1
|
Tomar AS, Finger PT, Gallie B, Kivelä TT, Mallipatna A, Zhang C, Zhao J, Wilson MW, Brennan RC, Burges M, Kim J, Berry JL, Jubran R, Khetan V, Ganesan S, Yarovoy A, Yarovaya V, Kotova E, Volodin D, Yousef YA, Nummi K, Ushakova TL, Yugay OV, Polyakov VG, Ramirez-Ortiz MA, Esparza-Aguiar E, Chantada G, Schaiquevich P, Fandino A, Yam JC, Lau WW, Lam CP, Sharwood P, Moorthy S, Long QB, Essuman VA, Renner LA, Semenova E, Català-Mora J, Correa-Llano G, Carreras E. Metastatic Death Based on Presenting Features and Treatment for Advanced Intraocular Retinoblastoma: A Multicenter Registry-Based Study. Ophthalmology 2022; 129:933-945. [PMID: 35500608 PMCID: PMC9329221 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate presenting features, tumor size, and treatment methods for risk of metastatic death due to advanced intraocular retinoblastoma (RB). DESIGN International, multicenter, registry-based retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1841 patients with advanced RB. METHODS Advanced RB was defined by 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) categories cT2 and cT3 and new AJCC-Ophthalmic Oncology Task Force (OOTF) Size Groups (1: < 50% of globe volume, 2: > 50% but < 2/3, 3: > 2/3, and 4: diffuse infiltrating RB). Treatments were primary enucleation, systemic chemotherapy with secondary enucleation, and systemic chemotherapy with eye salvage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Metastatic death. RESULTS The 5-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival estimates by patient-level AJCC clinical subcategories were 98% for cT2a, 96% for cT2b, 88% for cT3a, 95% for cT3b, 92% for cT3c, 84% for cT3d, and 75% for cT3e RB. Survival estimates by treatment modality were 96% for primary enucleation, 89% for systemic chemotherapy and secondary enucleation, and 90% for systemic chemotherapy with eye salvage. Risk of metastatic mortality increased with increasing cT subcategory (P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed a higher risk of metastatic mortality in categories cT3c (glaucoma, hazard ratio [HR], 4.9; P = 0.011), cT3d (intraocular hemorrhage, HR, 14.0; P < 0.001), and cT3e (orbital cellulitis, HR, 19.6; P < 0.001) than in category cT2a and with systemic chemotherapy with secondary enucleation (HR, 3.3; P < 0.001) and eye salvage (HR, 4.9; P < 0.001) than with primary enucleation. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival estimates by AJCC-OOTF Size Groups 1 to 4 were 99%, 96%, 94%, and 83%, respectively. Mortality from metastatic RB increased with increasing Size Group (P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that patients with Size Group 3 (HR, 10.0; P = 0.002) and 4 (HR, 41.1; P < 0.001) had a greater risk of metastatic mortality than Size Group 1. CONCLUSIONS The AJCC-RB cT2 and cT3 subcategories and size-based AJCC-OOTF Groups 3 (> 2/3 globe volume) and 4 (diffuse infiltrating RB) provided a robust stratification of clinical risk for metastatic death in advanced intraocular RB. Primary enucleation offered the highest survival rates for patients with advanced intraocular RB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Singh Tomar
- Department of Ocular Tumor, Orbital Disease, and Ophthalmic Radiation Therapy, The New York Eye Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul T Finger
- Department of Ocular Tumor, Orbital Disease, and Ophthalmic Radiation Therapy, The New York Eye Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Brenda Gallie
- The Eye Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, and Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tero T Kivelä
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ashwin Mallipatna
- The Eye Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, and Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Department of Ocular Oncology, Narayana Nethralaya Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Chengyue Zhang
- Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Junyang Zhao
- Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Matthew W Wilson
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, and Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Rachel C Brennan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, and Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Michala Burges
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, and Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jonathan Kim
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck Medical School of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; The Vision Center at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jesse L Berry
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck Medical School of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; The Vision Center at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Rima Jubran
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck Medical School of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; The Vision Center at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Vikas Khetan
- Department of Vitreoretina Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Suganeswari Ganesan
- Department of Vitreoretina Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Andrey Yarovoy
- Ocular Oncology Department, The S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Vera Yarovaya
- Ocular Oncology Department, The S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Elena Kotova
- Ocular Oncology Department, The S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Denis Volodin
- Ocular Oncology Department, The S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Yacoub A Yousef
- Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Kalle Nummi
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tatiana L Ushakova
- SRI of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology of N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center Oncology of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation; Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Olga V Yugay
