Adherence to assigned dosing regimen and sustained virological response among chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients treated with boceprevir plus peginterferon alfa-2b/ribavirin

Assessment of the effect of an enhanced prior authorization and management program in a United States Medicaid program on chronic hepatitis C treatment adherence and cost

OBJECTIVES

The market for chronic hepatitis C (HCV) treatment has changed rapidly. New treatments offer high cure rates, fewer adverse effects, and shorter treatments-but also increased costs per therapy. The objective of this study was to compare adherence and cost between HCV patients included in an enhanced prior authorization and management program (PAMP) versus no intervention in Medicaid members undergoing treatment.

DESIGN

A retrospective study using longitudinal panel data assessed differences in adherence and costs associated with implementation of the PAMP from the payer perspective. The PAMP included case management, patient education, pharmacy counseling, and medication adherence. Multivariable generalized estimating equations were used to assess associations between program and outcomes.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients with HCV enrolled in a state Medicaid program receiving or requesting HCV treatment from January 2014 to November 2015.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes included medication adherence, treatment gaps, and pharmacy and total direct costs after controlling for demographic and clinical factors between those in the PAMP and those in the preintervention period.

RESULTS

There were 384 Medicaid members included (156 pre-PAMP, 228 post-PAMP). Overall adherence was high regardless of PAMP intervention, although an adjusted 1.086-fold increase in medication possession ratio (MPR) was observed with the program and a 2.732-fold higher odds of adherence above 80% (P < 0.05). Members in the program had 0.358 times lower adjusted odds of a greater than 3-day treatment gap, and pharmacy-related costs were 0.940 times lower (P < 0.05); no difference was observed in total medical costs (P = 0.333).

CONCLUSION

This enhanced Medicaid program was associated with increased adherence to HCV therapy, decreased treatment gaps, and decreased pharmacy-related costs compared with the preintervention period. Because challenges exist if patients fail HCV treatment or if viral resistance emerges, ensuring high adherence and persistence remains key. Continued work is needed to develop and assess enhanced management programs for this population.

Evaluation of a Hepatitis C Patient Management Program at a University Specialty Pharmacy

BACKGROUND

The University of Rochester (UR) Specialty Pharmacy hepatitis C patient management program offers a unique advantage of being integrated within the same health system as the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) Gastroenterology and Hepatology division.

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose of this study was to assess treatment success through the incidence of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) in patients served by the UR Specialty Pharmacy versus other nonintegrated pharmacies.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study in adult patients of URMC Gastroenterology and Hepatology prescribed hepatitis C treatment between January 1, 2014, and July 15, 2015. The incidence of SVR, adherence, delay in therapy initiation, early treatment discontinuation, rate of attainment of viral load measurement post-therapy completion, and predictors associated with treatment outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 414 patients were prescribed hepatitis C virus treatment during the study period; 137 did not initiate therapy. The rate of SVR was 93% among patients at the UR Specialty Pharmacy and 89% at nonintegrated pharmacies ( P = 0.357). Adherence to therapy was 100% and 97% at the UR Specialty Pharmacy and nonintegrated pharmacies, respectively ( P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The UR Specialty Pharmacy was associated with a 93% SVR rate and significantly greater adherence compared with nonintegrated pharmacies. Larger studies are needed to determine if a significant difference in SVR exists between integrated and nonintegrated pharmacies. This study provides a framework for other institutions to justify developing integrated hepatitis C specialty pharmacy services and evaluate their success.

Retrospective Analysis of the Medication Utilization and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated with Various Regimens for Hepatitis C Infection

BACKGROUND

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common chronic blood-borne infection and the leading cause of liver transplantation in the United States. There are approximately 3.2 million people currently infected with HCV in the United States. In late 2013, the introduction of sofosbuvir and simeprevir represented a critical advancement in the treatment of HCV by improving sustained virologic response (SVR) rates.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate medication utilization and clinical outcomes of patients with HCV who were treated with any Food and Drug Administration-approved combination of ribavirin, peginterferon products, simeprevir, and sofosbuvir.

METHODS

Prescription records and clinical assessment forms of patients who started HCV therapy and were eligible for SVR between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, were retrospectively reviewed. Data collection included patient demographics, genotype, SVR, patient-reported adverse events, discontinuations, and adherence markers.

