1
|
Pinheiro JMB. Neonatal Airway Management. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 11:82. [PMID: 38255395 PMCID: PMC10814596 DOI: 10.3390/children11010082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
The neonatal airway is often difficult to secure, whether the practitioner responsible for managing the airway is a neonatologist, pediatrician, anesthesiologist, another specialist or an advanced practice provider [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaquim M B Pinheiro
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Neches SK, DeMartino C, Shay R. Pharmacologic Adjuncts for Neonatal Tracheal Intubation: The Evidence Behind Premedication. Neoreviews 2023; 24:e783-e796. [PMID: 38036442 DOI: 10.1542/neo.24-12-e783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Premedication such as analgesia, sedation, vagolytics, and paralytics may improve neonatal tracheal intubation success, reduce intubation-associated adverse events, and create optimal conditions for performing this high-risk and challenging procedure. Although rapid sequence induction including a paralytic agent has been adopted for intubations in pediatric and adult critical care, neonatal clinical practice varies. This review aims to summarize details of common classes of neonatal intubation premedication including indications for use, medication route, dosage, potential adverse effects in term and preterm infants, and reversal agents. In addition, this review shares the literature on national and international practice variations; explores evidence in support of establishing premedication guidelines; and discusses unique circumstances in which premedication use has not been established, such as during catheter-based or minimally invasive surfactant delivery. With increasing survival of extremely preterm infants, clear guidance for premedication use in this population will be necessary, particularly considering potential short- and long-term side effects of procedural sedation on the developing brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara K Neches
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA
| | - Cassandra DeMartino
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Rebecca Shay
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Colorado, Denver, CO
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kribs A, Roberts KD, Trevisanuto D, O' Donnell C, Dargaville PA. Alternative routes of surfactant application - An update. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2023; 28:101496. [PMID: 38040586 DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2023.101496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive modes of respiratory support have been shown to be the preferable way of primary respiratory support of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation can be beneficial for preterm infants in reduction of morbidity and even mortality. However, it is well-established that some infants managed with non-invasive respiratory support from the outset have symptomatic RDS to a degree that warrants surfactant administration. Infants for whom non-invasive respiratory support ultimately fails are prone to adverse outcomes, occurring at a frequency on par with the group intubated primarily. This raises the question how to combine non-invasive respiratory support with surfactant therapy. Several methods of less or minimally invasive surfactant therapy have been developed to address the dilemma between avoidance of mechanical ventilation and administration of surfactant. This paper describes the different methods of less invasive surfactant application, reports the existing evidence from clinical studies, discusses the limitations of each of the methods and the open and future research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Kribs
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Kari D Roberts
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Daniele Trevisanuto
- Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Colm O' Donnell
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neonatology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Peter A Dargaville
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Chronic pain and agitation in neonatal life impact the developing brain. Oral sweet-tasting solutions should be used judiciously to mitigate behavioral responses to mild painful procedures, keeping in mind that the long-term impact is unknown. Rapidly acting opioids should be used as part of premedication cocktails for nonemergent endotracheal intubations. Continuous low-dose morphine or dexmedetomidine may be considered for preterm or term neonates exhibiting signs of stress during mechanical ventilation and therapeutic hypothermia, respectively. Further research is required regarding the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of pharmacologic agents used to mitigate mild, moderate, and chronic pain and stress in neonates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher McPherson
- Department of Pharmacy, St. Louis Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Place, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | - Ruth E Grunau