- SRI of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology of N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center Oncology of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Vladimir G Polyakov
- SRI of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology of N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center Oncology of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation; Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Marco A Ramirez-Ortiz
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Paula Schaiquevich
- Precision Medicine Coordination Hospital JP Garrahan and CONICET, National Scientific and Technical Research Council, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Adriana Fandino
- Ophthalmology Service Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jason C Yam
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Winnie W Lau
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Carol P Lam
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Phillipa Sharwood
- Save Sight Institute, Discipline of Ophthalmology, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Vera Adobea Essuman
- Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Lorna A Renner
- Department of Child Health, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Ekaterina Semenova
- Department of Ocular Tumor, Orbital Disease, and Ophthalmic Radiation Therapy, The New York Eye Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jaume Català-Mora
- Retinoblastoma Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu. Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Genoveva Correa-Llano
- Retinoblastoma Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu. Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisa Carreras
- Retinoblastoma Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu. Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaliki S, Shields CL, Cassoux N, Munier FL, Chantada G, Grossniklaus HE, Yoshikawa H, Fabian ID, Berry JL, McKenzie JD, Kimani K, Reddy MA, Parulekar M, Tanabe M, Furuta M, Grigorovski N, Chevez-Barrios P, Scanlan P, Eagle RC, Rashid R, Coronado RD, Sultana S, Staffieri S, Frenkel S, Suzuki S, Ushakova TL, Ji X. Defining High-Risk Retinoblastoma: A Multicenter Global Survey. JAMA Ophthalmol 2021; 140:30-36. [PMID: 34762098 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.4732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Importance High-risk histopathologic features of retinoblastoma are useful to assess the risk of systemic metastasis. In this era of globe salvage treatments for retinoblastoma, the definition of high-risk retinoblastoma is evolving. Objective To evaluate variations in the definition of high-risk histopathologic features for metastasis of retinoblastoma in different ocular oncology practices around the world. Design, Setting, and Participants An electronic web-based, nonvalidated 10-question survey was sent in December 2020 to 52 oncologists and pathologists treating retinoblastoma at referral retinoblastoma centers. Intervention Anonymized survey about the definition of high-risk histopathologic features for metastasis of retinoblastoma. Main Outcomes and Measures High-risk histopathologic features that determine further treatment with adjuvant systemic chemotherapy to prevent metastasis. Results Among the 52 survey recipients, the results are based on the responses from 27 individuals (52%) from 24 different retinoblastoma practices across 16 countries in 6 continents. The following were considered to be high-risk features: postlaminar optic nerve infiltration (27 [100%]), involvement of optic nerve transection (27 [100%]), extrascleral tissue infiltration (27 [100%]), massive (≥3 mm) choroidal invasion (25 [93%]), microscopic scleral infiltration (23 [85%]), ciliary body infiltration (20 [74%]), trabecular meshwork invasion (18 [67%]), iris infiltration (17 [63%]), anterior chamber seeds (14 [52%]), laminar optic nerve infiltration (13 [48%]), combination of prelaminar and laminar optic nerve infiltration and minor choroidal invasion (11 [41%]), minor (<3 mm) choroidal invasion (5 [19%]), and prelaminar optic nerve infiltration (2 [7%]). The other histopathologic features considered high risk included Schlemm canal invasion (4 [15%]) and severe anaplasia (1 [4%]). Four respondents (15%) said that the presence of more than 1 high-risk feature, especially a combination of massive peripapillary choroidal invasion and postlaminar optic nerve infiltration, should be considered very high risk for metastasis. Conclusions and Relevance Responses to this nonvalidated survey conducted in 2020-2021 showed little uniformity in the definition of high-risk retinoblastoma. Postlaminar optic nerve infiltration, involvement of optic nerve transection, and extrascleral tumor extension were the only features uniformly considered as high risk for metastasis across all oncology practices. These findings suggest that the relevance about their value in the current scenario with advanced disease being treated conservatively needs further evaluation; there is also a need to arrive at consensus definitions and conduct prospective multicenter studies to understand their relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swathi Kaliki
- Operation Eyesight Universal Institute for Eye Cancer, LV Prasad Eye Institute India, Hyderabad, India
| | - Carol L Shields
- Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathalie Cassoux
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Insitut Curie Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Francis L Munier
- Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Hans E Grossniklaus
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Hiroshi Yoshikawa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Ido Didi Fabian
- Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Jesse L Berry
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - John D McKenzie
