Consecutive contralateral comparison of toric and non-toric implantable collamer lenses V4c in vault after implantation for myopia and astigmatism

Rotational Stability, Footplate Position, and Visual Outcomes of Toric Implantable Collamer Lenses in Eyes With Low Vault

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes, rotational stability, and footplate position of the toric Implantable Collamer Lens (TICL) (STAAR Surgical) in eyes with low vault and analyze factors related to rotational stability.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 59 eyes of 59 patients with insufficient vault (< 250 µm). Postoperative rotation was defined as the difference between the achieved angle and the intraoperative fixation angle, and assessed with a digital anterior segment photograph after full mydriasis at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was used to determine the ciliary body morphology and position of the footplate. Correlation analysis was employed to identify the risk factors associated with TICL rotation at 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 6 months postoperatively, the mean central vault was 137.4 ± 61.0 µm (range: 40 to 236 µm), and the mean efficacy and safety indices were 1.04 and 1.15, respectively. The mean manifest refractive astigmatism decreased from -1.67 ± 0.82 diopters (D) preoperatively to -0.43 ± 0.33 D postoperatively, and the mean absolute rotation was 4.50 ± 3.08 degrees (range: 0 to 12.50 degrees). The angle of rotation was correlated with the preoperative spherical power (r = -0.318, P = .014), the average value of TICL footplates position (r = 0.284, P = .029), and postoperative astigmatism (r = -.469, P⩽ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

TICL implantation is predictable, safe, and effective in correcting myopic astigmatism in eyes with low vault. The rotational stability was acceptable and related to the malposition of the footplate and preoperative spherical power. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e460-e467.].

Long-term observation of V4c implantable collamer lenses implantation for moderate to extreme high myopia correction: five years follow-up

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the long term effectiveness, safety, predictability and stability of V4c implantable collamer lenses (ICL) for correction of moderate to extreme high myopia.

METHODS

We reviewed 125 eyes from 64 patients who implanted V4c ICL at the Refractive Surgery Center of West China Hospital in Chengdu, China, between May 2015 and January 2017. The median spherical equivalent was -11.50 D (interquartile range [IQR]: -13.00 to -9.00 D). We followed up with the patients over five years and evaluated several parameters, including uncorrected visual acuity (UDVA), corrected visual acuity (CDVA), axial length, refractive error, endothelial cell density (ECD), intraocular pressure (IOP), white-to-white distance (WTW), and vault. We performed a correlation analysis to explore the potential impacts on vault following implantation.

RESULTS

The median safety index (postoperative CDVA/preoperative CDVA) during the last follow-up was 1.00 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.00-1.20), and the efficacy indices (postoperative UDVA/preoperative CDVA) were 1.20 (IQR: 1.00-1.25), 1.20 (IQR: 1.00-1.33), and 0.8 (IQR: 0.65-1.00) at postoperative 1 week, 1 month, and 5 years, respectively. At the five-year mark, 16% of the eyes were within ±0.50 D of expected correction, and 73% were within ±2.00 D. No significant difference in ECD was observed between pre-operative and post-operative measurements. Compared to baseline, we observed a significant increase in IOP at the one-week follow-up, which decreased significantly at the one-month visit. Furthermore, we identified ICL size and spherical equivalent (SE) as independent variables in a multiple linear regression model that accurately predicted the five-year vault after surgery.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, V4c ICL implantation is an effective and safe treatment for moderate to extreme high myopia with good predictability and stability over the long-term.

The Efficacy of Paired Opposite Clear Corneal Incisions Correcting Preexisting Low-to-Moderate Astigmatism in Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of paired opposite clear corneal incisions (OCCIs) in Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL; STAAR Surgical) implantation surgery for correcting preexisting low-to-moderate astigmatism and observe their influence on corneal aberration.

