1
|
Erikson K, Heidenreich A, Labunska V, Beach R, Cremers F, Rades D, Grisanti S, Katalinic A, Kakkassery V. Evaluation of ocular and systemic endpoints after radiation of posterior uveal melanoma - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 2024; 10:e36468. [PMID: 39309921 PMCID: PMC11414481 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Due to the large number of radiotherapeutic options for treatment of posterior uveal melanoma (UM), advantages of each option regarding important clinical endpoints have yet to be determined. Therefore, objective of this systematic review was to analyze the numerous pro- and retrospective cohort studies focusing on the efficacy of different radiotherapeutic options for UM in adults, considering local tumor control, overall survival, visual acuity, eye preservation, metastasis, radiation side effects and dose rates. Methods The Review was performed based on the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews. The PubMed database was searched for studies published from January 1st, 2000, up to December 31st, 2021. Research, study selection and critical appraisal was performed by two reviewers. The risk of bias assessment was performed through the revised Cochrane risk of bias tools RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed using R (R version 4.1.3, library: meta, procedure: metaprop). This systematic review was registered with Prospero (ID CRD42022311758). Results Of 4886 studies identified in the database, a total of 20 studies with 4979 participants were included in the qualitative synthesis. Through critical appraisal with ROBINS-I and RoB 2, studies received a 'moderate', 'serious' or 'some concerns' overall risk of bias. Heterogeneity analysis allowed for meta-analysis of proportion of 3 outcome-therapy combinations: local tumor control with I-125 Brachytherapy (proportion: 0.94, CI 95 %: 0.91-0.98), local tumor control with proton therapy (proportion: 0.96, CI 95 %: 0.92-1.00) and eye preservation with I-125 brachytherapy (proportion: 0.91, CI 95 %: 0.88-0.93). This shows local tumor control to be at 94 % with I-125 brachytherapy and at 96 % with proton therapy, as well as an eye preservation rate of 91 % with I-125 brachytherapy. Discussion The evaluation of outcomes of radiotherapy in UM is limited because of missing data on radiation doses as well as great heterogeneity of study protocols. Radiation therapy outcomes are so far not comparable. Therefore, we recommend for upcoming studies on this topic to provide the biological effective dose (BED) or the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) per eye structure, thereby enabling a comparison of outcomes of different forms of radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Erikson
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - A. Heidenreich
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - V. Labunska
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - R. Beach
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - F. Cremers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - D. Rades
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - S. Grisanti
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - A. Katalinic
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - V. Kakkassery
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yilmaz MT, Sari SY, Zorlu F, Yazici G. External Beam Radiotherapy in the Management of Uveal Melanoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:932-951. [PMID: 38869695 PMCID: PMC11236855 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01212-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Uveal melanoma is the most common primary ocular tumor in adults. With the evidence demonstrating that episcleral plaque brachytherapy (EPB) has similar survival rates as enucleation in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS), eye-sparing treatments have come to the fore today. External radiotherapy techniques (proton beam radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery/fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery) are an important treatment option for globe-sparing treatments. There are no prospective randomized trials comparing these techniques; however, retrospective series, meta-analyses, and reviews indicate that these EPB and external radiotherapy techniques are equal. With this review, we aimed to examine the external radiotherapy techniques used in the treatment of uveal melanoma in detail with reference to the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Tugce Yilmaz
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Faruk Zorlu
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gozde Yazici
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salim N, Loyko I, Tumanova K, Stolbovoy A, Levkina O, Prokofev I. Stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanoma: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2024; 20:23. [PMID: 38357672 PMCID: PMC10865074 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2024.2721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy worldwide. Surgical intervention and radiation therapy (RT) are the primary treatment options. Given the complexity and cosmetic discomfort associated with eye enucleation, this method is less frequently used. As a result, RT, including photon therapy, proton therapy and brachytherapy, has become the treatment of choice. Traditionally, plaque brachytherapy has been the most commonly used in clinical practice. However, the question of which type of radiation therapy is the most effective, safe, commonly available and cost-effective remains open. The present study provided a follow-up analysis of a patient with UM who was treated using the image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy (IG-VMAT) technique. A complete response without complications and symptom relief were noted one and a half years after treatment. The present findings suggest that photon external beam radiotherapy using the IG-VMAT technique may offer a viable and safe alternative for the management of UM. This approach potentially sidesteps the complex and morbid aspects of surgical intervention and plaque brachytherapy. Owing to the limited sample size, a more robust understanding of the efficacy and safety of this treatment will require the analysis of additional cases. Further research with a larger cohort is essential to validate these preliminary observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidal Salim
- Institute of Oncology, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
- Radiation Therapy Department, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow 125993, Russia
| | - Ilya Loyko
- Institute of Oncology, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
| | - Kristina Tumanova
- Institute of Oncology, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
| | - Aleksander Stolbovoy
- Institute of Oncology, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
