MED12 exon 2 mutation as a highly sensitive and specific marker in distinguishing phyllodes tumours from other spindle neoplasms of the breast

Refining the classification of breast phyllodes tumours

Phyllodes tumours of the breast are uncommon fibroepithelial neoplasms that pose recurrent classification challenges, in large part due to the multiple histological parameters of stromal hypercellularity and atypia, stromal mitotic count, stromal overgrowth and tumour borders, that are used for grading. While the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Breast Tumours provides recommendations on diagnostic features, defining criteria are not always applied in routine practice. Lack of concordance among pathologists in typing and grading further underscores the classification difficulties, especially in the borderline category. Although there has been significant molecular information on phyllodes tumours in recent years which has been diagnostically helpful, it has not been translated into daily clinical practice. In order to refine the classification of phyllodes tumours into one that is simple yet comprehensive, reproducible and prognostically precise, a multipronged approach is needed that leverages on global contributions of the International Fibroepithelial Consortium, support by the International Collaboration on Cancer Classification and Research (IC³ R) in amalgamating evidence translation, and guidance from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) for standardised reporting. It is hoped that the evidence generated can be used towards refining the classification of phyllodes tumours for the future.

Fibroepithelial tumours of the breast-a review

Fibroepithelial tumours of the breast are biphasic neoplasms composed of both epithelial and stromal elements, including the common fibroadenoma and the infrequent phyllodes tumour. The admixture of epithelium and stroma in the fibroadenoma shows intra- and pericanalicular patterns, and may display a variety of histological changes. Fibroadenoma variants include the cellular, juvenile, myxoid and complex forms. The cellular fibroadenoma may be difficult to distinguish from the benign phyllodes tumour. Stromal mitotic activity can be increased in fibroadenomas in the young and pregnant patients. Phyllodes tumours, neoplasms with the potential for recurrence, show an exaggerated intracanalicular growth pattern with broad stromal fronded architecture and stromal hypercellularity. They are graded into benign, borderline and malignant forms based on histological assessment of stromal features of hypercellularity, atypia, mitotic activity, overgrowth and the nature of the tumour borders. Classification of phyllodes tumours is imperfect, compounded by tumour heterogeneity with overlapping microscopic features among the different grades, especially in the borderline category. Malignant phyllodes tumours can metastasise and cause death. Determining which phyllodes tumours may behave aggressively has been difficult. The discovery of MED12 mutations in the pathogenesis of fibroepithelial tumours, together with other gene abnormalities in the progression pathway, has allowed refinements in diagnosis and prognosis.

Fibroepithelial lesions revisited: implications for diagnosis and management

Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast, comprising the fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour, are a unique group of neoplasms that share histological characteristics but possess different clinical behaviour. The fibroadenoma is the commonest benign breast tumour in women, while the phyllodes tumour is rare and may be associated with recurrences, grade progression and even metastasis. The diagnosis of fibroadenoma is usually straightforward, with recognised histological variants such as the cellular, complex, juvenile and myxoid forms. The phyllodes tumour comprises benign, borderline and malignant varieties, graded using a constellation of histological parameters based on stromal characteristics of hypercellularity, atypia, mitoses, overgrowth and the nature of tumour borders. While phyllodes tumour grade correlates with clinical behaviour, interobserver variability in assessing multiple parameters that are potentially of different biological weightage leads to significant challenges in accurate grade determination and consequently therapy. Differential diagnostic considerations along the spectrum of fibroepithelial tumours can be problematic in routine practice. Recent discoveries of the molecular underpinnings of these tumours may have diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications.

MED12, TERT and RARA in fibroepithelial tumours of the breast

Fibroepithelial tumours are biphasic neoplasms of the breast comprising the common benign fibroadenomas and the less common phyllodes tumours (PTs), which have recurrent potential. PTs are classified into benign, borderline or malignant, based on five histopathological criteria, with malignant PTs having the highest metastatic capability. Accurate diagnosis can be challenging due to the subjective assessment of histopathological parameters. Fibroadenomas bear morphological similarities to benign PTs, while borderline and malignant PTs can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from other spindle cell tumours of the breast. From clonality studies to whole-genome sequencing, much research has been conducted to elucidate the molecular pathogenesis of fibroepithelial tumours, which, in turn, have allowed leveraging the findings for diagnostic applications, including grading of PTs. The most noteworthy discovery was of recurrent MED12 mutations in both fibroadenomas and PTs. Subsequent studies also uncovered relatively frequent genetic mutations in TERT promoter and RARA. A customised panel of 16 most frequently mutated genes in fibroepithelial tissues has been compiled previously and has contributed to resolving a few diagnostic dilemmas. This review will introduce the 16 genes and focus on the top three that are most frequently mutated in fibroepithelial tumours: MED12, TERT, and RARA.

