the eye. This led to unreasonably wide spread of local destruction (removal) of large CM, primarily the endovitreal resection method. However, such metastasis risk factors as CM size and its localization are being overlooked. Literature analysis and author's own observations helped validate the unsafety of the local treatment of large CM. The article features long-term results of contact and distant radiation therapy, and presents CM metrics for best therapeutic effect.