METHODS

This prospective controlled randomized study included 123 eyes: 73 eyes in the ICL surgery group (control group) and 50 eyes in the ICL combined with OCCI group (OCCI group). All patients had corneal astigmatism between 0.50 and 3.00 D. Parameters considered included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refraction, keratometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, corneal topography, and higher order aberrations (HOAs). The Alpins method was used to analyze the correction of astigmatism. The follow-up period lasted for 12 months.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in mean UDVA and CDVA after surgery. At 1 and 12 months, the OCCI group had statistically better UDVA than the control group (P = .021 and .01). The OCCI group showed a significant reduction in mean refractive astigmatism from -0.835 ± 0.274 to -0.535 ± 0.353 and -0.450 ± 0.346 D postoperatively (P < .05) after 1 and 12 months. No significant change was observed in the control group (P > .05). The average magnitude of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was 0.911 ± 0.442 and 0.811 ± 0.397 D at 1 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively, in the OCCI group, which was slightly lower than the target induced astigmatism. The difference in SIA between the OCCI and control groups was significant by the end of 1 and 12 months postoperatively (P < .0001). The mean correction index was below 1, suggesting an undercorrection effect caused by clear corneal incisions in the opposite direction. HOAs increased in both the control and OCCI groups after surgery (t = 5.668, P < .0001, t = 3.773, P = .0003, respectively), with oblique trefoil only significantly increasing in the OCCI group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that OCCIs represent a secure, efficient, reliable, and long-term technique for reducing preexisting low-to-moderate corneal astigmatism during ICL surgery. However, OCCIs did not show any advantageous impact in terms of wavefront aberrations when compared to the traditional single-incision method. The presence of oblique trefoil may be the main contributor to the alteration of HOAs during OCCI surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(1):e20-e29.].

EVO/EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer Lenses for the correction of myopia and myopia with astigmatism

INTRODUCTION

Intraocular lens implantation in phakic eyes for the correction of refractive error is currently a widespread procedure. The EVO and EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer Lenses (ICL) are two of the most prevalent lenses implanted. They incorporate a central orifice to avoid the need for iridotomy. The main difference between both ICL is the higher optical diameter zone provided by the EVO+, allowing a better quality of vision at night. This review aims to provide an overview of the current ICL models available for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism.

AREAS COVERED

During the last decade, more than 100 scientific papers analyzing the performance of EVO and EVO+ lenses have been published. This review describes the objective visual performance achieved with the implantation of central hole ICL lenses and the subjective perception of the patients implanted with these lenses. In addition, the safety and the potential complications associated with undergoing an EVO and EVO+ ICL implantation have been addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

Refractive surgeons and candidates to undergo ICL implantation should be aware of the excellent safety and visual outcomes provided by the implantation of central hole ICL lenses. However, future research could address minor issues currently not resolved.

Short-term clinic observation of misalignment and rotational stability after implantable collamer lens implantation

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate misalignment (tilt and decentration) and rotational stability of the implantable collamer lens V4c 6 months after implantation and to explore the potential risk factors associated with postoperative misalignment and rotation.

METHODS

A total of 36 eyes of 36 patients with high myopia and myopic astigmatism who underwent implantable collamer lens V4c implantation were included in this study. Tilt, decentration, and rotation of the implantable collamer lens were assessed postoperatively at l week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Correlation analysis was used to identify the potential risk factors for implantable collamer lens tilt, decentration, and rotation at 6 months postoperatively. Higher-order aberration was measured to evaluate the effect of implantable collamer lens misalignment on visual quality at pupil diameters of 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm.

RESULTS

The tilt and decentration at the last follow-up were 2.43 ± 1.35° and 0.278 ± 0.160 mm, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between tilt and decentration (r = 0.31, P = 0.046). No significant correlation was detected between implantable collamer lens decentration and internal higher-order aberrations (P > 0.05). The degree of implantable collamer lens rotation (3.11 ± 2.00°) was significantly associated with the vault (r =  - 0.422, P = 0.01), while it was positively associated with the preoperative anterior chamber depth (r = 0.36, P = 0.034). No significant correlation was found between postoperative astigmatism and rotation (r =  - 0.07, P = 0.351).

CONCLUSIONS

The implantable collamer lens V4c provides relatively stable misalignment and rotation after implantation. The ICL lens vault is a potential risk factor for postoperative implantable collamer lens rotation. The absolute value of decentration and tilt was relatively small, which showed no correlation with internal higher-order aberration in short-term observation.

Vault differences in eyes implanted with spherical and toric implantable collamer lenses: an inter-eye analysis

Purpose

To determine the influence of implantable collamer lenses (ICL) geometry, i.e. spherical and toric on the vault, and report the refractive and visual outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with the two ICL geometries.

