Effects of hammock positioning in behavioral status, vital signs, and pain in preterms: a case series study.
Braz J Phys Ther 2018;
22:304-309. [PMID:
29598896 DOI:
10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.03.002]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The hammock positioning within the incubators simulates the intrauterine environment, however, there is little evidence of its benefits and possible risks.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to assess the effects of hammock positioning on behavioral status, vital signs, and pain in very low birth weight preterm newborns.
METHODS
This is a quasi-experimental/case series study in which premature infants (<1500g) were positioned in supine for one hour in a hammock. The preterm newborns were assessed 10min before, during (2, 20, 40, and 60min), and 10min after hammock positioning with the Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale, vital signs and pain by the Neonatal Facial Coding System.
RESULTS
28 preterm infants between 28 and 36 weeks of gestational age were evaluated. Regarding the behavioral state, the preterm newborns progressively evolved to light or deep sleep during hammock positioning. There was a statistically significant reduction of the heart and respiratory rate from 2 to 60th minute in a hammock, which was maintained after the positioning. The oxygen saturation remained within normal values. No changes in pain scores were observed.
CONCLUSION
The hammock positioning can be considered a safe method of positioning that can be used to reduce the stress levels in very low birth weight preterm newborns. We did not observe worsening in either pain or vital signs.
Collapse