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, F605B, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Durrmeyer X, Walter-Nicolet E, Chollat C, Chabernaud JL, Barois J, Chary Tardy AC, Berenguer D, Bedu A, Zayat N, Roué JM, Beissel A, Bellanger C, Desenfants A, Boukhris R, Loose A, Massudom Tagny C, Chevallier M, Milesi C, Tauzin M. Premedication before laryngoscopy in neonates: Evidence-based statement from the French society of neonatology (SFN). Front Pediatr 2022; 10:1075184. [PMID: 36683794 PMCID: PMC9846576 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1075184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Laryngoscopy is frequently required in neonatal intensive care. Awake laryngoscopy has deleterious effects but practice remains heterogeneous regarding premedication use. The goal of this statement was to provide evidence-based good practice guidance for clinicians regarding premedication before tracheal intubation, less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and laryngeal mask insertion in neonates. METHODS A group of experts brought together by the French Society of Neonatology (SFN) addressed 4 fields related to premedication before upper airway access in neonates: (1) tracheal intubation; (2) less invasive surfactant administration; (3) laryngeal mask insertion; (4) use of atropine for the 3 previous procedures. Evidence was gathered and assessed on predefined questions related to these fields. Consensual statements were issued using the GRADE methodology. RESULTS Among the 15 formalized good practice statements, 2 were strong recommendations to do (Grade 1+) or not to do (Grade 1-), and 4 were discretionary recommendations to do (Grade 2+). For 9 good practice statements, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert opinion. For tracheal intubation premedication was considered mandatory except for life-threatening situations (Grade 1+). Recommended premedications were a combination of opioid + muscle blocker (Grade 2+) or propofol in the absence of hemodynamic compromise or hypotension (Grade 2+) while the use of a sole opioid was discouraged (Grade 1-). Statements regarding other molecules before tracheal intubation were expert opinions. For LISA premedication was recommended (Grade 2+) with the use of propofol (Grade 2+). Statements regarding other molecules before LISA were expert opinions. For laryngeal mask insertion and atropine use, no specific data was found and expert opinions were provided. CONCLUSION This statement should help clinical decision regarding premedication before neonatal upper airway access and favor standardization of practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Durrmeyer
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil, Faculté de Santé de Créteil, IMRB, GRC CARMAS, Créteil, France
| | - Elizabeth Walter-Nicolet
- Neonatal Medicine and Intensive Care Unit, Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.,University of Paris-Cité, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRAE, Paris, France
| | - Clément Chollat
- Department of Neonatology, Hôpital Armand Trousseau, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Louis Chabernaud
- Division of Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care Transportation, Hôpital Antoine Beclere, AP-HP, Paris - Saclay University Hospital, Clamart, France
| | - Juliette Barois
- Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, CH de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France
| | - Anne-Cécile Chary Tardy
- Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Daniel Berenguer
- Department of Pediatric Anesthesia and Pediatric Transport (SMUR Pédiatrique), Hôpital des Enfants, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Antoine Bedu
- Department of Neonatal Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Noura Zayat
- Department of Neonatal Intensive Care and Pediatric Transport, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Jean-Michel Roué
- Department of Pediatric and Neonatal Critical Care, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - Anne Beissel
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Claire Bellanger
- Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, AP-HP, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | - Aurélie Desenfants
- Department of Neonatology, CHU Nimes, Université Montpellier, Nimes, France
| | - Riadh Boukhris
- Department of Neonatology, Pôle Femme-Mère-Nouveau-Né, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Anne Loose
- Department of Neonatology, CHRU de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - Clarisse Massudom Tagny
- Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Grand Hôpital de L'Est Francilien, Meaux, France
| | - Marie Chevallier
- Department of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.,TIMC-IMAG Research Department, Grenoble Alps University, Grenoble, France
| | - Christophe Milesi
- Department of Neonatal Medicine and Pediatric Intensive Care, Montpellier University Hospital, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Manon Tauzin
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sarafidis K, Chotas W, Agakidou E, Karagianni P, Drossou V. The Intertemporal Role of Respiratory Support in Improving Neonatal Outcomes: A Narrative Review. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 8:883. [PMID: 34682148 PMCID: PMC8535019 DOI: 10.3390/children8100883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Defining improvements in healthcare can be challenging due to the need to assess multiple outcomes and measures. In neonates, although progress in respiratory support has been a key factor in improving survival, the same degree of improvement has not been documented in certain outcomes, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia. By exploring the evolution of neonatal respiratory care over the last 60 years, this review highlights not only the scientific advances that occurred with the application of invasive mechanical ventilation but also the weakness of the existing knowledge. The contributing role of non-invasive ventilation and less-invasive surfactant administration methods as well as of certain pharmacological therapies is also discussed. Moreover, we analyze the cost-benefit of neonatal care-respiratory support and present future challenges and perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosmas Sarafidis
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (E.A.); (P.K.); (V.D.)
