Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study

A comprehensive model for measuring real-life cost-effectiveness in eyecare: automation in care and evaluation of system (aces-rwm™)

This paper describes a holistic, yet simple and comprehensible, ecosystem model to deal with multiple and complex challenges in eyecare. It aims at producing the best possible wellbeing and eyesight with the available resources. When targeting to improve the real-world cost-effectiveness, what gets done in everyday practice needs be measured routinely, efficiently and unselectively. Collection of all real-world data of all patients will enable evaluation and comparison of eyecare systems and departments between themselves nationally and internationally. The concept advocates a strategy to optimize real-life effectiveness, sustainability and outcomes of the service delivery in ophthalmology. The model consists of three components: (1) resource-governing principles (i.e., to deal with increasing demand and limited resources), (2) real-world monitoring (i.e., to collect structured real-world data utilizing automation and visualization of clinical parameters, health-related quality of life and costs), and (3) digital innovation strategy (i.e., to evaluate and benchmark real-world outcomes and cost-effectiveness). The core value and strength of the model lies in the consensus and collaboration of all Finnish university eye clinics to collect and evaluate the uniformly structured real-world outcomes data. In addition to ophthalmology, the approach is adaptable to any medical discipline to efficiently generate real-world insights and resilience in health systems.

Reliability of Refraction, Keratometry, and Intraocular Pressure Measurements with an Automated All-in-one Device

SIGNIFICANCE

This study explores the reliability of TonoRef II (Nidek, Tokyo, Japan), which represents a simple tool to obtain rapid refractometry and tonometry measurements. The present device demonstrates very high repeatability of refraction and intraocular pressure (IOP) readings as compared with subjective measurements and a higher concordance of IOP readings to Goldmann application tonometry (GAT).

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability of measurements acquired with the Autorefractometer/Keratometer/Tonometer TonoRef II and assess their agreement to subjective measurements and readings of other established devices.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 54 eyes of 54 healthy subjects were enrolled. Each subject underwent five measurements with the TonoRef II, three measurements with the Canon RK-F1 Autorefractor Keratometer (Canon Europe NV, Amstelveen, the Netherlands), three IOP measurements with the Canon TX-F Noncontact Tonometer (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan), three measurements with GAT, and a thorough subjective refraction. Repeatability coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate repeatability of readings and agreement to the subjective values.

RESULTS

TonoRef II showed high repeatability (ICC >0.9) in all parameters tested (sphere, r = 0.157; cylinder, r = 0.196; IOP, r = 2.653). A strong correlation was found between TonoRef and Canon instruments (P < .001 in all parameters). Mean differences and limits of agreement (mean ± 1.96 standard deviation) were -0.01 ± 0.69 D, -0.11 ± 0.7 D, and 2.1 ± 3.4 mmHg for sphere, cylinder, and IOP, respectively. Both autorefractors achieved a very good to excellent agreement to the values obtained with the subjective refraction for most of the parameters tested, without any significant difference to each other (P > .05). Intraocular pressure measurements of TonoRef II showed higher agreement to the GAT values compared with those obtained with the Canon tonometer (ICC, 0.9114 and 0.7002, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraocular pressure and refraction readings acquired with TonoRef II demonstrate very high repeatability and agreement to the subjective measurements. Regarding IOP evaluation, TonoRef II shows higher concordance to GAT compared with another established noncontact tonometer.

A Quantitative Comparison of Multispectral Refraction Topography and Autorefractometer in Young Adults

Purpose: Purpose of this study is to evaluate the measuring consistency of central refraction between multispectral refraction topography (MRT) and autorefractometry.

Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study including subjects in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital from September 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, ages 20 to 35 years with a best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. All patients underwent cycloplegia, and the refractive status was estimated with autorefractometer, experienced optometrist and MRT. We analyzed the central refraction of the autorefractometer and MRT. The repeatability and reproducibility of values measured using both devices were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: A total of 145 subjects ages 20 to 35 (290 eyes) were enrolled. The mean central refraction of the autorefractometer was −4.69 ± 2.64 diopters (D) (range −9.50 to +4.75 D), while the mean central refraction of MRT was −4.49 ± 2.61 diopters (D) (range −8.79 to +5.02 D). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a high correlation between the two devices. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) also showed high agreement. The intrarater and interrater ICC values of central refraction were more than 0.90 in both devices and conditions. At the same time, the mean central refraction of experienced optometrist was −4.74 ± 2.66 diopters (D) (range −9.50 to +4.75D). The intra-class correlation coefficient of central refraction measured by MRT and subjective refraction was 0.939.

Conclusions: Results revealed that autorefractometry, experienced optometrist and MRT show high agreement in measuring central refraction. MRT could provide a potential objective method to assess peripheral refraction.

Comparison Between Aberrometry-Based Binocular Refraction and Subjective Refraction

Purpose

We evaluate the efficacy of a new system of binocular refraction, mainly based on ocular aberrometry (EYER) and compare it with the traditional subjective refraction as gold standard.

Methods

A prospective, double blind, and transversal study was performed on 99 subjects (35 men, 64 women; mean age 37.22 ± 18.04 years; range, 7–70 years). Refractive surgery or irregular cornea were considered exclusion criteria. Subjective refraction was performed by three different optometrists and EYER by other optometrists on three different days randomly. The binocular best corrected visual acuity (BBCVA), subjective vision evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS), refraction spent time, and mean spherical equivalent (MSE), and vertical and oblique cylindrical components (J0 and J45) were analyzed.

Results

A positive strong correlation between EYER and subjective refraction was found for MSE (Pearson, 0.984; P < 0.001) and J0 and J45 (Pearson, 0.837; P < 0.001 and Pearson, 0.852; P < 0.001, respectively) in the total group. There were no statistically significant differences for BBCVA (P < 0.05). The VAS scores were 84.29 ± 12.29 with the EYER and 86.89 ± 12.38 with subjective refraction (P = 0.031). The spent time to perform the refraction was statistically lower (P < 0.05) with the EYER compared to conventional subjective refraction for all groups.

Conclusions

The EYER system showed similar results in terms of spherical and cylindrical components, visual acuity being the spent time in the refraction lower than conventional subjective refraction.

Translational Relevance

This new objective refraction system provides less chair spent time with similar results than subjective refraction.