Pre-admission use of glucocorticoids and 30-day mortality following colorectal cancer surgery: a population-based Danish cohort study

Impact of glucocorticoids on the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies suggest that glucocorticoids (GCs) promote the proliferation and development of colorectal cancer. Because GCs are broadly prescribed for treatment-related adverse events in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), it's essential to assess the effect of GCs on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

LARC cases treated with NCRT followed by surgery were assessed retrospectively. Evaluation of the relationship between GCs use (GCs vs. non-GCs) and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score (as a three-level categorical dependent variable) was performed using multivariable multinomial logistic regression (MLR). We also examined the relationship between the accumulated dose of GCs and NAR using multivariate MLR. Survival analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression was used to assess confounding factors that could influence OS and DFS.

RESULTS

This retrospective cohort study included 790 patients with newly diagnosed non-metastatic LARC (T3-4/N + M0) who received NCRT followed by surgery between January 2012 and April 2017. The end of the follow-up period was May 11, 2022. Among the 790 patients with LARC, 342 (43.2%) received GCs treatment and 448 (56.8%) did not during the NCRT-to-surgery period. GCs medication was significantly different between mid-NAR (8-16) and low-NAR (< 8) (odds ratio [OR], 0.615; 95% CI, 0.420-0.901; P = 0.013), and the high-NAR (> 16) and low-NAR (0.563; 0.352-0.900; 0.016). Patients exposed to GCs, had a decreased 5-year OS (GCs vs. non-GCs = 80.01% (95% CI, 75.87%-84.37%) vs. 85.30% (82.06%-88.67%), P = 0.023) and poorer 5-year DFS (73.99% (69.45%-78.82%) vs. 78.7% (75.14%-82.78%), P = 0.045). The accumulated dose of GCs was an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.007 [1.001-1.014], 0.036) and DFS (1.010 [1.004-1.017], 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our study revealed that GCs were associated with reduced efficacy of NCRT and worse clinical outcomes in patients with LARC during the NCRT-to-surgery period.

Intestinal epithelial glucocorticoid receptor promotes chronic inflammation-associated colorectal cancer

Synthetic immunosuppressive glucocorticoids (GCs) are widely used to control inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the impact of GC signaling on intestinal tumorigenesis remains controversial. Here, we report that intestinal epithelial GC receptor (GR), but not whole intestinal tissue GR, promoted chronic intestinal inflammation-associated colorectal cancer in both humans and mice. In patients with colorectal cancer, GR was enriched in intestinal epithelial cells and high epithelial cell GR levels were associated with poor prognosis. Consistently, intestinal epithelium–specific deletion of GR (GR iKO) in mice increased macrophage infiltration, improved tissue recovery, and enhanced antitumor response in a chronic inflammation–associated colorectal cancer model. Consequently, GR iKO mice developed fewer and less advanced tumors than control mice. Furthermore, oral GC administration in the early phase of tissue injury delayed recovery and accelerated the formation of aggressive colorectal cancers. Our study reveals that intestinal epithelial GR signaling repressed acute colitis but promoted chronic inflammation–associated colorectal cancer. Our study suggests that colorectal epithelial GR could serve as a predictive marker for colorectal cancer risk and prognosis. Our findings further suggest that, although synthetic GC treatment for IBD should be used with caution, there is a therapeutic window for GC therapy during colorectal cancer development in immunocompetent patients.

Pre-operative chronic opioid or glucocorticoid use and mortality after noncardiac surgery: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The chronic use of opioids and glucocorticoids is associated with serious side effects. Moreover, both medications are related to poor long-term postoperative outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to investigate the association between pre-operative chronic opioid and glucocorticoid use and 90-day mortality after noncardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective, population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary academic hospital.

PATIENTS

The study enrolled adult (≥18 years of age) patients admitted to Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, between January 2012 and December 2018 for planned, elective, noncardiac surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The study compared the 90-day mortality for patients using opioids or glucocorticoids chronically (≥3 months) prior to surgery and for opioid-naïve and glucocorticoid-naïve patients.

RESULTS

A total of 112 606 patients were included in the study. Among them, 107 843 (95.9%) were opioid-naïve and glucocorticoid-naïve patients; 3373 (3.0%), 1199 (1.1%) and 191 patients (0.2%) were chronic users of opioids, glucocorticoids or both, respectively. In the multivariable model, compared with opioid-naïve and glucocorticoid-naïve patients, the odds of dying within 90 days were significantly higher for chronic users of opioids [3.56-fold; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 2.36 to 5.38; P < 0.001], glucocorticoids (4.17-fold; 95% CI 3.28 to 5.29; P < 0.001) and combined opioids and glucocorticoids (7.66-fold; 95% CI 3.91 to 15.01; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Chronic pre-operative use of opioids and glucocorticoids, together or individually, were associated with increased 90-day mortalities after noncardiac surgery, compared with opioid-naïve and glucocorticoid-naïve patients. Our results suggest that chronic pre-operative use of opioids and glucocorticoids should be managed carefully.

