Clinical benefits and potential risks of adalimumab in non-JIA chronic paediatric uveitis

Uveitis in the Pediatric Population and Therapeutic Management: A Current Literature Review

Uveitis is an inflammatory disease that can lead to severe complications, including vision loss. The pediatric population is particularly at risk of developing complications, as uveitis in this age group often has idiopathic origins or is associated with systemic diseases that follow a severe course. This, coupled with unfavorable treatment outcomes, continues to be a challenge in pediatric ophthalmology. The cornerstone of uveitis treatment involves a therapeutic strategy that depends on the etiology, severity, and localization of the inflammation, as well as the patient's response to treatment and the presence of ocular complications. Patients who do not receive timely treatment face a significantly increased risk of experiencing a severe disease course. Understanding potential therapeutic options and their side effects is crucial in managing children with uveitis. Equally important is the continuous monitoring of the child's condition throughout the treatment process, due to the chronic and recurrent nature of uveitis in this demographic. The authors conducted a review of the current literature from 2018 to 2023 on the management and introduction of new therapeutic approaches for children with uveitis.

The Efficacy of Adalimumab in Children with Chronic Non-infectious Posterior Uveitis and Panuveitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in pediatric patients with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis and panuveitis (not associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis).

METHODS

The medical records of children (< 18 years old) with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis and panuveitis were collected and analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Children were allocated to a conventional adalimumab-free treatment (CT) or adalimumab (ADA) group based on whether they additionally received adalimumab.

RESULTS

In total, 69 children (138 eyes) were included, with 21 (42 eyes) and 48 (96 eyes) in the CT and ADA groups, respectively. During the average follow-up period of 24 months, the improvement in all ocular parameters (best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular inflammation, fluorescein angiography score) was better in the ADA group than in the CT group, except for changes in central macular thickness, which did not significantly differ between the groups. The mean time of first alleviation, which was after 1.03 ± 0.12 months of therapy, was earlier in the ADA group than in the CT group (2.30 ± 0.46 months). In the ADA group, 90.6% of children had remission within 3 months, and 47.9% had no relapse during follow-up. Cough and cold were the most common adverse events in the ADA group; however, the number of adverse events was similar between both the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab was effective in the treatment of chronic noninfectious posterior uveitis and panuveitis in pediatric patients, and disease inactivity was accomplished in the majority of the patients, thereby improving visual outcomes and maintaining disease stability. Adverse events were limited and tolerable.

Adalimumab (ADA) in Pediatric Non-infectious Uveitis: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

 Pediatric uveitis is a rare but sight-threatening condition. Prompt and adequate treatment is crucial to preserve vision and avoid long-term complications. In cases that are resistant to corticosteroids and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), anti-tumor necrosis (anti-TNF) biologic agents are usually added. In this study, we report our experience with adalimumab (ADA) anti-TNF use in this group of patients.

METHODS

 This is a retrospective observational study conducted in a tertiary pediatric uveitis clinic, in Manchester Royal Eye Hospital. All patients were pediatric patients (aged 2-18 years old) under follow-up during the period of six months. The patients' data were analyzed according to the diagnosis, age of onset of uveitis, systemic medications used before and concomitantly with ADA, duration of uveitis before starting ADA, its effect, and time to notice the therapeutic effect in controlling inflammation. Finally, cases were reviewed for the development of anti-drug antibodies.

RESULTS

 Forty-two patients were included in the study. Idiopathic uveitis was diagnosed in 47.6% of patients and 40.5% of patients were associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Most (97.6%) of patients were using topical steroids before starting ADA and 95.2% continued using steroids after established ADA use, but systemic steroid use was reduced from 33.3% to 14.3%. The most common non-biologic DMARD used before ADA was methotrexate (MTX) (90.5%). One-third of the patients started ADA between 6 and 12 months after the diagnosis of uveitis, while this percentage dropped to 9.5% the year after diagnosis. Seventy-eight percent of patients acquired complete clinical control of inflammation on ADA use. Almost 78.6% of patients showed a full response in less than six months. In eight patients who were not controlled or were transiently controlled on ADA, three patients had positive anti-drug antibodies. In one patient, antidrug antibodies were identified after 12 years of ADA use, and in another, after 4 years.

CONCLUSION

 Adalimumab is an effective, well-tolerated drug in children with uveitis refractory to non-biologic DMARD therapy. DMARDs were usually used alongside ADA in this cohort and few patients had confirmed ADA antibodies.

How should we approach management of childhood onset chronic anterior uveitis refractory to adalimumab?

INTRODUCTION

The management of refractory juvenile idiopathic associated uveitis (JIAU) or childhood-onset chronic anterior uveitis (CAU) is a challenge. There is no clear consensus or evidence base for to suggest the most appropriate therapy after primary or secondary failure of biweekly adalimumab. In this scenario, most clinicians advocate switching to another anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor; however, there are a variety of other disease modifying agents to choose from albeit with a differing levels of evidence.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss how to define nonresponse and potential treatment options for patients with JIAU and CAU refractory to biweekly adalimumab.

EXPERT OPINION

Uncontrolled CAU and JIAU remain one of the most challenging diseases to manage and can lead to irreversible loss of vision in a third of those affected. Amongst the possible choices, weekly adalimumab, infliximab, tocilizumab and abatacept have more evidence to support their use. JAK inhibitors seem to be a promising option. Golimumab and Rituximab has also been thought to be partially effective in some refractory cases, whereas IL-17, IL-23, and IL-12 inhibition along with apremilast seem not to be a therapeutic option currently. The route of administration should also be considered as there can be significant pros and cons for different children.

