Is there still a role of macular laser treatment in branch retinal vein occlusion in the era of intravitreal injections?

Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment Burden of Aflibercept 2 mg and Ranibizumab in Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated evidence base for clinical decision-making by comparing the efficacy and safety of aflibercept 2 mg and ranibizumab in treating retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using eight databases up to December 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWSs) comparing aflibercept and ranibizumab in patients with RVO were evaluated. The primary outcomes assessed were efficacy, number of injections administered, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Three RCTs (424 patients) and 11 RWSs (1415 patients) were included. For central RVO (CRVO), RCTs demonstrated a comparable efficacy, whereas RWSs showed that mean changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were significantly greater with aflibercept compared to ranibizumab; the number of injections of aflibercept was fewer than that of ranibizumab in RCTs, but similar in RWSs. For branch RVO (BRVO), no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the two drugs in RCTs/RWSs was observed, with fewer injections of aflibercept at 12 months in RWSs. The safety profiles of both drugs were similar for both CRVO and BRVO.

CONCLUSIONS

For CRVO, aflibercept had similar efficacy and safety profile but with fewer injections versus ranibizumab in RCTs; RWSs showed greater BCVA improvement and CRT reduction with aflibercept than ranibizumab. For BRVO, RCTs showed similar in efficacy, safety, and injection numbers for both drugs, while RWSs demonstrated that aflibercept required fewer injections at 12 months of follow-up. Overall, this study provides updated evidence for clinical decision-making in the treatment of RVO.

Evaluation of off-label anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and steroid implant medication uses in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion in Turkey

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is one of the most common causes of vision loss. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs, ranibizumab and aflibercept, and corticosteroid implants are approved treatment options for RVO-related macular edema (ME) in Turkey. To the best of our knowledge, there is no data regarding the off-label use of these drugs for RVO in English literature. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and demographic characteristics of off-label drug use applications in Turkey for RVO.

METHODS

Applications made to the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency between January 1 and December 31, 2018, for the use of off-label drugs (ranibizumab, aflibercept, dexamethasone implant) for the diagnosis of RVO from hospitals across Turkey were retrospectively analysed. Data of the applications, such as demographic characteristics, previous treatment regimens, reasons for applications, applicant hospitals and their regions, were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 291 approved applications for RVO. The mean age of the patients was 64.88 ± 10.78 years, 48.8% were male, and 51.2% were female. Of these applications, 44.7% were for aflibercept, 35.7% for ranibizumab and 19.6% for dexamethasone implant. No application was made for bevacizumab since it could be used without needing for an application. The most common reasons for applications were due to dose limitations, failure to complete loading doses, and glaucoma, respectively. In terms of the distribution of the applicant hospitals, public university hospitals ranked first with 72.5%, training and research hospitals ranked second with 14.7% and foundation university hospitals ranked third with 13.1% rates.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The practice of drug use in RVO in Turkey has changed as of the beginning of 2019. Stepwise therapy has been accepted by the drug regulatory agency Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency. Utilization of licensed drugs, aflibercept, ranibizumab and dexamethasone has been allowed only after administration of 3 doses of intravitreal bevacizumab. After 3 doses of bevacizumab, the physician may continue either with bevacizumab again or a dexamethasone implant. If there is a reason such as the presence of glaucoma, the physician may skip dexamethasone and switch to aflibercept and ranibizumab, but in this case, dexamethasone cannot be administered to the patient for life. The evaluation of the off-label treatments of RVO, which is one of the most frequently followed diseases in retina clinics, not only contributes to the literature but also provides information regarding the most frequently applied treatments and the physicians' off-label drug preferences for RVO.

Navigated laser and aflibercept versus aflibercept monotherapy in treatment-naïve branch retinal vein occlusion: A 12-month randomized trial

PURPOSE

Angiostatic agents have proven effective in the treatment of macular oedema in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). However, treatment is inconvenient and expensive, and novel treatment regimens are warranted. We aimed to evaluate if combination treatment of navigated central retinal laser and aflibercept lowered the treatment burden in these patients.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients with BRVO and macular oedema were included at two centres and randomized 1:1 to three monthly injections of 2.0 mg aflibercept with (Group A) or without (Group B) navigated central laser, followed by aflibercept as needed from month 4 through 12. Re-treatment need was evaluated, and secondary endpoints included functional and anatomical outcomes and safety evaluated by retinal microperimetry.

RESULTS

We evaluated 41 eyes of 41 patients with a mean age of 69.6 years. Baseline median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 70.0 letters, and median central retinal thickness (CRT) was 502 μm with no difference between Groups A (n = 21) and B (n = 20). Percentage of patients needing re-treatment after month three was 71% and 80% (p = 0.72). At month 12, groups did not differ in number of injections after loading (1 versus 2, p = 0.43), change in BCVA (+12.8 versus +15.1 letters, p = 0.48), CRT (-195 versus -181 μm, p = 0.82), or retinal sensitivity (+3.3 versus +4.1 dB, p = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

In treatment-naïve BRVO patients, addition of navigated central laser to aflibercept did not lower treatment burden or affect functional or anatomical outcomes. A low number of intravitreal injections were needed for successful outcome in both treatment arms.

Molecular Features of Classic Retinal Drugs, Retinal Therapeutic Targets and Emerging Treatments

The management of exudative retinal diseases underwent a revolution due to the introduction of intravitreal treatments. There are two main classes of intravitreal drugs, namely anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) and corticosteroids molecules. The clinical course and the outcome of retinal diseases radically changed thanks to the efficacy of these molecules in determining the regression of the exudation and the restoration of the macular profile. In this review, we described the molecular features of classic retinal drugs, highlighting the main therapeutic targets, and we provided an overview of new emerging molecules. We performed a systematic review of the current literature available in the MEDLINE library, focusing on current intravitreal molecules and on new emerging therapies. The anti-VEGF molecules include Bevacizumab, Pegaptanib, Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, Conbercept, Brolucizumab, Abicipar-pegol and Faricimab. The corticosteroids approach is mainly based on the employment of triamcinolone acetonide, dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide molecules. Many clinical trials and real-life reports demonstrated their efficacy in exudative retinal diseases, highlighting differences in terms of molecular targeting and pharmacologic profiles. Furthermore, several new molecules are currently under investigation. Intravitreal drugs focus their activity on a wide range of therapeutic targets and are safe and efficacy in managing retinal diseases.