Methods

This retrospective case series analysed 41 patients implanted with a spherical ICL (sICL) in one eye and an equal sized toric ICL (tICL) in the fellow eye. The anatomical and ICL-related parameters were assessed using anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT Visante, Zeiss Meditec AG) and optical tomography (Pentacam, OCULUS). The influence of the anatomical and ICL-related parameters on the vault was determined using generalised estimating equations (GEE) to incorporate inter-eye correlations.

Results

Postoperative spherical equivalent was within ± 0.50D in 66% and 83% of the eyes, respectively implanted with sICL and tICL. The efficacy index in the sICL group was 1.06 and 1.14 in the tICL group. The mean inter-eye vault difference was -1.46 µm, anatomical and ICL-related parameters showed similar associations with the vault for sICL and tICL. The GEE identified the ICL size minus the anterior chamber width, the ICL spherical power and ICL central thickness as significant factors influencing the vault.

Conclusions

Spherical and toric ICL showed good efficacy for the correction of myopia and astigmatism. Patients implanted bilaterally with sICL and tICL tend to present similar vaults. The vault produced by both types of ICL was mainly regulated by the oversizing of the ICL. This suggests that the ICL geometry (spherical vs toric) is a factor with limited influence on the vault, thus the sizing method of a sICL and tICL should be similar.

Analysis of perioperative problems related to intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation

PURPOSE

To introduce a modified procedure of ICL implantation, to summarize the perioperative problems and their corresponding treatment after myopia correction with Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL), and to compare the difference of complications between the no-hole ICL and hole ICL.

METHODS

We searched all articles on ICL-related perioperative problems and their corresponding treatment in Scopus, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases for the last 22 years.

RESULTS

ICL implantation is safe, effective, stable and predictable in the correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism, but can also cause a series of perioperative problems, including intraoperative and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

There are many kinds of complications related to ICL, but the common intraoperative and postoperative complications mainly include abnormality of arch height, abnormal position of ICL, loss of corneal endothelial cells and corneal decompensation, high intraocular pressure and secondary glaucoma, cataract and night vision symptoms. Compared with ICL without central pore, the incidence of complications such as loss of corneal endothelial cells and corneal decompensation, high intraocular pressure and secondary glaucoma and cataract was relatively lower in central hole ICL, while postoperative complications such as night vision symptoms were obvious.

Inter-eye and postoperative prediction of vault after implantation of EVO + Visian phakic implantable collamer lens

PURPOSE

To assess whether the postoperative outcomes of the implantation of an EVO + implantable collamer lens (ICL) in one eye can be used as a predictor of the vault of the fellow eye, and to evaluate the vault changes of the implantation in both eyes during the postoperative period.

METHODS

A prospective study including 40 eyes of 20 patients with a bilateral EVO + ICL implantation was performed. Subjects were evaluated before the surgery and 1 day, 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Central vault was assessed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The inter-eye and follow-up analyses were performed using lineal models and the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The vault of the first implanted eye at the 1-day visit highly predicts the vault of the second eye (R² = .87; P < .001); the mean inter-eye difference was - 0.95 μm, and the superior and inferior limits of agreement were -50.27 μm and 148.37 μm, respectively. This relationship was maintained during the medium-term follow-up, not finding differences in the slopes among visits (P ≥ .09). A progressive decrease of vault was found during the follow-up (P < .001). Larger vault change 6 months after the surgery was associated with higher vault 1 day after the ICL implantation (R² = .19;P = .005).

CONCLUSION

One-day postoperative vault in the first eye can help to predict the optimal ICL sizing in the second eye. Vault tends to decrease during the first 6 months after EVO + ICL implantation. Eyes with higher initial vaults will also show larger reductions during the medium-term follow-up.

Factors leading to realignment or exchange after implantable collamer lens implantation in 10 258 eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence, causes, and outcomes of implantable collamer lens (ICL) realignment or exchange after implantation of the EVO-ICL.