RESULTS

A total of 367 eligible patients were identified who had initiated treatment during the study period. Genotype 1 was the most common genotype, and an overall SVR rate of 86.9% was observed. Results were similar to those seen in phase III clinical trials. In addition, adverse events of these medications were more tolerable, and discontinuation rates were lower than with previous therapies.

Effect of Gender on the Response to Hepatitis C Treatment in an Inner-City Population

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation in the United States. Response to treatment has improved with the addition of direct acting protease inhibitors. However, there are limited real-world data on the role of gender in achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR).

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study in 70 patients treated for HCV, genotype 1 infection with pegylated alpha interferon, ribavirin, and either telaprevir or boceprevir at our inner-city liver clinic.

RESULTS

The SVR was significantly lower in women than in men (24% vs. 59%; p < .01). Statistical significance persisted after adjusting for age, race, genotype, prior treatment status, duration of therapy, and stage of fibrosis. The adjusted odds ratio for achieving SVR was significantly lower in women than in men (odds ratio [OR], 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.58; p = .01). Relapse after completing treatment was more likely to occur in women (p = .02). Thirty-four patients (48%) did not complete therapy. Discontinuation because of loss to follow-up was more likely in women, whereas discontinuation owing to therapy limiting adverse drug events were more common in men. Discontinuation rates owing to failure of therapy were similar in men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant difference in SVR between men and women. Both biological and nonbiological factors, the latter including access to care, adherence to therapy, and attitudes of and toward health care providers all could play a role in contributing to the observed disparity between sexes in treatment response.

Clinical pharmacology profile of boceprevir, a hepatitis C virus NS3 protease inhibitor: focus on drug-drug interactions

Boceprevir is a potent, orally administered ketoamide inhibitor that targets the active site of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) non-structural (NS) 3 protease. The addition of boceprevir to peginterferon plus ribavirin resulted in higher rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) than for peginterferon plus ribavirin alone in phase III studies in both previously treated and untreated patients with HCV infection. Because boceprevir is metabolized by metabolic routes common to many other drugs, and is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5, there is a high potential for drug-drug interactions when boceprevir is administered with other therapies, particularly when treating patients with chronic HCV infection who are often receiving other medications concomitantly. Boceprevir is no longer widely used in the US or EU due to the introduction of second-generation treatments for HCV infection. However, in many other geographic regions, first-generation protease inhibitors such as boceprevir continue to form an important treatment option for patients with HCV infection. This review summarizes the interactions between boceprevir and other therapeutic agents commonly used in this patient population, indicating dose adjustment requirements where needed. Most drug interactions do not affect boceprevir plasma concentrations to a clinically meaningful extent, and thus efficacy is likely to be maintained when boceprevir is coadministered with the majority of other therapeutics. Overall, the drug-drug interaction profile of boceprevir suggests that this agent is suitable for use in a wide range of HCV-infected patients receiving concomitant therapies.

Health state utilities associated with attributes of treatments for hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Cost-utility analyses are frequently conducted to compare treatments for hepatitis C, which are often associated with complex regimens and serious adverse events. Thus, the purpose of this study was to estimate the utility associated with treatment administration and adverse events of hepatitis C treatments.

DESIGN

Health states were drafted based on literature review and clinician interviews. General population participants in the UK valued the health states in time trade-off (TTO) interviews with 10- and 1-year time horizons. The 14 health states described hepatitis C with variations in treatment regimen and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 182 participants completed interviews (50% female; mean age = 39.3 years). Utilities for health states describing treatment regimens without injections ranged from 0.80 (1 tablet) to 0.79 (7 tablets). Utilities for health states describing oral plus injectable regimens were 0.77 (7 tablets), 0.75 (12 tablets), and 0.71 (18 tablets). Addition of a weekly injection had a disutility of -0.02. A requirement to take medication with fatty food had a disutility of -0.04. Adverse events were associated with substantial disutilities: mild anemia, -0.12; severe anemia, -0.32; flu-like symptoms, -0.21; mild rash, -0.13; severe rash, -0.48; depression, -0.47. One-year TTO scores were similar to these 10-year values.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events and greater treatment regimen complexity were associated with lower utility scores, suggesting a perceived decrease in quality of life beyond the impact of hepatitis C. The resulting utilities may be used in models estimating and comparing the value of treatments for hepatitis C.