Individual differences in glucocorticoid regulation: Does it relate to disease risk and resilience?

Glucocorticoid (GC) signaling varies among individuals, and this variation may relate to individual differences in health outcomes. To determine if and which aspects of signaling (basal, circadian, integrative, or reactivity) are associated with specific health outcomes, we reviewed recent studies that relate GCs to health outcomes. We identified papers through PubMed and reviewed 100 original research articles related to mental health, cardiovascular health, cancer, diabetes, obesity, pulmonary health, sleep, and fitness. Many studies reported elevated GC secretion associated with worse health, but this was only particularly true for integrative GC measures. On the other hand, accentuated cortisol awakening response and a steeper circadian rhythm were both associated with positive health outcomes. Overall, relationships between GC secretion and health outcomes were relatively weak. This systematic review of relationships between GC metrics and health outcomes highlights the importance of careful consideration when selecting methods to measure GC regulation in health research.

Early Postoperative Outcomes of Primary Bariatric Surgery in Patients on Chronic Steroid or Immunosuppressive Therapy

BACKGROUND

Previous research suggests that patients on chronic steroids may be at an increased risk of postoperative morbidity after major surgery. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of chronic use of steroid or immunosuppression on 30-day morbidity and mortality rates after primary bariatric surgery.

METHODS

From American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database, we identified patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery between 2005 and 2013. Logistic regression was used to determine the prognostic impact of chronic use of steroid or immunosuppression on the 30-day postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred seventy seven steroid/immunosuppressant-dependent (SD) and 112,892 non-dependent (ND) patients were analyzed. SD patients had a higher baseline risk profile compared to ND patients. Thirty-day mortality rates for SD and ND patients were 0.55 and 0.11 %, respectively (P < 0.001) which corresponds to an adjusted odds ration (OR) of 6.85 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.95-24.12). SD patients had a higher 30-day major morbidity compared to ND patients (5.01 versus 2.54 %; P < 0.001, respectively). After adjustment, this translated into an OR of 2.21 (95 % CI 1.29-3.79). Among SD patients, there was no significant difference in 30-day major morbidity after gastric bypass compared to sleeve gastrectomy (OR = 0.36; 95 % CI 0.08-1.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic and active use of steroid or immunosuppressant medications is a strong predictor of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality following primary bariatric surgery. Among the steroid/immunosuppressant users, complication rates were similar for gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy patients. Further studies are needed to help guide the management or discontinuation of such medications in the perioperative period.

Preoperative glucocorticoid use and risk of postoperative bleeding and infection after gastric bypass surgery for the treatment of obesity

BACKGROUND

Previous research suggests that patients using glucocorticoids may be at increased risk of postoperative bleeding and infection after major surgery. The objective was to investigate the association between preoperative glucocorticoid use and risk of bleeding and infection after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB).

SETTING

Nationwide cohort study of 13,195 patients, who underwent RYGB 2006-2012 using Danish population-based medical databases.

METHODS

Information was obtained on current (redeemed prescription<60 d before surgery), recent (prescription 60-180 d before surgery), or no glucocorticoid use, and postoperative bleeding or infection within 30 days of surgery. We computed risk differences and odds ratios (ORs) as a measure of relative risk with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between glucocorticoid use and bleeding or infection, adjusting for gender, age, and co-morbidities by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among RYGB patients, 325 (2.5%) were current glucocorticoid users, and 365 (2.8%) were recent users. The risk of bleeding was increased in current users: 2.8% versus 1.6% among nonusers (risk difference: 1.2%, 95% CI: -.6, 3.0) corresponding to an adjusted OR of 1.5 (95% CI: .8, 3.0). For recent users, the adjusted OR for bleeding was 1.2 (95% CI: .5, 2.5). The risk of infection did not differ materially between current (1.8%), recent (1.0%) and nonusers (1.7%), corresponding to an adjusted OR of .9 (95% CI: .4, 2.1) among current versus nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

Current use of glucocorticoids is associated with a slightly increased risk of postoperative bleeding, but not infection, after RYGB. No increased risks were found for recent users.