SETTING

Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, China.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

The study included 10 258 consecutive eyes after ICL implantation. Preoperative refractive and biometric measurements were compared between eyes with and without realignment or exchange. For eyes with ICL realignment or exchange, visual and biometric outcomes were also compared before and after ICL realignment or exchange.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of ICL realignment or exchange was 0.21% 22 eyes. 12 eyes (0.12%) underwent ICL realignment by axis rotation (10 eyes) or ICL exchange (2 eyes) due to toric ICL (TICL) misalignment. After realignment, uncorrected distance visual acuity improved, and residual cylinder decreased from -1.75 ± 0.48 diopters (D) to -0.87 ± 0.59 D ( P = .01). 10 eyes (0.10%) underwent vertical rotation of ICL (3 eyes) or ICL exchange (7 eyes) due to excessive vault. After either vertical rotation or ICL exchange, vault decreased significantly ( P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ICL realignment or exchange after ICL implantation is low. TICL misalignment and excessive vault are 2 main causes. Implant exchange may be performed for excessive vault or misalignment with an insufficient vault. In addition, vertical rotation of an ICL may be a less invasive method to treat excessive vault in certain cases.

Clinical Prediction of Inadequate Vault in Eyes With Thick Lens After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation Using Iris Morphology

Background

Obtaining an ideal vault is crucial in the implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery. Prediction of the vault value is difficult since it requires the integration of multiple factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the iris shape and vault value in eyes with thick lens.

Methods

The study was conducted in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Patients who received ICL V4c between 2017 and 2021 were screened. Eyes with thick lens (>4.0 mm) and abnormal iris shape (concave or convex) were included. The preoperative biometric parameters and postoperative vault value were compared between eyes with concave shape group and convex shape group. The relationship between various factors and vault was assessed by spearman rank analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. Representative cases our strategies to deal with the abnormal vault were demonstrated.

Results

Twenty eight eyes of 14 patients with thick lens and concave or convex shape iris were eventually included, with 14 eyes of 7 patients in group 1 (concave shape iris) and the other 14 eyes of 7 patients in group 2 (convex shape iris). The mean vault of group 1 was (0.16 ± 0.07) mm, which was significantly lower than (0.88 ± 0.13) mm in group 2. Multiple linear regression analysis showed iris shape (P < 0.001) was only the explanatory variables associated with the postoperative vault. In group1, 4 eyes showed extremely large ACA, requiring a secondary surgical intervention. So all of them underwent ICL exchange for a larger ICL. In group2, the ICL was implanted in a vertical or oblique position to avoid or rescue an extremely large vault.

Conclusion

Concave shape iris had a higher risk of low vault and convex shape iris were more likely to demonstrate high vault in eyes with thick lens. Exchanging ICL for the larger size and adjusting ICL to the vertical or oblique orientation are good option to rescue the low or high vault, respectively.

Peripheral Anterior Chamber Depth and Angle Measurements Using Pentacam After Implantation of Toric and Non-toric Implantable Collamer Lenses

Purpose: To evaluate the characteristics of peripheral anterior chamber measurements by Pentacam after posterior implantable collamer lenses (ICL) and toric ICL (TICL) with central hole (V4c) implantation.

Methods: Prospective, non-randomized consecutive case series. Forty-six patients undergoing ICL implantation in one eye (Group A) and identically sized TICL in the contralateral eye (Group B) in the Refractive Surgery Center of Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University were prospectively included. According to ICL/TICL size, these eyes were further divided into four subgroups. Peripheral anterior chamber depth (PACD) and angle (ACA) in nasal and temporal sides were measured using Pentacam pre-operatively and 12-month post-operatively.

Results: The safety indices were 1.34 ± 0.32 and 1.25 ± 0.16 and the efficacy indices were 1.20 ± 0.24 and 1.19 ± 0.19 for ICL and TICL groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in pre-operative PACD or ACA between the two groups. Post-operative PACD and ACA were significantly lower than pre-operative values. Variations of PACD and ACA of TICL group were significantly larger than those of ICL group. The change of ACA for 13.2 mm lenses was significantly larger than that of 12.6 mm lenses. Pre-operative CACD and vault were significantly associated with post-operative PACD, while pre-operative ACA and vault were significantly associated with post-operative ACA.

Conclusions: Variations of PACD and ACA were greater in eyes after TICL (V4c) implantation compared with identically sized ICL (V4c) implantation and with larger size than smaller size lens implantation. Pre-operative anterior chamber structure and vault affect post-operative PACD and ACA.