Rapid Prediction of Treatment Futility of Boceprevir with Peginterferon-Ribavirin for Taiwanese Treatment Experienced Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1-Infected Patients

The efficacy and safety of the boceprevir (BOC)-containing triple therapy in Taiwanese treatment-experienced patients remains elusive. After 4 weeks of peginterferon/ribavirin lead-in therapy, patients with cirrhosis or previous null-response received triple therapy for 44 weeks; whereas others received 32 weeks of triple therapy followed by 12 weeks of peginterferon/ribavirin therapy. Patients with HCV RNA > 100 IU/mL at week 12 or with detectable HCV RNA at week 24 of treatment were viewed as futile. A total of 123 patients received treatment. The rates of sustained virological response (SVR) and relapse were 66.7% and 8.9%, respectively by using intention-to-treat analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that factors associated with SVR included HCV-1b (odds ratio [OR]/ 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 19.23/1.76-525.15, P = 0.01), BOC adherence (7.69/1.55-48.78, P = 0.01), serum albumin (OR/CI:6.25/1.14-40.07, P = 0.03) levels and HCV RNA levels (OR/CI:0.34/0.12-0.79, P = 0.01). Twenty-six (21.1%) patients experienced severe adverse events (SAEs). Multivariate analysis revealed that APRI > 1.5 was the single factor associated with occurring SAEs (OR/CI: 3.77/ 0.97-14.98, P = 0.05). Merging the cut-off values of HCV RNA > 7 log IU/mL at baseline and HCV RNA > 6 log IU/mL at week 4 provided the earliest and best combing viral kinetics in predicting week 12/24 futility with the PPV of 100% and accuracy of 93.5%. HCV-1 treatment experienced Taiwanese patients treated with boceprevir-containing triple therapy in real world had comparable efficacy and safety profiles with those reported in clinical trials. Early viral kinetics before week 4 of treatment highly predicted futility at week 12 or 24 of treatment.

Rational Design and Adaptive Management of Combination Therapies for Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Recent discoveries of direct acting antivirals against Hepatitis C virus (HCV) have raised hopes of effective treatment via combination therapies. Yet rapid evolution and high diversity of HCV populations, combined with the reality of suboptimal treatment adherence, make drug resistance a clinical and public health concern. We develop a general model incorporating viral dynamics and pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamics to assess how suboptimal adherence affects resistance development and clinical outcomes. We derive design principles and adaptive treatment strategies, identifying a high-risk period when missing doses is particularly risky for de novo resistance, and quantifying the number of additional doses needed to compensate when doses are missed. Using data from large-scale resistance assays, we demonstrate that the risk of resistance can be reduced substantially by applying these principles to a combination therapy of daclatasvir and asunaprevir. By providing a mechanistic framework to link patient characteristics to the risk of resistance, these findings show the potential of rational treatment design.

Finding Truth in a World Full of Spin: Myth-Busting in the Case of Sovaldi

PURPOSE

Public discourse regarding the hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug Sovaldi® (sofosbuvir) has become inflamed, generating much heat but little light concerning the clinical, health economic, and quality-of-life merits of Sovaldi®. The purpose of this article is to provide a factual basis for evaluating the claims regarding the benefits of Sovaldi® relative to its costs.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted of news stories highlighted in the daily updates of the electronic newsletters BIO SmartBrief, FiercePharma, FierceBiotech and BioCentury Extra published from November 1, 2013, through December 31, 2014, on the topics of the HCV market, Sovaldi®, and other HCV therapeutics. Also reviewed were recent practice guidelines on the management of HCV infections, prescribing information on all HCV drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and health technology assessments of Sovaldi® and Harvoni(TM) (sofosbuvir/ledipasvir).

FINDINGS

Sovaldi® and Harvoni(TM) have provided significant improvements in the treatment of HCV, with all-oral regimens and cure rates exceeding 90% in some populations of patients with HCV. Sovaldi® prevents significant health care resource utilization in patients who would otherwise develop cirrhosis and require a liver transplant; however, only a small proportion of patients with HCV develop cirrhosis, and fewer require liver transplants. Because it is not possible to identify those patients whose HCV will progress to severe liver disease, it would be necessary to treat a large number of patients with HCV to prevent disease progression in this subpopulation, resulting in a considerable loss to health plans even over a 20-year horizon. The claim that treating all patients with HCV with Sovaldi® would cost nearly as much as the current total US expenditure on all prescription drugs, while factually correct, is not a realistic scenario. Many patients with HCV will continue to go undiagnosed. In addition, the medical expense for those who are treated will be spread out over many years. However, the unexpectedly large, up-front cost of covering these drugs has had a major impact on health plan budgets, resulting in losses for some plans.

