Epidemiology and outcomes of hyphema: a single tertiary centre experience of 180 cases

Ophthalmic Trauma Malpractice in the Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company Database

PURPOSE

To review ophthalmic trauma malpractice claims in the Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company (OMIC) database to determine the frequency and causes of litigation.

METHODS

A retrospective case series analysis of ophthalmic trauma claims from 2009 to 2019 was completed. Cases were selected only if the injury was secondary to trauma (e.g., fall, gunshot wound, paintball injury, etc.); iatrogenic traumatic surgical injuries were excluded.

RESULTS

31 closed cases associated with 40 total claims related to ophthalmic trauma out of 2565 claims (1.56%) in the OMIC database were analysed. 13 of the 31 cases (41.9%) were decided for the plaintiff. In decisions for the plaintiff, the median settlement amount was $330,000 (range $125,000-$1,000,000). The most frequent initial diagnoses were corneal abrasion (n = 10), hyphema (n = 5) and open-globe injury (n = 5), and the most common final diagnoses were endophthalmitis (n = 8), intraocular foreign body (n = 7) and retinal detachment (n = 7). The most common causes of malpractice litigation were a delay in referral or follow-up (n = 11) and failure to get appropriate imaging (n = 8). In the 13 cases decided for the plaintiff, experts concluded nine did not meet standard of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Ophthalmic trauma malpractice claims are very uncommon in the United States, however, the payout is higher than non-trauma settlements, and approximately 40% of cases were decided for the plaintiff. Care could be improved with a careful history and complete ophthalmic examination (with dilated fundoscopy), imaging in appropriate patients, meticulous documentation, and early sub-specialist referral when the diagnosis or management plan was unclear.

Predictors of Long-term Ophthalmic Complications after Closed Globe Injuries Using the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry

Purpose

To identify clinical factors associated with the need for future surgical intervention following closed globe ocular trauma.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Subjects Participants and/or Controls

Patients in the American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry with a diagnosis of closed globe ocular trauma occurring between 2013 and 2019, identified using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine codes.

Methods

Diagnosis codes were used to identify multiple concomitant diagnoses present on the date of closed globe ocular trauma. Survival analyses were performed for each outcome of interest, and linear regression was used to identify clinical factors associated with the risk of surgical intervention.

Main Outcome Measures

Outcomes included retinal break treatment, retinal detachment (RD) repair, retinal break treatment or RD repair, glaucoma surgery, and cataract surgery.

Results

Of the 206 807 patients with closed globe ocular trauma, 9648 underwent surgical intervention during the follow-up period (mean, 444 days): 1697 (0.8%) had RD repair, 1658 (0.8%) had retinal break treatment, 600 (0.3%) had glaucoma surgery, and 5693 (2.8%) had cataract surgery. Traumatic cataract was the strongest risk factor for cataract surgery (hazard ratio, 13.0; 95% confidence interval, 10.8-15.6), traumatic hyphema showed highest risk for glaucoma surgery (7.24; 4.60-11.4), and vitreous hemorrhage was the strongest risk factor for retinal break treatment and detachment repair (11.01; 9.18-13.2 and 14.2; 11.5-17.6, respectively) during the first 60 days after trauma date. Vitreous hemorrhage was a risk factor for cataract surgery at > 60 days after trauma date only. Iris-angle injury was the strongest risk factor for glaucoma surgery > 60 days after trauma, while vitreous hemorrhage remained the strongest factor for retinal break treatment and detachment repair at > 60 days. Traumatic hyphema was a risk factor for all surgical outcomes during all follow-up intervals.

Conclusions

Diagnosis of concomitant traumatic cataract, vitreous hemorrhage, traumatic hyphema, and other risk factors may increase the likelihood of requiring surgical intervention after closed globe ocular trauma.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Postoperative Hyphema After 23-Gauge Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Purpose

We aim to investigate the incidence, clinical course, and risk factors for developing postoperative hyphema after 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) without neovascularization of the iris or angles and neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

Methods

This retrospective study included 155 consecutive eyes from 124 patients with at least three-month follow-up who underwent PPV for PDR without neovascularization of the iris or angles and NVG. Demographic data, surgery notes, postoperative hyphema assessment, intraocular pressure (IOP), and the surgical outcome were recorded.

Results

Postoperative hyphema occurred in 18 of 155 eyes (11.6%), with 14 of those having hyphema on day 1, and 4 having hyphema on days 7–20. Of the 18 eyes, only 3 (16.7%) had normal IOP, and immediate intraocular hypertension was observed in 15 (83.3%). Seven eyes required anterior chamber paracentesis and five needed anterior chamber irrigation. The average time for absorption of the hyphema was 13.1 days, and IOP was controlled in all cases. There was a significant correlation between membrane removal and the development of hyphema (OR = 5.65 and 95% CI: 1.190–25.203; p = 0.013). No recurrence of hyphema was observed. In patients with hyphema, the final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.75 ± 0.84 logMAR, which improved significantly compared to the initial BCVA of 2.20 ± 0.65 logMAR (t = 3.893; p = 0.001), and the final anatomic success rate was 100%.

Conclusion

The development of hyphema is not uncommon after PPV for patients with PDR without neovascularization of the iris or angles and NVG, and membrane removal is a risk factor for postoperative hyphema. The timely management of hyphema ensures that hyphema does not affect the visual recovery or the final anatomical success.

Creation of a New Explosive Injury Equipment to Induce a Rabbit Animal Model of Closed Globe Blast Injury via Gas Shock

To establish a rabbit animal model of closed globe blast injury with an application of self-developed explosive injury equipment, we tend to explore the anatomic and pathological changes of eyes under different gas pressure. The device comprises of high-pressure air source compression pump, air channel, and gas shock. There were 36 healthy bluish blue rabbits exposed to one of five blast pressures (500, 1,000, 1,500, 2,000, and 5,000 Kpa). Slit lamp microscope, B-mode ultrasonography, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) examination were performed at 0-, 1-, 3-, and 7-days post exposure, while gross histopathology was assessed with H&E stain at 7 days. The contralateral eyes and non-blast exposed rabbits were used as controls. Definitive evidence of closed globe blast injury was obtained. Corneal edema and hyphema were observed in the models under all pressures with no full-thickness globe injury, or lens rupture, as the severity was pressure independent. There was no obvious retinal abnormality on B ultrasound or OCT scan, while light vitreous hemorrhage, commotio retinae, and heavy retinal pigmentation presented on one eye, respectively, in the eyes exposed to 5,000 Kpa. Increased retinal thickness with disorganizations on the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) layer and RGC apoptosis in groups under higher pressure (>500 Kpa). IOP of injured eyes were statistically decreased at day 1 and 7 post injury (p < 0.05). Conclusively, the rabbit animal model induced by self-developed equipment could mimic the clinical features of closed ocular blast injury successfully that was feasible and easy to operate. This will be a new rabbit animal model for investigating mechanisms and new therapeutic interventions of closed globe blast injury in the future.