Characteristics of babies who unexpectedly survive long term after withdrawal of intensive care

Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Children Who Survived after End-of-Life Decisions in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

To investigate long-term outcomes of infants who survive despite life-and-death discussions with families and a decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining interventions (WWLST) in one neonatal intensive care unit.

STUDY DESIGN

Medical records for neonatal intensive care unit admissions from 2012 to 2017 were reviewed for presence of WWLST discussions or decisions, as well as the 2-year outcome of all children who survived. WWLST discussions were prospectively recorded in a specific book; follow-up to age 2 years was determined by retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

WWLST discussions occurred for 266 of 5251 infants (5%): 151 (57%) were born at term and 115 (43%) were born preterm. Among these discussions, 164 led to a WWLST decision (62%) and 130 were followed by the infant's death (79%). Of the 34 children (21%) surviving to discharge after WWLST decisions, 10 (29%) died before 2 years of age and 11 (32%) required frequent medical follow-up. Major functional limitations were common among survivors, but 8 were classified as functionally normal or with mild-to-moderate functional limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

When a WWLST decision was made in our cohort, 21% of the infants survived to discharge. By 2 years of age, the majority of these infants had died or had major functional limitations. This highlights the uncertainty of WWLST decisions during neonatal intensive care and the importance of ensuring that parents are informed of all possibilities. Additional studies including longer-term follow-up and ascertaining the family's views will be important.

Neonatal neuropalliative care

Neonatal neuropalliative care is directed toward patients and families impacted by serious, life limiting, or debilitating neurologic illness in the antenatal and newborn period. This chapter will outline key considerations for clinicians hoping to provide a neuropalliative care approach antenatally, at birth, and in the neonatal intensive care unit. We focus on three core domains: (1) family-centered communication and care, (2) prognostication and decision-making, and (3) pain and symptom management. In each domain, we outline key considerations in the antenatal period, at birth, and in the neonatal intensive care unit. We also address special considerations in care at the end of life and in varied cultural and practice contexts. We conclude with suggestions for future research and key considerations for neonatal clinicians who wish to incorporate a neuropalliative approach to care into their practice.

Ethical considerations in the care of encephalopathic neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia

Engaging with ethical issues is central to the management of neonatal encephalopathy (NE). As treatment for these neonates evolves, new ethical issues will arise and many existing challenges will remain. We highlight three key ethical issues that arise in the care of neonates with NE treated with therapeutic hypothermia: facilitating shared decision making, understanding futility, and defining the boundaries between standard of care and research. Awareness of these issues will help clinicians counsel families in light of evolving treatments and outcomes.

Characterization of Death in Infants With Neonatal Seizures

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures are associated with death and neurological morbidity; however, little is known about how neonates with seizures die.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational cohort study of neonates with seizures treated at seven sites of the Neonatal Seizure Registry. We characterized the mode of death, evaluated the association between infant characteristics and mode of death, and evaluated predictors of death or transfer to hospice.

RESULTS

We enrolled 611 consecutive neonates with seizures, and 90 neonates (15%) died before hospital discharge at a median age of 11 days (range: 1 to 163 days); 32 (36%) died in the first postnatal week. An additional 19 neonates (3%) were transferred to hospice. The most common mode of in-hospital death was death after extubation amidst concerns for poor neurological prognosis, in the absence of life-threatening physiologic instability (n = 43, 48%). Only one infant died while actively receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In an adjusted analysis, premature birth (odds ratio: 3.06, 95% confidence interval 1.59 to 5.90) and high seizure burden (odds ratio: 4.33, 95% confidence interval 1.88 to 9.95) were associated with increased odds of death or transfer to hospice.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of neonates with seizures, death occurred predominantly after decisions to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining intervention(s). Future work should characterize how these decisions occur and develop optimized approaches to support families and clinicians caring for newborns with seizures.

The role of the neuropediatrician in pediatric intensive care unit: Diagnosis, therapeutics and major participation in collaborative multidisciplinary deliberations about life-sustaining treatments' withdrawal

BACKGROUND

In Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) two types of population require the intervention of neuropediatricians (NP): chronic brain diseases' patients who face repetitive and prolonged hospitalizations, and patients with acute brain failure facing the risk of potential neurologic sequelae, and both conditions may result in a limitation of life-sustaining treatments (LLST) decision.

OBJECTIVE

To assess NP's involvement in LLST decisions within the PICU of a tertiary hospital.

METHOD

Retrospective study of medical reports of patients hospitalized during 2014 in the Necker-Hospital PICU. Patients were selected using keywords ("cardiorespiratory arrest", "death", "withdrawal of treatment", "palliative care", "acute brain failure", or "chronic neurological disease"), and/or if they were assessed by a NP during the hospitalization. Demographic and medical data were analysed, including the NP's assessment and data about Collaborative Multidisciplinary Deliberation (CMD) to discuss potential LLST.

RESULTS

Among 1160 children, 274 patients were included and 142 (56%) were assessed by a NP during their hospitalization for diagnosis (n = 55) and/or treatment (n = 95) management. NP was required for 59%-100% of patients with neurological acute failure, and for 14-44% of patients with extra neurological failure. A LLST decision was taken after a CMD for 27 (9.8%) of them, and a NP was involved in 19/27 (70%) of these decisions that occurred during the hospitalization (n = 19) or before (n = 8).12 patients died thereafter the LLST decision (40% of the 30 dead patients).

CONCLUSION

NP are clearly involved in the decision-process of LLST for patients admitted in PICU, claiming for close collaboration to improve current practices and the quality of the care provided to children.

Challenges in neurologic prognostication after neonatal brain injury

Parents often ask neonatologists and neurologists to determine neurologic prognosis in the preterm and term infant after neonatal brain injury. Prognostication in these populations remains rather full of uncertainties. Knowledge of available diagnostic tests and their limitations allows the clinician to synthesize the most likely outcomes after neurologic injury. In this review, we describe the diagnostic tools available to the clinician, active areas of research, and challenges in neurologic prognostication of the neonate.