1
|
McGill K, Salem A, Hanstock TL, Heard TR, Garvey L, Leckning B, Whyte I, Page A, Carter G. Indigeneity and Likelihood of Discharge to Psychiatric Hospital in an Australian Deliberate Self-Poisoning Hospital-Treated Cohort. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12238. [PMID: 36231541 PMCID: PMC9566708 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Hospital-treated self-harm rates for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) people are at least double those for other Australians. Despite this, limited research has explored the relationship between Indigeneity and the clinical management of hospital-treated deliberate self-harm. A retrospective clinical cohort study (2003-2012) at a regional referral centre (NSW) for deliberate self-poisoning was used to explore the magnitude and direction of the relationship between Indigeneity and discharge destination (psychiatric hospital vs. other) using a series of logistic regressions. There were 149 (4%) Indigenous and 3697 (96%) non-Indigenous deliberate self-poisoning admissions during the study period. One-third (31%) were referred to the psychiatric hospital at discharge; Indigenous 21% (n = 32) vs. non-Indigenous 32% (n = 1175). Those who identified as Indigenous were less likely to be discharged to the psychiatric hospital, OR 0.59 (0.40-0.87) at the univariate level, with little change after sequential adjustment; and AOR 0.34 (0.21-0.73) in the fully adjusted model. The Indigenous cohort had a lower likelihood of psychiatric hospital discharge even after adjustment for variables associated with discharge to the psychiatric hospital highlighting the need for further investigation of the reasons accounting for this differential pattern of clinical management and the effectiveness of differential after-care allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie McGill
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
- Healthy Minds, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
- Mental Health-Research, Evaluation and Dissemination (MH-READ), Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia
| | - Amir Salem
- School of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Tanya L. Hanstock
- School of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Todd R. Heard
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
- Healthy Minds, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
- Wiyillin Ta Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
| | - Leonie Garvey
- Aboriginal Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW 2287, Australia
| | - Bernard Leckning
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 1466, Australia
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0811, Australia
| | - Ian Whyte
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
- Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia
| | - Andrew Page
- Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
| | - Greg Carter
- Healthy Minds, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
- Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Across the United States, state laws most commonly limit the duration of emergency psychiatric holds to 72 hours. Estimates suggest that more than 1 million emergency psychiatric holds are placed in the United States each year, and this 72-hour limit can shape the lives of patients, clinicians, law enforcement officials, and others in the community. Yet, from where did this time frame originate, and why is it so prevalent in psychiatric care? The author examines the evolution of 72-hour limits on psychiatric holds in the United States, as well as the evidence for or against use of this specific time frame in emergency psychiatric care. Given limited research into policies that affect millions of people, the author concludes that further study is needed to understand how these time limits influence outcomes related to psychiatric care and to strengthen the evidence base for civil commitment practices.
Collapse
|
3
|
Zeng LN, Zong QQ, Yang Y, Zhang L, Xiang YF, Ng CH, Chen LG, Xiang YT. Gender Difference in the Prevalence of Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:577429. [PMID: 33329116 PMCID: PMC7714764 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.577429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Insomnia is a major health challenge in the general population, but the results of the gender differences in the epidemiology of insomnia have been mixed. This is a meta-analysis to examine the gender difference in the prevalence of insomnia among the general population. Methods:Two reviewers independently searched relevant publications in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science from their inception to 16 April 2019. Studies that reported the gender-based prevalence of insomnia according to the international diagnostic criteria were included for analyses using the random-effects model. Results:Eventually 13 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of insomnia in the general population was 22.0% [n = 22,980, 95% confidence interval (CI): 17.0-28.0%], and females had a significantly higher prevalence of insomnia compared with males (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.35, 1.85, Z = 5.63, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses showed that greater gender difference was associated with the use of case-control study design and consecutive sampling method. Meta-regression analyses also revealed that higher proportion of females and better study quality were significantly associated with greater gender difference. Conclusions:This meta-analysis found that the prevalence of insomnia in females was significantly higher than males in the included studies. Due to the negative effects of insomnia on health, regular screening, and effective interventions should be implemented in the general population particularly for females.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang-Nan Zeng
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.,Neurosurgery Clinical Medical Research Center of Sichuan Province, Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, China.,Unit of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Macau, Macao, China.,Center for Cognition and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China.,Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China
| | - Qian-Qian Zong
- The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Yang
- Unit of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Macau, Macao, China.,Center for Cognition and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China.,Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China
| | - Ling Zhang
- The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Chee H Ng
- Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic and St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Li-Gang Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.,Neurosurgery Clinical Medical Research Center of Sichuan Province, Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, China
| | - Yu-Tao Xiang
- Unit of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Macau, Macao, China.,Center for Cognition and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China
| |
Collapse
|