| | - William Chotas
- Department of Neonatology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA;
| | - Eleni Agakidou
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (E.A.); (P.K.); (V.D.)
| | - Paraskevi Karagianni
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (E.A.); (P.K.); (V.D.)
| | - Vasiliki Drossou
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (E.A.); (P.K.); (V.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Premedication for nonemergent intubations linked to fewer adverse events. J Perinatol 2021; 41:2367-2369. [PMID: 34274943 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01155-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
8
|
Walter‐Nicolet E, Marchand‐Martin L, Guellec I, Biran V, Moktari M, Zana‐Taieb E, Magny J, Desfrère L, Waszak P, Boileau P, Chauvin G, Saint Blanquat L, Borrhomée S, Droutman S, Merhi M, Zupan V, Karoui L, Cimerman P, Carbajal R, Durrmeyer X. Premedication practices for neonatal tracheal intubation: Results from the EPIPPAIN 2 prospective cohort study and comparison with EPIPPAIN 1. PAEDIATRIC AND NEONATAL PAIN 2021; 3:46-58. [PMID: 35547594 PMCID: PMC8975199 DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
To describe the frequency and nature of premedication practices for neonatal tracheal intubation (TI) in 2011; to identify independent risk factors for the absence of premedication; to compare data with those from 2005 and to confront observed practices with current recommendations. Data concerning TI performed in neonates during the first 14 days of their admission to participating neonatal/pediatric intensive care units were prospectively collected at the bedside. This study was part of the Epidemiology of Procedural Pain in Neonates study (EPIPPAIN 2) conducted in 16 tertiary care units in the region of Paris, France, in 2011. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with premedication use and multilevel analysis to identify center effect. Results were compared with those of the EPIPPAIN 1 study, conducted in 2005 with a similar design, and to a current guidance for the clinician for this procedure. One hundred and twenty‐one intubations carried out in 121 patients were analyzed. The specific premedication rate was 47% and drugs used included mainly propofol (26%), sufentanil (24%), and ketamine (12%). Three factors were associated with the use of a specific premedication: nonemergent TI (Odds ratio (OR) [95% CI]: 5.3 [1.49‐20.80]), existence of a specific written protocol in the ward (OR [95% CI]:4.80 [2.12‐11.57]), and the absence of a nonspecific concurrent analgesia infusion before TI (OR [95% CI]: 3.41 [1.46‐8.45]). No center effect was observed. The specific premedication rate was lower than the 56% rate observed in 2005. The drugs used were more homogenous and consistent with the current recommendations than in 2005, especially in centers with a specific written protocol. Premedication use prior to neonatal TI was low, even for nonemergent procedures. Scientific consensus, implementation of international or national recommendations, and local written protocols are urgently needed to improve premedication practices for neonatal intubation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Walter‐Nicolet
- Medicine and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Saint Joseph Hospital Paris France
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team Paris France
| | - Laetitia Marchand‐Martin
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team Paris France
| | - Isabelle Guellec
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team Paris France
- Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Trousseau Hospital Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- Medicine Sorbonne University Paris France
| | - Valérie Biran
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris CHU Robert Debré University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité Paris France
- Inserm U1141 University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité Paris France
| | - Mostafa Moktari
- Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Bicêtre Hospital Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
- Espace Ethique/Ile de France ‐ Saint‐Louis Hospital Assistance Publique ‐Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
| | - Elodie Zana‐Taieb
- Port‐Royal Maternity Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Cochin‐Port Royal Hospital Assistance Publique‐Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
| | - Jean‐François Magny
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Necker‐Enfants Maladies Hospital Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
| | - Luc Desfrère
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Louis Mourier Hospital Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
| | - Paul Waszak
- Medicine and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Delafontaine Hospital Saint Denis France
| | - Pascal Boileau
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Poissy‐Saint Germain Poissy France
- Inserm U1185 Université Paris Saclay Le Kremlin‐Bicêtre France
| | - Gilles Chauvin
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Argenteuil Hospital Argenteuil France