Mediator complex (MED) 7: a biomarker associated with good prognosis in invasive breast cancer, especially ER+ luminal subtypes

Background

Mediator complex (MED) proteins have a key role in transcriptional regulation, some interacting with the oestrogen receptor (ER). Interrogation of the METABRIC cohort suggested that MED7 may regulate lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Thus MED7 expression was assessed in large breast cancer (BC) cohorts to determine clinicopathological significance.

Methods

MED7 gene expression was investigated in the METABRIC cohort (n = 1980) and externally validated using bc-GenExMiner v4.0. Immunohistochemical expression was assessed in the Nottingham primary BC series (n = 1280). Associations with clinicopathological variables and patient outcome were evaluated.

Results

High MED7 mRNA and protein expression was associated with good prognostic factors: low grade, smaller tumour size, good NPI, positive hormone receptor status (p < 0.001), and negative LVI (p = 0.04) status. Higher MED7 protein expression was associated with improved BC-specific survival within the whole cohort and ER+/luminal subgroup. Pooled MED7 gene expression data in the external validation cohort confirmed association with better survival, corroborating with the protein expression. On multivariate analysis, MED7 protein was independently predictive of longer BC-specific survival in the whole cohort and Luminal A subtype (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

MED7 is an important prognostic marker in BC, particularly in ER+luminal subtypes, associated with improved survival and warrants future functional analysis.

MED12, TERT promoter and RBM15 mutations in primary and recurrent phyllodes tumours

BACKGROUND

MED12 and TERT promoter mutations have been shown to be the most common somatic mutations in phyllodes tumours (PTs). The aims of this study were to determine the frequency of these mutations in recurrent PTs, assess whether TERT promoter mutations could be helpful in distinguishing fibroadenomas (FAs) from PTs and identify novel mutations that may be driving malignant progression.

METHODS

MED12 and the TERT promoter were Sanger sequenced in 75 primary PTs, 21 recurrences, 19 single FAs and 2 cases of multiple FAs with benign PTs. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on one borderline PT.

RESULTS

Recurrent PTs and multiple FAs showed temporal discordance in MED12 but not TERT. Recurrent samples did acquire TERT mutations, with recurrent benign PTs more likely to have mutations in both genes. TERT mutations were not helpful in differentiating between benign PTs and FAs in cases of multiple FAs/PTs. Exome sequencing revealed a nonsense mutation in RBM15 and Sanger sequencing revealed another three RBM15 mutations in malignant/borderline PTs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that MED12 mutations can be heterogeneous in both synchronous and recurrent PTs unlike TERT mutations. We have also shown that RBM15 mutations may be important in the pathogenesis of borderline/malignant PTs.

Lipomatous tumors of the breast: A contemporary review

Breast tumors with lipomatous or liposarcomatous components are infrequently encountered, but can be a source of diagnostic difficulty if the context of the fatty differentiation is not recognized. Among the true adipocytic tumors, lipoma is the most common lipomatous tumor arising in the breast. Several mammary spindle cell tumors may show adipocytic differentiation, including fibroepithelial tumors and myofibroblastoma. Liposarcomatous components most often arise in malignant phyllodes tumors, as opposed to primary liposarcomas of the breast which are believed to be uncommon. This article will review the spectrum fat-containing tumors of the breast with an emphasis on differential diagnosis and insights from recent molecular studies.

Fibroepithelial lesions; The WHO spectrum

Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast comprise a morphologically and biologically heterogeneous group of biphasic tumors with epithelial and stromal components that demonstrate widely variable clinical behavior. Fibroadenomas are common benign tumors with a number of histologic variants, most of which pose no diagnostic challenge. Cellular and juvenile fibroadenomas can have overlapping features with phyllodes tumors and should be recognized. Phyllodes tumors constitute a spectrum of lesions with varying clinical behavior and are graded as benign, borderline or malignant based on a set of histologic features according to recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO). Recent developments have significantly expanded our understanding of the pathogenesis of fibroepithelial lesions, highlighting fibroadenomas as true neoplasms and underscoring a commonality with phyllodes tumors in the form of recurrent MED12 exon 2 mutations. In addition, sequencing studies have elucidated pathways associated with phyllodes tumor progression. Accurate diagnosis and grading of phyllodes tumors are important for patient management and prognosis, as grade broadly correlates with increasing local recurrence risk, and essentially only malignant tumors metastasize. However, classification of fibroepithelial lesions in many cases remains challenging on both core biopsy and excision specimens. A commonly encountered problem at the benign end of the spectrum is the distinction of benign phyllodes tumor from cellular fibroadenoma, which is largely due to the subjective nature of histologic features used in diagnosis and histologic overlap between lesions. Grading is further complicated by the requirement to integrate multiple subjective and ill-defined parameters. On the opposite end of the histologic spectrum, malignant phyllodes tumors must be distinguished from more common metaplastic carcinomas and from primary or metastatic sarcomas, which can be especially difficult in core biopsies. Immunohistochemistry can be useful in the differential diagnosis but should be interpreted with attention to caveats. This review provides an overview and update on the spectrum of fibroepithelial lesions, with special emphasis on common problems and practical issues in diagnosis.