IMPLICATIONS

Sovaldi® represents an enormous advance in the care of some populations of HCV-infected patients, but also a major cost burden to health plans. As the first of a number of anticipated, paradigm-changing drugs to treat medical conditions affecting large patient populations, Sovaldi® should act as a wake-up call for all health care stakeholders to engage in a meaningful, fact-based discussion about managing the cost of innovative new drugs to balance the needs of drug manufacturers, health plans, providers, and, above all, patients.

Treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs in U.S. patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C infection who received telaprevir or boceprevir

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, with the future burden of disease predicted to significantly increase. The recent addition of 2 direct-acting antiviral (DAA) protease inhibitors, telaprevir and boceprevir, to peginterferon alfa (PEG) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy has been shown to significantly improve sustained virologic response rates and thus has become standard of care. While the efficacy and safety of DAAs has been assessed in the clinical trial setting, less is known about real-world use of these new therapies.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) evaluate the treatment patterns, health care utilization, and costs of CHC patients receiving DAA-based therapies in the United States using a retrospective analysis of a large administrative claims database and (b) evaluate factors associated with therapy noncompletion using multivariable analyses.

METHODS

Adult patients with ≥ 1 claim for CHC and a prescription filled for boceprevir or telaprevir were selected from a de-identified U.S.-based claims database. The date of the first fill for a DAA after May 13, 2011 (date of first DAA availability) was defined as the index date, and patients were categorized into either the telaprevir or boceprevir cohort. Patients were required to have continuous eligibility and no claims for hepatitis B during the 6 months before (baseline) and 12 months following (study period) the index date. Baseline characteristics and study period treatment patterns, health care utilization, and costs were described. Factors associated with therapy noncompletion were examined using multivariable logistic regression, and adjusted health care costs were compared between the DAA cohorts using multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 871 telaprevir and 284 boceprevir patients were identified. DAA patients were aged 54 years on average and more often were male (60%, n = 688). Approximately 25% (n = 216) of telaprevir and 18% (n = 52) of boceprevir patients had cirrhosis, and 9% (n = 82) of telaprevir and 7% (n = 20) of boceprevir patients had decompensated cirrhosis at baseline. Less than 1% (n = 9) of patients were HIV co-infected. Approximately 54% (n = 470) of telaprevir and 74% (n = 210) of boceprevir patients did not complete the minimum duration of therapy as per the prescribing information (telaprevir: 12 weeks of triple + 12 weeks of dual; boceprevir: 3 weeks of lead-in + 24 weeks of triple). In multivariable analyses, females (vs. males) and patients taking boceprevir (vs. telaprevir) were more likely to not complete therapy (P = 0.011). CHC patients experienced high medical and drug-related resource utilization. Telaprevir patients had numerically higher study period unadjusted medical (boceprevir: $16,927; telaprevir: $19,519) and drug costs (boceprevir: $59,953; telaprevir: $76,497) than boceprevir patients; however, after adjusting for baseline characteristics, only drug costs remained significantly different (P  less than  0.001). 

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that a large proportion of CHC patients receiving telaprevir or boceprevir did not complete minimum duration of therapy as per the prescribing information. CHC patients on a DAA regimen also experienced high resource utilization and high medical and drug costs.

Virological outcomes and treatment algorithms utilisation in observational study of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with boceprevir or telaprevir

BACKGROUND

HCV-TARGET is a longitudinal observational study of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients treated with direct-acting anti-viral agents (DAAs) in a US consortium of 90 academic and community medical centres.

AIM

To assess utilisation of response-guided therapy (RGT) and sustained virological response (SVR) of a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

Patients received peginterferon (PEG-IFN), ribavirin and either telaprevir or boceprevir. Demographical, clinical and virological data were collected during treatment and follow-up. RGT and treatment futility stopping rules was assessed at key time points.

RESULTS

Of 2084 patients, 38% had cirrhosis and 56% had received prior treatment for HCV. SVR rates were 31% (95% CI: 24-40) and 50% (95% CI: 44-56) in boceprevir patients with and without cirrhosis, respectively. SVR rates were 46% (95% CI: 42-50) and 60% (95% CI: 57-64) in telaprevir patients with and without cirrhosis, respectively. Early clearance of virus, IL28B genotype, platelet counts and diabetes were identified as predictors of SVR among boceprevir patients, while early clearance of virus, IL28B, cirrhosis, HCV subtype, age, haemoglobin, bilirubin and albumin levels were identified as predictors of SVR for telaprevir patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In academic and community centres, triple therapy including boceprevir or telaprevir led to SVR rates somewhat lower than those noted in large phase 3 clinical trials. Response rates were consistently higher among patients without cirrhosis compared to those with cirrhosis regardless of DAA used and prior treatment response. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT01474811.