| | - Laure Saint Blanquat
- Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Necker‐enfants Malades Hospital Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
| | | | - Stéphanie Droutman
- Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal André Grégoire Montreuil France
| | - Mona Merhi
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien Corbeil‐Essonnes France
| | - Véronique Zupan
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Antoine Béclère Hospital Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Clamart France
| | - Leila Karoui
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Grand hôpital de l’Est francilien, site de Meaux Meaux France
| | - Patricia Cimerman
- Centre National de Ressources de lutte contre la Douleur, Trousseau Hospital Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
| | - Ricardo Carbajal
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team Paris France
- Medicine Sorbonne University Paris France
- Paediatric Emergency Department, Trousseau Hospital Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
| | - Xavier Durrmeyer
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team Paris France
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil University Paris Est Créteil Créteil France
- Faculté de Médecine de Créteil IMRB, GRC CARMAS Université Paris Est Créteil Créteil France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Castillo Barrio B, Rasines Rodríguez A, Aneiros Suanzes C, Royuela Vicente A, Ortiz Movilla R, Marín Gabriel MA. A survey of procedural pain assessment and non-pharmacologic analgesic interventions in neonates in Spanish public maternity units. J Perinatol 2020; 40:1764-1769. [PMID: 32873906 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-020-00800-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To qualify and quantify clinical practices related to pain assessment and non-pharmacologic analgesia (NPA) in newborns in Spanish public maternity hospitals STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed providers online regarding their use of pain assessment scales, NPA interventions in neonates undergoing procedures, as well parents' presence or absence during interventions. RESULTS The number of painful procedures and the subjective grading of pain from the responding physicians were similar in all hospitals. Only 12.5% of hospitals used pain scales. No NPA was employed in 37.7% of procedures, with less NPA used in the lower complexity hospitals for venous extraction (p < 0.001) and gastric lavage (p = 0.001). Respondents reported parents' absence during 56.1% of procedures. CONCLUSIONS Available pain assessment scales and NPA interventions to mitigate pain are being underused. The presence of the parents during painful interventions is low despite the evidence that this may help to reduce newborns' perception of pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ana Royuela Vicente
- Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Puerta de Hierro (IDIPHIM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Roberto Ortiz Movilla
- Department of Pediatrics, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel A Marín Gabriel
- Department of Pediatrics, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. .,Department of Pediatrics, Autónoma University, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Balakrishnan A, Sanghera RS, Boyle EM. New techniques, new challenges—The dilemma of pain management for less invasive surfactant administration? PAEDIATRIC AND NEONATAL PAIN 2020; 3:2-8. [PMID: 35548851 PMCID: PMC8975189 DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Recent years have seen the increasing use of noninvasive respiratory support in preterm infants with the aim of minimizing the risk of mechanical ventilation and subsequent bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Respiratory distress syndrome is the most common respiratory diagnosis in preterm infants, and is best treated by administration of surfactant. Until recently, this has been performed via an endotracheal tube using premedication, which has often included opiate analgesia; subsequently, the infant has been ventilated. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation, however, does not negate the need for surfactant therapy. Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in spontaneously breathing infants is increasing in popularity, and appears to have beneficial effects. However, laryngoscopy is necessary, which carries adverse effects and is painful for the infant. Conventional methods of premedication for intubation tend to reduce respiratory drive, which increases the likelihood of ventilation being required. This has led to intense debate about the best strategy for providing appropriate treatment, taking into account both the respiratory needs of the infant and the need to alleviate procedural pain. Currently, clinical practice varies considerably and there is no consensus with respect to optimal management. This review seeks to summarize the benefits, risks, and challenges associated with this new approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elaine M. Boyle
- Department of Health Sciences University of Leicester Leicester UK
| |
Collapse
|