- Radiation Therapy Department, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow 125993, Russia
| | - Oksana Levkina
- Ophthalmology Department, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
| | - Igor Prokofev
- Institute of Oncology, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Asplund E, Fili M, Pansell T, Brautaset R, Nilsson M, Stålhammar G. The prognostic implication of visual acuity at the time of uveal melanoma diagnosis. Eye (Lond) 2023; 37:2204-2211. [PMID: 36434284 PMCID: PMC10366190 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02316-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Visual outcomes after primary tumour treatment of uveal melanoma (UM) have been investigated repeatedly. This study evaluates the correlation between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before treatment with clinicopathological factors and patient survival. SUBJECTS/METHODS Pre-treatment BCVA was examined in relation to tumour dimensions and location, and survival in a retrospective cohort of 1809 patients who underwent plaque brachytherapy. BCVA was also correlated to tumour histological factors in a second cohort of 137 enucleated eyes. RESULTS The mean BCVA of the tumour eye prior to plaque brachytherapy was LogMAR 0.42 (SD 0.46). Patients with low BCVA (LogMAR ≥ 1.00) did not differ in age (p = 0.19) and had similar frequency of ciliary body involvement (p = 0.99) but had tumours with greater apical thickness (p < 0.0001), greater diameter (p < 0.0001) and shorter distance to the optic disc and fovea (p < 0.0001). There were no significant relations between low BCVA and any of 13 examined tumour histological factors at a Bonferroni-corrected significance level (p > 0.004). Patients with low BCVA had greater incidence of UM-related mortality in competing risk analysis (p = 0.0019) and shorter overall survival (p < 0.0001). Low BCVA was also associated with increased hazard ratio (HR) for UM-related mortality in univariate analysis (HR 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 1.9), but not in multivariate analysis with tumour size and location as covariates. CONCLUSIONS UM patients with low BCVA before primary tumour treatment have a worse prognosis, likely related to increased tumour dimensions. Future studies should examine the prognostic significance of BCVA in relation to macula-involving retinal detachment and genetic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Asplund
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Optometry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Fili
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Ocular Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tony Pansell
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Marianne Bernadotte Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rune Brautaset
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Optometry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Optometry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gustav Stålhammar
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Ocular Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Banou L, Tsani Z, Arvanitogiannis K, Pavlaki M, Dastiridou A, Androudi S. Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma: A Review of Ocular Complications. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6374-6396. [PMID: 37504330 PMCID: PMC10378371 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma represents the most prevalent form of primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Historically, enucleation was considered the gold-standard approach in the treatment of uveal melanoma. Currently, radiotherapy is the most commonly used therapy, aiming at a better quality of life. However, radiotherapy can result in several ocular complications, some of which may be vision-threatening. Radiation-induced dry eye, scleral necrosis, cataract, rubeosis iridis, neovascular glaucoma, radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, and optic neuropathy are the most common complications. This article aims to summarize the current literature regarding the ocular complications after radiotherapy, as well as their clinical features, risk factors, and management strategies. A thorough understanding of these issues is crucial for ophthalmologists and oncologists to provide optimal patient care, improve visual outcomes, and minimize long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lamprini Banou
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Zoi Tsani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Maria Pavlaki
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Anna Dastiridou
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Sofia Androudi
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jarczak J, Karska-Basta I, Romanowska-Dixon B. Deterioration of Visual Acuity after Brachytherapy and Proton Therapy of Uveal Melanoma, and Methods of Counteracting This Complication Based on Recent Publications. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1131. [PMID: 37374335 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59061131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. The eyeball is the most common extracutaneous location of melanoma. UM is a huge threat to a patient's life. It metastasizes distantly via blood vessels, but it can also spread locally and infiltrate extraocular structures. The treatment uses surgical methods, which include, among others, enucleation and conservative methods, such as brachytherapy (BT), proton therapy (PT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) and photodynamic therapy. The key advantage of radiotherapy, which is currently used in most patients, is the preservation of the eyeball with the risk of metastasis and mortality comparable to that of enucleation. Unfortunately, radiotherapy very often leads to a significant deterioration in visual acuity (VA) as a result of radiation complications. This article is a review of the latest research on ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) brachytherapy, iodine-125 (I-125) brachytherapy and proton therapy of uveal melanoma that took into account the deterioration of eye function after therapy, and also the latest studies presenting the new concepts of modifications to the applied treatments in order to reduce radiation complications and maintain better visual acuity in treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Jarczak
- Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Ocular Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland
- Jagiellonian University Medical College, Doctoral School of Medical and Health Sciences, 31-530 Krakow, Poland
| | - Izabella Karska-Basta
- Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Ocular Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland
| | - Bożena Romanowska-Dixon
- Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Ocular Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|