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kahaki Kimani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - M Ashwin Reddy
- Retinoblastoma Service, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Manoj Parulekar
- Retinoblastoma Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mika Tanabe
- Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Minoru Furuta
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Natalia Grigorovski
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Clinical Division, National Institute of Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Patricia Scanlan
- Department of Pediatrics, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Ralph C Eagle
- Department of Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Riffat Rashid
- Department of Oculoplasty and Ocular Oncology, Ispahani Islamia Eye Institute and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | - Sadia Sultana
- Department of Oculoplasty and Ocular Oncology, Ispahani Islamia Eye Institute and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Sandra Staffieri
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Retinoblastoma Service, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shahar Frenkel
- Division of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Shigenobu Suzuki
- Department of Ophthalmic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatiana L Ushakova
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center Oncology of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.,Retinoblastoma Service, Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Moscow, Russia
| | - Xunda Ji
- Department of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al Qahtani M, AlMasfer S, Khandekar R. Health related quality of life of patients treated with bilateral enucleation for retinoblastoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2021; 32:1960-1965. [PMID: 34392723 DOI: 10.1177/11206721211035637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Bilateral enucleation is rarely used to manage retinoblastoma (Rb). We present the health-related quality of life (HQL) and the associated factors among individuals who underwent bilateral surgical enucleation for retinoblastoma. METHODS Patients were interviewed via telephone in January 2020. A retinoblastoma registry was used to select patients who underwent bilateral enucleation/exenteration during 33 years. Data included age, gender, literacy, occupation, marital status, and health issues. Patients were asked eight questions on HQL. The responses were graded as 0-10. The percentage proportion of the HQL score was correlated to the determinants. RESULTS Twenty-one out of 24 participants were interviewed (median age, 23 years). Fourteen participants answered the HQL question themselves, and for 7, their parents answered. Twenty patients (95%) had an ocular prosthesis. The median HQL score was 58 (out of a maximum score of 80) (interquartile range (IQR): 49; 70; minimum, 0 and maximum, 74). The HQL score was positively correlated to: self-reporting than parents reporting (Mann Whitney U (MW) p = 0.05); among students versus individuals in other occupations (MW p = 0.03); interval between eye removal and interview (p = 0.02). Age at enucleation of the second eye (p = 0.001), students (p < 0.001), and self-responders (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of a high HQL score. CONCLUSIONS HQL of individuals having bilateral eye enucleation for retinoblastoma was reasonably good and positively correlated to self-reporting, learning as students to cope and age at 2nd eye removal. Anaplasty services to improve cosmetics seem to benefit such disabled persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha Al Qahtani
- Research Department, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Salah AlMasfer
- Oncology Department, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rajiv Khandekar
- Research Department, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yousef YA, Mohammad M, Mehyar M, Sultan I, Al-Hussaini M, Alhourani J, Halalsheh H, Khzouz J, Jaradat I, Qaddoumi I, Al-Nawaiseh I. The Predictive Value of the Eighth Edition of the Clinical TNM Staging System for the Likelihood of Eye Salvage for Intraocular Retinoblastoma by Systemic Chemotherapy and Focal Therapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2021; 43:e841-e847. [PMID: 33769386 PMCID: PMC8373642 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000002144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) cTNM staging is emerging as a universal staging for all cancers, including retinoblastoma. METHODS Here we evaluated the predictive value of the eighth edition AJCC/UICC cTNM staging in comparison with the International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification for eye globe salvage by primary systemic chemotherapy and focal therapy (CRD) using logistic regression model for the probability of treatment failure. RESULTS The eye salvage rate for 565 treated eyes was 95% (n=139/147) for T1 tumors (98% for T1a and 93% for T1b), 56% (n=230/410) for T2 (81% for T2a and 53% for T2b), and 0% for T3 tumors, and was 98%, 93%, 76%, and 44% for group A, B, C, and D tumors, respectively. As estimated by odds ratios, T2 were 13.6-fold more likely to fail treatment than T1, and T1b, T2a, and T2b were 2.8-, 9.4-, and 35.1-fold more likely to fail treatment than T1a, respectively. Group B, C, and D tumors were 2.8-, 12.7-, and 50.1-fold more likely to fail treatment than group A tumors, respectively. Eye salvage rate was 62% for eyes with focal seeds (3 mm close to the tumor), and 42% for eyes with diffuse seeds (clouds more than 3 mm from tumor edge) (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION Both, the eighth edition cTNM classification and the International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification systems, can effectively predict eye salvage rates for retinoblastoma by CRD. Eyes with higher cT stages are more likely to experience treatment failure. Because the cT2b group is very heterogeneous, our findings suggest further division of this group based on the severity of vitreous/subretinal seeds, this should be revised in the next edition of cTNM system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yacoub A. Yousef
