Is intravenous paracetamol as effective as ibuprofen in closing haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus after the first treatment course in preterm babies?

Neurodevelopmental outcomes following paracetamol use for treatment of patent ductus arteriosus: A review

AIM

Concerns exist regarding potential adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes associated with paracetamol exposure during pregnancy and early infancy. This review evaluates the evidence for the impact of paracetamol use for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) treatment on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.

METHODS

A literature search was performed via Medline, Ovid Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases. The search details are below: ('Infant, Newborn' [MeSH] OR 'neonate*' [Title/Abstract]) AND ('Paracetamol' [MeSH] OR 'Acetaminophen' [Title/Abstract]) AND ('Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/drug therapy' [MeSH] OR 'patent ductus arteriosus' [Title/Abstract]) AND ('Neurodevelopmental Disorders' [MeSH] OR 'neurodevelopment*' [Title/Abstract] OR 'Child Development' [MeSH] OR 'Developmental Disabilities' [MeSH]). All studies were critically appraised and synthesised.

RESULTS

Seven studies reported neurodevelopmental outcomes after paracetamol use for PDA treatment in preterm infants <32 weeks gestation. The studies varied in dosage, route, and duration of paracetamol administration and in the methods used to assess neurodevelopmental outcomes. None of the studies revealed different outcomes between paracetamol-exposed preterm infants and controls.

CONCLUSION

Current low-to-moderate quality evidence suggests no association between paracetamol used for PDA treatment and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Future well-powered studies with standardised neurodevelopmental assessments are warranted to strengthen the current evidence base.

Comparative safety and efficacy of paracetamol versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents in neonates with patent ductus arteriosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM

Ibuprofen and indomethacin are the preferred drug treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm neonates. The comparative safety and efficacy of paracetamol as an alternative has not yet been well-established. The aim of our study was to define the comparative efficacy and safety of paracetamol versus ibuprofen and indomethacin for PDA METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane databases on randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and/or the safety of paracetamol versus ibuprofen and/or indomethacin and meta-analyzed the available data.

RESULTS

There were 1718 neonates from 20 eligible studies. Paracetamol did not differ from ibuprofen or indomethacin regarding the primary [OR: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.69-1.26), p-value: 0.650, when compared to ibuprofen, and OR: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.20-3.02), p-value: 0.716, when compared to indomethacin] and overall [OR: 1.17 (95% CI: 0.82-1.66), p-value: 0.394, when compared to ibuprofen, and OR: 1.12 (95% CI: 0.58-2.15), p-value: 0.733, when compared to indomethacin] PDA closure rates. Paracetamol resulted in significantly reduced risk of oliguria and a tendency towards less gastrointestinal bleeding.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between paracetamol and ibuprofen or indomethacin in the PDA closure rates. However, paracetamol caused less adverse effects.