Prompt and Sustained Suppression of Intraocular Inflammation with Adalimumab in Pediatric Patients with Non-Infectious Uveitis Resistant to Traditional Managements: A 6-Month Follow-Up Research

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) on visual acuity (VA), ocular inflammation, vitreous haze and central macular thickness (CMT) in pediatric refractory non-infectious uveitis.

METHODS

Thirty-one eyes of 16 pediatric patients with uveitis of various etiologies were treated with ADA. VA, intraocular active inflammatory cells, vitreous haze, and CMT were evaluated at the baseline and 2nd, 4th, 12th, and 24th weeks following ADA treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 31 eyes had active and the remaining 8 eyes had inactive uveitis (with frequent relapse) before ADA therapy. VA (LogMAR) increased at 12th week following ADA treatment (p< .001). Intraocular inflammation degrees significantly improved within 4 weeks (p< .001). Vitreous haze decreased at fourth week and stabilized at 12th week (p= .038). CMT started to decrease within weeks and stabilized at 12th week (p= .006).

CONCLUSIONS

ADA was found to be safe and effective to suppress intraocular inflammation in pediatric non-infectious uveitis, which prevented sight-threatening complications.

Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Pediatric Non-infectious Non-anterior Uveitis: Real-life Experience From the International AIDA Network Uveitis Registry

INTRODUCTION

Scientific evidence of the effectiveness of the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor adalimumab (ADA) in pediatric patients with non-infectious non-anterior uveitis is still limited. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic role of ADA in a cohort of pediatric patients with non-anterior uveitis.

METHODS

This is an international multicenter study analyzing real-life data referred to pediatric patients treated with ADA for intermediate uveitis/pars planitis, posterior uveitis and panuveitis. Data were drawn from the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) registry for patients with uveitis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (36 affected eyes) were enrolled, and all patients benefited from ADA administration. In detail, 11 patients (19 affected eyes) did not experience further ocular inflammation after ADA introduction; 10 cases (17 affected eyes) showed a significant clinical improvement consisting of a decrease in severity and/or frequency of ocular relapses. The number of ocular flares dropped from 3.91 to 1.1 events/patient/year after ADA introduction (p = 0.0009); macular edema and retinal vasculitis were respectively observed in 18 eyes and 20 eyes at the start of ADA and in 4 eyes and 2 eyes at the last assessment. The mean daily glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased from 26.8 ± 16.8 mg/day at the start of ADA to 6.25 ± 6.35 mg/day at the last assessment (p = 0.002). Intermediate uveitis/pars planitis (p = 0.01) and posterior uveitis (p = 0.03) were more frequently observed in patients with full response to ADA; panuveitis (p = 0.001) was significantly more frequent among patients continuing to experience uveitic flares. This could be related to a higher use of systemic glucocorticoids (p = 0.002) and conventional immunosuppressants (p = 0.007) at the start of ADA when treating intermediate uveitis/pars planitis. Regarding the safety profile, only one adverse event was reported during ADA treatment, consisting of the development of generalized adenopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

ADA proved to have an effective therapeutic role in all pediatric patients with non-anterior uveitis enrolled in the study. An overall glucocorticoid-sparing effect was observed despite the severity of cases enrolled. A more aggressive treatment of panuveitis and posterior uveitis at start of ADA could increase the likelihood of full response to therapy.

An Overview of Pediatric Uveitis

Uveitis in childhood poses a distinct challenge, mainly because of the insidious onset and chronic course of intraocular inflammation in most cases, which may result in permanent visual loss due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Although anterior uveitis, frequently associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, is the most common form of ocular involvement, idiopathic intermediate uveitis (pars planitis) is also a common uveitic entity in childhood. Posterior or panuveitis of a variety of noninfectious or infectious etiologies may be seen as well. Pediatric uveitis needs to be closely monitored since serious ocular complications such as intraocular pressure elevation, cataract, and macular edema may rapidly develop due to inadequately controlled inflammation and/or the use of corticosteroids. Methotrexate is generally the first- line corticosteroid-sparing agent, and adalimumab is the first-line biologic in refractory cases of noninfectious uveitis. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to monitor systemic disease associations, treatment response, and adverse events in children with uveitis.

Uveitis in Children: The Role of Biological Agents in Its Management

We aimed to determine medium and long-term effects of TNF-α inhibitors in patients with pediatric uveitis. This was a retrospective review of medical charts. Included were 50 patients (84 eyes). Mean age at diagnosis was 7.22 ± 4.04 years. At baseline (time of initiation of biologic therapy), all patients had active uveitis. Complete control of uveitis was achieved in 84.52% (n = 71) of eyes, after a median of 3 months (IQR 2 months). Mean LogMAR BCVA at baseline was 0.23 ± 0.44; it remained stable at 12 and 24 months. At baseline, 64% of patients were treated with oral corticosteroids, this decreased to 29.5% at 12 months (p = 0.001) and to 21.9% at 24 months (p < 0.001). Mean time to prednisone dose of ≤0.2 mg/kg/day was 8.1 ± 2.02 months after baseline. A total of 40.5% of eyes were treated with topical steroids at baseline and this significantly decreased to 5.8% at 12 months. Multiple linear regression model was calculated to predict moderate and severe visual loss; only presenting visual acuity accounted for a unique variance in the model. In conclusion, TNF-α inhibitors achieved rapid disease control while enabling a remarkable steroid-sparing effect in children suffering from chronic uveitis. Presenting visual acuity was the sole predictor of moderate to severe visual loss.