"Fighting an uphill battle": experience with the HCV triple therapy: a qualitative thematic analysis

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are a severe burden on public health worldwide, causing mortality rates triple that of the general population. Since 2011, for both therapy-naive and therapy-experienced genotype 1 patients, the first generation of direct acting antivirals (DAAs), i.e., the protease-inhibitors (PI) telaprevir and boceprevir have been added to existing dual therapies. The therapeutic effect of the resulting triple therapy is striking; however, treatment regimens are complex and commonly cause side effects. Little is known of how patients implement therapy in their daily lives, or of how they deal with these effects.

This study aims to describe HCV patients' experiences with protease-inhibitor-based triple therapy and their support needs.

Methods

A qualitative design was used. Patients from three outpatient clinics, with ongoing, completed or discontinued PI treatment experience were recruited using a maximum variation sampling approach. Open-ended interviews were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis according to Braun & Clarke (Qual Res Psychol 3:77-101, 2006).

Results

Thirteen patients participated in the interviews. All described themselves as highly motivated to undergo treatment, since they saw the new therapy as a “real chance” for a cure. However, all later described the therapy period as a struggle. The constitutive theme–“Fighting an uphill battle”– describes the common existential experience of and negative consequences of coping with side effects. The processes that fostered this common experience followed three sub-themes: “encountering surprises”, “dealing with disruption” and “reaching the limits of systems”.

Conclusion

HCV patients undergoing outpatient protease-inhibitor-based triple therapy need systematic support in symptom management. This will require specially trained professionals to advise and support them and their families, and to provide rapid responses to their needs throughout this complex course of therapy. As the generation of DAAs for all genotypes, are expected to have less severe side effects, and many HCV patients require treatment, this knowledge can improve treatment support tremendously, especially for patients who are quite difficult to treat. Furthermore, these findings are helpful to illustrate development in HCV treatment.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-507) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Serum 25(OH)D3 levels affect treatment outcomes for telaprevir/peg-interferon/ribavirin combination therapy in genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Close relationships between chronic hepatitis C and vitamin D levels have been reported. For genotype 1b infection, the current standard of care is pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy combined with a protease inhibitor. The present study analyzed the relationship between outcomes of triple therapy and serum 25(OH)D3 levels.

METHODS

Factors contributing to sustained virological response were investigated in 177 patients with chronic hepatitis C who received telaprevir-based triple therapy in this prospective study.

RESULTS

The sustained virological response rate was 86.9% in patients with 25(OH)D3 levels of >18 ng/ml; this was higher than the 66.7% in patients with 25(OH)D3 levels of ≤ 18 ng/ml (P=0.003). 25(OH)D3 levels and IL28B genotype were identified as significantly independent factors contributing to sustained virological response. The sustained virological response rate did not differ according to 25(OH)D3 levels in patients with the IL28B major genotype. The sustained virological response rate was 64.9% in patients with the IL28B minor genotype and 25(OH)D3 levels of >18 ng/ml, and was 38.5% in those with decreased 25(OH)D3 levels (P=0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

In triple therapy, 25(OH)D3 levels were an independent factor contributing to sustained virological response. Of particular note, the sustained virological response rate was significantly lower in patients with the IL28B minor genotype.

How to optimize current therapy of HCV genotype 1 infection with boceprevir

Treatment with first generation protease inhibitors (PIs) is a milestone in the history of HCV therapy. Triple therapy with boceprevir (BOC) improves sustained virological response (SVR) by 30% in treatment naïve genotype 1 patients and by 50-60% in relapsers, 40-45% in partial responders and 25% in null responders compared with the Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin regimen. To optimize BOC treatment, screening and access to treatment must be improved in genotype 1 patients. To select the ideal candidate for immediate treatment with triple therapy, an individual risk/benefit ratio must be assessed. Recent data have shown that patients with compensated cirrhosis and more advanced disease may also benefit from this regimen. Moreover, in HCV patients with extrahepatic manifestations, patients with HCV recurrence after liver transplantation and HIV-HCV co-infected patients, immediate treatment with triple therapy should be discussed. There is growing evidence that triple therapy with BOC is cost-effective in genotype 1 patients. Finally, the treatment design of BOC must be optimized in relation to baseline characteristics, so that optimal stopping rules can be followed, Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can be prevented and AEs can be accurately prevented and managed.

