Post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus management: Delayed neonatal transport negatively affects outcome

Current Status and Associated Factors of Post-Hemorrhagic Hydrocephalus in Infants of 22 to 28 Weeks Gestation With Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), a common complication of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in very low birth weight (BW) infants, is associated with significant morbidity and poor neurological outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the current status of PHH and analyze the risk factors associated with the necessity of treatment for PHH in infants born between 22 and 28 weeks of gestation, specifically those with severe IVH (grade 3 or 4).

METHODS

The analysis was conducted on 1,097 infants who were born between 22-28 gestational weeks and diagnosed with severe IVH, using data from the Korean Neonatal Network. We observed that the prevalence of PHH requiring treatment was 46.3% in infants with severe IVH.

RESULTS

Higher rates of mortality, transfer during admission, cerebral palsy, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt after discharge were higher in infants with PHH than in those without PHH. PHH in severe IVH was associated with a higher rate of pulmonary hemorrhage, seizures, and IVH grade 4 in the entire cohort. In addition, it was associated with a lower rate of small for gestational age and chorioamnionitis. In the subgroup analysis, high BW, outborn status, pulmonary hemorrhage, seizure, sepsis, and IVH grade 4 were associated with a higher incidence of PHH between 22 and 25 gestational weeks (GW). In infants born between 26 and 28 GW, a higher incidence of PHH was associated with seizures and IVH grade 4.

CONCLUSION

It is necessary to maintain meticulous monitoring and neurological intervention for infants with PHH not only during admission but also after discharge. In addition, identifying the clinical factors that increase the likelihood of developing PHH from severe IVH is crucial.

Point-of-care brain ultrasound and transcranial doppler or color-coded doppler in critically ill neonates and children

Point-of-care brain ultrasound and transcranial doppler or color-coded doppler is being increasingly used as an essential diagnostic and monitoring tool at the bedside of critically ill neonates and children. Brain ultrasound has already established as a cornerstone of daily practice in the management of the critically ill newborn for diagnosis and follow-up of the most common brain diseases, considering the easiness to insonate the brain through transfontanellar window. In critically ill children, doppler based techniques are used to assess cerebral hemodynamics in acute brain injury and recommended for screening patients suffering from sickle cell disease at risk for stroke. However, more evidence is needed regarding the accuracy of doppler based techniques for non-invasive estimation of cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure, as well as regarding the accuracy of brain ultrasound for diagnosis and monitoring of acute brain parenchyma alterations in children. This review is aimed at providing a comprehensive overview for clinicians of the technical, anatomical, and physiological basics for brain ultrasonography and transcranial doppler or color-coded doppler, and of the current status and future perspectives of their clinical applications in critically ill neonates and children.

CONCLUSION

In critically ill neonates, brain ultrasound for diagnosis and follow-up of the most common cerebral pathologies of the neonatal period may be considered the standard of care. Data are needed about the possible role of doppler techniques for the assessment of cerebral perfusion and vasoreactivity of the critically ill neonate with open fontanelles. In pediatric critical care, doppler based techniques should be routinely adopted to assess and monitor cerebral hemodynamics. New technologies and more evidence are needed to improve the accuracy of brain ultrasound for the assessment of brain parenchyma of critically ill children with fibrous fontanelles.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• In critically ill neonates, brain ultrasound for early diagnosis and follow-up of the most common cerebral and neurovascular pathologies of the neonatal period is a cornerstone of daily practice. In critically ill children, doppler-based techniques are more routinely used to assess cerebral hemodynamics and autoregulation after acute brain injury and to screen patients at risk for vasospasm or stroke (e.g., sickle cell diseases, right-to-left shunts).

WHAT IS NEW

• In critically ill neonates, research is currently focusing on the use of novel high frequency probes, even higher than 10 MHz, especially for extremely preterm babies. Furthermore, data are needed about the role of doppler based techniques for the assessment of cerebral perfusion and vasoreactivity of the critically ill neonate with open fontanelles, also integrated with a non-invasive assessment of brain oxygenation. In pediatric critical care, new technologies should be developed to improve the accuracy of brain ultrasound for the assessment of brain parenchyma of critically ill children with fibrous fontanelles. Furthermore, large multicenter studies are needed to clarify role and accuracy of doppler-based techniques to assess cerebral perfusion pressure and its changes after treatment interventions.

Ventriculosubgaleal shunt and neuroendoscopic lavage: refining the treatment algorithm of neonatal post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of neonatal post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) is still debated, though several treatment options have been proposed. In the last years, ventriculosubgaleal shunt (VSgS) and neuroendosdcopic lavage (NEL) have been proposed to overcome the drawbacks of more traditional options, such as external ventricular drainage and ventricular access device.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed neonates affected by PHH treated at our institution since September 2012 to September 2020. Until 2017 patients received VSgS as initial treatment. After the introduction of NEL, this treatment option was offered to patients with large intraventricular clots. After NEL, VSgS was always placed. Primary VSgS was reserved to patients without significant intraventricular clots and critically ill patients that could not be transferred to the operating room and undergo a longer surgery.

RESULTS

We collected 63 babies (38 males and 25 females) with mean gestational age of 27.8 ± 3.8SD weeks (range 23-38.5 weeks) and mean birthweight of 1199.7 ± 690.6 SD grams (range 500-3320 g). In 6 patients, hemorrhage occurred in the third trimester of gestation, while in the remaining cases hemorrhage complicated prematurity. This group included 37 inborn and 26 outborn babies. Intraventricular hemorrhage was classified as low grade (I-II according to modified Papile grading scale) in 7 cases, while in the remaining cases the grade of hemorrhage was III to IV. Mean age at first neurosurgical procedure was 32.2 ± 3.6SD weeks (range 25.4-40 weeks). Death due to prematurity occurred in 5 patients. First-line treatment was VSgS in 49 patients and NEL in the remaining 14 cases. Mean longevity of VSgS was 30.3 days (range 10-97 days) in patients finally requiring an additional treatment of hydrocephalus. Thirty-two patients required one to three redo VSgS. Interval from initial treatment to permanent shunt ranged from 14 to 312 days (mean 70.9 days). CSF infection was observed in 5 patients (7.9%). Shunt dependency was observed in 51 out of 58 surviving patients, while 7 cases remained shunt-free at the last follow-up. Multiloculated hydrocephalus was observed in 14 cases. Among these, only one patient initially received NEL and was complicated by isolated trapped temporal horn.

CONCLUSIONS

VSgS and NEL are two effective treatment options in the management of PHH. Both procedures should be part of the neurosurgical armamentarium to deal with PHH, since they offer specific advantages in selected patients. A treatment algorithm combining these two options may reduce the infectious risk and the risk of multiloculated hydrocephalus.