- Departments of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman, Jordan
| | - Mona Mohammad
- Departments of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman, Jordan
| | - Mustafa Mehyar
- Departments of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman, Jordan
| | - Iyad Sultan
- Pediatrics Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman, Jordan
| | - Maysa Al-Hussaini
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman, Jordan
| | - Joud Alhourani
- Departments of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Jakub Khzouz
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman, Jordan
| | - Imad Jaradat
- Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman, Jordan
| | - Ibrahim Qaddoumi
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ibrahim Al-Nawaiseh
- Departments of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Intra-arterial Chemotherapy as Primary Treatment for Cavitary Retinoblastoma: Excellent Response in Eight Tumors. Ophthalmol Retina 2020; 5:479-485. [PMID: 32853834 DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The "cavitary" form of retinoblastoma has historically demonstrated minimal treatment response with intravenous chemoreduction, showing less robust regression and less reduction in tumor size. Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) has been reported to more effectively treat retinoblastoma, allowing many previously unsalvageable eyes to now be saved. The purpose was to report treatment response of cavitary retinoblastoma tumors to IAC. DESIGN Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS Patients presenting with cavitary retinoblastoma who were treated with IAC. METHODS Retrospective case series of all patients presenting with cavitary retinoblastoma between August 2014 and January 2019 who were treated with primary IAC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Tumor regression, recurrence, resolution of vitreous and subretinal seeds, number of treatments required, globe salvage, metastasis, and death. RESULTS Eight cavitary retinoblastoma tumors in 6 eyes of 4 patients were treated with IAC. One hundred percent of the cavitary tumors regressed (8/8 tumors, in 6/6 eyes), and 100% of vitreous and subretinal seeds regressed, with 100% globe salvage. None of the tumors recurred, no patients developed metastases, and no patients died. Eyes were treated with a median of 4.5 cycles of IAC (range, 1-7), with fewer IAC treatments used in the later patients (1-3 treatments per eye for the most recent 3 eyes, compared with 6-7 treatments per eye for the earliest 3 eyes). Mean reduction in thickness was 73.4% (range, 59.7%-84.6%). Mean reduction in basal diameter was 45.5% (range, 24.8%-56.0%). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with IAC results in regression of cavitary retinoblastoma, often with greater reduction in tumor size than has been reported previously with intravenous chemotherapy (IVC). Using up-front triple therapy (e.g., melphalan 0.4 mg/kg, carboplatin 50 mg, and topotecan 2 mg) and noting certain subtle signs of early regression can help to minimize unnecessary additional cycles of treatment.
Collapse
|
6
|
A Multicenter, International Collaborative Study for American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging of Retinoblastoma: Part II: Treatment Success and Globe Salvage. Ophthalmology 2020; 127:1733-1746. [PMID: 32526306 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the ability of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition to predict local tumor control and globe salvage for children with retinoblastoma (RB). DESIGN International, multicenter, registry-based retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS A total of 2854 eyes of 2097 patients from 18 ophthalmic oncology centers from 13 countries over 6 continents. METHODS International, multicenter, registry-based data were pooled from patients enrolled between January 2001 and December 2013. All RB eyes with adequate records to allow tumor staging by the AJCC 8th edition criteria and follow-up to ascertain treatment outcomes were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Globe-salvage rates were estimated by AJCC clinical (cTNMH) categories and tumor laterality. Local treatment failure was defined as use of enucleation or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), with or without plaque brachytherapy or intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC). RESULTS Unilateral RB occurred in 1340 eyes (47%). Among the 2854 eyes, tumor categories were cT1 to cT4 in 696 eyes (24%), 1334 eyes (47%), 802 eyes (28%), and 22 eyes (1%), respectively. Of these, 1275 eyes (45%) were salvaged, and 1179 eyes (41%) and 400 eyes (14%) underwent primary and secondary enucleation, respectively. The 2- and 5-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative globe-salvage rates without the use of EBRT by cTNMH categories were 97% and 96% for category cT1a tumors, 94% and 88% for cT1b tumors, 68% and 60% for cT2a tumors, 66% and 57% for cT2b tumors, and 32% and 25% for cT3 tumors, respectively. Risk of local treatment failure increased with increasing cT category (P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed a higher risk of local treatment failure in categories cT1b (hazard ratio [HR], 3.5; P = 0.004), cT2a (HR, 15.1; P < 0.001), cT2b (HR, 16.4; P < 0.001), and cT3 (HR, 45.0; P < 0.001) compared with category cT1a. Use of plaque brachytherapy and IAC improved local tumor control in categories cT1a (P = 0.031) and cT1b (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Multicenter, international, internet-based data sharing validated the 8th edition AJCC RB staging to predict globe-salvage in a large, heterogeneous, real-world patient population with RB.
Collapse
|