Predictors of hepatitis C treatment response: what's new?

Hepatitis C virus infection is a growing, global health problem, with mortality expected to reach a peak in the next ten years in many western countries. A number of host and viral factors have been established as useful predictors of treatment response in the context of interferon and ribavirin. Several new markers have recently been identified that improve our understanding of treatment response. The addition of protease inhibitors to treatment regimens has highlighted the importance of viral kinetics on-treatment in predicting response to treatment. Many new classes of direct acting anti-virals are currently being developed and expected to be clinically available in the near future. Current predictors of treatment response will be redefined in the context of interferon free regimens.

Comparative effectiveness of the hepatitis C virus protease inhibitors boceprevir and telaprevir in a large U.S. cohort

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on the effectiveness of boceprevir and telaprevir in routine practice.

AIM

To assess the comparative effectiveness of boceprevir and telaprevir regimens.

METHODS

In this observational, intent-to-treat cohort analysis of hepatitis C genotype 1-infected veterans initiated on peginterferon/ribavirin and boceprevir (n = 661) or telaprevir (n = 198), we determined sustained virological response (SVR), treatment discontinuation rates and adverse haematological events. Inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to estimate the effect of one drug over the other, with matched pairs and unweighted logistic regression on the entire cohort for comparison.

RESULTS

Of 835 veterans, SVR occurred in 50% and 52% receiving boceprevir- and telaprevir-based treatment, respectively (P = 0.72). No significant differences occurred among subgroups: cirrhotics (37% vs. 39%, P = 0.94), null responders (23% vs. 18%, P = 0.81), partial responders (39% vs. 58%, P = 0.15) and relapsers (60% vs. 77%, P = 0.11). Early discontinuation rates for boceprevir and telaprevir, respectively, were 31% and 28% by week 24 (P = 0.46) and 54% and 45% by 48 weeks (in those completing at least 28 weeks) (P = 0.14). Choice of telaprevir over boceprevir was significantly associated with SVR in multivariate models (IPTW OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.10-2.25, P = 0.01; matched-pairs OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.23-3.00, P = 0.004; unweighted OR: 1.50 95% CI: 1.05-2.14, P = 0.02). Rates of haematological adverse events in boceprevir- and telaprevir-treated patients were as follows: anaemia 59% vs. 51%, P = 0.30, thrombocytopenia 41% vs. 48%, P = 0.26, neutropenia 41% vs. 27%, P = 0.04.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained virological response was more likely with telaprevir-based regimens compared with boceprevir-based regimens in routine medical practice, after accounting for patient differences. Early discontinuation and haematological events, however, were similar.

Telaprevir-based triple therapy for chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis: a prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Antiviral treatment is recommended for chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis to reduce and prevent cirrhosis-related complications.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of telaprevir (TVR)-based triple therapy for patients with advanced fibrosis in a clinical practice setting.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre study consisted of 102 patients with advanced fibrosis (METAVIR score F3-4) who were infected with HCV genotype 1b. All received 12 weeks of TVR in combination with 24 weeks of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) α2b and ribavirin (RBV).

RESULTS

The sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 69.6% (71 of 102). Notably, for treatment-naïve and prior relapse patients the SVR rate was over 80%. Previous treatment response, interleukin 28B polymorphism (rs8099917) and rapid virological response (undetectable HCV RNA at week 4) were independently associated with SVR. To achieve SVR, an adequate dosage of PEG-IFNα2b (≥1.2 μg/kg/week) and RBV (≥7.5 mg/kg/day) is preferable; however, the mean weight-adjusted TVR dosage had little impact on treatment outcome. Although severe blood cytopaenia and a dermatological disorder were frequently found, the rate of discontinuation due to adverse effects was 12.7%. The inosine triphosphatase CC allele (rs1127354) was independently associated with the development of severe anaemia, and lower serum albumin level (<35 g/L) was associated with the occurrence of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The great gain in the SVR rate by telaprevir-based triple therapy offsets the problems with adverse effects; thus, it should be considered as a potent treatment protocol for patients with advanced fibrosis, especially for those with treatment-naïve and prior relapse.