Evaluation of a semi-automated Seegene PCR workflow with MTB, MDR, and NTM detection for rapid screening of tuberculosis in a low-prevalence setting

Evaluation of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, rifampicin and isoniazid resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria in a low-incidence setting

Rapid detection is crucial for tuberculosis (TB) control. GeneXpert (Cepheid) is a widely used PCR system, known for its simplicity, random access, and point-of-care compatibility. SD BIOSENSOR recently introduced a similar system, STANDARD M10, including a Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid resistance (herein, MDR-TB) assay and an MTB/nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) assay. We evaluated these assays for the potential to replace the established Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay in a low-TB incidence setting. We analyzed 160 clinical respiratory samples (45 MTB-positive and 35 NTM-positive) and further 24 drug-resistant MTB, 30 mycobacterial species (2 MTB, 28 NTM), and 37 non-mycobacterial isolates. Compared with culture, clinical sensitivities and specificities for MTB detection were 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76.1-95.6%) and 97.4% (CI = 92.3-99.4%) with Xpert Ultra, 88.9% (95% CI = 76.1-95.6%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MDR-TB, and 84.4% (CI = 70.9-94.4%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MTB/NTM, respectively. For NTM detection, M10 MTB/NTM showed sensitivity and specificity of 65.7% (CI = 49.1-79.2%) and 96.8% (CI = 91.8-99.0%). Compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), sensitivity and specificity for detecting RIF resistance were 100% (CI = 77.3-100%) and 95.6% (CI = 84.4-99.6%) with Xpert Ultra, and 100% (CI = 74.9-100%) and 95.5% (CI = 84.0-99.6%) with M10 MDR-TB. M10 MDR-TB showed 92.3% sensitivity (CI = 74.7-99.0%) and 100% specificity (CI = 87.3-100%) for detecting isoniazid resistance. All discrepancies in DST by PCR were concordant with whole-genome sequencing. While M10 MDR-TB demonstrated great potential as an alternative to Xpert Ultra, M10 MTB/NTM had limitations in NTM screening. Additionally, the M10 sputum pretreatment did not inactivate MTB efficiently, which should be considered in process risk assessment.

IMPORTANCE

The molecular diagnostic STANDARD M10 system is highly analogous to the widely established GeneXpert system, which significantly increases the relevance of this evaluation study in the field of rapid detection of M. tuberculosis. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical evaluation describing the performance of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays, including an extensive analytical specificity panel (inclusivity and exclusivity) for the detection of M. tuberculosis, drug resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria.

Evaluation of mycobacteria infection prevalence and optimization of the identification process in North Sardinia, Italy

IMPORTANCE

Mycobacterial infection is a major threat to public health worldwide. Accurate identification of infected species and drug resistance detection are critical factors in treatment. We focused on shortening the turn-around time of identifying mycobacteria species and antibiotic resistance tests.

Microfluidic Chip for Detection of Drug Resistance at the Single-cell Level

Drug-resistant bacterial strains seriously threaten human health. Rapid screening of antibiotics is urgently required to improve clinical treatment. Conventional methods of antimicrobial susceptibility testing rely on turbidimetry that is evident only after several days of incubation. The lengthy time of the assay can delay clinical treatment. Here, we proposed a single-cell level rapid system based on a microfluidic chip. The detection period of 30 min to 2 h was significantly shorter than the conventional turbidity-based method. To promote detection efficiency, 16 independent channels were designed, permitting the simultaneous screening of 16 drugs in the microfluidic chip. Prepositioning of drugs in the chip permitted prolonged transportation and storage. This may allow for the widespread use of the novel system, particularly in the regions where medical facilities are scarce. The growth curves were reported rapidly through a custom code in Matlab after tracking and photographing the bacteria during microscopy examination. The capability of the proposed system was validated by antimicrobial susceptibility testing trials with standard strains. The system provides a potentially useful detection tool for drug-resistant bacteria.

Revisiting the methods for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis: what has the new millennium brought thus far?

Tuberculosis (TB) affects around 10 million people worldwide in 2019. Approximately 3.4 % of new TB cases are multidrug-resistant. The gold standard method for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which is the aetiological agent of TB, is still based on microbiological culture procedures, followed by species identification and drug sensitivity testing. Sputum is the most commonly obtained clinical specimen from patients with pulmonary TB. Although smear microscopy is a low-cost and widely used method, its sensitivity is 50-60 %. Thus, owing to the need to improve the performance of current microbiological tests to provide prompt treatment, different methods with varied sensitivity and specificity for TB diagnosis have been developed. Here we discuss the existing methods developed over the past 20 years, including their strengths and weaknesses. In-house and commercial methods have been shown to be promising to achieve rapid diagnosis. Combining methods for mycobacterial detection systems demonstrates a correlation of 100 %. Other assays are useful for the simultaneous detection of M. tuberculosis species and drug-related mutations. Novel approaches have also been employed to rapidly identify and quantify total mycobacteria RNA, including assessments of global gene expression measured in whole blood to identify the risk of TB. Spoligotyping, mass spectrometry and next-generation sequencing are also promising technologies; however, their cost needs to be reduced so that low- and middle-income countries can access them. Because of the large impact of M. tuberculosis infection on public health, the development of new methods in the context of well-designed and -controlled clinical trials might contribute to the improvement of TB infection control.

Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples with the FluoroType MTBDR assay

OBJECTIVES

Rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) are the two most effective first-line antibiotic drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). The new FluoroType MTBDR (FT-MTBDR) real-time PCR is intended to detect INH and RIF resistance mutations as a second step following a primary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) PCR. Here we evaluate the feasibility of the FT-MTBDR assay to detect simultaneously MTBC-specific DNA as well as to detect potential INH and RIF resistance through analysing inhA promotor, katG and rpoB sequences in one PCR reaction.

METHODS

We analysed 3885 consecutive primary samples with FT-MTBDR and compared the results with microscopy and culture: 978 were from sputum, 2007 from other respiratory tract locations plus gastric lavages, and 875 from extrapulmonary locations, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 176 samples were MTBC culture positive and 139 FT-MTBDR positive, providing a FT-MTBDR sensitivity of 0.714 (95% confidence interval 0.640-0.779) and specificity of 0.996 (0.994-0.998), respectively. For the 978 sputum, 96 were MTBC culture positive and 89 FT-MTBDR positive, sensitivity 0.854 (0.764-0.915) and specificity 0.992 (0.983-0.997). Of the 139 MTBC positive, 99 (71%) had interpretable genotypic resistance results for at least one drug, 92 (66%) for both drugs.

DISCUSSION

The ability of FT-MTBDR to detect MTBC is adequate with the significant added feature of simultaneous genotypic resistance detection of both INH and RIF in a single PCR reaction.